Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(signature-collection): Not stop paper signatures when already signed #16137

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 24, 2024

Conversation

juni-haukur
Copy link
Member

@juni-haukur juni-haukur commented Sep 24, 2024

...

Attach a link to issue if relevant

What

Specify what you're trying to achieve

Why

Specify why you need to achieve this

Screenshots / Gifs

Attach Screenshots / Gifs to help reviewers understand the scope of the pull request

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced eligibility criteria for signing from paper, allowing for more flexibility in signature approvals.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Resolved issues with the previous signing logic to ensure that existing signatures do not block new paper signatures.

@juni-haukur juni-haukur requested a review from a team as a code owner September 24, 2024 14:37
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 24, 2024

Walkthrough

The SignatureCollectionService class has been updated, specifically the canSignFromPaper method. This method now fetches the signee object using a different service method and includes enhanced logic for determining signing eligibility. The new logic allows a signee to sign if either they have permission or if they have previously signed, thus modifying the criteria for signing.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
libs/api/domains/signature-collection/src/lib/signatureCollection.service.ts Updated canSignFromPaper method to retrieve signee using signatureCollectionClientService.getSignee and enhanced logic for determining signing eligibility.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

automerge, high priority

Suggested reviewers

  • kksteini

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1f684cf and 8c62f6e.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • libs/api/domains/signature-collection/src/lib/signatureCollection.service.ts (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
libs/api/domains/signature-collection/src/lib/signatureCollection.service.ts (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
Additional comments not posted (2)
libs/api/domains/signature-collection/src/lib/signatureCollection.service.ts (2)

151-154: Confirm the necessity of passing signeeNationalId alongside user

The getSignee method is called with both user and input.signeeNationalId:

const signee = await this.signatureCollectionClientService.getSignee(
  user,
  input.signeeNationalId,
)

Please verify if it's necessary to pass input.signeeNationalId when the user object may already contain the national ID. If they can differ (e.g., signing on behalf of another signee), consider adding documentation or comments to clarify this behavior to maintain consistency and prevent confusion.


156-161: Ensure safe access to signee.canSignInfo

In the computation of canSign:

const canSign =
  signee.canSign ||
  (signee.canSignInfo?.length === 1 &&
    signee.canSignInfo[0] === ReasonKey.AlreadySigned)

Confirm that signee.canSignInfo is reliably defined when signee.canSign is false. While optional chaining (?.) helps prevent runtime errors, it's important to ensure that signee.canSignInfo initializes as an array or undefined but not null. This verification will help avoid potential issues if signee.canSignInfo is unexpectedly null.

@juni-haukur juni-haukur added the deprecated:automerge (Disabled) Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass label Sep 24, 2024
@datadog-island-is
Copy link

Datadog Report

Branch report: fix/parliamentary-paper-signature-tweak
Commit report: ddc96ea
Test service: api

✅ 0 Failed, 4 Passed, 0 Skipped, 2.9s Total Time
➡️ Test Sessions change in coverage: 1 no change

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 24, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 36.69%. Comparing base (1f684cf) to head (8c62f6e).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #16137   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   36.69%   36.69%           
=======================================
  Files        6761     6761           
  Lines      139064   139064           
  Branches    39497    39497           
=======================================
  Hits        51035    51035           
  Misses      88029    88029           
Flag Coverage Δ
api 3.39% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1f684cf...8c62f6e. Read the comment docs.

@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit e9c1d7c into main Sep 24, 2024
51 checks passed
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the fix/parliamentary-paper-signature-tweak branch September 24, 2024 14:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
deprecated:automerge (Disabled) Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants