Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update key types #28

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 1, 2020
Merged

Conversation

adityasaky
Copy link
Member

Updates section 4.2 of the in-toto spec to reflect changes to the key types and formats. Also fixes #21.

Signed-off-by: Aditya Saky <aditya@saky.in>
@SantiagoTorres
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

I think we should be also moving to tagging the spec as 1.0...

@SantiagoTorres SantiagoTorres merged commit 581895c into in-toto:master May 1, 2020
Copy link
Member

@lukpueh lukpueh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the PR @adityasaky. The change makes sense, but it doesn't fully represent the current implementation...

in-toto-spec.md Show resolved Hide resolved
@adityasaky
Copy link
Member Author

To summarize in the main thread, @lukpueh pointed out that a change I made to the ECDSA key format doesn't match the current reality. As it stands, securesystemslib doesn't differentiate between keytype and scheme for ECDSA keys. This has been ticketised at secure-systems-lab/securesystemslib#239.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Resolve documentation inconsistency in number of signing methods supported.
3 participants