Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes reference count in asset instances due to circular references #580

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jun 27, 2024

Conversation

Mayankm96
Copy link
Contributor

@Mayankm96 Mayankm96 commented Jun 27, 2024

Description

With the lazy buffer implementation in asset classes, we pass the physics sim-view to the data object. This increments the reference count of the sim-view instance and blocks the asset instance itself to be garbage collected properly.

This MR takes steps to fix this issue.

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • This change requires a documentation update

Checklist

  • I have run the pre-commit checks with ./isaaclab.sh --format
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have run all the tests with ./isaaclab.sh --test and they pass
  • I have updated the changelog and the corresponding version in the extension's config/extension.toml file
  • I have added my name to the CONTRIBUTORS.md or my name already exists there

@Mayankm96 Mayankm96 added the bug Something isn't working label Jun 27, 2024
@Mayankm96 Mayankm96 self-assigned this Jun 27, 2024
@Dhoeller19 Dhoeller19 merged commit 1a7c86b into main Jun 27, 2024
2 of 3 checks passed
@Dhoeller19 Dhoeller19 deleted the fix/double-ref-count branch June 27, 2024 09:17
fatimaanes pushed a commit to fatimaanes/omniperf that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2024
…saac-sim#580)

With the lazy buffer implementation in asset classes, we pass the
physics sim-view to the data object. This increments the reference count
of the sim-view instance and blocks the asset instance itself to be
garbage collected properly.

This MR takes steps to fix this issue.

## Type of change

- Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- This change requires a documentation update

## Checklist

- [x] I have run the [`pre-commit` checks](https://pre-commit.com/) with
`./isaaclab.sh --format`
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] I have run all the tests with `./isaaclab.sh --test` and they pass
- [ ] I have updated the changelog and the corresponding version in the
extension's `config/extension.toml` file
- [x] I have added my name to the `CONTRIBUTORS.md` or my name already
exists there
iamdrfly pushed a commit to iamdrfly/IsaacLab that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2024
…saac-sim#580)

With the lazy buffer implementation in asset classes, we pass the
physics sim-view to the data object. This increments the reference count
of the sim-view instance and blocks the asset instance itself to be
garbage collected properly.

This MR takes steps to fix this issue.

## Type of change

- Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- This change requires a documentation update

## Checklist

- [x] I have run the [`pre-commit` checks](https://pre-commit.com/) with
`./isaaclab.sh --format`
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] I have run all the tests with `./isaaclab.sh --test` and they pass
- [ ] I have updated the changelog and the corresponding version in the
extension's `config/extension.toml` file
- [x] I have added my name to the `CONTRIBUTORS.md` or my name already
exists there
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants