chore(j-s): Slack event when subpoena is serviced #16747
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/subpoena.module.ts (1)
Missing test coverage for SubpoenaService event integration
The codebase lacks test coverage for the event integration in SubpoenaService. Specifically:
- No dedicated test file exists for SubpoenaService (
subpoena.service.spec.tsnot found)- The service emits 'SUBPOENA_SERVICE_STATUS' events when service status changes, but this behavior is untested
- Integration between SubpoenaService and EventService needs test coverage to ensure events are properly posted with correct parameters
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
8-24: Tests needed for EventModule integration.The integration between SubpoenaModule and EventModule for handling service status events should be covered by tests to ensure reliable functionality.
Let's check if there are any existing test files for this module:
Would you like me to help create test cases for:
- Event emission when subpoena service status changes
- Integration between SubpoenaService and EventService
Let me check if there are any tests covering the event integration by examining the test files and looking for event-related tests.
Let me check the actual event integration implementation to understand what needs to be tested.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Look for test files related to subpoena module fd "subpoena.*\.spec\.ts" apps/judicial-system/backend/srcLength of output: 983
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check test files for event-related tests for file in $(fd ".*\.spec\.ts" apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/test); do echo "=== $file ===" rg -i "event" "$file" done # Also check the implementation to understand what events should be tested rg -i "eventservice" apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/Length of output: 4334
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the SubpoenaService implementation for event-related code rg -A 5 "eventService" apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/subpoena.service.ts # Also check if there's a dedicated test file for SubpoenaService fd "subpoena.service.spec.ts" apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/Length of output: 537
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/models/subpoena.model.ts (2)
24-36: Consider refactoring nested ternaries for better readability.While the logic is correct, the nested ternary operators make the code harder to read and maintain.
Consider using a switch statement instead:
static serviceStatusText(serviceStatus: ServiceStatus) { - return serviceStatus === ServiceStatus.DEFENDER - ? 'Birt fyrir verjanda' - : serviceStatus === ServiceStatus.ELECTRONICALLY - ? 'Birt rafrænt' - : serviceStatus === ServiceStatus.IN_PERSON - ? 'Birt persónulega' - : serviceStatus === ServiceStatus.FAILED - ? 'Árangurslaus birting' - : serviceStatus === ServiceStatus.EXPIRED - ? 'Rann út á tíma' - : 'Í birtingarferli' // This should never happen + switch (serviceStatus) { + case ServiceStatus.DEFENDER: + return 'Birt fyrir verjanda'; + case ServiceStatus.ELECTRONICALLY: + return 'Birt rafrænt'; + case ServiceStatus.IN_PERSON: + return 'Birt persónulega'; + case ServiceStatus.FAILED: + return 'Árangurslaus birting'; + case ServiceStatus.EXPIRED: + return 'Rann út á tíma'; + default: + return 'Í birtingarferli'; // This should never happen + } }
24-36: Consider implementing internationalization.The method contains hard-coded Icelandic strings. Consider implementing i18n to make the text strings maintainable and reusable across the application.
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/event/event.service.ts (2)
90-95: Consider using a more specific type for the info parameter.The current type
{ [key: string]: string | boolean | Date | undefined }is quite flexible but could benefit from a more specific interface to ensure type safety and better documentation.Consider creating a dedicated interface:
interface EventInfo { serviceStatus?: string; updatedBy?: string; timestamp?: Date; // Add other known properties }
Line range hint
123-137: Extract court date formatting logic to a separate method.The court date text construction logic is complex and could be extracted to improve readability and maintainability.
Consider refactoring to:
private getCourtDateText(theCase: Case, event: CaseEvent): string { if (event !== 'SCHEDULE_COURT_DATE') { return ''; } const courtDate = DateLog.courtDate(theCase.dateLogs)?.date ?? DateLog.arraignmentDate(theCase.dateLogs)?.date; return `\n>Dómari ${theCase.judge?.name ?? 'er ekki skráður'} \n>Dómritari ${theCase.registrar?.name ?? 'er ekki skráður'} \n>Fyrirtaka ${formatDate(courtDate, 'Pp') ?? 'er ekki skráð'}`; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/event/event.service.ts(8 hunks)apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/models/subpoena.model.ts(1 hunks)apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/subpoena.module.ts(2 hunks)apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/subpoena.service.ts(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (4)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/event/event.service.ts (1)
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/models/subpoena.model.ts (1)
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/subpoena.module.ts (1)
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/subpoena.service.ts (1)
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
📓 Learnings (1)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/models/subpoena.model.ts (2)
Learnt from: unakb
PR: island-is/island.is#16393
File: apps/judicial-system/digital-mailbox-api/src/app/modules/cases/models/subpoena.response.ts:164-169
Timestamp: 2024-10-14T21:34:16.234Z
Learning: Ensure that suggested code changes in `subpoena.response.ts` are accurate and necessary, avoiding redundant suggestions.
