forked from bloomberg/TypeScript
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Private Named Instance Fields Implementation #14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
joeywatts
wants to merge
17
commits into
class-properties-esnext
from
esnext-private-instance-fields
Closed
Private Named Instance Fields Implementation #14
joeywatts
wants to merge
17
commits into
class-properties-esnext
from
esnext-private-instance-fields
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
37ae579
to
d23e150
Compare
f833ce0
to
666a02c
Compare
86a90df
to
861936e
Compare
Moves the transformation of class properties to the ESNext transformer. Property initializers are moved to the constructor by the TypeScript transformer only if there is constructor parameter properties. This is to preserve property initialization order. It currently does not produce void 0 initializers for property declarations that have no initializer due to ESNext and TypeScript having different runtime behaviors. TS completely elides property declarations with no initializer, while I believe the ESNext would define that property on the instance with an undefined value (which is observable at runtime - propertyName in instance or for (var prop in instance) {}).
Signed-off-by: Joseph Watts <jwatts43@bloomberg.net>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Watts <jwatts43@bloomberg.net>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Watts <jwatts43@bloomberg.net>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Watts <jwatts43@bloomberg.net>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Watts <jwatts43@bloomberg.net>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Watts <jwatts43@bloomberg.net>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Watts <jwatts43@bloomberg.net>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Watts <jwatts43@bloomberg.net>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Watts <jwatts43@bloomberg.net>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Watts <jwatts43@bloomberg.net>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Watts <jwatts43@bloomberg.net>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Watts <jwatts43@bloomberg.net>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Watts <jwatts43@bloomberg.net>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Watts <jwatts43@bloomberg.net>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Watts <jwatts43@bloomberg.net>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Watts <jwatts43@bloomberg.net>
0c79ea1
to
0b48937
Compare
closed (opened bloomberg#15) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a PR to track the implementation of Private Named Instance Fields.