dvc: use ' to mark dynamic command output, et al.

[jorgeorpinel]

Follow-up of #2644 and #2644

@efiop it seems to me we still have dynamic output without ' around it, am I right or have I not completely understood the criteria you use yet? Thanks

UPDATE: The criteria I have kind of deduced at this point is to only wrap with ' dynamic output (logger.info/warning mainly) in larger messages, not when the entire (or almost) string or line is dynamic, when it's the last part of the string/line/sentence? after : (e.g. like in dvc version), or when it wouldn't make sense for some other reason (like in involved formatted strings). Also noting that these dynamic parts of the output typically come from variable user input (e.g. file names), not necessarily predefined variables (e.g. remote types).

---

• ❗ Have you followed the guidelines in the Contributing to DVC list?

• 📖 Check this box if this PR does not require documentation updates, or if it does and you have created a separate PR in dvc.org with such updates (or at least opened an issue about it in that repo). Please link below to your PR (or issue) in the dvc.org repo.

• ❌ Have you checked DeepSource, CodeClimate, and other sanity checks below? We consider their findings recommendatory and don't expect everything to be addressed. Please review them carefully and fix those that actually improve code or fix bugs.

Thank you for the contribution - we'll try to review it as soon as possible. 🙏

[jorgeorpinel]

The changes so far are just a sample of the first instances I found/fixed.

Note to self: using grep regex ".*([^']\{)

[efiop]

@jorgeorpinel Looks good! Please install our hooks and fix the tests that depend on the messages that you've changed.

[jorgeorpinel]

Ah yeah sorry I should've checked that. I'll fix them, finish wrapping dynamic output with ', and re-request your reviews. Thanks!

[jorgeorpinel]

Interesting @efiop @shcheklein so Restyled can't always make a PR into the original PR branch. Have you found this problematic Ruslan? Seems a bit confusing:

Since the original Pull Request was opened as a fork in a contributor's
repository, we are unable to create a Pull Request branching from it with only
the style fixes.

See #2987

[jorgeorpinel]

OK guys I fixed the formatting (and fixed the pre-hook) and continued down with this down to all commands, but still have many places in the rest of the code to double check. Probably won't find many more instances but maybe you want to review my latest changes so each review is small? Note that this is still WIP please, please don't merge it yet.

[jorgeorpinel]

OK well I'm done here now actually 😬 Pending your reviews, of course.

[efiop]

Thank you @jorgeorpinel ! 🙏