feat(j-s): Separate requested defender info from actual assigned defender #16393
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (9)
apps/judicial-system/api/src/app/modules/defendant/models/defendant.model.ts (2)
81-82: LGTM: New fieldrequestedDefenderNationalIdadded correctlyThe addition of
requestedDefenderNationalIdis correct and aligns with the PR objective. It's properly typed as a nullable string and correctly decorated for GraphQL.Consider adding a comment or using a more specific type (e.g.,
NationalId) if there's a standard format for national IDs in your system. This could enhance type safety and self-documentation.
78-85: Overall changes align well with PR objectiveThe additions of
requestedDefenderChoice,requestedDefenderNationalId, andrequestedDefenderNameeffectively implement the PR objective of separating requested defender information from the actual assigned defender. These changes maintain consistency with the existing code structure and complement the existing defender-related fields.To fully implement this feature:
- Ensure that corresponding changes are made in related components (e.g., services, resolvers) to handle these new fields.
- Update any relevant database schemas or migrations.
- Modify the frontend to display and manage this new information.
- Add or update unit tests to cover these new fields.
- Update the documentation to reflect these changes in the
Defendantmodel.apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/defendant/models/defendant.model.ts (1)
140-155: Consider grouping related properties for improved readabilityThe implementation of the new properties is correct and aligns well with the PR objectives. However, to enhance code organization and maintainability, consider grouping related properties together. For example, you could place all defender-related properties (both requested and assigned) in one section of the class.
This is a minor suggestion and doesn't affect the functionality, but it could improve code readability in the long term.
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Advocates/Advocates.strings.ts (1)
77-89: Well-structured localization additions with room for minor improvementsThe new messages
defenderChoiceAlertTitleanddefenderChoiceAlertMessageare well-integrated into the existing localization structure. They follow best practices for NextJS and react-intl usage, including proper namespacing of IDs and providing descriptions for maintainability.The use of a
selectstatement indefenderChoiceAlertMessageis particularly good for handling various scenarios flexibly.Suggestions for improvement:
- Consider adding English translations in comments for non-Icelandic speakers, to improve code readability and maintainability.
- In the
selectstatement ofdefenderChoiceAlertMessage, consider using lowercase keys for better readability (e.g.,waiveinstead ofWAIVE).Example of adding English translation comment:
defenderChoiceAlertTitle: { id: 'judicial.system.core:court_indictments.advocates.defender_choice_alert_title', defaultMessage: 'Val á verjanda - {defendantName}', // English: "Choice of defender - {defendantName}" description: 'Notaður sem texti þegar ákærði hefur valið verjanda í dómaraflæði í ákærum.', // English: "Used as text when the defendant has chosen a defender in the court flow in indictments." },apps/judicial-system/xrd-api/src/app/app.service.ts (2)
99-99: LGTM! Consider using const assertion for type safety.The simplification of defender information aligns well with the PR objective. To further improve type safety, consider using a const assertion:
let defenderName = undefined as string | undefined;This ensures that
defenderNamecan only be assigned string or undefined values throughout the function.
144-146: LGTM! Consider updating theSubpoenaResponsetype for consistency.The changes effectively implement the separation of requested defender info from assigned defender info, both in the update payload and response handling. This aligns well with the PR objective.
To ensure full type safety and consistency, consider updating the
SubpoenaResponsetype to reflect these changes:interface SubpoenaResponse { subpoenaComment: string; defenderInfo: { requestedDefenderChoice: DefenderChoice; requestedDefenderName: string | undefined; }; }This will provide better type checking and documentation for the updated response structure.
Also applies to: 168-169
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/subpoena.service.ts (1)
95-97: LGTM with suggestions for improvementThe implementation aligns well with the PR objectives to store requested defender information separately. However, consider the following improvements:
- Add type annotations for the new properties to maintain consistency with TypeScript best practices:
requestedDefenderChoice: DefenderChoice, requestedDefenderNationalId: string, requestedDefenderName: string,
- Refactor the conditional check for better readability:
const shouldUpdateDefender = [ defenderChoice, defenderNationalId, requestedDefenderChoice, requestedDefenderNationalId ].some(Boolean); if (shouldUpdateDefender) { // ... existing update logic }
- Consider adding input validation for the new fields to ensure data integrity and security.
