Clean-up generation tests after moving methods to private #29582
Conversation
|
The docs for this PR live here. All of your documentation changes will be reflected on that endpoint. The docs are available until 30 days after the last update. |
|
@zucchini-nlp a more descriptive PR name would be nice :D Musicgen seems to need some retouches, looking at the failing CI. @amyeroberts see the PR header in #29437 for more context on why we are deprecating calls to the internal decoding methods |
zucchini-nlp
changed the title
|
Fixed MusicGen. All passed except for two tests for multigpu, but those are failing in |
| @@ -2455,220 +2037,6 @@ def test_diverse_beam_search(self): | |||
| ], | |||
| ) | |||
|
|
|||
| def test_max_length_backward_compat_greedy(self): | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We should still have at least one test_max_length_backward_compat test which calls model.generate
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I removed this tests, because we can only check it if the (now private) generate methods are called directly. When calling from the model.generate, the max_length get defined by default from the generation config.
We have a test test_default_max_length_warning, which check max_length warnings when calling directly generate
|
@zucchini-nlp suggestion: revert docsting changes, as they will cause CI to fail ( #29718 fixes the CI error) :) |
zucchini-nlp
force-pushed
the
generation_tests
branch
from
51102e9 to
be52438
Compare
* clean-up tests * refine comments * fix musicgen tests * make style * remove slow decorator from a test * more clean-up * fix other failing tests
What does this PR do?
Folllowing #29437 , this PR removes tests that call "to be private" generation methods. Instead we check each generation method by passing its arguments to the
generatemethod.All tests in generation, including slow are passing.
Before submitting
Pull Request section?
to it if that's the case.
documentation guidelines, and
here are tips on formatting docstrings.
Who can review?
Anyone in the community is free to review the PR once the tests have passed. Feel free to tag
members/contributors who may be interested in your PR.
@gante