Learnt from: oddsson
PR: island-is/island.is#16645
File: apps/judicial-system/digital-mailbox-api/src/app/modules/cases/case.service.ts:99-108
Timestamp: 2024-11-01T13:43:42.392Z
Learning: In `case.service.ts`, the `fetchSubpoenaStatus` function checks if a service status has been set in the system and sets it if not. The status does not need to be used in the response.
🔇 Additional comments (5)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/subpoena.module.ts (1)
8-8: LGTM! Clean implementation of EventModule integration.
The changes follow NestJS best practices with proper circular dependency handling using forwardRef.
Also applies to: 23-23
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/models/subpoena.model.ts (1)
35-35: Verify the default case handling.
The comment "This should never happen" suggests an impossible state, but the code still handles it. Could you clarify:
- Are there any other possible values for
ServiceStatus? - Should we throw an error in the default case instead?
Let's check the ServiceStatus enum definition:
✅ Verification successful
Let me check how this enum is being used in the subpoena model to understand the context better.
The default case is correctly handled and should be kept
The ServiceStatus enum is well-defined with all possible values: ELECTRONICALLY, DEFENDER, IN_PERSON, FAILED, and EXPIRED. The default case in serviceStatusText serves as a safety net for the following scenarios:
- When
serviceStatusis undefined/null (the column is nullable) - During enum value transitions in the database
- For type safety in TypeScript
While the comment suggests it should never happen, having a default case is a good practice here. The text 'Í birtingarferli' (In service process) is an appropriate fallback.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find and display the ServiceStatus enum definition
rg -A 10 "enum ServiceStatus"
Length of output: 1296
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find where the ServiceStatus is used in the subpoena model
rg -B 5 -A 5 "ServiceStatus" apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/models/subpoena.model.ts
Length of output: 1336
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/event/event.service.ts (2)
65-65: LGTM: Event type addition follows established patterns.
The new SUBPOENA_SERVICE_STATUS event type is well-integrated with appropriate emoji and description.
Also applies to: 79-79
90-95: Verify integration with SubpoenaService.
Let's ensure that the EventService is properly integrated with the SubpoenaService for posting subpoena status events.
Also applies to: 199-212
✅ Verification successful
Based on the shell script results, I can see that:
- The EventService is properly injected in SubpoenaService's constructor (line 73)
- The EventService is used to post events for subpoena service status changes (lines 249-254)
- The event type 'SUBPOENA_SERVICE_STATUS' is properly defined in EventService (line 1 of event.service.ts)
Let me verify one more aspect to ensure complete integration:
Let me try a different approach to verify the Slack integration:
Integration with SubpoenaService is properly implemented
The verification confirms that:
- EventService is correctly injected in SubpoenaService
- The 'SUBPOENA_SERVICE_STATUS' event is properly posted when subpoena status changes
- The event is configured in EventService with the appropriate Slack emoji and message format
- The integration follows the same pattern as other event types in the system
The changes are well-integrated and maintain consistency with the existing event handling patterns in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify EventService integration in SubpoenaService
# Test 1: Check if EventService is imported and injected in SubpoenaService
echo "Checking EventService integration..."
ast-grep --pattern 'class SubpoenaService {
constructor($$$) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
# Test 2: Check if postEvent is called with SUBPOENA_SERVICE_STATUS
echo "Checking event posting..."
rg -A 5 "SUBPOENA_SERVICE_STATUS" --type ts
Length of output: 32281
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the event is properly handled in the Slack integration
rg -A 5 "postEvent.*SUBPOENA_SERVICE_STATUS" --type ts
Length of output: 56
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for Slack event handling configuration
echo "Checking Slack integration..."
rg -A 5 "SUBPOENA_SERVICE_STATUS.*:page_with_curl:" --type ts
# Check event handling in general
echo "Checking event handling..."
ast-grep --pattern 'async postEvent(event: $_) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 881
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/subpoena.service.ts (1)
35-35: LGTM: Clean dependency injection implementation.
The EventService integration follows the established patterns for service imports and dependency injection.
Also applies to: 73-73
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/subpoena.service.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Datadog ReportBranch report: ✅ 0 Failed, 333 Passed, 0 Skipped, 56.44s Total Time |
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/models/subpoena.model.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/limitedAccessSubpoena.controller.ts(1 hunks)apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/test/createTestingSubpoenaModule.ts(4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/limitedAccessSubpoena.controller.ts (1)
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/test/createTestingSubpoenaModule.ts (1)
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
📓 Learnings (2)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/limitedAccessSubpoena.controller.ts (1)
Learnt from: oddsson
PR: island-is/island.is#16463
File: apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/test/limitedAccessSubpoenaController/limitedAccessSubpoenaControllerGuards.spec.ts:17-17
Timestamp: 2024-10-21T21:14:47.668Z
Learning: In `LimitedAccessSubpoenaController`, `SubpoenaExistsOptionalGuard` is still used on specific endpoints not covered by the test file `limitedAccessSubpoenaControllerGuards.spec.ts`.
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/test/createTestingSubpoenaModule.ts (1)
Learnt from: unakb
PR: island-is/island.is#16747
File: apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/subpoena.service.ts:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-06T16:08:25.635Z
Learning: Error handling and asynchronous handling are already managed within the `EventService.postEvent` method in `event.service.ts`.
🔇 Additional comments (3)
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/limitedAccessSubpoena.controller.ts (2)
Line range hint 41-48: LGTM: Robust security implementation with proper guard layering.
The controller implements a comprehensive security model:
- Authentication via
JwtAuthGuard - Resource validation through
CaseExistsGuardandDefendantExistsGuard - Role-based access control with
RolesGuard - Type-specific validation using
CaseTypeGuard - Read permission verification through
CaseReadGuard
The PDF endpoint is well-protected and properly documented with Swagger annotations.
Also applies to: 52-83
35-35: Verify the impact of using SubpoenaExistsOptionalGuard.
The change from SubpoenaExistsGuard to SubpoenaExistsOptionalGuard makes the subpoena existence check optional. While this aligns with the PR's objective to handle service status changes, we should verify that this doesn't introduce security risks.
Let's verify the usage and impact:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the usage of these guards to verify the impact.
Let me gather more information about the implementation of these guards to understand their relationship and usage.
Let me check the actual implementation of these guards to understand their behavior.
The change to use SubpoenaExistsOptionalGuard is appropriate and safe
The implementation shows that SubpoenaExistsOptionalGuard is a proper extension of SubpoenaExistsGuard that simply makes the subpoena ID parameter optional. When no subpoena ID is provided, it allows the request to proceed. When a subpoena ID is provided, it performs the same validation as the parent guard.
This aligns with the endpoint's purpose:
- The PDF endpoint accepts an optional subpoena ID
- When provided, it validates the subpoena exists
- When not provided, it allows the request to proceed
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Analyze the usage of SubpoenaExistsGuard vs SubpoenaExistsOptionalGuard
# Test 1: Check if SubpoenaExistsGuard is still used elsewhere
echo "Checking SubpoenaExistsGuard usage:"
rg "SubpoenaExistsGuard" -A 3
# Test 2: Check other endpoints using SubpoenaExistsOptionalGuard
echo "Checking SubpoenaExistsOptionalGuard usage:"
rg "SubpoenaExistsOptionalGuard" -A 3
# Test 3: Check for potential security implications in test files
echo "Checking related test coverage:"
rg "SubpoenaExists.*Guard.*test|spec" --type ts
Length of output: 152353
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of SubpoenaExistsOptionalGuard
ast-grep --pattern 'export class SubpoenaExistsOptionalGuard {
$$$
}'
# Check where SubpoenaExistsOptionalGuard is used
rg "SubpoenaExistsOptionalGuard" -A 3 -B 3
# Check test coverage
rg "SubpoenaExistsOptionalGuard.*test|spec" --type ts
Length of output: 148974
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of both guards
ast-grep --pattern 'export class SubpoenaExistsGuard {
$$$
}'
# Check the implementation of the optional guard
ast-grep --pattern 'export class SubpoenaExistsOptionalGuard extends SubpoenaExistsGuard {
$$$
}'
# Check where these guards are used in controllers
rg "@UseGuards.*SubpoenaExists.*Guard" -A 3 -B 3
Length of output: 5072
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the full implementation of the guards
cat apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/guards/subpoenaExists.guard.ts
# Check if there are any tests that verify the behavior
rg -l "describe.*SubpoenaExists.*Guard" --type ts
Length of output: 1694
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/test/createTestingSubpoenaModule.ts (1)
17-17: LGTM! EventService setup looks good.
The EventService is properly imported, mocked, and provided in the testing module, following the existing patterns in the file.
Also applies to: 32-32, 51-51
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/test/createTestingSubpoenaModule.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #16747 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 36.55% 36.55% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 6892 6892
Lines 143782 143810 +28
Branches 40974 40986 +12
==========================================
+ Hits 52556 52564 +8
- Misses 91226 91246 +20
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
* chore(j-s): Post event to slack when subpoena status updates * chore(j-s): Slack event when service status changes * chore: nx format:write update dirty files * fix(j-s): Mock event service * Update createTestingSubpoenaModule.ts --------- Co-authored-by: andes-it <builders@andes.is> Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Slack event þegar fyrirkall er birt
What
Send a slack event when a subpoena's service status changes
Why
So we can see changes to subpoena service statuses
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores