operator/pkg/tasks/init: unit test rbac #5636
Conversation
karmada-bot
added
the
size/L
mohamedawnallah
force-pushed
the
unitTestRBACInitTaskOperatorPkg
branch
from
7305bd1 to
87e68cc
Compare
In this commit, we unit test rbac in the karmada init task operator package by checking that cluster roles and their associated cluster role bindings are created as expected. Signed-off-by: Mohamed Awnallah <mohamedmohey2352@gmail.com>
mohamedawnallah
force-pushed
the
unitTestRBACInitTaskOperatorPkg
branch
from
87e68cc to
6a83fe4
Compare
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #5636 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 39.09% 39.16% +0.06%
==========================================
Files 650 650
Lines 45209 45209
==========================================
+ Hits 17676 17705 +29
+ Misses 26180 26143 -37
- Partials 1353 1361 +8
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
cc @XiShanYongYe-Chang All test cases passed after rebasing on the master branch :) |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: XiShanYongYe-Chang The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
karmada-bot
added
the
approved
Description
In this commit, we unit test rbac in the karmada init task operator package by checking that cluster roles and their associated cluster role bindings are created as expected.
What type of PR is this?
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Part of #5491.
Dependency
This PR depends on #5630.
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: