Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add optional cacert_file parameter to openstack provider #5106

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 19, 2016

Conversation

kars7e
Copy link
Contributor

@kars7e kars7e commented Feb 12, 2016

Official OpenStack clients support [1] specifing custom CA certificate file
that should be used when communicating with OpenStack server. This patch
adds similar behavior to Terraform OpenStack provider, by:

  • Using OS_CACERT environmental variable, if available
  • Using cacert_file provider parameter, if configured

[1] http://docs.openstack.org/developer/python-openstackclient/man/openstack.html#options

Official OpenStack clients support specifing custom CA certificate file
that should be used when communicating with OpenStack server. This patch
adds similar behavior to Terraform OpenStack provider, by:
- Using OS_CACERT environmental variable, if available
- Using cacert_file provider parameter, if configured
@jtopjian
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for submitting this :)

At first glance, this looks good! I should have time to review it in more detail shortly.

jtopjian added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 19, 2016
Add optional cacert_file parameter to openstack provider
@jtopjian jtopjian merged commit a230213 into hashicorp:master Feb 19, 2016
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 28, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 28, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants