fix(ads): Update code for explicit and manual use #17193
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
apps/air-discount-scheme/backend/src/app/modules/user/user.service.ts (2)
20-24: Consider making DEFAULT_FUND configurable and documentedThe hardcoded values in DEFAULT_FUND could be moved to configuration to allow easier updates. Additionally, add documentation explaining the significance of these default values.
+// Default fund values used for explicit discount code creation +// TODO: Consider moving these values to configuration const DEFAULT_FUND: Fund = { credit: 2, total: 2, used: 0, }
Test coverage needed for new parameters in getUserInfoByNationalId
The verification reveals that while the method signature changes are backward compatible (new optional parameters), the test coverage needs to be updated:
discount.service.tsalready uses all parameters includingisExplicitandisManualdiscount.controller.tsonly uses required parameters, which is fine as the new ones are optionaluser.service.spec.tsdoesn't have test cases for the new parameters🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-156: Verify updates to all callers of these methodsThe signature changes to
getUserInfoByNationalIdand related methods might affect existing callers. Let's verify all usages:
Let me check the actual usage of these methods to verify the impact.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for all calls to getUserInfoByNationalId echo "Searching for getUserInfoByNationalId calls..." rg "getUserInfoByNationalId\(" --type ts # Search for potential test files that need updating echo "Searching for related test files..." fd "user\.service\.spec\.ts$"Length of output: 2200
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check discount.service.ts usage echo "=== Checking discount.service.ts usage ===" rg -A 5 "getUserInfoByNationalId\(" apps/air-discount-scheme/backend/src/app/modules/discount/discount.service.ts # Check discount.controller.ts usage echo "=== Checking discount.controller.ts usage ===" rg -A 5 "getUserInfoByNationalId\(" apps/air-discount-scheme/backend/src/app/modules/discount/discount.controller.ts # Check test cases echo "=== Checking test cases ===" rg -A 5 "getUserInfoByNationalId\(" apps/air-discount-scheme/backend/src/app/modules/user/test/unit/user.service.spec.tsLength of output: 2605
apps/air-discount-scheme/backend/src/app/modules/discount/discount.service.ts (2)
214-216: Enhance logging context for better debuggingWhile the warning logs are well-placed, they could benefit from additional context to aid in debugging.
Consider adding more context to the logs:
- this.logger.warn('User by national id not found for explicit discount.', { + this.logger.warn('User by national id not found for explicit discount.', { category: 'ads-backend', + nationalId, + isExplicit, + isManual }) - this.logger.warn( - `User fund used requirements not met: ${user.fund.used}.`, + this.logger.warn( + 'User fund used requirements not met.', { category: 'ads-backend', + used: user.fund.used, + nationalId, + isExplicit }, ) - this.logger.warn(`User fund no credit, has total: ${user.fund.total}.`, { + this.logger.warn('User fund no credit.', { category: 'ads-backend', + total: user.fund.total, + nationalId, + isExplicit })Also applies to: 225-230, 235-237
204-204: LGTM: Manual discount code handling implementationThe implementation properly supports manual discount code creation, aligning with the PR objective of enabling account creation for minors by admin users.
Consider making the manual flag more explicit in
createManualDiscountCode:- const isManual = true + const isManual = true // Flag to bypass standard eligibility checks for admin-created discountsAlso applies to: 209-210, 499-499, 510-510
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
apps/air-discount-scheme/backend/src/app/modules/discount/discount.service.ts(6 hunks)apps/air-discount-scheme/backend/src/app/modules/user/user.service.ts(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
apps/air-discount-scheme/backend/src/app/modules/discount/discount.service.ts (1)
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/air-discount-scheme/backend/src/app/modules/user/user.service.ts (1)
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
🔇 Additional comments (2)
apps/air-discount-scheme/backend/src/app/modules/discount/discount.service.ts (2)
20-21: LGTM: Logger implementation follows best practices
The logger dependency is properly injected using dependency injection, with correct typing and provider configuration.
Also applies to: 52-53
204-210: Verify the impact on existing discount code creation flows
The addition of the isManual parameter changes the behavior of discount code creation. Let's verify that existing flows are not affected.
✅ Verification successful
Existing discount code flows are properly maintained
Based on the code analysis:
- The
createExplicitDiscountCodeendpoint now delegates tocreateManualDiscountCodewithisExplicit: false - All existing test cases and implementations remain intact
- The
isManualparameter is properly propagated through the service layer without breaking changes - The change is backward compatible as existing flows use the default
falsevalue forisManual
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for existing usages of createExplicitDiscountCode to ensure they're not affected
# Search for direct calls to createExplicitDiscountCode
rg -A 5 "createExplicitDiscountCode\(" --type ts
# Search for potential test cases
rg -A 5 "createExplicitDiscountCode" --type test
Length of output: 11522
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the implementation of createExplicitDiscountCode and its relationship with the new isManual parameter
# Check the implementation and usage of createManualDiscountCode
rg -A 10 "createManualDiscountCode" --type ts
# Check the implementation details of getUserInfoByNationalId
ast-grep --pattern 'getUserInfoByNationalId($$$) {
$$$
}'
# Check test files specifically
fd -e spec.ts -e test.ts | xargs rg -A 5 "createExplicitDiscountCode"
Length of output: 11005
Datadog ReportAll test runs ❌ 98 Total Test Services: 1 Failed, 89 Passed Test ServicesThis report shows up to 10 services
❌ Failed Tests (78)
🔻 Code Coverage Decreases vs Default Branch (2) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
apps/air-discount-scheme/backend/src/app/modules/discount/test/unit/discount.service.spec.ts (2)
67-69: Enhance logger mock implementationThe conversion to
jest.fn()improves the test's ability to track and verify logging behavior. However, given the changes mentioned in the AI summary regarding manual discount creation and user eligibility checks, consider adding test cases for these scenarios.Consider adding the following test cases:
describe('createManualDiscountCode', () => { it('should log appropriate messages when creating manual discount', async () => { const loggerSpy = jest.spyOn(LOGGER_PROVIDER, 'info'); await discountService.createManualDiscountCode(/* params */); expect(loggerSpy).toHaveBeenCalledWith( expect.stringContaining('manual discount created') ); }); });
Add test coverage for manual discount code creation and minor-related scenarios
Based on the codebase analysis:
- The
createManualDiscountCodemethod is implemented but lacks test coverage- There's logic for handling minors in the user service that isn't tested
- The existing test suite only covers explicit discount code creation
Please add test coverage for:
createManualDiscountCodefunctionality including validation of theisExplicitparameter- Scenarios involving minors and custodian verification
- Edge cases around manual discount code expiration dates
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-300: Add test coverage for new functionalityBased on the PR objectives and AI summary, there are changes related to account creation for minors and admin access that aren't covered in the current test suite.
Let's verify the test coverage:
Consider adding these test scenarios:
- Admin creating accounts for minors
- Validation of manual vs. automatic discount creation
- Edge cases around user eligibility with the new parameters
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for test cases related to minor accounts and admin access rg -l "minor|admin|isManual" "apps/air-discount-scheme/backend/src/app/modules/**/test" # Look for the new parameters in the service implementations ast-grep --pattern 'createExplicitDiscountCode($_) { $$$ isManual $$$ }'Length of output: 267
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for test cases related to minor accounts and admin access with correct path rg -l "minor|admin|isManual" "apps/air-discount-scheme/backend/src" # Look for the implementation of createExplicitDiscountCode ast-grep --pattern 'createExplicitDiscountCode($$$) { $$$ }' # Search for any test files containing createExplicitDiscountCode rg "createExplicitDiscountCode" "apps/air-discount-scheme/backend/src" -A 5Length of output: 9803
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the implementation details of user service for minor-related functionality rg "minor" "apps/air-discount-scheme/backend/src/app/modules/user/user.service.ts" -A 5 # Check for manual discount code implementation rg "createManualDiscountCode" "apps/air-discount-scheme/backend/src/app/modules/discount/discount.service.ts" -A 10 # Look for any test files containing manual discount tests rg "createManualDiscountCode" "apps/air-discount-scheme/backend/src/app/modules/**/test" -A 5Length of output: 1008
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
apps/air-discount-scheme/backend/src/app/modules/discount/test/unit/discount.service.spec.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
apps/air-discount-scheme/backend/src/app/modules/discount/test/unit/discount.service.spec.ts (1)
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
* Update code for explicit and manual use * Fix tests to handle logging warn and info --------- Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update code for explicit and manual use * Fix tests to handle logging warn and info --------- Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix(ads): Update code for explicit and manual use (#17193) * Update code for explicit and manual use * Fix tests to handle logging warn and info --------- Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(my-pages): small tweaks for vaccinations (#17138) Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Ásdís Erna Guðmundsdóttir <disa@hugsmidjan.is>
What
Update code for explicit and manual use
Why
Creation for minors is unavailable for admin users.
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation