-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 74
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Revert fixes related to JENKINS-67351 and JENKINS-67164 #198
Conversation
…e cases (jenkinsci#188)" This reverts commit 6d6de20.
…e` (jenkinsci#187)" This reverts commit 6a04bac.
…kflowRun.onLoad rather than via FlowExecutionList.ItemListenerImpl to ensure step resumption (jenkinsci#178)" This reverts commit 37c8c49.
src/main/java/org/jenkinsci/plugins/workflow/flow/FlowExecutionList.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/main/java/org/jenkinsci/plugins/workflow/flow/FlowExecutionList.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/main/java/org/jenkinsci/plugins/workflow/flow/FlowExecutionList.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/main/java/org/jenkinsci/plugins/workflow/flow/FlowExecutionList.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
@@ -99,113 +79,4 @@ | |||
}); | |||
} | |||
|
|||
@Test public void forceLoadRunningExecutionsAfterRestart() throws Throwable { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
or just @Ignore
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@dwnusbaum I can leave it to you to merge if you want to make any additional updates
Rebuilding, last build was interrupted for some reason. |
Reverts #188, #187, and #178 due to problems in #188 (see #188 (comment)) which have no obvious fix.
The
FlowExecutionList.isResumptionComplete
API from #188 is preserved to avoid binary compatibility issues withworkflow-durable-task-step
prior to jenkinsci/workflow-durable-task-step-plugin#197.These fixes were generally expected only to apply to uncommon scenarios related to disaster recovery, so I think it is ok to revert them for now.