Skip to content

Release plan for 2.0.0 #220

Closed
Closed
@consideRatio

Description

@consideRatio

This is a dependency of z2jh and tljh that hasn't been updated in a long time. I'd like to get one release out that is known to work with jupyterhub 4 at least.

Action points

Activity

kimkihoon0515

kimkihoon0515 commented on Jun 12, 2023

@kimkihoon0515

great

changed the title [-]Release plan for 1.3.3, 1.4.0, or 2.0.0[/-] [+]Release plan for 2.0.0[/+] on Sep 12, 2024
pinned this issue on Sep 12, 2024
manics

manics commented on Sep 15, 2024

@manics
Member

Which of these do you consider blockers for 2.0.0?

consideRatio

consideRatio commented on Sep 15, 2024

@consideRatio
MemberAuthor

I'm not sure, but I'd like to keep going a while and when I run out of steam try to answer that with a better overview.

consideRatio

consideRatio commented on Sep 16, 2024

@consideRatio
MemberAuthor

Here are things I'm currently thinking truly must resolved before 2.0 @manics:

I think we should resolve the following as well, but they could come in a followup minor release as well.

minrk

minrk commented on Sep 17, 2024

@minrk
Member

Thanks for leading all this! I can have a stab at #246. allow config is very likely the cause.

manics

manics commented on Sep 17, 2024

@manics
Member

When this is ready do you think we could release a beta first, to give more time for reviewing the authenticator as a whole, especially after the security changes?

consideRatio

consideRatio commented on Sep 17, 2024

@consideRatio
MemberAuthor

Let's do a beta release to be part of tljh / z2jh beta releases, where kubespawner probably needs a beta release as well for z2jh

consideRatio

consideRatio commented on Sep 20, 2024

@consideRatio
MemberAuthor

2.0.0b1 is released!

image

consideRatio

consideRatio commented on Sep 22, 2024

@consideRatio
MemberAuthor

Having worked in this code base a while and read all issues, I have a few ideas of improvements still:


  • Is group_attributes really required, even if we don't read about them in the response?
    Is there really a use case for lookup_dn and bind_dn_template? If not we should disallow it to reduce complexity for users and maintainers.
    allow search_filter to consider either resolved_username or login_username
consideRatio

consideRatio commented on Oct 18, 2024

@consideRatio
MemberAuthor

I think we can go for a 2.0.0 release now, the beta has been tested a bit already with no red flags I think.

unpinned this issue on Oct 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

      Development

      Participants

      @minrk@manics@consideRatio@kimkihoon0515

      Issue actions

        Release plan for 2.0.0 · Issue #220 · jupyterhub/ldapauthenticator