enh(parser) className => scope, use "hybrid" pproach #3135
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
joshgoebel
changed the title
allejo
approved these changes
Apr 21, 2021
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Shouldn't our Mode Reference documentation also be touched in this PR? i.e. specifying that className is deprecated in favor of scope?
Otherwise, this lgtm
|
I'll take another look, this may have grown from where it started and perhaps I still need to update a few docs. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changes
Changes nested scopes to the hybrid TM approach suggested over
in the Prism thread on the subject.
Resolves #3085
Checklist
CHANGES.md