Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: fix types of few expect tests #13361

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 3, 2022
Merged

chore: fix types of few expect tests #13361

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 3, 2022

Conversation

mrazauskas
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

Few more expect test with fixed types. Looks like there is no overlap with #13360. Just wanted to push these before diving into each types (;

Test plan

Green CI.

@mrazauskas mrazauskas changed the title chore: fix type of few expect tests chore: fix types of few expect tests Oct 2, 2022
@@ -224,13 +229,16 @@ test('ObjectContaining matches prototype properties', () => {
function Foo() {}
Foo.prototype = prototypeObject;
Foo.prototype.constructor = Foo;
obj = new Foo();
obj = new (Foo as any)();
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here TS complains about implicit any.

Comment on lines +254 to +255
objectContaining({}).asymmetricMatch(null),
objectContaining({}).asymmetricMatch(undefined),
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added those simply for completeness.

[{first: objectNotContaining({second: {}})}, {first: {second: {}}}],
[{}, {foo: undefined}],
] as const
).forEach(([sample, received]) => {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Was considering to use test.each, but it was hard to invent a title for each case. Without unique titles it did not look good. So perhaps forEach is fine in this file?

Copy link
Member

@SimenB SimenB left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@SimenB SimenB merged commit 9ba555b into jestjs:main Oct 3, 2022
@mrazauskas mrazauskas deleted the chore-fix-types-of-few-expect-tests branch October 3, 2022 06:43
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 3, 2022

This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.
Please note this issue tracker is not a help forum. We recommend using StackOverflow or our discord channel for questions.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 3, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants