Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(signature-colletion): allow manager on paper upload #16427

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Oct 16, 2024

Conversation

alexdiljar
Copy link
Member

@alexdiljar alexdiljar commented Oct 16, 2024

What

Allow manager to upload paper signatures

Why

It is their right

Screenshots / Gifs

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced access control for uploading paper signatures with the addition of the @AllowManager() decorator.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Removed unnecessary import statements to streamline the code.

@alexdiljar alexdiljar requested a review from a team as a code owner October 16, 2024 13:06
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 16, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request focus on modifying the SignatureCollectionResolver class within the signatureCollection.resolver.ts file. Key updates include the removal of the AllowDelegation decorator from imports and the addition of the @AllowManager() decorator to the signatureCollectionUploadPaperSignature method, which alters access control for this method. While the overall structure and functionality of the resolver remain unchanged, these adjustments reflect a shift in user role requirements for specific operations related to signature collections.

Changes

File Change Summary
libs/api/domains/signature-collection/src/lib/signatureCollection.resolver.ts - Removed AllowDelegation from imports.
- Added @AllowManager() to signatureCollectionUploadPaperSignature method.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • juni-haukur
  • kksteini

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@alexdiljar alexdiljar added the automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass label Oct 16, 2024
@albinagu albinagu changed the title fix: allow manager on paper upload fix(signature-colletion): allow manager on paper upload Oct 16, 2024
@datadog-island-is
Copy link

datadog-island-is bot commented Oct 16, 2024

Datadog Report

All test runs ca60ad5 🔗

4 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 4 Passed
🔻 Test Sessions change in coverage: 1 decreased (-0.01%), 9 no change

Test Services
Service Name Failed Known Flaky New Flaky Passed Skipped Total Time Code Coverage Change Test Service View
api 0 0 0 4 0 3.07s 1 no change Link
application-system-api 0 0 0 120 2 4m 18.51s 1 no change Link
application-template-api-modules 0 0 0 123 0 3m 0.86s 1 decreased (-0.01%) Link
application-ui-shell 0 0 0 74 0 42.57s 1 no change Link

🔻 Code Coverage Decreases vs Default Branch (1)

  • application-template-api-modules - jest 30.09% (-0.01%) - Details

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
libs/api/domains/signature-collection/src/lib/signatureCollection.resolver.ts (1)

183-183: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.

The addition of @AllowManager() successfully implements the PR objective. This change allows managers to upload paper signatures as intended.

Consider adding a brief comment explaining the rationale behind allowing managers to perform this action, for improved code maintainability. For example:

// Allow managers to upload paper signatures as per business requirements
@AllowManager()
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between cc988c7 and d40e0b6.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • libs/api/domains/signature-collection/src/lib/signatureCollection.resolver.ts (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
libs/api/domains/signature-collection/src/lib/signatureCollection.resolver.ts (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."

@alexdiljar alexdiljar added the high priority VIP-Kodiak PR label Oct 16, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 16, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 36.73%. Comparing base (4a5ebba) to head (89c0bc8).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #16427   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   36.72%   36.73%           
=======================================
  Files        6809     6809           
  Lines      141165   141131   -34     
  Branches    40245    40228   -17     
=======================================
- Hits        51844    51839    -5     
+ Misses      89321    89292   -29     
Flag Coverage Δ
api 3.37% <ø> (ø)
application-system-api 41.41% <ø> (ø)
application-template-api-modules 27.86% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️
application-ui-shell 21.35% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 3 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4a5ebba...89c0bc8. Read the comment docs.

@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit 525e166 into main Oct 16, 2024
38 checks passed
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the fix/SignatureCollectionDelegation branch October 16, 2024 15:01
kksteini pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2024
* fix: allow manager on paper upload

* fix: rm cl

* fix: rm cl

* chore: nx format:write update dirty files

---------

Co-authored-by: andes-it <builders@andes.is>
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
kodiakhq bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2024
)

* fix: allow manager on paper upload

* fix: rm cl

* fix: rm cl

* chore: nx format:write update dirty files

---------

Co-authored-by: Alex Diljar Birkisbur Hellsing <42963845+alexdiljar@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: andes-it <builders@andes.is>
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass high priority VIP-Kodiak PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants