You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Some of the generated selectors in the table pattern mixin violate our implicit specificity contract (i.e. resulting specificity is too high and makes override within apps using it challenging). Need to have a proverbial think about this. There is a generated rule .class-with-table-mixin thead th that is without doubt too specific, but need to have a look at the single-nested element rules as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Make sure we're meeting our general specificity contract for styles that
should be override-able by applications. A style that applies to table
headers was nested too deep, making its resulting rule too high in
specificity, and making it thus hard to override in other applications.
Do a bit of rearranging and leveling out of other rules.
Fixes#180
Some of the generated selectors in the table pattern mixin violate our implicit specificity contract (i.e. resulting specificity is too high and makes override within apps using it challenging). Need to have a proverbial think about this. There is a generated rule
.class-with-table-mixin thead th
that is without doubt too specific, but need to have a look at the single-nested element rules as well.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: