Using a BOM #95
Merged
Using a BOM #95
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jglick
commented
Jul 23, 2019
basil
approved these changes
Jul 31, 2019
|
Are there any problems with using the BOM in the context of security releases or when working with incremental/snapshot versions of dependencies? Or would you just have to temporarily add an explicit |
Yes. |
|
On hold pending jenkinsci/bom#107. |
bitwiseman
reviewed
Jan 23, 2020
bitwiseman
approved these changes
Jan 23, 2020
Co-Authored-By: Liam Newman <bitwiseman@gmail.com>
…ugin into bom Also updated to newest BOM.
bitwiseman
approved these changes
Jan 27, 2020
oleg-nenashev
approved these changes
Feb 26, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@oleg-nenashev this case is of interest since it is applied to a plugin which is itself mentioned in the BOM. See apache/maven-integration-testing#25.