-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
selftests/bpf: fix crash in core_reloc when bpftool btfgen fails #32
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Master branch: 1b8c924 |
Initialize obj to null and skip closing if null. Signed-off-by: Yucong Sun <fallentree@fb.com>
Master branch: b38101c |
kernel-patches-bot
force-pushed
the
series/615518=>bpf-next
branch
from
February 17, 2022 19:01
cfee98d
to
4b97b5c
Compare
At least one diff in series https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=615518 irrelevant now. Closing PR. |
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 18, 2022
Rafael reports that on a system with LX2160A and Marvell DSA switches, if a reboot occurs while the DSA master (dpaa2-eth) is up, the following panic can be seen: systemd-shutdown[1]: Rebooting. Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 00a0000800000041 [00a0000800000041] address between user and kernel address ranges Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP CPU: 6 PID: 1 Comm: systemd-shutdow Not tainted 5.16.5-00042-g8f5585009b24 #32 pc : dsa_slave_netdevice_event+0x130/0x3e4 lr : raw_notifier_call_chain+0x50/0x6c Call trace: dsa_slave_netdevice_event+0x130/0x3e4 raw_notifier_call_chain+0x50/0x6c call_netdevice_notifiers_info+0x54/0xa0 __dev_close_many+0x50/0x130 dev_close_many+0x84/0x120 unregister_netdevice_many+0x130/0x710 unregister_netdevice_queue+0x8c/0xd0 unregister_netdev+0x20/0x30 dpaa2_eth_remove+0x68/0x190 fsl_mc_driver_remove+0x20/0x5c __device_release_driver+0x21c/0x220 device_release_driver_internal+0xac/0xb0 device_links_unbind_consumers+0xd4/0x100 __device_release_driver+0x94/0x220 device_release_driver+0x28/0x40 bus_remove_device+0x118/0x124 device_del+0x174/0x420 fsl_mc_device_remove+0x24/0x40 __fsl_mc_device_remove+0xc/0x20 device_for_each_child+0x58/0xa0 dprc_remove+0x90/0xb0 fsl_mc_driver_remove+0x20/0x5c __device_release_driver+0x21c/0x220 device_release_driver+0x28/0x40 bus_remove_device+0x118/0x124 device_del+0x174/0x420 fsl_mc_bus_remove+0x80/0x100 fsl_mc_bus_shutdown+0xc/0x1c platform_shutdown+0x20/0x30 device_shutdown+0x154/0x330 __do_sys_reboot+0x1cc/0x250 __arm64_sys_reboot+0x20/0x30 invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0x4c/0xe0 do_el0_svc+0x4c/0x150 el0_svc+0x24/0xb0 el0t_64_sync_handler+0xa8/0xb0 el0t_64_sync+0x178/0x17c It can be seen from the stack trace that the problem is that the deregistration of the master causes a dev_close(), which gets notified as NETDEV_GOING_DOWN to dsa_slave_netdevice_event(). But dsa_switch_shutdown() has already run, and this has unregistered the DSA slave interfaces, and yet, the NETDEV_GOING_DOWN handler attempts to call dev_close_many() on those slave interfaces, leading to the problem. The previous attempt to avoid the NETDEV_GOING_DOWN on the master after dsa_switch_shutdown() was called seems improper. Unregistering the slave interfaces is unnecessary and unhelpful. Instead, after the slaves have stopped being uppers of the DSA master, we can now reset to NULL the master->dsa_ptr pointer, which will make DSA start ignoring all future notifier events on the master. Fixes: 0650bf5 ("net: dsa: be compatible with masters which unregister on shutdown") Reported-by: Rafael Richter <rafael.richter@gin.de> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 16, 2022
The BPF STX/LDX instruction uses offset relative to the FP to address stack space. Since the BPF_FP locates at the top of the frame, the offset is usually a negative number. However, arm64 str/ldr immediate instruction requires that offset be a positive number. Therefore, this patch tries to convert the offsets. The method is to find the negative offset furthest from the FP firstly. Then add it to the FP, calculate a bottom position, called FPB, and then adjust the offsets in other STR/LDX instructions relative to FPB. FPB is saved using the callee-saved register x27 of arm64 which is not used yet. Before adjusting the offset, the patch checks every instruction to ensure that the FP does not change in run-time. If the FP may change, no offset is adjusted. For example, for the following bpftrace command: bpftrace -e 'kprobe:do_sys_open { printf("opening: %s\n", str(arg1)); }' Without this patch, jited code(fragment): 0: bti c 4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! 8: mov x29, sp c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]! 10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]! 14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]! 18: mov x25, sp 1c: mov x26, #0x0 // #0 20: bti j 24: sub sp, sp, #0x90 28: add x19, x0, #0x0 2c: mov x0, #0x0 // #0 30: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff78 // #-136 34: str x0, [x25, x10] 38: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff80 // #-128 3c: str x0, [x25, x10] 40: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff88 // #-120 44: str x0, [x25, x10] 48: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff90 // #-112 4c: str x0, [x25, x10] 50: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff98 // #-104 54: str x0, [x25, x10] 58: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa0 // #-96 5c: str x0, [x25, x10] 60: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa8 // #-88 64: str x0, [x25, x10] 68: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb0 // #-80 6c: str x0, [x25, x10] 70: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb8 // #-72 74: str x0, [x25, x10] 78: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc0 // #-64 7c: str x0, [x25, x10] 80: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc8 // #-56 84: str x0, [x25, x10] 88: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd0 // #-48 8c: str x0, [x25, x10] 90: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd8 // #-40 94: str x0, [x25, x10] 98: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe0 // #-32 9c: str x0, [x25, x10] a0: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe8 // #-24 a4: str x0, [x25, x10] a8: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff0 // #-16 ac: str x0, [x25, x10] b0: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff8 // #-8 b4: str x0, [x25, x10] b8: mov x10, #0x8 // #8 bc: ldr x2, [x19, x10] [...] With this patch, jited code(fragment): 0: bti c 4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! 8: mov x29, sp c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]! 10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]! 14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]! 18: stp x27, x28, [sp, #-16]! 1c: mov x25, sp 20: sub x27, x25, #0x88 24: mov x26, #0x0 // #0 28: bti j 2c: sub sp, sp, #0x90 30: add x19, x0, #0x0 34: mov x0, #0x0 // #0 38: str x0, [x27] 3c: str x0, [x27, #8] 40: str x0, [x27, #16] 44: str x0, [x27, #24] 48: str x0, [x27, #32] 4c: str x0, [x27, #40] 50: str x0, [x27, #48] 54: str x0, [x27, #56] 58: str x0, [x27, #64] 5c: str x0, [x27, #72] 60: str x0, [x27, #80] 64: str x0, [x27, #88] 68: str x0, [x27, #96] 6c: str x0, [x27, #104] 70: str x0, [x27, #112] 74: str x0, [x27, #120] 78: str x0, [x27, #128] 7c: ldr x2, [x19, #8] [...] Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 16, 2022
The BPF STX/LDX instruction uses offset relative to the FP to address stack space. Since the BPF_FP locates at the top of the frame, the offset is usually a negative number. However, arm64 str/ldr immediate instruction requires that offset be a positive number. Therefore, this patch tries to convert the offsets. The method is to find the negative offset furthest from the FP firstly. Then add it to the FP, calculate a bottom position, called FPB, and then adjust the offsets in other STR/LDX instructions relative to FPB. FPB is saved using the callee-saved register x27 of arm64 which is not used yet. Before adjusting the offset, the patch checks every instruction to ensure that the FP does not change in run-time. If the FP may change, no offset is adjusted. For example, for the following bpftrace command: bpftrace -e 'kprobe:do_sys_open { printf("opening: %s\n", str(arg1)); }' Without this patch, jited code(fragment): 0: bti c 4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! 8: mov x29, sp c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]! 10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]! 14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]! 18: mov x25, sp 1c: mov x26, #0x0 // #0 20: bti j 24: sub sp, sp, #0x90 28: add x19, x0, #0x0 2c: mov x0, #0x0 // #0 30: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff78 // #-136 34: str x0, [x25, x10] 38: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff80 // #-128 3c: str x0, [x25, x10] 40: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff88 // #-120 44: str x0, [x25, x10] 48: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff90 // #-112 4c: str x0, [x25, x10] 50: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff98 // #-104 54: str x0, [x25, x10] 58: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa0 // #-96 5c: str x0, [x25, x10] 60: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa8 // #-88 64: str x0, [x25, x10] 68: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb0 // #-80 6c: str x0, [x25, x10] 70: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb8 // #-72 74: str x0, [x25, x10] 78: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc0 // #-64 7c: str x0, [x25, x10] 80: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc8 // #-56 84: str x0, [x25, x10] 88: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd0 // #-48 8c: str x0, [x25, x10] 90: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd8 // #-40 94: str x0, [x25, x10] 98: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe0 // #-32 9c: str x0, [x25, x10] a0: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe8 // #-24 a4: str x0, [x25, x10] a8: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff0 // #-16 ac: str x0, [x25, x10] b0: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff8 // #-8 b4: str x0, [x25, x10] b8: mov x10, #0x8 // #8 bc: ldr x2, [x19, x10] [...] With this patch, jited code(fragment): 0: bti c 4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! 8: mov x29, sp c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]! 10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]! 14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]! 18: stp x27, x28, [sp, #-16]! 1c: mov x25, sp 20: sub x27, x25, #0x88 24: mov x26, #0x0 // #0 28: bti j 2c: sub sp, sp, #0x90 30: add x19, x0, #0x0 34: mov x0, #0x0 // #0 38: str x0, [x27] 3c: str x0, [x27, #8] 40: str x0, [x27, #16] 44: str x0, [x27, #24] 48: str x0, [x27, #32] 4c: str x0, [x27, #40] 50: str x0, [x27, #48] 54: str x0, [x27, #56] 58: str x0, [x27, #64] 5c: str x0, [x27, #72] 60: str x0, [x27, #80] 64: str x0, [x27, #88] 68: str x0, [x27, #96] 6c: str x0, [x27, #104] 70: str x0, [x27, #112] 74: str x0, [x27, #120] 78: str x0, [x27, #128] 7c: ldr x2, [x19, #8] [...] Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 16, 2022
The BPF STX/LDX instruction uses offset relative to the FP to address stack space. Since the BPF_FP locates at the top of the frame, the offset is usually a negative number. However, arm64 str/ldr immediate instruction requires that offset be a positive number. Therefore, this patch tries to convert the offsets. The method is to find the negative offset furthest from the FP firstly. Then add it to the FP, calculate a bottom position, called FPB, and then adjust the offsets in other STR/LDX instructions relative to FPB. FPB is saved using the callee-saved register x27 of arm64 which is not used yet. Before adjusting the offset, the patch checks every instruction to ensure that the FP does not change in run-time. If the FP may change, no offset is adjusted. For example, for the following bpftrace command: bpftrace -e 'kprobe:do_sys_open { printf("opening: %s\n", str(arg1)); }' Without this patch, jited code(fragment): 0: bti c 4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! 8: mov x29, sp c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]! 10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]! 14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]! 18: mov x25, sp 1c: mov x26, #0x0 // #0 20: bti j 24: sub sp, sp, #0x90 28: add x19, x0, #0x0 2c: mov x0, #0x0 // #0 30: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff78 // #-136 34: str x0, [x25, x10] 38: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff80 // #-128 3c: str x0, [x25, x10] 40: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff88 // #-120 44: str x0, [x25, x10] 48: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff90 // #-112 4c: str x0, [x25, x10] 50: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff98 // #-104 54: str x0, [x25, x10] 58: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa0 // #-96 5c: str x0, [x25, x10] 60: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa8 // #-88 64: str x0, [x25, x10] 68: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb0 // #-80 6c: str x0, [x25, x10] 70: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb8 // #-72 74: str x0, [x25, x10] 78: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc0 // #-64 7c: str x0, [x25, x10] 80: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc8 // #-56 84: str x0, [x25, x10] 88: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd0 // #-48 8c: str x0, [x25, x10] 90: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd8 // #-40 94: str x0, [x25, x10] 98: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe0 // #-32 9c: str x0, [x25, x10] a0: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe8 // #-24 a4: str x0, [x25, x10] a8: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff0 // #-16 ac: str x0, [x25, x10] b0: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff8 // #-8 b4: str x0, [x25, x10] b8: mov x10, #0x8 // #8 bc: ldr x2, [x19, x10] [...] With this patch, jited code(fragment): 0: bti c 4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! 8: mov x29, sp c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]! 10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]! 14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]! 18: stp x27, x28, [sp, #-16]! 1c: mov x25, sp 20: sub x27, x25, #0x88 24: mov x26, #0x0 // #0 28: bti j 2c: sub sp, sp, #0x90 30: add x19, x0, #0x0 34: mov x0, #0x0 // #0 38: str x0, [x27] 3c: str x0, [x27, #8] 40: str x0, [x27, #16] 44: str x0, [x27, #24] 48: str x0, [x27, #32] 4c: str x0, [x27, #40] 50: str x0, [x27, #48] 54: str x0, [x27, #56] 58: str x0, [x27, #64] 5c: str x0, [x27, #72] 60: str x0, [x27, #80] 64: str x0, [x27, #88] 68: str x0, [x27, #96] 6c: str x0, [x27, #104] 70: str x0, [x27, #112] 74: str x0, [x27, #120] 78: str x0, [x27, #128] 7c: ldr x2, [x19, #8] [...] Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 17, 2022
The BPF STX/LDX instruction uses offset relative to the FP to address stack space. Since the BPF_FP locates at the top of the frame, the offset is usually a negative number. However, arm64 str/ldr immediate instruction requires that offset be a positive number. Therefore, this patch tries to convert the offsets. The method is to find the negative offset furthest from the FP firstly. Then add it to the FP, calculate a bottom position, called FPB, and then adjust the offsets in other STR/LDX instructions relative to FPB. FPB is saved using the callee-saved register x27 of arm64 which is not used yet. Before adjusting the offset, the patch checks every instruction to ensure that the FP does not change in run-time. If the FP may change, no offset is adjusted. For example, for the following bpftrace command: bpftrace -e 'kprobe:do_sys_open { printf("opening: %s\n", str(arg1)); }' Without this patch, jited code(fragment): 0: bti c 4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! 8: mov x29, sp c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]! 10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]! 14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]! 18: mov x25, sp 1c: mov x26, #0x0 // #0 20: bti j 24: sub sp, sp, #0x90 28: add x19, x0, #0x0 2c: mov x0, #0x0 // #0 30: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff78 // #-136 34: str x0, [x25, x10] 38: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff80 // #-128 3c: str x0, [x25, x10] 40: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff88 // #-120 44: str x0, [x25, x10] 48: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff90 // #-112 4c: str x0, [x25, x10] 50: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff98 // #-104 54: str x0, [x25, x10] 58: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa0 // #-96 5c: str x0, [x25, x10] 60: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa8 // #-88 64: str x0, [x25, x10] 68: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb0 // #-80 6c: str x0, [x25, x10] 70: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb8 // #-72 74: str x0, [x25, x10] 78: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc0 // #-64 7c: str x0, [x25, x10] 80: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc8 // #-56 84: str x0, [x25, x10] 88: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd0 // #-48 8c: str x0, [x25, x10] 90: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd8 // #-40 94: str x0, [x25, x10] 98: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe0 // #-32 9c: str x0, [x25, x10] a0: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe8 // #-24 a4: str x0, [x25, x10] a8: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff0 // #-16 ac: str x0, [x25, x10] b0: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff8 // #-8 b4: str x0, [x25, x10] b8: mov x10, #0x8 // #8 bc: ldr x2, [x19, x10] [...] With this patch, jited code(fragment): 0: bti c 4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! 8: mov x29, sp c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]! 10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]! 14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]! 18: stp x27, x28, [sp, #-16]! 1c: mov x25, sp 20: sub x27, x25, #0x88 24: mov x26, #0x0 // #0 28: bti j 2c: sub sp, sp, #0x90 30: add x19, x0, #0x0 34: mov x0, #0x0 // #0 38: str x0, [x27] 3c: str x0, [x27, #8] 40: str x0, [x27, #16] 44: str x0, [x27, #24] 48: str x0, [x27, #32] 4c: str x0, [x27, #40] 50: str x0, [x27, #48] 54: str x0, [x27, #56] 58: str x0, [x27, #64] 5c: str x0, [x27, #72] 60: str x0, [x27, #80] 64: str x0, [x27, #88] 68: str x0, [x27, #96] 6c: str x0, [x27, #104] 70: str x0, [x27, #112] 74: str x0, [x27, #120] 78: str x0, [x27, #128] 7c: ldr x2, [x19, #8] [...] Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 17, 2022
The BPF STX/LDX instruction uses offset relative to the FP to address stack space. Since the BPF_FP locates at the top of the frame, the offset is usually a negative number. However, arm64 str/ldr immediate instruction requires that offset be a positive number. Therefore, this patch tries to convert the offsets. The method is to find the negative offset furthest from the FP firstly. Then add it to the FP, calculate a bottom position, called FPB, and then adjust the offsets in other STR/LDX instructions relative to FPB. FPB is saved using the callee-saved register x27 of arm64 which is not used yet. Before adjusting the offset, the patch checks every instruction to ensure that the FP does not change in run-time. If the FP may change, no offset is adjusted. For example, for the following bpftrace command: bpftrace -e 'kprobe:do_sys_open { printf("opening: %s\n", str(arg1)); }' Without this patch, jited code(fragment): 0: bti c 4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! 8: mov x29, sp c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]! 10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]! 14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]! 18: mov x25, sp 1c: mov x26, #0x0 // #0 20: bti j 24: sub sp, sp, #0x90 28: add x19, x0, #0x0 2c: mov x0, #0x0 // #0 30: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff78 // #-136 34: str x0, [x25, x10] 38: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff80 // #-128 3c: str x0, [x25, x10] 40: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff88 // #-120 44: str x0, [x25, x10] 48: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff90 // #-112 4c: str x0, [x25, x10] 50: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff98 // #-104 54: str x0, [x25, x10] 58: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa0 // #-96 5c: str x0, [x25, x10] 60: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa8 // #-88 64: str x0, [x25, x10] 68: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb0 // #-80 6c: str x0, [x25, x10] 70: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb8 // #-72 74: str x0, [x25, x10] 78: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc0 // #-64 7c: str x0, [x25, x10] 80: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc8 // #-56 84: str x0, [x25, x10] 88: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd0 // #-48 8c: str x0, [x25, x10] 90: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd8 // #-40 94: str x0, [x25, x10] 98: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe0 // #-32 9c: str x0, [x25, x10] a0: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe8 // #-24 a4: str x0, [x25, x10] a8: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff0 // #-16 ac: str x0, [x25, x10] b0: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff8 // #-8 b4: str x0, [x25, x10] b8: mov x10, #0x8 // #8 bc: ldr x2, [x19, x10] [...] With this patch, jited code(fragment): 0: bti c 4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! 8: mov x29, sp c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]! 10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]! 14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]! 18: stp x27, x28, [sp, #-16]! 1c: mov x25, sp 20: sub x27, x25, #0x88 24: mov x26, #0x0 // #0 28: bti j 2c: sub sp, sp, #0x90 30: add x19, x0, #0x0 34: mov x0, #0x0 // #0 38: str x0, [x27] 3c: str x0, [x27, #8] 40: str x0, [x27, #16] 44: str x0, [x27, #24] 48: str x0, [x27, #32] 4c: str x0, [x27, #40] 50: str x0, [x27, #48] 54: str x0, [x27, #56] 58: str x0, [x27, #64] 5c: str x0, [x27, #72] 60: str x0, [x27, #80] 64: str x0, [x27, #88] 68: str x0, [x27, #96] 6c: str x0, [x27, #104] 70: str x0, [x27, #112] 74: str x0, [x27, #120] 78: str x0, [x27, #128] 7c: ldr x2, [x19, #8] [...] Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 17, 2022
The BPF STX/LDX instruction uses offset relative to the FP to address stack space. Since the BPF_FP locates at the top of the frame, the offset is usually a negative number. However, arm64 str/ldr immediate instruction requires that offset be a positive number. Therefore, this patch tries to convert the offsets. The method is to find the negative offset furthest from the FP firstly. Then add it to the FP, calculate a bottom position, called FPB, and then adjust the offsets in other STR/LDX instructions relative to FPB. FPB is saved using the callee-saved register x27 of arm64 which is not used yet. Before adjusting the offset, the patch checks every instruction to ensure that the FP does not change in run-time. If the FP may change, no offset is adjusted. For example, for the following bpftrace command: bpftrace -e 'kprobe:do_sys_open { printf("opening: %s\n", str(arg1)); }' Without this patch, jited code(fragment): 0: bti c 4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! 8: mov x29, sp c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]! 10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]! 14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]! 18: mov x25, sp 1c: mov x26, #0x0 // #0 20: bti j 24: sub sp, sp, #0x90 28: add x19, x0, #0x0 2c: mov x0, #0x0 // #0 30: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff78 // #-136 34: str x0, [x25, x10] 38: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff80 // #-128 3c: str x0, [x25, x10] 40: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff88 // #-120 44: str x0, [x25, x10] 48: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff90 // #-112 4c: str x0, [x25, x10] 50: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff98 // #-104 54: str x0, [x25, x10] 58: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa0 // #-96 5c: str x0, [x25, x10] 60: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa8 // #-88 64: str x0, [x25, x10] 68: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb0 // #-80 6c: str x0, [x25, x10] 70: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb8 // #-72 74: str x0, [x25, x10] 78: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc0 // #-64 7c: str x0, [x25, x10] 80: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc8 // #-56 84: str x0, [x25, x10] 88: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd0 // #-48 8c: str x0, [x25, x10] 90: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd8 // #-40 94: str x0, [x25, x10] 98: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe0 // #-32 9c: str x0, [x25, x10] a0: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe8 // #-24 a4: str x0, [x25, x10] a8: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff0 // #-16 ac: str x0, [x25, x10] b0: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff8 // #-8 b4: str x0, [x25, x10] b8: mov x10, #0x8 // #8 bc: ldr x2, [x19, x10] [...] With this patch, jited code(fragment): 0: bti c 4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! 8: mov x29, sp c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]! 10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]! 14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]! 18: stp x27, x28, [sp, #-16]! 1c: mov x25, sp 20: sub x27, x25, #0x88 24: mov x26, #0x0 // #0 28: bti j 2c: sub sp, sp, #0x90 30: add x19, x0, #0x0 34: mov x0, #0x0 // #0 38: str x0, [x27] 3c: str x0, [x27, #8] 40: str x0, [x27, #16] 44: str x0, [x27, #24] 48: str x0, [x27, #32] 4c: str x0, [x27, #40] 50: str x0, [x27, #48] 54: str x0, [x27, #56] 58: str x0, [x27, #64] 5c: str x0, [x27, #72] 60: str x0, [x27, #80] 64: str x0, [x27, #88] 68: str x0, [x27, #96] 6c: str x0, [x27, #104] 70: str x0, [x27, #112] 74: str x0, [x27, #120] 78: str x0, [x27, #128] 7c: ldr x2, [x19, #8] [...] Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 17, 2022
The BPF STX/LDX instruction uses offset relative to the FP to address stack space. Since the BPF_FP locates at the top of the frame, the offset is usually a negative number. However, arm64 str/ldr immediate instruction requires that offset be a positive number. Therefore, this patch tries to convert the offsets. The method is to find the negative offset furthest from the FP firstly. Then add it to the FP, calculate a bottom position, called FPB, and then adjust the offsets in other STR/LDX instructions relative to FPB. FPB is saved using the callee-saved register x27 of arm64 which is not used yet. Before adjusting the offset, the patch checks every instruction to ensure that the FP does not change in run-time. If the FP may change, no offset is adjusted. For example, for the following bpftrace command: bpftrace -e 'kprobe:do_sys_open { printf("opening: %s\n", str(arg1)); }' Without this patch, jited code(fragment): 0: bti c 4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! 8: mov x29, sp c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]! 10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]! 14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]! 18: mov x25, sp 1c: mov x26, #0x0 // #0 20: bti j 24: sub sp, sp, #0x90 28: add x19, x0, #0x0 2c: mov x0, #0x0 // #0 30: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff78 // #-136 34: str x0, [x25, x10] 38: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff80 // #-128 3c: str x0, [x25, x10] 40: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff88 // #-120 44: str x0, [x25, x10] 48: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff90 // #-112 4c: str x0, [x25, x10] 50: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff98 // #-104 54: str x0, [x25, x10] 58: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa0 // #-96 5c: str x0, [x25, x10] 60: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa8 // #-88 64: str x0, [x25, x10] 68: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb0 // #-80 6c: str x0, [x25, x10] 70: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb8 // #-72 74: str x0, [x25, x10] 78: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc0 // #-64 7c: str x0, [x25, x10] 80: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc8 // #-56 84: str x0, [x25, x10] 88: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd0 // #-48 8c: str x0, [x25, x10] 90: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd8 // #-40 94: str x0, [x25, x10] 98: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe0 // #-32 9c: str x0, [x25, x10] a0: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe8 // #-24 a4: str x0, [x25, x10] a8: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff0 // #-16 ac: str x0, [x25, x10] b0: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff8 // #-8 b4: str x0, [x25, x10] b8: mov x10, #0x8 // #8 bc: ldr x2, [x19, x10] [...] With this patch, jited code(fragment): 0: bti c 4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! 8: mov x29, sp c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]! 10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]! 14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]! 18: stp x27, x28, [sp, #-16]! 1c: mov x25, sp 20: sub x27, x25, #0x88 24: mov x26, #0x0 // #0 28: bti j 2c: sub sp, sp, #0x90 30: add x19, x0, #0x0 34: mov x0, #0x0 // #0 38: str x0, [x27] 3c: str x0, [x27, #8] 40: str x0, [x27, #16] 44: str x0, [x27, #24] 48: str x0, [x27, #32] 4c: str x0, [x27, #40] 50: str x0, [x27, #48] 54: str x0, [x27, #56] 58: str x0, [x27, #64] 5c: str x0, [x27, #72] 60: str x0, [x27, #80] 64: str x0, [x27, #88] 68: str x0, [x27, #96] 6c: str x0, [x27, #104] 70: str x0, [x27, #112] 74: str x0, [x27, #120] 78: str x0, [x27, #128] 7c: ldr x2, [x19, #8] [...] Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 18, 2022
The BPF STX/LDX instruction uses offset relative to the FP to address stack space. Since the BPF_FP locates at the top of the frame, the offset is usually a negative number. However, arm64 str/ldr immediate instruction requires that offset be a positive number. Therefore, this patch tries to convert the offsets. The method is to find the negative offset furthest from the FP firstly. Then add it to the FP, calculate a bottom position, called FPB, and then adjust the offsets in other STR/LDX instructions relative to FPB. FPB is saved using the callee-saved register x27 of arm64 which is not used yet. Before adjusting the offset, the patch checks every instruction to ensure that the FP does not change in run-time. If the FP may change, no offset is adjusted. For example, for the following bpftrace command: bpftrace -e 'kprobe:do_sys_open { printf("opening: %s\n", str(arg1)); }' Without this patch, jited code(fragment): 0: bti c 4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! 8: mov x29, sp c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]! 10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]! 14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]! 18: mov x25, sp 1c: mov x26, #0x0 // #0 20: bti j 24: sub sp, sp, #0x90 28: add x19, x0, #0x0 2c: mov x0, #0x0 // #0 30: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff78 // #-136 34: str x0, [x25, x10] 38: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff80 // #-128 3c: str x0, [x25, x10] 40: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff88 // #-120 44: str x0, [x25, x10] 48: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff90 // #-112 4c: str x0, [x25, x10] 50: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff98 // #-104 54: str x0, [x25, x10] 58: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa0 // #-96 5c: str x0, [x25, x10] 60: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa8 // #-88 64: str x0, [x25, x10] 68: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb0 // #-80 6c: str x0, [x25, x10] 70: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb8 // #-72 74: str x0, [x25, x10] 78: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc0 // #-64 7c: str x0, [x25, x10] 80: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc8 // #-56 84: str x0, [x25, x10] 88: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd0 // #-48 8c: str x0, [x25, x10] 90: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd8 // #-40 94: str x0, [x25, x10] 98: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe0 // #-32 9c: str x0, [x25, x10] a0: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe8 // #-24 a4: str x0, [x25, x10] a8: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff0 // #-16 ac: str x0, [x25, x10] b0: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff8 // #-8 b4: str x0, [x25, x10] b8: mov x10, #0x8 // #8 bc: ldr x2, [x19, x10] [...] With this patch, jited code(fragment): 0: bti c 4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! 8: mov x29, sp c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]! 10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]! 14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]! 18: stp x27, x28, [sp, #-16]! 1c: mov x25, sp 20: sub x27, x25, #0x88 24: mov x26, #0x0 // #0 28: bti j 2c: sub sp, sp, #0x90 30: add x19, x0, #0x0 34: mov x0, #0x0 // #0 38: str x0, [x27] 3c: str x0, [x27, #8] 40: str x0, [x27, #16] 44: str x0, [x27, #24] 48: str x0, [x27, #32] 4c: str x0, [x27, #40] 50: str x0, [x27, #48] 54: str x0, [x27, #56] 58: str x0, [x27, #64] 5c: str x0, [x27, #72] 60: str x0, [x27, #80] 64: str x0, [x27, #88] 68: str x0, [x27, #96] 6c: str x0, [x27, #104] 70: str x0, [x27, #112] 74: str x0, [x27, #120] 78: str x0, [x27, #128] 7c: ldr x2, [x19, #8] [...] Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 18, 2022
The BPF STX/LDX instruction uses offset relative to the FP to address stack space. Since the BPF_FP locates at the top of the frame, the offset is usually a negative number. However, arm64 str/ldr immediate instruction requires that offset be a positive number. Therefore, this patch tries to convert the offsets. The method is to find the negative offset furthest from the FP firstly. Then add it to the FP, calculate a bottom position, called FPB, and then adjust the offsets in other STR/LDX instructions relative to FPB. FPB is saved using the callee-saved register x27 of arm64 which is not used yet. Before adjusting the offset, the patch checks every instruction to ensure that the FP does not change in run-time. If the FP may change, no offset is adjusted. For example, for the following bpftrace command: bpftrace -e 'kprobe:do_sys_open { printf("opening: %s\n", str(arg1)); }' Without this patch, jited code(fragment): 0: bti c 4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! 8: mov x29, sp c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]! 10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]! 14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]! 18: mov x25, sp 1c: mov x26, #0x0 // #0 20: bti j 24: sub sp, sp, #0x90 28: add x19, x0, #0x0 2c: mov x0, #0x0 // #0 30: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff78 // #-136 34: str x0, [x25, x10] 38: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff80 // #-128 3c: str x0, [x25, x10] 40: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff88 // #-120 44: str x0, [x25, x10] 48: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff90 // #-112 4c: str x0, [x25, x10] 50: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff98 // #-104 54: str x0, [x25, x10] 58: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa0 // #-96 5c: str x0, [x25, x10] 60: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa8 // #-88 64: str x0, [x25, x10] 68: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb0 // #-80 6c: str x0, [x25, x10] 70: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb8 // #-72 74: str x0, [x25, x10] 78: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc0 // #-64 7c: str x0, [x25, x10] 80: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc8 // #-56 84: str x0, [x25, x10] 88: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd0 // #-48 8c: str x0, [x25, x10] 90: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd8 // #-40 94: str x0, [x25, x10] 98: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe0 // #-32 9c: str x0, [x25, x10] a0: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe8 // #-24 a4: str x0, [x25, x10] a8: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff0 // #-16 ac: str x0, [x25, x10] b0: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff8 // #-8 b4: str x0, [x25, x10] b8: mov x10, #0x8 // #8 bc: ldr x2, [x19, x10] [...] With this patch, jited code(fragment): 0: bti c 4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! 8: mov x29, sp c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]! 10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]! 14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]! 18: stp x27, x28, [sp, #-16]! 1c: mov x25, sp 20: sub x27, x25, #0x88 24: mov x26, #0x0 // #0 28: bti j 2c: sub sp, sp, #0x90 30: add x19, x0, #0x0 34: mov x0, #0x0 // #0 38: str x0, [x27] 3c: str x0, [x27, #8] 40: str x0, [x27, #16] 44: str x0, [x27, #24] 48: str x0, [x27, #32] 4c: str x0, [x27, #40] 50: str x0, [x27, #48] 54: str x0, [x27, #56] 58: str x0, [x27, #64] 5c: str x0, [x27, #72] 60: str x0, [x27, #80] 64: str x0, [x27, #88] 68: str x0, [x27, #96] 6c: str x0, [x27, #104] 70: str x0, [x27, #112] 74: str x0, [x27, #120] 78: str x0, [x27, #128] 7c: ldr x2, [x19, #8] [...] Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 18, 2022
The BPF STX/LDX instruction uses offset relative to the FP to address stack space. Since the BPF_FP locates at the top of the frame, the offset is usually a negative number. However, arm64 str/ldr immediate instruction requires that offset be a positive number. Therefore, this patch tries to convert the offsets. The method is to find the negative offset furthest from the FP firstly. Then add it to the FP, calculate a bottom position, called FPB, and then adjust the offsets in other STR/LDX instructions relative to FPB. FPB is saved using the callee-saved register x27 of arm64 which is not used yet. Before adjusting the offset, the patch checks every instruction to ensure that the FP does not change in run-time. If the FP may change, no offset is adjusted. For example, for the following bpftrace command: bpftrace -e 'kprobe:do_sys_open { printf("opening: %s\n", str(arg1)); }' Without this patch, jited code(fragment): 0: bti c 4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! 8: mov x29, sp c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]! 10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]! 14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]! 18: mov x25, sp 1c: mov x26, #0x0 // #0 20: bti j 24: sub sp, sp, #0x90 28: add x19, x0, #0x0 2c: mov x0, #0x0 // #0 30: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff78 // #-136 34: str x0, [x25, x10] 38: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff80 // #-128 3c: str x0, [x25, x10] 40: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff88 // #-120 44: str x0, [x25, x10] 48: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff90 // #-112 4c: str x0, [x25, x10] 50: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff98 // #-104 54: str x0, [x25, x10] 58: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa0 // #-96 5c: str x0, [x25, x10] 60: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa8 // #-88 64: str x0, [x25, x10] 68: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb0 // #-80 6c: str x0, [x25, x10] 70: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb8 // #-72 74: str x0, [x25, x10] 78: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc0 // #-64 7c: str x0, [x25, x10] 80: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc8 // #-56 84: str x0, [x25, x10] 88: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd0 // #-48 8c: str x0, [x25, x10] 90: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd8 // #-40 94: str x0, [x25, x10] 98: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe0 // #-32 9c: str x0, [x25, x10] a0: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe8 // #-24 a4: str x0, [x25, x10] a8: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff0 // #-16 ac: str x0, [x25, x10] b0: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff8 // #-8 b4: str x0, [x25, x10] b8: mov x10, #0x8 // #8 bc: ldr x2, [x19, x10] [...] With this patch, jited code(fragment): 0: bti c 4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! 8: mov x29, sp c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]! 10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]! 14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]! 18: stp x27, x28, [sp, #-16]! 1c: mov x25, sp 20: sub x27, x25, #0x88 24: mov x26, #0x0 // #0 28: bti j 2c: sub sp, sp, #0x90 30: add x19, x0, #0x0 34: mov x0, #0x0 // #0 38: str x0, [x27] 3c: str x0, [x27, #8] 40: str x0, [x27, #16] 44: str x0, [x27, #24] 48: str x0, [x27, #32] 4c: str x0, [x27, #40] 50: str x0, [x27, #48] 54: str x0, [x27, #56] 58: str x0, [x27, #64] 5c: str x0, [x27, #72] 60: str x0, [x27, #80] 64: str x0, [x27, #88] 68: str x0, [x27, #96] 6c: str x0, [x27, #104] 70: str x0, [x27, #112] 74: str x0, [x27, #120] 78: str x0, [x27, #128] 7c: ldr x2, [x19, #8] [...] Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 18, 2022
The BPF STX/LDX instruction uses offset relative to the FP to address stack space. Since the BPF_FP locates at the top of the frame, the offset is usually a negative number. However, arm64 str/ldr immediate instruction requires that offset be a positive number. Therefore, this patch tries to convert the offsets. The method is to find the negative offset furthest from the FP firstly. Then add it to the FP, calculate a bottom position, called FPB, and then adjust the offsets in other STR/LDX instructions relative to FPB. FPB is saved using the callee-saved register x27 of arm64 which is not used yet. Before adjusting the offset, the patch checks every instruction to ensure that the FP does not change in run-time. If the FP may change, no offset is adjusted. For example, for the following bpftrace command: bpftrace -e 'kprobe:do_sys_open { printf("opening: %s\n", str(arg1)); }' Without this patch, jited code(fragment): 0: bti c 4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! 8: mov x29, sp c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]! 10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]! 14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]! 18: mov x25, sp 1c: mov x26, #0x0 // #0 20: bti j 24: sub sp, sp, #0x90 28: add x19, x0, #0x0 2c: mov x0, #0x0 // #0 30: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff78 // #-136 34: str x0, [x25, x10] 38: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff80 // #-128 3c: str x0, [x25, x10] 40: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff88 // #-120 44: str x0, [x25, x10] 48: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff90 // #-112 4c: str x0, [x25, x10] 50: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff98 // #-104 54: str x0, [x25, x10] 58: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa0 // #-96 5c: str x0, [x25, x10] 60: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa8 // #-88 64: str x0, [x25, x10] 68: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb0 // #-80 6c: str x0, [x25, x10] 70: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb8 // #-72 74: str x0, [x25, x10] 78: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc0 // #-64 7c: str x0, [x25, x10] 80: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc8 // #-56 84: str x0, [x25, x10] 88: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd0 // #-48 8c: str x0, [x25, x10] 90: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd8 // #-40 94: str x0, [x25, x10] 98: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe0 // #-32 9c: str x0, [x25, x10] a0: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe8 // #-24 a4: str x0, [x25, x10] a8: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff0 // #-16 ac: str x0, [x25, x10] b0: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff8 // #-8 b4: str x0, [x25, x10] b8: mov x10, #0x8 // #8 bc: ldr x2, [x19, x10] [...] With this patch, jited code(fragment): 0: bti c 4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! 8: mov x29, sp c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]! 10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]! 14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]! 18: stp x27, x28, [sp, #-16]! 1c: mov x25, sp 20: sub x27, x25, #0x88 24: mov x26, #0x0 // #0 28: bti j 2c: sub sp, sp, #0x90 30: add x19, x0, #0x0 34: mov x0, #0x0 // #0 38: str x0, [x27] 3c: str x0, [x27, #8] 40: str x0, [x27, #16] 44: str x0, [x27, #24] 48: str x0, [x27, #32] 4c: str x0, [x27, #40] 50: str x0, [x27, #48] 54: str x0, [x27, #56] 58: str x0, [x27, #64] 5c: str x0, [x27, #72] 60: str x0, [x27, #80] 64: str x0, [x27, #88] 68: str x0, [x27, #96] 6c: str x0, [x27, #104] 70: str x0, [x27, #112] 74: str x0, [x27, #120] 78: str x0, [x27, #128] 7c: ldr x2, [x19, #8] [...] Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 18, 2022
The BPF STX/LDX instruction uses offset relative to the FP to address stack space. Since the BPF_FP locates at the top of the frame, the offset is usually a negative number. However, arm64 str/ldr immediate instruction requires that offset be a positive number. Therefore, this patch tries to convert the offsets. The method is to find the negative offset furthest from the FP firstly. Then add it to the FP, calculate a bottom position, called FPB, and then adjust the offsets in other STR/LDX instructions relative to FPB. FPB is saved using the callee-saved register x27 of arm64 which is not used yet. Before adjusting the offset, the patch checks every instruction to ensure that the FP does not change in run-time. If the FP may change, no offset is adjusted. For example, for the following bpftrace command: bpftrace -e 'kprobe:do_sys_open { printf("opening: %s\n", str(arg1)); }' Without this patch, jited code(fragment): 0: bti c 4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! 8: mov x29, sp c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]! 10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]! 14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]! 18: mov x25, sp 1c: mov x26, #0x0 // #0 20: bti j 24: sub sp, sp, #0x90 28: add x19, x0, #0x0 2c: mov x0, #0x0 // #0 30: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff78 // #-136 34: str x0, [x25, x10] 38: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff80 // #-128 3c: str x0, [x25, x10] 40: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff88 // #-120 44: str x0, [x25, x10] 48: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff90 // #-112 4c: str x0, [x25, x10] 50: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff98 // #-104 54: str x0, [x25, x10] 58: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa0 // #-96 5c: str x0, [x25, x10] 60: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa8 // #-88 64: str x0, [x25, x10] 68: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb0 // #-80 6c: str x0, [x25, x10] 70: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb8 // #-72 74: str x0, [x25, x10] 78: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc0 // #-64 7c: str x0, [x25, x10] 80: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc8 // #-56 84: str x0, [x25, x10] 88: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd0 // #-48 8c: str x0, [x25, x10] 90: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd8 // #-40 94: str x0, [x25, x10] 98: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe0 // #-32 9c: str x0, [x25, x10] a0: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe8 // #-24 a4: str x0, [x25, x10] a8: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff0 // #-16 ac: str x0, [x25, x10] b0: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff8 // #-8 b4: str x0, [x25, x10] b8: mov x10, #0x8 // #8 bc: ldr x2, [x19, x10] [...] With this patch, jited code(fragment): 0: bti c 4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! 8: mov x29, sp c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]! 10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]! 14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]! 18: stp x27, x28, [sp, #-16]! 1c: mov x25, sp 20: sub x27, x25, #0x88 24: mov x26, #0x0 // #0 28: bti j 2c: sub sp, sp, #0x90 30: add x19, x0, #0x0 34: mov x0, #0x0 // #0 38: str x0, [x27] 3c: str x0, [x27, #8] 40: str x0, [x27, #16] 44: str x0, [x27, #24] 48: str x0, [x27, #32] 4c: str x0, [x27, #40] 50: str x0, [x27, #48] 54: str x0, [x27, #56] 58: str x0, [x27, #64] 5c: str x0, [x27, #72] 60: str x0, [x27, #80] 64: str x0, [x27, #88] 68: str x0, [x27, #96] 6c: str x0, [x27, #104] 70: str x0, [x27, #112] 74: str x0, [x27, #120] 78: str x0, [x27, #128] 7c: ldr x2, [x19, #8] [...] Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 18, 2022
The BPF STX/LDX instruction uses offset relative to the FP to address stack space. Since the BPF_FP locates at the top of the frame, the offset is usually a negative number. However, arm64 str/ldr immediate instruction requires that offset be a positive number. Therefore, this patch tries to convert the offsets. The method is to find the negative offset furthest from the FP firstly. Then add it to the FP, calculate a bottom position, called FPB, and then adjust the offsets in other STR/LDX instructions relative to FPB. FPB is saved using the callee-saved register x27 of arm64 which is not used yet. Before adjusting the offset, the patch checks every instruction to ensure that the FP does not change in run-time. If the FP may change, no offset is adjusted. For example, for the following bpftrace command: bpftrace -e 'kprobe:do_sys_open { printf("opening: %s\n", str(arg1)); }' Without this patch, jited code(fragment): 0: bti c 4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! 8: mov x29, sp c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]! 10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]! 14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]! 18: mov x25, sp 1c: mov x26, #0x0 // #0 20: bti j 24: sub sp, sp, #0x90 28: add x19, x0, #0x0 2c: mov x0, #0x0 // #0 30: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff78 // #-136 34: str x0, [x25, x10] 38: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff80 // #-128 3c: str x0, [x25, x10] 40: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff88 // #-120 44: str x0, [x25, x10] 48: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff90 // #-112 4c: str x0, [x25, x10] 50: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff98 // #-104 54: str x0, [x25, x10] 58: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa0 // #-96 5c: str x0, [x25, x10] 60: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa8 // #-88 64: str x0, [x25, x10] 68: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb0 // #-80 6c: str x0, [x25, x10] 70: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb8 // #-72 74: str x0, [x25, x10] 78: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc0 // #-64 7c: str x0, [x25, x10] 80: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc8 // #-56 84: str x0, [x25, x10] 88: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd0 // #-48 8c: str x0, [x25, x10] 90: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd8 // #-40 94: str x0, [x25, x10] 98: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe0 // #-32 9c: str x0, [x25, x10] a0: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe8 // #-24 a4: str x0, [x25, x10] a8: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff0 // #-16 ac: str x0, [x25, x10] b0: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff8 // #-8 b4: str x0, [x25, x10] b8: mov x10, #0x8 // #8 bc: ldr x2, [x19, x10] [...] With this patch, jited code(fragment): 0: bti c 4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! 8: mov x29, sp c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]! 10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]! 14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]! 18: stp x27, x28, [sp, #-16]! 1c: mov x25, sp 20: sub x27, x25, #0x88 24: mov x26, #0x0 // #0 28: bti j 2c: sub sp, sp, #0x90 30: add x19, x0, #0x0 34: mov x0, #0x0 // #0 38: str x0, [x27] 3c: str x0, [x27, #8] 40: str x0, [x27, #16] 44: str x0, [x27, #24] 48: str x0, [x27, #32] 4c: str x0, [x27, #40] 50: str x0, [x27, #48] 54: str x0, [x27, #56] 58: str x0, [x27, #64] 5c: str x0, [x27, #72] 60: str x0, [x27, #80] 64: str x0, [x27, #88] 68: str x0, [x27, #96] 6c: str x0, [x27, #104] 70: str x0, [x27, #112] 74: str x0, [x27, #120] 78: str x0, [x27, #128] 7c: ldr x2, [x19, #8] [...] Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 18, 2022
The BPF STX/LDX instruction uses offset relative to the FP to address stack space. Since the BPF_FP locates at the top of the frame, the offset is usually a negative number. However, arm64 str/ldr immediate instruction requires that offset be a positive number. Therefore, this patch tries to convert the offsets. The method is to find the negative offset furthest from the FP firstly. Then add it to the FP, calculate a bottom position, called FPB, and then adjust the offsets in other STR/LDX instructions relative to FPB. FPB is saved using the callee-saved register x27 of arm64 which is not used yet. Before adjusting the offset, the patch checks every instruction to ensure that the FP does not change in run-time. If the FP may change, no offset is adjusted. For example, for the following bpftrace command: bpftrace -e 'kprobe:do_sys_open { printf("opening: %s\n", str(arg1)); }' Without this patch, jited code(fragment): 0: bti c 4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! 8: mov x29, sp c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]! 10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]! 14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]! 18: mov x25, sp 1c: mov x26, #0x0 // #0 20: bti j 24: sub sp, sp, #0x90 28: add x19, x0, #0x0 2c: mov x0, #0x0 // #0 30: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff78 // #-136 34: str x0, [x25, x10] 38: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff80 // #-128 3c: str x0, [x25, x10] 40: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff88 // #-120 44: str x0, [x25, x10] 48: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff90 // #-112 4c: str x0, [x25, x10] 50: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff98 // #-104 54: str x0, [x25, x10] 58: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa0 // #-96 5c: str x0, [x25, x10] 60: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa8 // #-88 64: str x0, [x25, x10] 68: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb0 // #-80 6c: str x0, [x25, x10] 70: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb8 // #-72 74: str x0, [x25, x10] 78: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc0 // #-64 7c: str x0, [x25, x10] 80: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc8 // #-56 84: str x0, [x25, x10] 88: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd0 // #-48 8c: str x0, [x25, x10] 90: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd8 // #-40 94: str x0, [x25, x10] 98: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe0 // #-32 9c: str x0, [x25, x10] a0: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe8 // #-24 a4: str x0, [x25, x10] a8: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff0 // #-16 ac: str x0, [x25, x10] b0: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff8 // #-8 b4: str x0, [x25, x10] b8: mov x10, #0x8 // #8 bc: ldr x2, [x19, x10] [...] With this patch, jited code(fragment): 0: bti c 4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! 8: mov x29, sp c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]! 10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]! 14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]! 18: stp x27, x28, [sp, #-16]! 1c: mov x25, sp 20: sub x27, x25, #0x88 24: mov x26, #0x0 // #0 28: bti j 2c: sub sp, sp, #0x90 30: add x19, x0, #0x0 34: mov x0, #0x0 // #0 38: str x0, [x27] 3c: str x0, [x27, #8] 40: str x0, [x27, #16] 44: str x0, [x27, #24] 48: str x0, [x27, #32] 4c: str x0, [x27, #40] 50: str x0, [x27, #48] 54: str x0, [x27, #56] 58: str x0, [x27, #64] 5c: str x0, [x27, #72] 60: str x0, [x27, #80] 64: str x0, [x27, #88] 68: str x0, [x27, #96] 6c: str x0, [x27, #104] 70: str x0, [x27, #112] 74: str x0, [x27, #120] 78: str x0, [x27, #128] 7c: ldr x2, [x19, #8] [...] Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 19, 2022
The BPF STX/LDX instruction uses offset relative to the FP to address stack space. Since the BPF_FP locates at the top of the frame, the offset is usually a negative number. However, arm64 str/ldr immediate instruction requires that offset be a positive number. Therefore, this patch tries to convert the offsets. The method is to find the negative offset furthest from the FP firstly. Then add it to the FP, calculate a bottom position, called FPB, and then adjust the offsets in other STR/LDX instructions relative to FPB. FPB is saved using the callee-saved register x27 of arm64 which is not used yet. Before adjusting the offset, the patch checks every instruction to ensure that the FP does not change in run-time. If the FP may change, no offset is adjusted. For example, for the following bpftrace command: bpftrace -e 'kprobe:do_sys_open { printf("opening: %s\n", str(arg1)); }' Without this patch, jited code(fragment): 0: bti c 4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! 8: mov x29, sp c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]! 10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]! 14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]! 18: mov x25, sp 1c: mov x26, #0x0 // #0 20: bti j 24: sub sp, sp, #0x90 28: add x19, x0, #0x0 2c: mov x0, #0x0 // #0 30: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff78 // #-136 34: str x0, [x25, x10] 38: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff80 // #-128 3c: str x0, [x25, x10] 40: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff88 // #-120 44: str x0, [x25, x10] 48: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff90 // #-112 4c: str x0, [x25, x10] 50: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff98 // #-104 54: str x0, [x25, x10] 58: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa0 // #-96 5c: str x0, [x25, x10] 60: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa8 // #-88 64: str x0, [x25, x10] 68: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb0 // #-80 6c: str x0, [x25, x10] 70: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb8 // #-72 74: str x0, [x25, x10] 78: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc0 // #-64 7c: str x0, [x25, x10] 80: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc8 // #-56 84: str x0, [x25, x10] 88: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd0 // #-48 8c: str x0, [x25, x10] 90: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd8 // #-40 94: str x0, [x25, x10] 98: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe0 // #-32 9c: str x0, [x25, x10] a0: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe8 // #-24 a4: str x0, [x25, x10] a8: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff0 // #-16 ac: str x0, [x25, x10] b0: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff8 // #-8 b4: str x0, [x25, x10] b8: mov x10, #0x8 // #8 bc: ldr x2, [x19, x10] [...] With this patch, jited code(fragment): 0: bti c 4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! 8: mov x29, sp c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]! 10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]! 14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]! 18: stp x27, x28, [sp, #-16]! 1c: mov x25, sp 20: sub x27, x25, #0x88 24: mov x26, #0x0 // #0 28: bti j 2c: sub sp, sp, #0x90 30: add x19, x0, #0x0 34: mov x0, #0x0 // #0 38: str x0, [x27] 3c: str x0, [x27, #8] 40: str x0, [x27, #16] 44: str x0, [x27, #24] 48: str x0, [x27, #32] 4c: str x0, [x27, #40] 50: str x0, [x27, #48] 54: str x0, [x27, #56] 58: str x0, [x27, #64] 5c: str x0, [x27, #72] 60: str x0, [x27, #80] 64: str x0, [x27, #88] 68: str x0, [x27, #96] 6c: str x0, [x27, #104] 70: str x0, [x27, #112] 74: str x0, [x27, #120] 78: str x0, [x27, #128] 7c: ldr x2, [x19, #8] [...] Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 21, 2022
The BPF STX/LDX instruction uses offset relative to the FP to address stack space. Since the BPF_FP locates at the top of the frame, the offset is usually a negative number. However, arm64 str/ldr immediate instruction requires that offset be a positive number. Therefore, this patch tries to convert the offsets. The method is to find the negative offset furthest from the FP firstly. Then add it to the FP, calculate a bottom position, called FPB, and then adjust the offsets in other STR/LDX instructions relative to FPB. FPB is saved using the callee-saved register x27 of arm64 which is not used yet. Before adjusting the offset, the patch checks every instruction to ensure that the FP does not change in run-time. If the FP may change, no offset is adjusted. For example, for the following bpftrace command: bpftrace -e 'kprobe:do_sys_open { printf("opening: %s\n", str(arg1)); }' Without this patch, jited code(fragment): 0: bti c 4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! 8: mov x29, sp c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]! 10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]! 14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]! 18: mov x25, sp 1c: mov x26, #0x0 // #0 20: bti j 24: sub sp, sp, #0x90 28: add x19, x0, #0x0 2c: mov x0, #0x0 // #0 30: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff78 // #-136 34: str x0, [x25, x10] 38: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff80 // #-128 3c: str x0, [x25, x10] 40: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff88 // #-120 44: str x0, [x25, x10] 48: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff90 // #-112 4c: str x0, [x25, x10] 50: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff98 // #-104 54: str x0, [x25, x10] 58: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa0 // #-96 5c: str x0, [x25, x10] 60: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa8 // #-88 64: str x0, [x25, x10] 68: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb0 // #-80 6c: str x0, [x25, x10] 70: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb8 // #-72 74: str x0, [x25, x10] 78: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc0 // #-64 7c: str x0, [x25, x10] 80: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc8 // #-56 84: str x0, [x25, x10] 88: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd0 // #-48 8c: str x0, [x25, x10] 90: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd8 // #-40 94: str x0, [x25, x10] 98: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe0 // #-32 9c: str x0, [x25, x10] a0: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe8 // #-24 a4: str x0, [x25, x10] a8: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff0 // #-16 ac: str x0, [x25, x10] b0: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff8 // #-8 b4: str x0, [x25, x10] b8: mov x10, #0x8 // #8 bc: ldr x2, [x19, x10] [...] With this patch, jited code(fragment): 0: bti c 4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]! 8: mov x29, sp c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]! 10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]! 14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]! 18: stp x27, x28, [sp, #-16]! 1c: mov x25, sp 20: sub x27, x25, #0x88 24: mov x26, #0x0 // #0 28: bti j 2c: sub sp, sp, #0x90 30: add x19, x0, #0x0 34: mov x0, #0x0 // #0 38: str x0, [x27] 3c: str x0, [x27, #8] 40: str x0, [x27, #16] 44: str x0, [x27, #24] 48: str x0, [x27, #32] 4c: str x0, [x27, #40] 50: str x0, [x27, #48] 54: str x0, [x27, #56] 58: str x0, [x27, #64] 5c: str x0, [x27, #72] 60: str x0, [x27, #80] 64: str x0, [x27, #88] 68: str x0, [x27, #96] 6c: str x0, [x27, #104] 70: str x0, [x27, #112] 74: str x0, [x27, #120] 78: str x0, [x27, #128] 7c: ldr x2, [x19, #8] [...] Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 7, 2024
Inline calls to bpf_get_smp_processor_id() helper in the JIT by emitting a read from struct thread_info. The SP_EL0 system register holds the pointer to the task_struct and thread_info is the first member of this struct. We can read the cpu number from the thread_info. Here is how the ARM64 JITed assembly changes after this commit: ARM64 JIT =========== BEFORE AFTER -------- ------- int cpu = bpf_get_smp_processor_id(); int cpu = bpf_get_smp_processor_id(); mov x10, #0xfffffffffffff4d0 mrs x10, sp_el0 movk x10, #0x802b, lsl #16 ldr w7, [x10, #24] movk x10, #0x8000, lsl #32 blr x10 add x7, x0, #0x0 Performance improvement using benchmark[1] ./benchs/run_bench_trigger.sh glob-arr-inc arr-inc hash-inc +---------------+-------------------+-------------------+--------------+ | Name | Before | After | % change | |---------------+-------------------+-------------------+--------------| | glob-arr-inc | 23.380 ± 1.675M/s | 25.893 ± 0.026M/s | + 10.74% | | arr-inc | 23.928 ± 0.034M/s | 25.213 ± 0.063M/s | + 5.37% | | hash-inc | 12.352 ± 0.005M/s | 12.609 ± 0.013M/s | + 2.08% | +---------------+-------------------+-------------------+--------------+ [1] anakryiko/linux@8dec900975ef Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 7, 2024
Inline calls to bpf_get_smp_processor_id() helper in the JIT by emitting a read from struct thread_info. The SP_EL0 system register holds the pointer to the task_struct and thread_info is the first member of this struct. We can read the cpu number from the thread_info. Here is how the ARM64 JITed assembly changes after this commit: ARM64 JIT =========== BEFORE AFTER -------- ------- int cpu = bpf_get_smp_processor_id(); int cpu = bpf_get_smp_processor_id(); mov x10, #0xfffffffffffff4d0 mrs x10, sp_el0 movk x10, #0x802b, lsl #16 ldr w7, [x10, #24] movk x10, #0x8000, lsl #32 blr x10 add x7, x0, #0x0 Performance improvement using benchmark[1] ./benchs/run_bench_trigger.sh glob-arr-inc arr-inc hash-inc +---------------+-------------------+-------------------+--------------+ | Name | Before | After | % change | |---------------+-------------------+-------------------+--------------| | glob-arr-inc | 23.380 ± 1.675M/s | 25.893 ± 0.026M/s | + 10.74% | | arr-inc | 23.928 ± 0.034M/s | 25.213 ± 0.063M/s | + 5.37% | | hash-inc | 12.352 ± 0.005M/s | 12.609 ± 0.013M/s | + 2.08% | +---------------+-------------------+-------------------+--------------+ [1] anakryiko/linux@8dec900975ef Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 8, 2024
Inline calls to bpf_get_smp_processor_id() helper in the JIT by emitting a read from struct thread_info. The SP_EL0 system register holds the pointer to the task_struct and thread_info is the first member of this struct. We can read the cpu number from the thread_info. Here is how the ARM64 JITed assembly changes after this commit: ARM64 JIT =========== BEFORE AFTER -------- ------- int cpu = bpf_get_smp_processor_id(); int cpu = bpf_get_smp_processor_id(); mov x10, #0xfffffffffffff4d0 mrs x10, sp_el0 movk x10, #0x802b, lsl #16 ldr w7, [x10, #24] movk x10, #0x8000, lsl #32 blr x10 add x7, x0, #0x0 Performance improvement using benchmark[1] ./benchs/run_bench_trigger.sh glob-arr-inc arr-inc hash-inc +---------------+-------------------+-------------------+--------------+ | Name | Before | After | % change | |---------------+-------------------+-------------------+--------------| | glob-arr-inc | 23.380 ± 1.675M/s | 25.893 ± 0.026M/s | + 10.74% | | arr-inc | 23.928 ± 0.034M/s | 25.213 ± 0.063M/s | + 5.37% | | hash-inc | 12.352 ± 0.005M/s | 12.609 ± 0.013M/s | + 2.08% | +---------------+-------------------+-------------------+--------------+ [1] anakryiko/linux@8dec900975ef Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 8, 2024
Inline calls to bpf_get_smp_processor_id() helper in the JIT by emitting a read from struct thread_info. The SP_EL0 system register holds the pointer to the task_struct and thread_info is the first member of this struct. We can read the cpu number from the thread_info. Here is how the ARM64 JITed assembly changes after this commit: ARM64 JIT =========== BEFORE AFTER -------- ------- int cpu = bpf_get_smp_processor_id(); int cpu = bpf_get_smp_processor_id(); mov x10, #0xfffffffffffff4d0 mrs x10, sp_el0 movk x10, #0x802b, lsl #16 ldr w7, [x10, #24] movk x10, #0x8000, lsl #32 blr x10 add x7, x0, #0x0 Performance improvement using benchmark[1] ./benchs/run_bench_trigger.sh glob-arr-inc arr-inc hash-inc +---------------+-------------------+-------------------+--------------+ | Name | Before | After | % change | |---------------+-------------------+-------------------+--------------| | glob-arr-inc | 23.380 ± 1.675M/s | 25.893 ± 0.026M/s | + 10.74% | | arr-inc | 23.928 ± 0.034M/s | 25.213 ± 0.063M/s | + 5.37% | | hash-inc | 12.352 ± 0.005M/s | 12.609 ± 0.013M/s | + 2.08% | +---------------+-------------------+-------------------+--------------+ [1] anakryiko/linux@8dec900975ef Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 8, 2024
Inline calls to bpf_get_smp_processor_id() helper in the JIT by emitting a read from struct thread_info. The SP_EL0 system register holds the pointer to the task_struct and thread_info is the first member of this struct. We can read the cpu number from the thread_info. Here is how the ARM64 JITed assembly changes after this commit: ARM64 JIT =========== BEFORE AFTER -------- ------- int cpu = bpf_get_smp_processor_id(); int cpu = bpf_get_smp_processor_id(); mov x10, #0xfffffffffffff4d0 mrs x10, sp_el0 movk x10, #0x802b, lsl #16 ldr w7, [x10, #24] movk x10, #0x8000, lsl #32 blr x10 add x7, x0, #0x0 Performance improvement using benchmark[1] ./benchs/run_bench_trigger.sh glob-arr-inc arr-inc hash-inc +---------------+-------------------+-------------------+--------------+ | Name | Before | After | % change | |---------------+-------------------+-------------------+--------------| | glob-arr-inc | 23.380 ± 1.675M/s | 25.893 ± 0.026M/s | + 10.74% | | arr-inc | 23.928 ± 0.034M/s | 25.213 ± 0.063M/s | + 5.37% | | hash-inc | 12.352 ± 0.005M/s | 12.609 ± 0.013M/s | + 2.08% | +---------------+-------------------+-------------------+--------------+ [1] anakryiko/linux@8dec900975ef Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 8, 2024
Inline calls to bpf_get_smp_processor_id() helper in the JIT by emitting a read from struct thread_info. The SP_EL0 system register holds the pointer to the task_struct and thread_info is the first member of this struct. We can read the cpu number from the thread_info. Here is how the ARM64 JITed assembly changes after this commit: ARM64 JIT =========== BEFORE AFTER -------- ------- int cpu = bpf_get_smp_processor_id(); int cpu = bpf_get_smp_processor_id(); mov x10, #0xfffffffffffff4d0 mrs x10, sp_el0 movk x10, #0x802b, lsl #16 ldr w7, [x10, #24] movk x10, #0x8000, lsl #32 blr x10 add x7, x0, #0x0 Performance improvement using benchmark[1] ./benchs/run_bench_trigger.sh glob-arr-inc arr-inc hash-inc +---------------+-------------------+-------------------+--------------+ | Name | Before | After | % change | |---------------+-------------------+-------------------+--------------| | glob-arr-inc | 23.380 ± 1.675M/s | 25.893 ± 0.026M/s | + 10.74% | | arr-inc | 23.928 ± 0.034M/s | 25.213 ± 0.063M/s | + 5.37% | | hash-inc | 12.352 ± 0.005M/s | 12.609 ± 0.013M/s | + 2.08% | +---------------+-------------------+-------------------+--------------+ [1] anakryiko/linux@8dec900975ef Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 9, 2024
Inline calls to bpf_get_smp_processor_id() helper in the JIT by emitting a read from struct thread_info. The SP_EL0 system register holds the pointer to the task_struct and thread_info is the first member of this struct. We can read the cpu number from the thread_info. Here is how the ARM64 JITed assembly changes after this commit: ARM64 JIT =========== BEFORE AFTER -------- ------- int cpu = bpf_get_smp_processor_id(); int cpu = bpf_get_smp_processor_id(); mov x10, #0xfffffffffffff4d0 mrs x10, sp_el0 movk x10, #0x802b, lsl #16 ldr w7, [x10, #24] movk x10, #0x8000, lsl #32 blr x10 add x7, x0, #0x0 Performance improvement using benchmark[1] ./benchs/run_bench_trigger.sh glob-arr-inc arr-inc hash-inc +---------------+-------------------+-------------------+--------------+ | Name | Before | After | % change | |---------------+-------------------+-------------------+--------------| | glob-arr-inc | 23.380 ± 1.675M/s | 25.893 ± 0.026M/s | + 10.74% | | arr-inc | 23.928 ± 0.034M/s | 25.213 ± 0.063M/s | + 5.37% | | hash-inc | 12.352 ± 0.005M/s | 12.609 ± 0.013M/s | + 2.08% | +---------------+-------------------+-------------------+--------------+ [1] anakryiko/linux@8dec900975ef Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 9, 2024
Inline calls to bpf_get_smp_processor_id() helper in the JIT by emitting a read from struct thread_info. The SP_EL0 system register holds the pointer to the task_struct and thread_info is the first member of this struct. We can read the cpu number from the thread_info. Here is how the ARM64 JITed assembly changes after this commit: ARM64 JIT =========== BEFORE AFTER -------- ------- int cpu = bpf_get_smp_processor_id(); int cpu = bpf_get_smp_processor_id(); mov x10, #0xfffffffffffff4d0 mrs x10, sp_el0 movk x10, #0x802b, lsl #16 ldr w7, [x10, #24] movk x10, #0x8000, lsl #32 blr x10 add x7, x0, #0x0 Performance improvement using benchmark[1] ./benchs/run_bench_trigger.sh glob-arr-inc arr-inc hash-inc +---------------+-------------------+-------------------+--------------+ | Name | Before | After | % change | |---------------+-------------------+-------------------+--------------| | glob-arr-inc | 23.380 ± 1.675M/s | 25.893 ± 0.026M/s | + 10.74% | | arr-inc | 23.928 ± 0.034M/s | 25.213 ± 0.063M/s | + 5.37% | | hash-inc | 12.352 ± 0.005M/s | 12.609 ± 0.013M/s | + 2.08% | +---------------+-------------------+-------------------+--------------+ [1] anakryiko/linux@8dec900975ef Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 9, 2024
Inline calls to bpf_get_smp_processor_id() helper in the JIT by emitting a read from struct thread_info. The SP_EL0 system register holds the pointer to the task_struct and thread_info is the first member of this struct. We can read the cpu number from the thread_info. Here is how the ARM64 JITed assembly changes after this commit: ARM64 JIT =========== BEFORE AFTER -------- ------- int cpu = bpf_get_smp_processor_id(); int cpu = bpf_get_smp_processor_id(); mov x10, #0xfffffffffffff4d0 mrs x10, sp_el0 movk x10, #0x802b, lsl #16 ldr w7, [x10, #24] movk x10, #0x8000, lsl #32 blr x10 add x7, x0, #0x0 Performance improvement using benchmark[1] ./benchs/run_bench_trigger.sh glob-arr-inc arr-inc hash-inc +---------------+-------------------+-------------------+--------------+ | Name | Before | After | % change | |---------------+-------------------+-------------------+--------------| | glob-arr-inc | 23.380 ± 1.675M/s | 25.893 ± 0.026M/s | + 10.74% | | arr-inc | 23.928 ± 0.034M/s | 25.213 ± 0.063M/s | + 5.37% | | hash-inc | 12.352 ± 0.005M/s | 12.609 ± 0.013M/s | + 2.08% | +---------------+-------------------+-------------------+--------------+ [1] anakryiko/linux@8dec900975ef Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 12, 2024
Inline calls to bpf_get_smp_processor_id() helper in the JIT by emitting a read from struct thread_info. The SP_EL0 system register holds the pointer to the task_struct and thread_info is the first member of this struct. We can read the cpu number from the thread_info. Here is how the ARM64 JITed assembly changes after this commit: ARM64 JIT =========== BEFORE AFTER -------- ------- int cpu = bpf_get_smp_processor_id(); int cpu = bpf_get_smp_processor_id(); mov x10, #0xfffffffffffff4d0 mrs x10, sp_el0 movk x10, #0x802b, lsl #16 ldr w7, [x10, #24] movk x10, #0x8000, lsl #32 blr x10 add x7, x0, #0x0 Performance improvement using benchmark[1] ./benchs/run_bench_trigger.sh glob-arr-inc arr-inc hash-inc +---------------+-------------------+-------------------+--------------+ | Name | Before | After | % change | |---------------+-------------------+-------------------+--------------| | glob-arr-inc | 23.380 ± 1.675M/s | 25.893 ± 0.026M/s | + 10.74% | | arr-inc | 23.928 ± 0.034M/s | 25.213 ± 0.063M/s | + 5.37% | | hash-inc | 12.352 ± 0.005M/s | 12.609 ± 0.013M/s | + 2.08% | +---------------+-------------------+-------------------+--------------+ [1] anakryiko/linux@8dec900975ef Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240502151854.9810-5-puranjay@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 12, 2024
Puranjay Mohan says: ==================== bpf: Inline helpers in arm64 and riscv JITs Changes in v5 -> v6: arm64 v5: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240430234739.79185-1-puranjay@kernel.org/ riscv v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240430175834.33152-1-puranjay@kernel.org/ - Combine riscv and arm64 changes in single series - Some coding style fixes Changes in v4 -> v5: v4: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240429131647.50165-1-puranjay@kernel.org/ - Implement the inlining of the bpf_get_smp_processor_id() in the JIT. NOTE: This needs to be based on: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240430175834.33152-1-puranjay@kernel.org/ to be built. Manual run of bpf-ci with this series rebased on above: kernel-patches/bpf#6929 Changes in v3 -> v4: v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240426121349.97651-1-puranjay@kernel.org/ - Fix coding style issue related to C89 standards. Changes in v2 -> v3: v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240424173550.16359-1-puranjay@kernel.org/ - Fixed the xlated dump of percpu mov to "r0 = &(void __percpu *)(r0)" - Made ARM64 and x86-64 use the same code for inlining. The only difference that remains is the per-cpu address of the cpu_number. Changes in v1 -> v2: v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240405091707.66675-1-puranjay12@gmail.com/ - Add a patch to inline bpf_get_smp_processor_id() - Fix an issue in MRS instruction encoding as pointed out by Will - Remove CONFIG_SMP check because arm64 kernel always compiles with CONFIG_SMP This series adds the support of internal only per-CPU instructions and inlines the bpf_get_smp_processor_id() helper call for ARM64 and RISC-V BPF JITs. Here is an example of calls to bpf_get_smp_processor_id() and percpu_array_map_lookup_elem() before and after this series on ARM64. BPF ===== BEFORE AFTER -------- ------- int cpu = bpf_get_smp_processor_id(); int cpu = bpf_get_smp_processor_id(); (85) call bpf_get_smp_processor_id#229032 (85) call bpf_get_smp_processor_id#8 p = bpf_map_lookup_elem(map, &zero); p = bpf_map_lookup_elem(map, &zero); (18) r1 = map[id:78] (18) r1 = map[id:153] (18) r2 = map[id:82][0]+65536 (18) r2 = map[id:157][0]+65536 (85) call percpu_array_map_lookup_elem#313512 (07) r1 += 496 (61) r0 = *(u32 *)(r2 +0) (35) if r0 >= 0x1 goto pc+5 (67) r0 <<= 3 (0f) r0 += r1 (79) r0 = *(u64 *)(r0 +0) (bf) r0 = &(void __percpu *)(r0) (05) goto pc+1 (b7) r0 = 0 ARM64 JIT =========== BEFORE AFTER -------- ------- int cpu = bpf_get_smp_processor_id(); int cpu = bpf_get_smp_processor_id(); mov x10, #0xfffffffffffff4d0 mrs x10, sp_el0 movk x10, #0x802b, lsl #16 ldr w7, [x10, #24] movk x10, #0x8000, lsl #32 blr x10 add x7, x0, #0x0 p = bpf_map_lookup_elem(map, &zero); p = bpf_map_lookup_elem(map, &zero); mov x0, #0xffff0003ffffffff mov x0, #0xffff0003ffffffff movk x0, #0xce5c, lsl #16 movk x0, #0xe0f3, lsl #16 movk x0, #0xca00 movk x0, #0x7c00 mov x1, #0xffff8000ffffffff mov x1, #0xffff8000ffffffff movk x1, #0x8bdb, lsl #16 movk x1, #0xb0c7, lsl #16 movk x1, #0x6000 movk x1, #0xe000 mov x10, #0xffffffffffff3ed0 add x0, x0, #0x1f0 movk x10, #0x802d, lsl #16 ldr w7, [x1] movk x10, #0x8000, lsl #32 cmp x7, #0x1 blr x10 b.cs 0x0000000000000090 add x7, x0, #0x0 lsl x7, x7, #3 add x7, x7, x0 ldr x7, [x7] mrs x10, tpidr_el1 add x7, x7, x10 b 0x0000000000000094 mov x7, #0x0 Performance improvement found using benchmark[1] ./benchs/run_bench_trigger.sh glob-arr-inc arr-inc hash-inc +---------------+-------------------+-------------------+--------------+ | Name | Before | After | % change | |---------------+-------------------+-------------------+--------------| | glob-arr-inc | 23.380 ± 1.675M/s | 25.893 ± 0.026M/s | + 10.74% | | arr-inc | 23.928 ± 0.034M/s | 25.213 ± 0.063M/s | + 5.37% | | hash-inc | 12.352 ± 0.005M/s | 12.609 ± 0.013M/s | + 2.08% | +---------------+-------------------+-------------------+--------------+ [1] anakryiko/linux@8dec900975ef RISCV64 JIT output for `call bpf_get_smp_processor_id` ======================================================= Before After -------- ------- auipc t1,0x848c ld a5,32(tp) jalr 604(t1) mv a5,a0 Benchmark using [1] on Qemu. ./benchs/run_bench_trigger.sh glob-arr-inc arr-inc hash-inc +---------------+------------------+------------------+--------------+ | Name | Before | After | % change | |---------------+------------------+------------------+--------------| | glob-arr-inc | 1.077 ± 0.006M/s | 1.336 ± 0.010M/s | + 24.04% | | arr-inc | 1.078 ± 0.002M/s | 1.332 ± 0.015M/s | + 23.56% | | hash-inc | 0.494 ± 0.004M/s | 0.653 ± 0.001M/s | + 32.18% | +---------------+------------------+------------------+--------------+ ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240502151854.9810-1-puranjay@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 19, 2024
On ARM64, the pointer to task_struct is always available in the sp_el0 register and therefore the calls to bpf_get_current_task() and bpf_get_current_task_btf() can be inlined into a single MRS instruction. Here is the difference before and after this change: Before: ; struct task_struct *task = bpf_get_current_task_btf(); 54: mov x10, #0xffffffffffff7978 // #-34440 58: movk x10, #0x802b, lsl #16 5c: movk x10, #0x8000, lsl #32 60: blr x10 --------------> 0xffff8000802b7978 <+0>: mrs x0, sp_el0 64: add x7, x0, #0x0 <-------------- 0xffff8000802b797c <+4>: ret After: ; struct task_struct *task = bpf_get_current_task_btf(); 54: mrs x7, sp_el0 This shows around 1% performance improvement in artificial microbenchmark. Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 21, 2024
On ARM64, the pointer to task_struct is always available in the sp_el0 register and therefore the calls to bpf_get_current_task() and bpf_get_current_task_btf() can be inlined into a single MRS instruction. Here is the difference before and after this change: Before: ; struct task_struct *task = bpf_get_current_task_btf(); 54: mov x10, #0xffffffffffff7978 // #-34440 58: movk x10, #0x802b, lsl #16 5c: movk x10, #0x8000, lsl #32 60: blr x10 --------------> 0xffff8000802b7978 <+0>: mrs x0, sp_el0 64: add x7, x0, #0x0 <-------------- 0xffff8000802b797c <+4>: ret After: ; struct task_struct *task = bpf_get_current_task_btf(); 54: mrs x7, sp_el0 This shows around 1% performance improvement in artificial microbenchmark. Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org> Acked-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 21, 2024
On ARM64, the pointer to task_struct is always available in the sp_el0 register and therefore the calls to bpf_get_current_task() and bpf_get_current_task_btf() can be inlined into a single MRS instruction. Here is the difference before and after this change: Before: ; struct task_struct *task = bpf_get_current_task_btf(); 54: mov x10, #0xffffffffffff7978 // #-34440 58: movk x10, #0x802b, lsl #16 5c: movk x10, #0x8000, lsl #32 60: blr x10 --------------> 0xffff8000802b7978 <+0>: mrs x0, sp_el0 64: add x7, x0, #0x0 <-------------- 0xffff8000802b797c <+4>: ret After: ; struct task_struct *task = bpf_get_current_task_btf(); 54: mrs x7, sp_el0 This shows around 1% performance improvement in artificial microbenchmark. Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org> Acked-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 21, 2024
On ARM64, the pointer to task_struct is always available in the sp_el0 register and therefore the calls to bpf_get_current_task() and bpf_get_current_task_btf() can be inlined into a single MRS instruction. Here is the difference before and after this change: Before: ; struct task_struct *task = bpf_get_current_task_btf(); 54: mov x10, #0xffffffffffff7978 // #-34440 58: movk x10, #0x802b, lsl #16 5c: movk x10, #0x8000, lsl #32 60: blr x10 --------------> 0xffff8000802b7978 <+0>: mrs x0, sp_el0 64: add x7, x0, #0x0 <-------------- 0xffff8000802b797c <+4>: ret After: ; struct task_struct *task = bpf_get_current_task_btf(); 54: mrs x7, sp_el0 This shows around 1% performance improvement in artificial microbenchmark. Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org> Acked-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 21, 2024
