Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(j-s): Indictment Cleanup #16286

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 10, 2024
Merged

fix(j-s): Indictment Cleanup #16286

merged 4 commits into from
Oct 10, 2024

Conversation

gudjong
Copy link
Member

@gudjong gudjong commented Oct 7, 2024

Indictment Cleanup

Hreinsa og fela sameinað málsnúmer ef það er valið að sameina og svo eitthvað annað
Hreinsa niðurstöðu þinghalds þegar nýtt fyrirkall er gefið út

What

  • Only shows the merge id while completing a case.
  • Clears the merge id when the court conclusion does not involve merging the case.
  • Clears previous court conclusion when issuing a new subpoena.

Why

  • Verified bugs.

Screenshots / Gifs

Screen.Recording.2024-10-07.at.12.06.55.mov

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced decision-making interface in the Indictments section with additional options for FINE, DISMISSAL, and MERGE.
    • Improved handling of court date rescheduling in the Subpoena component, ensuring relevant fields are cleared before updates.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Adjusted conditional rendering for the SelectConnectedCase component to reflect the current selection accurately.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 7, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve updates to the Conclusion.tsx and Subpoena.tsx files within the judicial system application. In Conclusion.tsx, the logic for handling indictment decisions has been refined, including the addition of a mergeCaseId property and expanded radio button options. In Subpoena.tsx, new logic has been introduced to manage court date rescheduling, incorporating a clearedConclusion variable to clear specific fields in the workingCase object. These modifications enhance the functionality and clarity of the respective components.

Changes

File Change Summary
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Conclusion/Conclusion.tsx - Added mergeCaseId to UpdateCase in handleNavigationTo.
- Expanded COMPLETING case with new radio options.
- Modified rendering structure for radio options using fragments.
- Renamed FINE to CANCELLATION and updated logic.
- Adjusted rendering of SelectConnectedCase to display only when selectedDecision is MERGE.
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Subpoena/Subpoena.tsx - Introduced clearedConclusion to manage state when rescheduling court dates.
- Updated sendCourtDateToServer method to include clearedConclusion.
- Updated handleNavigationTo to clear relevant fields before sending data to the server.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

automerge

Suggested reviewers

  • unakb
  • oddsson

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 7, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 18 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 36.68%. Comparing base (eebf2ef) to head (cb20feb).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...routes/Court/Indictments/Conclusion/Conclusion.tsx 0.00% 14 Missing ⚠️
...src/routes/Court/Indictments/Subpoena/Subpoena.tsx 0.00% 4 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #16286      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   36.73%   36.68%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files        6804     6797       -7     
  Lines      140860   139815    -1045     
  Branches    40117    39807     -310     
==========================================
- Hits        51751    51285     -466     
+ Misses      89109    88530     -579     
Flag Coverage Δ
judicial-system-backend 55.14% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-web 27.94% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
testing-e2e ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...src/routes/Court/Indictments/Subpoena/Subpoena.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...routes/Court/Indictments/Conclusion/Conclusion.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

... and 173 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update eebf2ef...cb20feb. Read the comment docs.

@datadog-island-is
Copy link

datadog-island-is bot commented Oct 7, 2024

Datadog Report

All test runs 224de18 🔗

2 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 2 Passed
➡️ Test Sessions change in coverage: 2 no change

Test Services
Service Name Failed Known Flaky New Flaky Passed Skipped Total Time Code Coverage Change Test Service View
judicial-system-backend 0 0 0 21211 0 21m 21.31s 1 no change Link
judicial-system-web 0 0 0 338 0 1m 19.44s 1 no change Link

@gudjong gudjong marked this pull request as ready for review October 7, 2024 10:10
@gudjong gudjong requested a review from a team as a code owner October 7, 2024 10:10
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Subpoena/Subpoena.tsx (1)

80-96: Add unit tests for the new clearedConclusion logic

The introduction of clearedConclusion is crucial for handling rescheduling scenarios. To ensure this functionality works as intended, consider adding unit tests that cover cases when:

  • isArraignmentScheduled and workingCase.indictmentDecision are both true.
  • Either isArraignmentScheduled or workingCase.indictmentDecision is false.
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Conclusion/Conclusion.tsx (2)

Line range hint 233-248: Explicitly handle all indictment decisions in useEffect

The useEffect currently handles specific IndictmentDecision cases but defaults to SCHEDULING for others. To enhance clarity and ensure no cases are overlooked, consider explicitly handling all possible IndictmentDecision cases, including POSTPONING_UNTIL_VERDICT and REDISTRIBUTING.

This aligns with the preference for explicit case handling to avoid assumptions and improve code maintainability.


Line range hint 129-145: Include POSTPONING_UNTIL_VERDICT in handleNavigationTo switch

The handleNavigationTo function does not explicitly handle the POSTPONING_UNTIL_VERDICT action. To ensure all indictment decisions are properly managed, consider adding a case for IndictmentDecision.POSTPONING_UNTIL_VERDICT, even if no additional logic is needed.

Adding explicit handling improves clarity and aligns with best practices for maintaining comprehensive switch statements.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 600ae64 and 38bfac0.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Conclusion/Conclusion.tsx (3 hunks)
  • apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Subpoena/Subpoena.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Conclusion/Conclusion.tsx (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Subpoena/Subpoena.tsx (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
📓 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: unakb
PR: island-is/island.is#15378
File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Summary/Summary.tsx:86-100
Timestamp: 2024-06-27T14:37:07.823Z
Learning: User unakb prefers explicit case handling in switch statements for key functionalities like `getRulingDecisionTagColor` to ensure clarity and avoid assumptions that a case was overlooked.
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Conclusion/Conclusion.tsx (1)
Learnt from: unakb
PR: island-is/island.is#15378
File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Summary/Summary.tsx:86-100
Timestamp: 2024-06-27T14:37:07.823Z
Learning: User unakb prefers explicit case handling in switch statements for key functionalities like `getRulingDecisionTagColor` to ensure clarity and avoid assumptions that a case was overlooked.
🔇 Additional comments (4)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Conclusion/Conclusion.tsx (4)

122-122: Appropriately resetting mergeCaseId when not merging cases

Setting mergeCaseId to null in the initial update object ensures that the merge case ID is cleared when the court conclusion does not involve merging. This aligns with the PR objective to prevent confusion regarding case statuses.


141-143: Assigning mergeCaseId only when merging cases

Updating mergeCaseId only when selectedDecision is MERGE ensures that the merge ID is set appropriately. This fulfills the requirement to display the merge ID only when completing a case involving a merge.


402-488: UI for completing indictment decision is well-structured

The addition of radio buttons for RULING, FINE, DISMISSAL, MERGE, and CANCELLATION under the COMPLETING action enhances the decision-making interface. The onChange handlers correctly update selectedDecision, and the labels are appropriately localized.


490-501: Conditional rendering of SelectConnectedCase component

Displaying the SelectConnectedCase component only when selectedDecision is MERGE ensures that users are prompted to select a connected case only when necessary. This enhances the user experience by keeping the interface relevant.

@oddsson oddsson added the deprecated:automerge (Disabled) Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass label Oct 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
deprecated:automerge (Disabled) Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants