feat(j-s): Send correct indictment pdf with subpoena #16353
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #16353 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 36.73% 36.75% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 6804 6804
Lines 140861 140828 -33
Branches 40118 40082 -36
==========================================
+ Hits 51751 51760 +9
+ Misses 89110 89068 -42
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
... and 37 files with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
Datadog ReportBranch report: ✅ 0 Failed, 21303 Passed, 0 Skipped, 18m 37.14s Total Time |
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
🧰 Additional context used📓 Path-based instructions (1)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/subpoena.module.ts (1)
18-18: LGTM: FileModule correctly added to module importsThe addition of
forwardRef(() => FileModule)to the imports array is correct and consistent with the module's structure. This change properly incorporates the FileModule into the SubpoenaModule, adhering to NestJS best practices for module composition.Consider adding a comment explaining the reason for using
forwardRefwith FileModule, especially if there are circular dependencies involved. This would improve code maintainability.apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/test/internalSubpoenaController/deliverSubpoenaToPolice.spec.ts (2)
17-30: LGTM: Test setup and mock data are well-structured.The test setup and mock data creation follow Jest best practices. Using
uuidensures unique identifiers for each test run, which is excellent for test isolation.Consider using
jest.spyOn()instead of directly assigning a mock function tomockSubpoenaService.deliverSubpoenaToPolice. This approach provides more flexibility and allows for easier reset between tests if needed.
63-76: LGTM: Test case for successful subpoena delivery is well-structured.The test case effectively verifies that the
deliverSubpoenaToPolicemethod is called with the correct parameters when a subpoena is successfully delivered to the police. The structure is clear and follows Jest best practices.Consider adding more test cases to cover different scenarios:
- Test the behavior when the
deliverSubpoenaToPolicemethod throws an error.- Verify the return value of the
deliverSubpoenaToPolicemethod.- Test with different user roles or permissions, if applicable.
These additional test cases will improve the overall test coverage and ensure the robustness of the
InternalSubpoenaController.apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/police/police.service.ts (1)
688-688: Approved: Improved error logging with consistent identifierThe change from
defendant?.nationalIdtodefendant?.idenhances error traceability by using a consistent identifier for the defendant. This aligns well with the PR objective and improves the overall robustness of the error logging system.For consistency, consider updating the
defendantIdproperty name in the error event object to match the new identifier being used (e.g.,defendantId: defendant?.id).
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/police/police.service.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/subpoena.module.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/subpoena.service.ts (5 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/test/internalSubpoenaController/deliverSubpoenaToPolice.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/test/limitedAccessSubpoenaController/getSubpoenaPdf.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (5)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/police/police.service.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/subpoena.module.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/subpoena.service.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/test/internalSubpoenaController/deliverSubpoenaToPolice.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/test/limitedAccessSubpoenaController/getSubpoenaPdf.spec.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
🪛 Biome
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/test/internalSubpoenaController/deliverSubpoenaToPolice.spec.ts
[error] 38-38: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
🔇 Additional comments (11)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/subpoena.module.ts (1)
6-6: LGTM: FileModule import added correctlyThe import of
FileModuleis syntactically correct and follows the established pattern for module imports in this file. This addition aligns with the PR objective of enhancing functionality related to sending indictments, which likely involves file handling.apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/test/limitedAccessSubpoenaController/getSubpoenaPdf.spec.ts (3)
7-7: LGTM: New import enhances type safetyThe addition of the
Defendantimport improves type safety in the test suite, which aligns with our TypeScript best practices. This change supports the PR's objective of enhancing subpoena functionality.
Line range hint
19-71: LGTM: Test updates correctly incorporate new functionalityThe changes to the test setup and execution appropriately incorporate the new
Defendantobject and its usage in thegetSubpoenaPdfmethod. This ensures that the new functionality is properly tested, aligning with the PR objectives.A few observations:
- The
defendantobject is correctly typed and initialized with a subpoena.- The
givenWhenThenfunction now passes thedefendantobject togetSubpoenaPdf.- The test case verifies that
getSubpoenaPdfis called with the correct parameters, including the newdefendantobject.These updates maintain the existing test structure while effectively covering the new functionality.
Line range hint
1-71: Overall assessment: Changes align well with PR objectivesThe modifications to this test file effectively incorporate the
Defendantmodel, aligning with the PR's objective of enhancing subpoena functionality. The changes are minimal and targeted, maintaining the original test structure while adding the necessary elements to test the new functionality.Key points:
- The new import and usage of the
Defendantmodel improve type safety.- Test setup and execution have been updated appropriately to include the
Defendantobject.- The changes ensure that the new functionality is properly tested without disrupting the existing test cases.
These updates contribute to the overall goal of improving the accuracy and reliability of documents sent with subpoenas.
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/test/internalSubpoenaController/deliverSubpoenaToPolice.spec.ts (2)
1-16: LGTM: Imports and type definitions are well-structured.The imports and type definitions are appropriate for the test file. The
Theninterface andGivenWhenThentype are well-defined, providing a clear structure for error handling in the tests.
1-77: LGTM: File structure and coding guidelines are well-followed.The overall structure of the test file adheres to NextJS best practices and Jest conventions. The use of TypeScript enhances type safety, which is crucial for maintaining a robust test suite. The file organization is clear and appropriate for a NextJS application.
Great job on maintaining consistency with the project's coding standards and best practices for testing in a NextJS environment.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 38-38: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/subpoena.service.ts (5)
17-21: Imports are appropriate and necessaryThe added imports
CaseFileCategory,isTrafficViolationCase, andUserare appropriate for the new functionality introduced in the code.
27-27: FileService import is correctly addedImporting
FileServicefrom'../file'is necessary for accessing file-related methods used in the service.
153-172: getIndictmentPdf method is well-implementedThe
getIndictmentPdfmethod correctly retrieves the indictment PDF based on the case type. It handles traffic violation cases appropriately and includes error handling for cases where the indictment is not found. The use of optional chaining and type safety with TypeScript is well-applied.
187-187: Integration of getIndictmentPdf in deliverSubpoenaToPoliceThe inclusion of
getIndictmentPdf(theCase)in thedeliverSubpoenaToPolicemethod enhances functionality by ensuring the correct indictment PDF is retrieved and sent. This change aligns with the overall objective of sending the correct indictment with the subpoena.
46-47: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionReview the use of forwardRef in FileService injection
The use of
forwardRefwhen injectingFileServicesuggests a potential circular dependency betweenSubpoenaServiceandFileService. Consider refactoring to eliminate the circular dependency if possible, as this can improve code maintainability and reduce complexity.To verify if
FileServicedepends onSubpoenaService, you can run the following script:✅ Verification successful
Circular dependency not found. You can safely remove
forwardReffromFileServiceinjection.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if FileService imports SubpoenaService, indicating a circular dependency. rg --type typescript 'from.*subpoena.service' src/app/modules/fileLength of output: 103
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if FileService imports SubpoenaService, indicating a circular dependency. rg 'from\s+.*subpoena\.service' 'src/app/modules/file/**/*.{ts,tsx}'Length of output: 145
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all FileService TypeScript files and check if they import SubpoenaService. # Find all TypeScript files related to FileService file_service_files=$(fd 'file\.service\.ts$' . -e ts) # Check each FileService file for imports from SubpoenaService for file in $file_service_files; do rg 'from\s+["'\''].*subpoena\.service["'\'']' "$file" doneLength of output: 2481
...end/src/app/modules/subpoena/test/internalSubpoenaController/deliverSubpoenaToPolice.spec.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/subpoena.service.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Bæta inn caseId og 3 skjölum í fyrirkall sem er sent til RLS
What
Why
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests
deliverSubpoenaToPolicemethod to ensure correct functionality.Defendantmodel for better validation.