Also applies to: 107-112, 119-121
apps/judicial-system/digital-mailbox-api/src/app/modules/cases/case.service.ts (2)
Line range hint
120-143: Improved handling of defender assignment and choiceThe changes in the
updateSubpoenaInfomethod effectively separate the requested defender information from the actual assignment, aligning with the PR objectives. The error handling and lawyer validation are well-implemented.Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of the
chosenLawyervariable for better code readability.let chosenLawyer = null + // Store the chosen lawyer's details if a specific defender is requested if (defenderAssignment.defenderChoice === DefenderChoice.CHOOSE) { if (!defenderAssignment.defenderNationalId) { throw new NotFoundException( 'Defender national id is required for choice', ) }
228-235: Improved method signature with explicit typingThe renaming of
patchSubpoenaInfotopatchDefenseInfoand the updated parameter type enhance code clarity and type safety. The new structure ofdefenderChoicealigns well with the PR objectives.Consider using a TypeScript interface or type alias for the
defenderChoiceobject to improve reusability and maintainability.interface DefenderChoiceInfo { requestedDefenderChoice: DefenderChoice; requestedDefenderNationalId: string | undefined; requestedDefenderName?: string; } private async patchDefenseInfo( defendantNationalId: string, caseId: string, defenderChoice: DefenderChoiceInfo ): Promise<InternalDefendantResponse> { // ... existing implementation }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
- apps/judicial-system/api/src/app/modules/defendant/models/defendant.model.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/migrations/20241011090000-update-defendant.js (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/defendant/dto/updateDefendant.dto.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/defendant/models/defendant.model.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/dto/updateSubpoena.dto.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/subpoena.service.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/digital-mailbox-api/src/app/modules/cases/case.service.ts (3 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/digital-mailbox-api/src/app/modules/cases/models/internal/internalCase.response.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/digital-mailbox-api/src/app/modules/cases/models/internal/internalDefendant.response.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/digital-mailbox-api/src/app/modules/cases/models/subpoena.response.ts (3 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/FormProvider/case.graphql (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Advocates/Advocates.strings.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Advocates/Advocates.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/xrd-api/src/app/app.service.ts (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (14)
apps/judicial-system/api/src/app/modules/defendant/models/defendant.model.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/migrations/20241011090000-update-defendant.js (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/defendant/dto/updateDefendant.dto.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/defendant/models/defendant.model.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/dto/updateSubpoena.dto.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/subpoena.service.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/digital-mailbox-api/src/app/modules/cases/case.service.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/digital-mailbox-api/src/app/modules/cases/models/internal/internalCase.response.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/digital-mailbox-api/src/app/modules/cases/models/internal/internalDefendant.response.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/digital-mailbox-api/src/app/modules/cases/models/subpoena.response.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/FormProvider/case.graphql (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Advocates/Advocates.strings.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Advocates/Advocates.tsx (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/xrd-api/src/app/app.service.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
🪛 Biome
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Advocates/Advocates.tsx
[error] 65-65: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
🔇 Additional comments (22)
apps/judicial-system/digital-mailbox-api/src/app/modules/cases/models/internal/internalDefendant.response.ts (2)
7-9: LGTM! The changes align well with the PR objectives.The addition of
requestedDefenderChoice,requestedDefenderNationalId, andrequestedDefenderNameproperties successfully implements the requirement to store requested defender information separately from the actual assigned defender. The use of optional properties and appropriate types is consistent with TypeScript best practices and the existing code structure.
Line range hint
1-11: Verify updates in related componentsThe changes to
InternalDefendantResponselook good. To ensure full implementation of the feature, please verify that related components, services, and GraphQL queries have been updated to utilize these new properties where appropriate.Run the following script to check for usage of the new properties:
✅ Verification successful
Usage of new properties confirmed
The new properties
requestedDefenderChoice,requestedDefenderNationalId, andrequestedDefenderNameare utilized in related components and services as expected.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of new properties in related files # Test: Search for usage of new properties rg --type typescript -e "requestedDefenderChoice" -e "requestedDefenderNationalId" -e "requestedDefenderName" apps/judicial-systemLength of output: 161
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of new properties in related TypeScript files # Test: Search for usage of new properties rg --type ts -e "requestedDefenderChoice" -e "requestedDefenderNationalId" -e "requestedDefenderName" apps/judicial-systemLength of output: 7005
apps/judicial-system/digital-mailbox-api/src/app/modules/cases/models/internal/internalCase.response.ts (1)
33-35: LGTM: New properties align with PR objectives and follow best practices.The addition of
requestedDefenderChoice,requestedDefenderNationalId, andrequestedDefenderNameto theDefendantinterface effectively addresses the PR's main objective. These properties allow for separate storage of requested defender information, distinct from the actual assigned defender. The use of optional properties and consistent typing (reusingDefenderChoiceand usingstringfor IDs and names) maintains type safety and follows TypeScript best practices.apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/dto/updateSubpoena.dto.ts (3)
53-56: LGTM: Well-definedrequestedDefenderChoicepropertyThe
requestedDefenderChoiceproperty is correctly implemented with appropriate decorators for validation and API documentation. It aligns well with the existingdefenderChoiceproperty and supports the PR objective of separating requested defender info from the assigned defender.
58-61: LGTM: Well-definedrequestedDefenderNationalIdpropertyThe
requestedDefenderNationalIdproperty is correctly implemented with appropriate decorators for validation and API documentation. It complements therequestedDefenderChoiceproperty and aligns with the PR objective.
63-66: LGTM: Well-definedrequestedDefenderNamepropertyThe
requestedDefenderNameproperty is correctly implemented with appropriate decorators for validation and API documentation. It completes the set of requested defender properties and supports the PR objective.apps/judicial-system/backend/migrations/20241011090000-update-defendant.js (3)
2-47: LGTM: Well-structured migration with proper use of transactionsThe 'up' method is well-structured, using a transaction to ensure atomicity of the migration. The addition of new columns is done correctly using Sequelize methods.
48-72: LGTM: Proper implementation of the 'down' methodThe 'down' method is correctly implemented, using a transaction to ensure atomicity and properly removing the columns added in the 'up' method. This ensures that the migration is fully reversible, which is a best practice in database migrations.
1-73: Overall assessment: Well-implemented migration scriptThis migration script successfully implements the changes required to separate requested defender information from actual assigned defender, aligning well with the PR objectives. The use of transactions, proper structuring of 'up' and 'down' methods, and adherence to Sequelize migration patterns are commendable.
A minor suggestion for improvement has been made regarding the use of Sequelize methods for data population, but overall, this is a solid implementation that should effectively update the database schema as intended.
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/defendant/dto/updateDefendant.dto.ts (4)
97-100: LGTM: Properly definedrequestedDefenderChoicepropertyThe
requestedDefenderChoiceproperty is correctly implemented as an optional enum of typeDefenderChoice. The use of appropriate decorators ensures proper validation and API documentation.
102-105: LGTM: Properly definedrequestedDefenderNationalIdpropertyThe
requestedDefenderNationalIdproperty is correctly implemented as an optional string. The use of appropriate decorators ensures proper validation and API documentation.
107-110: LGTM: Properly definedrequestedDefenderNamepropertyThe
requestedDefenderNameproperty is correctly implemented as an optional string. The use of appropriate decorators ensures proper validation and API documentation.
97-110: Great job: Successfully implemented requested defender propertiesThe addition of
requestedDefenderChoice,requestedDefenderNationalId, andrequestedDefenderNameproperties effectively separates the requested defender information from the actual assigned defender. This change aligns perfectly with the PR objectives and maintains consistency with the existing code structure and best practices.The implementation:
- Enhances the data model's clarity
- Maintains type safety and API documentation standards
- Follows NextJS and TypeScript best practices
- Introduces new functionality without modifying existing code, minimizing the risk of regressions
Great work on implementing this feature!
apps/judicial-system/api/src/app/modules/defendant/models/defendant.model.ts (2)
78-79: LGTM: New fieldrequestedDefenderChoiceadded correctlyThe addition of
requestedDefenderChoicealigns with the PR objective. It's correctly typed as a nullableDefenderChoiceand properly decorated for GraphQL schema generation.
84-85: LGTM: New fieldrequestedDefenderNameadded correctlyThe addition of
requestedDefenderNameis appropriate and aligns with the PR objective. It's correctly typed as a nullable string and properly decorated for GraphQL schema generation.apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/defendant/models/defendant.model.ts (3)
141-147: LGTM: Properly implementedrequestedDefenderChoicepropertyThe
requestedDefenderChoiceproperty is well-implemented:
- It uses an ENUM type, ensuring type safety and restricting possible values.
- It allows null values, which is appropriate for an optional field.
- The
@ApiPropertyOptionalannotation is correctly used for API documentation.This implementation aligns well with the PR objective of separating requested defender information from the actual assigned defender.
149-151: LGTM: Well-implementedrequestedDefenderNationalIdpropertyThe
requestedDefenderNationalIdproperty is correctly implemented:
- It uses a STRING type, which is appropriate for storing national IDs.
- It allows null values, accommodating cases where the requested defender's national ID might not be available.
- The
@ApiPropertyOptionalannotation is correctly used for API documentation.This implementation supports the PR objective of separately storing requested defender information.
153-155: LGTM: Correctly implementedrequestedDefenderNamepropertyThe
requestedDefenderNameproperty is implemented correctly:
- It uses a STRING type, which is suitable for storing names.
- It allows null values, which is appropriate as the requested defender's name might not always be provided.
- The
@ApiPropertyOptionalannotation is correctly used for API documentation.This implementation aligns with the PR objective of separately storing requested defender information.
apps/judicial-system/xrd-api/src/app/app.service.ts (1)
115-116: LGTM! Simplified defender information retrieval.The changes effectively simplify the defender information retrieval, aligning with the PR objective. The code maintains type safety through the use of the
getLawyermethod's return type.apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/FormProvider/case.graphql (1)
25-27: LGTM! New fields align well with PR objectives.The addition of
requestedDefenderChoice,requestedDefenderNationalId, andrequestedDefenderNamefields is well-implemented and directly addresses the PR's main objective of separating requested defender information from the actual assigned defender. The naming convention is consistent with existing fields, and the placement within thedefendantssection is logical.apps/judicial-system/digital-mailbox-api/src/app/modules/cases/case.service.ts (2)
144-146: Appropriate method renaming and parameter passingThe change from
patchSubpoenaInfotopatchDefenseInfoaccurately reflects the focus on defense information, aligning with the PR objectives. The passing of thedefenderChoiceobject to the new method maintains code clarity and consistency.
Line range hint
236-275: Verify API endpoint compatibilityThe
patchDefenseInfomethod body remains largely unchanged, which is good for maintaining consistency. However, it's important to ensure that the backend API endpoint can handle the new structure of thedefenderChoiceobject.Please confirm that the backend API endpoint at
/api/internal/case/${caseId}/defense/${defendantNationalId}has been updated to handle the newdefenderChoicestructure withrequestedDefenderChoice,requestedDefenderNationalId, andrequestedDefenderName.✅ Verification successful
The previous script encountered an error with the
--type typescriptflag. Let's retry the search without specifying the file type to ensure we capture the necessary endpoint definitions.
To ensure that the backend API handles the new
defenderChoicestructure, let's search for the updated properties within the backend codebase.
API Endpoint Compatibility Verified
The backend has been updated to handle the new
defenderChoicestructure, as confirmed by the presence ofrequestedDefenderChoice,requestedDefenderNationalId, andrequestedDefenderNamein the backend codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if the API endpoint has been updated in the backend # Test: Search for the endpoint definition rg --type typescript "/api/internal/case/.+/defense/.+" apps/judicial-system/backendLength of output: 119
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the API endpoint definition in the backend without specifying file type rg "/api/internal/case/.+/defense/.+" apps/judicial-system/backendLength of output: 66
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for updated defenderChoice properties in the backend rg "requestedDefenderChoice|requestedDefenderNationalId|requestedDefenderName" apps/judicial-system/backendLength of output: 2092
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/subpoena/dto/updateSubpoena.dto.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/judicial-system/backend/migrations/20241011090000-update-defendant.js
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Advocates/Advocates.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/judicial-system/digital-mailbox-api/src/app/modules/cases/models/subpoena.response.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/judicial-system/digital-mailbox-api/src/app/modules/cases/models/subpoena.response.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
apps/judicial-system/digital-mailbox-api/src/app/modules/cases/models/subpoena.response.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #16393 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 36.73% 36.73%
=======================================
Files 6809 6809
Lines 141088 141109 +21
Branches 40225 40233 +8
=======================================
+ Hits 51826 51835 +9
- Misses 89262 89274 +12
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
Datadog ReportAll test runs ✅ 8 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 8 Passed Test Services
🔻 Code Coverage Decreases vs Default Branch (1)
|
apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/defendant/models/defendant.model.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Afstaða til verjanda - birta í gáttinni
What
Store requested defender information separated from the actual assigned defender
Why
Because although the defendant requests something, the judge still has the final say on the actual choice and needs to accept a requested defender before the defender gets access to the case.
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation