Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

resource groups - switch dependency from riviera to azure-sdk-for-go #178

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

resource groups - switch dependency from riviera to azure-sdk-for-go #178

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

sebastus
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@sebastus
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is for resource_arm_resource_group.

@tombuildsstuff tombuildsstuff changed the title switch dependency from riviera to azure-sdk-for-go resource groups - switch dependency from riviera to azure-sdk-for-go Jul 25, 2017
@tombuildsstuff
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @sebastus

Sorry for the delayed response on this PR.

As mentioned in #190 and #191, I've been working on a similar task which requires the Riviera SDK to be removed - as such I've rolled your PR's (#191 #190 and #178) into a new PR - which also removes the bulk of the Riviera SDK; I hope you don't mind (and we really appreciate your efforts here) - and this is visible in #289.

As such I'm going to close this PR for the moment in favour of #289.

Thanks!

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 1, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 hashibot-feedback@hashicorp.com. Thanks!

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 1, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants