Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change the name before v2.0.0 released? #225

Closed
lidel opened this issue Mar 25, 2017 · 12 comments
Closed

Change the name before v2.0.0 released? #225

lidel opened this issue Mar 25, 2017 · 12 comments
Labels
help wanted Seeking public contribution on this issue kind/discussion Topical discussion; usually not changes to codebase
Milestone

Comments

@lidel
Copy link
Member

lidel commented Mar 25, 2017

In past Firefox add-on was named IPFS Gateway Redirect.

It is an understatement, because in addition to redirect functionality, v2.0.0alpha2 features IPFS node status monitoring, experimental dnslink support, web+ipfs:// protocol support and quick upload options for local and web content.

I feel it may be a good time to pick visually shorter and more broad name.

Please vote using emoji reaction below or suggest something more elegant in comments below
(one per comment, to make it easy to vote with 👍 reactions) 🙃

👍 here → change name to IPFS Companion
👎 here → keep the old name IPFS Gateway Redirect
go to this comment → change name to IPFS Station

@lidel lidel added the kind/discussion Topical discussion; usually not changes to codebase label Mar 25, 2017
@lidel lidel added this to the v2.0.0 milestone Mar 25, 2017
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 25, 2017

Reasons for my change-vote:

  • The gateway will hopefully soon be just one of various "transports"
  • Redirect is an implementation detail

@lidel lidel added the help wanted Seeking public contribution on this issue label Mar 26, 2017
lidel added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 22, 2017
There is 4:1 in #225 right now, let's test this.
@lidel
Copy link
Member Author

lidel commented May 9, 2017

IPFS Station was suggested in ipfs/in-web-browsers#54
(👍 this comment to vote for it)

@daviddias
Copy link
Member

Let's timebox this decision. I say, let's pick the name till Wednesday 17. That give everyone enough time to check this issue and vote

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented May 15, 2017

Ping -- this timebox expires on Wednesday.

Station sounds good to me IF that means the current station tool and the addon will be one thing.

@daviddias
Copy link
Member

Thank you @lgierth ! :)

@daviddias
Copy link
Member

daviddias commented May 22, 2017

Sounds like IPFS Gateway Redirect IPFS Companion it is 🍾

@lidel
Copy link
Member Author

lidel commented May 22, 2017

You mean... IPFS Station ? 🙃
Should I make PR with the change?

@daviddias
Copy link
Member

Oh, I meant IPFS Companion

  • IPFS Companion - 6 votes
  • IPFS Gateway Redirect - 1 vote
  • IPFS Station - 5 votes

image

image

@lidel
Copy link
Member Author

lidel commented May 22, 2017

Oy... that was a close one 😕
We've added "Station" after "Companion" already had 4 votes, and some votes got duplicated.

@lgierth, @RndFooBar, @verox, @jedahan, @mateon1, @sonatagreen:
Please check your votes, decide between "Station" vs. "Companion" and update your votes accordingly.
Make sure you vote only for one option.

@lidel
Copy link
Member Author

lidel commented May 23, 2017

Lol, seems that made IPFS Companion even stronger 🙃
Can we say it is settled? What is the next step? Repo rename to ipfs-companion? Who can do it?

@victorb
Copy link
Member

victorb commented May 23, 2017

Renamed :) Welcome to ipfs-companion! 🎉

@victorb victorb closed this as completed May 23, 2017
@victorb
Copy link
Member

victorb commented May 23, 2017

Screenshot for historic purposes:

image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
help wanted Seeking public contribution on this issue kind/discussion Topical discussion; usually not changes to codebase
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants