Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(j-s): Move subpoena pdf above added documents #16311

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 10, 2024

Conversation

oddsson
Copy link
Member

@oddsson oddsson commented Oct 8, 2024

Move subpoena pdf above added documents

Asana

What

Move subpoena pdf above added documents

Why

Today the subpoena pdf is placed between the added documents table and the add documents button.

Screenshots / Gifs

Screenshot 2024-10-08 at 10 09 43

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Reintroduced the display of uploaded case files in the Indictment Case Files List.
    • Added a heading and a Case File Table to show uploaded files when available.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Ensured the rendering logic for uploaded case files works seamlessly with existing components.

@oddsson oddsson requested a review from a team as a code owner October 8, 2024 10:14
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 8, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the IndictmentCaseFilesList component in the IndictmentCaseFilesList.tsx file by reintroducing a section that displays uploaded case files. This section checks for the presence of uploaded files and, if available, renders a heading along with a CaseFileTable component. The overall structure and logic of the component remain unchanged, preserving existing functionalities related to other case file categories.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/IndictmentCaseFilesList/IndictmentCaseFilesList.tsx Reintroduced section to display uploaded case files, including a heading and CaseFileTable.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • unakb

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 8, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 50.00000% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 36.72%. Comparing base (e9452c9) to head (ca58ec0).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...ndictmentCaseFilesList/IndictmentCaseFilesList.tsx 50.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #16311      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   36.73%   36.72%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files        6804     6801       -3     
  Lines      140861   140019     -842     
  Branches    40118    39867     -251     
==========================================
- Hits        51751    51424     -327     
+ Misses      89110    88595     -515     
Flag Coverage Δ
judicial-system-web 27.94% <50.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...ndictmentCaseFilesList/IndictmentCaseFilesList.tsx 68.83% <50.00%> (ø)

... and 154 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e9452c9...ca58ec0. Read the comment docs.

@datadog-island-is
Copy link

datadog-island-is bot commented Oct 8, 2024

Datadog Report

Branch report: j-s/subpoena-pdf-placement
Commit report: 7d3df39
Test service: judicial-system-web

✅ 0 Failed, 338 Passed, 0 Skipped, 1m 6.86s Total Time
➡️ Test Sessions change in coverage: 1 no change

@oddsson oddsson added the automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass label Oct 10, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/IndictmentCaseFilesList/IndictmentCaseFilesList.tsx (1)

248-255: LGTM! Consider adding an aria-label for accessibility.

The addition of the uploaded case files section is well-implemented and aligns with the PR objectives. The code is clean, follows TypeScript best practices, and maintains consistency with the existing component structure.

To further improve accessibility, consider adding an aria-label to the Box component containing the uploaded case files section.

Here's a suggested minor improvement:

-      {uploadedCaseFiles && uploadedCaseFiles.length > 0 && (
-        <Box marginBottom={5}>
+      {uploadedCaseFiles && uploadedCaseFiles.length > 0 && (
+        <Box marginBottom={5} aria-label={formatMessage(strings.uploadedCaseFiles)}>

This change will provide better context for screen readers, enhancing the overall accessibility of the component.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6ce1b55 and 3217e9c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/IndictmentCaseFilesList/IndictmentCaseFilesList.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/IndictmentCaseFilesList/IndictmentCaseFilesList.tsx (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants