-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Timeoutable timeouts causing Rails to flash[:timedout] as "true" #1777
Comments
Yes, (unfortunately?) we are using such values. The problem with using instance variables in the Rack stack is that they are not threadsafe (the stack is shared between all threads). So I think our best option is to indeed improve the docs and let people know that Devise uses flash to keep other state besides flash messages. |
That certainly makes sense. Another alternative, perhaps, is to use the Rack |
Yeah, I tried it out with the env after I replied to you and I realized it won't work because redirects are involved. So we really need to store it in the session. :S |
Given that it’s quite common to print flash messages just as-is, at the very least this unexpected behavior should be mentioned somewhere. Got bitten by this issue today as well, but I could not find any mention of it in the README even though this issue has been closed. I understand it’s convenient to use flash to have the message expire automatically from the session, but sprinkling respond_to? everywhere is not very clean either (where’d that have us all end up?). Could thread-local variables be used as an alternative to instance variables and the env? It’s just an idea, no idea if it’s doable. Thanks! |
Nope, thread variables are not an alternative because we need to know this information in another request, which may happen in a different process, different machine. If someone want to sprinkle up the readme or add a note to the README we show when you call devise:install, patches are welcome. |
Add message about :timedout flash to the Readme (resolved #1777)
Would it not be possible to create a separate hash that has the same life cycle as the flash but is specifically for storing Devise specific state? I guess I would need to look more closely at how this is being used to understand the design needs but it seems like using the flash, which is supposed to be for displaying messages to a user from a controller, to store authentication system state, is a bit of a code smell. Anyone who was accessing the flash for display like: - flash.each do |key, msg| is going to get bit by the :timedout key when they upgrade to Devise 2.0, and flash messages on timeouts are not something that most devs will be testing if they assume that Devise should handle that automagically. |
At best the flash notice is a nuisance, but at worst it is confusing to users. |
Why can't this be put into the session hash? session[:timeout] |
Previously, if you revisited Bridge Troll after having timed out, you would see one error saying 'Your session expired' and another saying 'true'. Devise inserts a :timedout key into the FlashHash, which careful programmers have to avoid. See heartcombo/devise#1777 Also: pasting over the latest Devise en.yml for fun.
@josevalim Would you be willing to accept a PR that moves this to the session hash? It seems like a more appropriate place than using flash messages, right? |
@deivid-rodriguez no because it is a fine use of flash. :) Flash is not only about messages but temporary storage. |
@josevalim Alright, this is all very subjective. I just happened to read the code handling this and it seemed like a code smell (https://github.com/plataformatec/devise/blob/master/lib/devise/failure_app.rb#L58-63). It's not clear what it does, it's not commented, it's not tested, there's quite a lot of issues linking here, and that use of |
We don't have unit tests but we do have integration tests. The flash is an implementation detail to how the feature works. Also, notice we also keep the alert, that's more of a bug of how flash behaves in Rails because it doesn't survive redirects... |
Really? I thought they survived a single action... regardless of it being a redirect or not. |
Excuse me, how to exclude ":timedout" flash messages from this code: "flash.each do |msg_type, message|" that I have in an helper? |
@ginolon a bit late but perhaps something like this in your block:
or do a check before your block:
|
@tonycchung If I use the
def flash_messages(opts = {})
flash.except(:timedout).each do |msg_type, message|
concat(content_tag(:div, message, class: "alert #{bootstrap_class_for(msg_type)} alert-dismissible text-center fade in", role: 'alert') do
concat(content_tag(:button, class: 'close', data: { dismiss: 'alert' }) do
concat content_tag(:span, '×'.html_safe, 'aria-hidden' => true)
concat content_tag(:span, 'Close', class: 'sr-only')
end)
concat message
end)
end
nil
end |
@ginolon Something like this inside your each block should do the trick
|
At least in Rails 4.2.4 ActionDispatch::Flash::FlashHash does not extend from Hash and does not have an #except method. So it's not really a viable option. While I agree this is a good use of the flash hash, I think its a little stubborn to keep that as a justification when clearly its causing heartburn for people. I mean the intended use of the flash has is clearly messaging, with default methods for :notice and :alert keys and so forth. |
Devise sets `flash[:timedout] = true` which renders "true" with a standard handling of `flash`. Devise says that flash isn't necessarily only messages (https://github.com/plataformatec/devise/blob/master/README.md#configuring-controllers and heartcombo/devise#1777 (comment)) and recommends rendering individual messages. Figuring out all of the flash keys to render sounds like a pain, so hopefully only strings is good enough.
Expire the user session after 1 hour of inactivity. Timeoutable uses the FlashHash as global storage which causes issues when displaying flash messages. The workaround is to skip non String values. More info on heartcombo/devise#1777
Expire the user session after one hour of inactivity. Timeoutable uses the FlashHash as storage which causes issues when displaying flash messages and a workaround is to skip non String values. More info can be found at heartcombo/devise#1777
Devise uses `flash[:timedout]` for recording when a session is timed out and this is automatically displayed to the user. Adding `timedout` to the list of messages to hide in `app/views/layouts/_flashes.html.haml` hides this. For reference: heartcombo/devise#1777
Because - This is a bug with devise - heartcombo/devise#1777 - When you are timed out, a flash will appear with "true" as the message This commit - Do not render the flash component if the type is "timedout"
Because - This is a bug with devise - heartcombo/devise#1777 - When you are timed out, a flash will appear with "true" as the message <img width="548" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-15 at 17 50 07" src="https://github.com/TheOdinProject/theodinproject/assets/7963776/9932355d-e3f8-453b-b5b6-7defb394c750"> This commit - Do not render the flash component if the type is "timedout"
I know this has been mentioned in other tickets, but it appears to still be an issue, as of 2.0.4. From the current, master's failure_app.rb:
The third line there is causing the Rails
Flash::FlashHash
object instance to carry a flash[:timedout] whose value is of TrueClass. For generalized flash implementations, such as the one generated and recommended by this gem:The following HTML is being generated and displayed to visitors:
Obviously, this is non-ideal. :) Is this
:timedout
flash message actually used for anything? I see that the failure_app is explicitly keeping the :timedout flash message, even though it's simply atrue
statement:Based on a cursory reading of this code, it seems to me that a simple instance variable, which is set to true/false and nilified with each Rack
call
request, would provide the same functionality and work significantly better.And, yes, I did see @josevalim's comment on the use of Flash... I just wonder if either the README and example application layout should be updated to reflect the check for String-iness or the surprising usage of Flash for non-user messages should be removed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: