Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(web): Change fallback theme for organization pages #16913

Conversation

RunarVestmann
Copy link
Member

@RunarVestmann RunarVestmann commented Nov 18, 2024

Change fallback theme for organization pages

What

Current fallback theme for organization pages presumes there isn't a white background, meaning that if there is a white background then the header is invisible to the user.

Why

The new default is to always have a white background in the header, meaning that the fallback is never visible

Screenshots / Gifs

Before

Screenshot 2024-11-18 at 10 10 16

After

Screenshot 2024-11-18 at 10 09 43

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Streamlined theme configuration logic for the OrganizationWrapper component.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Removed redundant checks and unused variables to enhance code clarity.
  • Refactor
    • Simplified return values for theme configuration without affecting component behavior.

@RunarVestmann RunarVestmann added the automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass label Nov 18, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 18, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request focus on the OrganizationWrapper.tsx file, specifically the getThemeConfig function. The function has been simplified by removing a default return statement for theme configurations, now returning only a configuration based on the footerVersion. The logic for rendering the OrganizationHeader component remains unchanged. Minor code organization adjustments were made, such as removing unused variables, but these do not affect the component's functionality or public interface.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
apps/web/components/Organization/Wrapper/OrganizationWrapper.tsx Simplified getThemeConfig function by removing default theme configuration return statement; updated function signature to reflect new return type; minor code organization adjustments made.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

high priority


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@RunarVestmann RunarVestmann marked this pull request as ready for review November 18, 2024 10:07
@RunarVestmann RunarVestmann requested a review from a team as a code owner November 18, 2024 10:07
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 18, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 36.45%. Comparing base (f1ff30d) to head (91a4d7e).
Report is 14 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...nents/Organization/Wrapper/OrganizationWrapper.tsx 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #16913      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   36.45%   36.45%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        6903     6903              
  Lines      144567   144567              
  Branches    41280    41280              
==========================================
- Hits        52704    52701       -3     
- Misses      91863    91866       +3     
Flag Coverage Δ
air-discount-scheme-web 0.00% <ø> (ø)
api 3.34% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-communications 39.58% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-education 30.57% <ø> (ø)
application-api-files 62.35% <ø> (ø)
application-core 70.75% <ø> (-0.32%) ⬇️
application-system-api 41.03% <ø> (ø)
application-template-api-modules 27.70% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
application-templates-accident-notification 28.98% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-car-recycling 3.12% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-criminal-record 25.87% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-driving-license 18.14% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-estate 12.14% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-example-payment 24.80% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-financial-aid 15.48% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-general-petition 23.07% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-inheritance-report 6.52% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-marriage-conditions 15.04% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-mortgage-certificate 43.36% <ø> (ø)
application-templates-parental-leave 29.74% <ø> (-0.12%) ⬇️
application-types 6.60% <ø> (ø)
application-ui-components 1.27% <ø> (ø)
application-ui-shell 20.83% <ø> (ø)
auth-react 21.85% <ø> (ø)
clients-charge-fjs-v2 24.11% <ø> (ø)
contentful-apps 4.69% <ø> (ø)
file-storage 45.80% <ø> (ø)
financial-aid-backend 51.29% <ø> (ø)
financial-aid-shared 17.81% <ø> (ø)
island-ui-core 28.88% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-web 27.16% <ø> (ø)
nest-aws 53.04% <ø> (ø)
portals-admin-regulations-admin 1.85% <ø> (ø)
portals-core 15.89% <ø> (ø)
services-auth-personal-representative 45.63% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
services-endorsements-api 53.21% <ø> (ø)
shared-components 26.90% <ø> (ø)
shared-form-fields 31.26% <ø> (ø)
web 1.77% <0.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...nents/Organization/Wrapper/OrganizationWrapper.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f1ff30d...91a4d7e. Read the comment docs.

---- 🚨 Try these New Features:

@datadog-island-is
Copy link

datadog-island-is bot commented Nov 18, 2024

Datadog Report

All test runs 0bf05d4 🔗

36 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 35 Passed
❄️ 1 with New Flaky
🔻 Test Sessions change in coverage: 2 decreased, 156 no change

Test Services
This report shows up to 10 services
Service Name Failed Known Flaky New Flaky Passed Skipped Total Time Code Coverage Change Test Service View
services-auth-personal-representative 0 0 1 59 0 1m 46.58s 1 no change Link
air-discount-scheme-web 0 0 0 2 0 8.66s 1 no change Link
api 0 0 0 4 0 3.34s 1 no change Link
api-domains-communications 0 0 0 5 0 38.55s 1 no change Link
api-domains-education 0 0 0 8 0 25.24s 1 no change Link
application-api-files 0 0 0 2 0 5.48s 1 no change Link
application-core 0 0 0 97 0 21.14s 1 decreased (-0.2%) Link
application-system-api 0 0 0 112 2 3m 38.7s 1 no change Link
application-template-api-modules 0 0 0 113 0 2m 35.37s 1 no change Link
application-templates-accident-notification 0 0 0 148 0 20.53s 1 no change Link

🔻 Code Coverage Decreases vs Default Branch (2)

  • application-core - jest 78.49% (-0.2%) - Details
  • application-templates-parental-leave - jest 34.9% (-0.1%) - Details

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/web/components/Organization/Wrapper/OrganizationWrapper.tsx (1)

Line range hint 270-273: Consider improving logo alt text for better accessibility

The fallback alt text is quite generic. Consider making it more descriptive or organization-specific to improve accessibility.

-  const organizationLogoAltTextFallback =
-    activeLocale === 'is' ? 'Forsíða stofnunar' : 'Organization frontpage'
+  const organizationLogoAltTextFallback =
+    activeLocale === 'is' ? 'Forsíða stofnunar - Aðalvalmynd' : 'Organization frontpage - Main menu'
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d89ae9c and ff6f501.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/web/components/Organization/Wrapper/OrganizationWrapper.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
apps/web/components/Organization/Wrapper/OrganizationWrapper.tsx (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
🔇 Additional comments (2)
apps/web/components/Organization/Wrapper/OrganizationWrapper.tsx (2)

Line range hint 275-1183: LGTM! No changes needed in the remaining components

The other components in the file are well-structured and haven't been modified. They don't require changes as part of this PR.


208-208: Verify the impact of simplified theme configuration

The removal of default theme configurations could affect components that rely on these theme settings. Please ensure that this change doesn't adversely affect other theme-dependent components.

Consider adding a comment explaining the rationale behind removing the default theme configuration to help future maintainers understand the decision.

✅ Verification successful

Based on the search results and code analysis, I can now provide a final response:

Simplified theme configuration change is safe

The change to return only { themeConfig: { footerVersion } } is safe because:

  1. The removed theme configurations were only used when specific theme names were present in the lightThemes, blueberryThemes, or darkThemes arrays
  2. The footerVersion is the only theme property consistently used across all organization pages
  3. The search results show that headerColorScheme usage is limited to organization-specific components that have their own theme handling
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for components that might be affected by theme configuration changes

# Search for components using theme configurations
ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ = $theme.$_' -l typescript

# Search for direct theme property access
rg -l 'theme\.' --type typescript

# Search for headerColorScheme usage
rg -l 'headerColorScheme' --type typescript

Length of output: 207


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for theme-related usage without file type restriction
# Look for theme configuration usage
rg 'theme\.' -l

# Look for headerColorScheme usage
rg 'headerColorScheme' -l

# Look for footerVersion usage to understand impact
rg 'footerVersion' -l

# Look specifically in the organization wrapper component
cat "apps/web/components/Organization/Wrapper/OrganizationWrapper.tsx"

Length of output: 92502

@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit 37d8204 into main Nov 18, 2024
132 checks passed
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the feature/web-default-organization-theme-should-presume-white-background branch November 18, 2024 12:12
jonnigs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2024
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants