-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(j-s): Indictment Cleanup #16286
fix(j-s): Indictment Cleanup #16286
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #16286 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 36.73% 36.68% -0.06%
==========================================
Files 6804 6797 -7
Lines 140860 139815 -1045
Branches 40117 39807 -310
==========================================
- Hits 51751 51285 -466
+ Misses 89109 88530 -579
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
... and 173 files with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
Datadog ReportAll test runs ✅ 2 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 2 Passed Test Services
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Subpoena/Subpoena.tsx (1)
80-96
: Add unit tests for the newclearedConclusion
logicThe introduction of
clearedConclusion
is crucial for handling rescheduling scenarios. To ensure this functionality works as intended, consider adding unit tests that cover cases when:
isArraignmentScheduled
andworkingCase.indictmentDecision
are bothtrue
.- Either
isArraignmentScheduled
orworkingCase.indictmentDecision
isfalse
.apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Conclusion/Conclusion.tsx (2)
Line range hint
233-248
: Explicitly handle all indictment decisions inuseEffect
The
useEffect
currently handles specificIndictmentDecision
cases but defaults toSCHEDULING
for others. To enhance clarity and ensure no cases are overlooked, consider explicitly handling all possibleIndictmentDecision
cases, includingPOSTPONING_UNTIL_VERDICT
andREDISTRIBUTING
.This aligns with the preference for explicit case handling to avoid assumptions and improve code maintainability.
Line range hint
129-145
: IncludePOSTPONING_UNTIL_VERDICT
inhandleNavigationTo
switchThe
handleNavigationTo
function does not explicitly handle thePOSTPONING_UNTIL_VERDICT
action. To ensure all indictment decisions are properly managed, consider adding a case forIndictmentDecision.POSTPONING_UNTIL_VERDICT
, even if no additional logic is needed.Adding explicit handling improves clarity and aligns with best practices for maintaining comprehensive switch statements.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Conclusion/Conclusion.tsx (3 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Subpoena/Subpoena.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Conclusion/Conclusion.tsx (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Subpoena/Subpoena.tsx (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
📓 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: unakb PR: island-is/island.is#15378 File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Summary/Summary.tsx:86-100 Timestamp: 2024-06-27T14:37:07.823Z Learning: User unakb prefers explicit case handling in switch statements for key functionalities like `getRulingDecisionTagColor` to ensure clarity and avoid assumptions that a case was overlooked.
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Conclusion/Conclusion.tsx (1)
Learnt from: unakb PR: island-is/island.is#15378 File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Summary/Summary.tsx:86-100 Timestamp: 2024-06-27T14:37:07.823Z Learning: User unakb prefers explicit case handling in switch statements for key functionalities like `getRulingDecisionTagColor` to ensure clarity and avoid assumptions that a case was overlooked.
🔇 Additional comments (4)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Conclusion/Conclusion.tsx (4)
122-122
: Appropriately resettingmergeCaseId
when not merging casesSetting
mergeCaseId
tonull
in the initialupdate
object ensures that the merge case ID is cleared when the court conclusion does not involve merging. This aligns with the PR objective to prevent confusion regarding case statuses.
141-143
: AssigningmergeCaseId
only when merging casesUpdating
mergeCaseId
only whenselectedDecision
isMERGE
ensures that the merge ID is set appropriately. This fulfills the requirement to display the merge ID only when completing a case involving a merge.
402-488
: UI for completing indictment decision is well-structuredThe addition of radio buttons for
RULING
,FINE
,DISMISSAL
,MERGE
, andCANCELLATION
under theCOMPLETING
action enhances the decision-making interface. TheonChange
handlers correctly updateselectedDecision
, and thelabel
s are appropriately localized.
490-501
: Conditional rendering ofSelectConnectedCase
componentDisplaying the
SelectConnectedCase
component only whenselectedDecision
isMERGE
ensures that users are prompted to select a connected case only when necessary. This enhances the user experience by keeping the interface relevant.
Indictment Cleanup
Hreinsa og fela sameinað málsnúmer ef það er valið að sameina og svo eitthvað annað
Hreinsa niðurstöðu þinghalds þegar nýtt fyrirkall er gefið út
What
Why
Screenshots / Gifs
Screen.Recording.2024-10-07.at.12.06.55.mov
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
FINE
,DISMISSAL
, andMERGE
.Bug Fixes
SelectConnectedCase
component to reflect the current selection accurately.