On ARM64, the pointer to task_struct is always available in the sp_el0 register and therefore the calls to bpf_get_current_task() and bpf_get_current_task_btf() can be inlined into a single MRS instruction. Here is the difference before and after this change: Before: ; struct task_struct *task = bpf_get_current_task_btf(); 54: mov x10, #0xffffffffffff7978 // #-34440 58: movk x10, #0x802b, lsl #16 5c: movk x10, #0x8000, lsl #32 60: blr x10 --------------> 0xffff8000802b7978 <+0>: mrs x0, sp_el0 64: add x7, x0, #0x0 <-------------- 0xffff8000802b797c <+4>: ret After: ; struct task_struct *task = bpf_get_current_task_btf(); 54: mrs x7, sp_el0 This shows around 1% performance improvement in artificial microbenchmark. Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org> Acked-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 21, 2024
On ARM64, the pointer to task_struct is always available in the sp_el0 register and therefore the calls to bpf_get_current_task() and bpf_get_current_task_btf() can be inlined into a single MRS instruction. Here is the difference before and after this change: Before: ; struct task_struct *task = bpf_get_current_task_btf(); 54: mov x10, #0xffffffffffff7978 // #-34440 58: movk x10, #0x802b, lsl #16 5c: movk x10, #0x8000, lsl #32 60: blr x10 --------------> 0xffff8000802b7978 <+0>: mrs x0, sp_el0 64: add x7, x0, #0x0 <-------------- 0xffff8000802b797c <+4>: ret After: ; struct task_struct *task = bpf_get_current_task_btf(); 54: mrs x7, sp_el0 This shows around 1% performance improvement in artificial microbenchmark. Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org> Acked-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 21, 2024
On ARM64, the pointer to task_struct is always available in the sp_el0 register and therefore the calls to bpf_get_current_task() and bpf_get_current_task_btf() can be inlined into a single MRS instruction. Here is the difference before and after this change: Before: ; struct task_struct *task = bpf_get_current_task_btf(); 54: mov x10, #0xffffffffffff7978 // #-34440 58: movk x10, #0x802b, lsl #16 5c: movk x10, #0x8000, lsl #32 60: blr x10 --------------> 0xffff8000802b7978 <+0>: mrs x0, sp_el0 64: add x7, x0, #0x0 <-------------- 0xffff8000802b797c <+4>: ret After: ; struct task_struct *task = bpf_get_current_task_btf(); 54: mrs x7, sp_el0 This shows around 1% performance improvement in artificial microbenchmark. Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org> Acked-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 21, 2024
On ARM64, the pointer to task_struct is always available in the sp_el0 register and therefore the calls to bpf_get_current_task() and bpf_get_current_task_btf() can be inlined into a single MRS instruction. Here is the difference before and after this change: Before: ; struct task_struct *task = bpf_get_current_task_btf(); 54: mov x10, #0xffffffffffff7978 // #-34440 58: movk x10, #0x802b, lsl #16 5c: movk x10, #0x8000, lsl #32 60: blr x10 --------------> 0xffff8000802b7978 <+0>: mrs x0, sp_el0 64: add x7, x0, #0x0 <-------------- 0xffff8000802b797c <+4>: ret After: ; struct task_struct *task = bpf_get_current_task_btf(); 54: mrs x7, sp_el0 This shows around 1% performance improvement in artificial microbenchmark. Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org> Acked-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 21, 2024
On ARM64, the pointer to task_struct is always available in the sp_el0 register and therefore the calls to bpf_get_current_task() and bpf_get_current_task_btf() can be inlined into a single MRS instruction. Here is the difference before and after this change: Before: ; struct task_struct *task = bpf_get_current_task_btf(); 54: mov x10, #0xffffffffffff7978 // #-34440 58: movk x10, #0x802b, lsl #16 5c: movk x10, #0x8000, lsl #32 60: blr x10 --------------> 0xffff8000802b7978 <+0>: mrs x0, sp_el0 64: add x7, x0, #0x0 <-------------- 0xffff8000802b797c <+4>: ret After: ; struct task_struct *task = bpf_get_current_task_btf(); 54: mrs x7, sp_el0 This shows around 1% performance improvement in artificial microbenchmark. Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240619131334.4297-1-puranjay@kernel.org
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 25, 2024
Run the following BPF selftests on Loongarch: ./test_sockmap A Kernel panic occurs: ''' Oops[#1]: CPU: 20 PID: 23245 Comm: test_sockmap Tainted: G OE 6.10.0-rc2+ #32 Hardware name: LOONGSON Dabieshan/Loongson-TC542F0, BIOS Loongson-UDK2018-V4.0.11 pc 900000000426cd1c ra 90000000043a315c tp 900010008bfbc000 sp 900010008bfbf8a0 a0 ffffffffffffffe4 a1 900010008bfbfe20 a2 9000100089cd9400 a3 0000000000000003 a4 900010008bfbfb80 a5 900010008bfbfe20 a6 0000000000000000 a7 00000000000000d3 t0 0000000000000000 t1 0000000000000000 t2 0000000000008000 t3 0000000000000000 t4 0000000000000000 t5 0000000000000000 t6 0000000000000006 t7 fffffef1fea12c80 t8 fffffffffffffffc u0 0000000400000005 s9 0000000000000003 s0 0000000000000000 s1 0000000000000012 s2 900010008b9bbc00 s3 0000000000000018 s4 0000020000000000 s5 fffffffffffffffc s6 000000007fffffff s7 0000000000000002 s8 9000100089cd9400 ra: 90000000043a315c tcp_bpf_sendmsg+0x23c/0x420 ERA: 900000000426cd1c sk_msg_memcopy_from_iter+0xbc/0x220 CRMD: 000000b0 (PLV0 -IE -DA +PG DACF=CC DACM=CC -WE) PRMD: 0000000c (PPLV0 +PIE +PWE) EUEN: 00000007 (+FPE +SXE +ASXE -BTE) ECFG: 00071c1d (LIE=0,2-4,10-12 VS=7) ESTAT: 00010000 [PIL] (IS= ECode=1 EsubCode=0) BADV: 0000000000000040 PRID: 0014c011 (Loongson-64bit, Loongson-3C5000) Modules linked in: tls xt_CHECKSUM xt_MASQUERADE xt_conntrack ipt_REJECT Process test_sockmap (pid: 23245, threadinfo=00000000aeb68043, task=00000000781bb2f1) Stack : 0000000000000000 900010008bfbfe20 0000000000000000 0000000000000003 0000000000000000 900010008bfbf94c 900010008bfbf950 0000000000000000 0000000000000003 0000000000000003 900010008bfbfe10 900010008beeb400 9000100089cd9400 0000000000000003 900010008b9bbc00 90000000043a315c 0000000000084000 900010008bfbfe20 900010008bfbf958 900010008beeb5ac 900010087fffd500 0000000000000000 7fffffffffffffff 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ... Call Trace: [<900000000426cd1c>] sk_msg_memcopy_from_iter+0xbc/0x220 [<90000000043a315c>] tcp_bpf_sendmsg+0x23c/0x420 [<90000000041cafc8>] __sock_sendmsg+0x68/0xe0 [<90000000041cc4bc>] ____sys_sendmsg+0x2bc/0x360 [<90000000041cea18>] ___sys_sendmsg+0xb8/0x120 [<90000000041cf1f8>] __sys_sendmsg+0x98/0x100 [<90000000045b76ec>] do_syscall+0x8c/0xc0 [<90000000030e1da4>] handle_syscall+0xc4/0x160 Code: 001532f7 0014f210 001036ed <28c10204> 298043ed 28c8632c 0010c5ef 0010bc84 0014ed8c ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- ''' This is because "sg_page(sge)" is NULL in that case. This patch adds null check for it in sk_msg_memcopy_from_iter() to fix this error. Fixes: 604326b ("bpf, sockmap: convert to generic sk_msg interface") Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 26, 2024
Run the following BPF selftests on Loongarch: ./test_sockmap A Kernel panic occurs: ''' Oops[#1]: CPU: 20 PID: 23245 Comm: test_sockmap Tainted: G OE 6.10.0-rc2+ #32 Hardware name: LOONGSON Dabieshan/Loongson-TC542F0, BIOS Loongson-UDK2018-V4.0.11 pc 900000000426cd1c ra 90000000043a315c tp 900010008bfbc000 sp 900010008bfbf8a0 a0 ffffffffffffffe4 a1 900010008bfbfe20 a2 9000100089cd9400 a3 0000000000000003 a4 900010008bfbfb80 a5 900010008bfbfe20 a6 0000000000000000 a7 00000000000000d3 t0 0000000000000000 t1 0000000000000000 t2 0000000000008000 t3 0000000000000000 t4 0000000000000000 t5 0000000000000000 t6 0000000000000006 t7 fffffef1fea12c80 t8 fffffffffffffffc u0 0000000400000005 s9 0000000000000003 s0 0000000000000000 s1 0000000000000012 s2 900010008b9bbc00 s3 0000000000000018 s4 0000020000000000 s5 fffffffffffffffc s6 000000007fffffff s7 0000000000000002 s8 9000100089cd9400 ra: 90000000043a315c tcp_bpf_sendmsg+0x23c/0x420 ERA: 900000000426cd1c sk_msg_memcopy_from_iter+0xbc/0x220 CRMD: 000000b0 (PLV0 -IE -DA +PG DACF=CC DACM=CC -WE) PRMD: 0000000c (PPLV0 +PIE +PWE) EUEN: 00000007 (+FPE +SXE +ASXE -BTE) ECFG: 00071c1d (LIE=0,2-4,10-12 VS=7) ESTAT: 00010000 [PIL] (IS= ECode=1 EsubCode=0) BADV: 0000000000000040 PRID: 0014c011 (Loongson-64bit, Loongson-3C5000) Modules linked in: tls xt_CHECKSUM xt_MASQUERADE xt_conntrack ipt_REJECT Process test_sockmap (pid: 23245, threadinfo=00000000aeb68043, task=00000000781bb2f1) Stack : 0000000000000000 900010008bfbfe20 0000000000000000 0000000000000003 0000000000000000 900010008bfbf94c 900010008bfbf950 0000000000000000 0000000000000003 0000000000000003 900010008bfbfe10 900010008beeb400 9000100089cd9400 0000000000000003 900010008b9bbc00 90000000043a315c 0000000000084000 900010008bfbfe20 900010008bfbf958 900010008beeb5ac 900010087fffd500 0000000000000000 7fffffffffffffff 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ... Call Trace: [<900000000426cd1c>] sk_msg_memcopy_from_iter+0xbc/0x220 [<90000000043a315c>] tcp_bpf_sendmsg+0x23c/0x420 [<90000000041cafc8>] __sock_sendmsg+0x68/0xe0 [<90000000041cc4bc>] ____sys_sendmsg+0x2bc/0x360 [<90000000041cea18>] ___sys_sendmsg+0xb8/0x120 [<90000000041cf1f8>] __sys_sendmsg+0x98/0x100 [<90000000045b76ec>] do_syscall+0x8c/0xc0 [<90000000030e1da4>] handle_syscall+0xc4/0x160 Code: 001532f7 0014f210 001036ed <28c10204> 298043ed 28c8632c 0010c5ef 0010bc84 0014ed8c ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- ''' This is because "sg_page(sge)" is NULL in that case. This patch adds null check for it in sk_msg_memcopy_from_iter() to fix this error. Fixes: 604326b ("bpf, sockmap: convert to generic sk_msg interface") Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 26, 2024
Run the following BPF selftests on Loongarch: ./test_sockmap A Kernel panic occurs: ''' Oops[#1]: CPU: 20 PID: 23245 Comm: test_sockmap Tainted: G OE 6.10.0-rc2+ #32 Hardware name: LOONGSON Dabieshan/Loongson-TC542F0, BIOS Loongson-UDK2018-V4.0.11 pc 900000000426cd1c ra 90000000043a315c tp 900010008bfbc000 sp 900010008bfbf8a0 a0 ffffffffffffffe4 a1 900010008bfbfe20 a2 9000100089cd9400 a3 0000000000000003 a4 900010008bfbfb80 a5 900010008bfbfe20 a6 0000000000000000 a7 00000000000000d3 t0 0000000000000000 t1 0000000000000000 t2 0000000000008000 t3 0000000000000000 t4 0000000000000000 t5 0000000000000000 t6 0000000000000006 t7 fffffef1fea12c80 t8 fffffffffffffffc u0 0000000400000005 s9 0000000000000003 s0 0000000000000000 s1 0000000000000012 s2 900010008b9bbc00 s3 0000000000000018 s4 0000020000000000 s5 fffffffffffffffc s6 000000007fffffff s7 0000000000000002 s8 9000100089cd9400 ra: 90000000043a315c tcp_bpf_sendmsg+0x23c/0x420 ERA: 900000000426cd1c sk_msg_memcopy_from_iter+0xbc/0x220 CRMD: 000000b0 (PLV0 -IE -DA +PG DACF=CC DACM=CC -WE) PRMD: 0000000c (PPLV0 +PIE +PWE) EUEN: 00000007 (+FPE +SXE +ASXE -BTE) ECFG: 00071c1d (LIE=0,2-4,10-12 VS=7) ESTAT: 00010000 [PIL] (IS= ECode=1 EsubCode=0) BADV: 0000000000000040 PRID: 0014c011 (Loongson-64bit, Loongson-3C5000) Modules linked in: tls xt_CHECKSUM xt_MASQUERADE xt_conntrack ipt_REJECT Process test_sockmap (pid: 23245, threadinfo=00000000aeb68043, task=00000000781bb2f1) Stack : 0000000000000000 900010008bfbfe20 0000000000000000 0000000000000003 0000000000000000 900010008bfbf94c 900010008bfbf950 0000000000000000 0000000000000003 0000000000000003 900010008bfbfe10 900010008beeb400 9000100089cd9400 0000000000000003 900010008b9bbc00 90000000043a315c 0000000000084000 900010008bfbfe20 900010008bfbf958 900010008beeb5ac 900010087fffd500 0000000000000000 7fffffffffffffff 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ... Call Trace: [<900000000426cd1c>] sk_msg_memcopy_from_iter+0xbc/0x220 [<90000000043a315c>] tcp_bpf_sendmsg+0x23c/0x420 [<90000000041cafc8>] __sock_sendmsg+0x68/0xe0 [<90000000041cc4bc>] ____sys_sendmsg+0x2bc/0x360 [<90000000041cea18>] ___sys_sendmsg+0xb8/0x120 [<90000000041cf1f8>] __sys_sendmsg+0x98/0x100 [<90000000045b76ec>] do_syscall+0x8c/0xc0 [<90000000030e1da4>] handle_syscall+0xc4/0x160 Code: 001532f7 0014f210 001036ed <28c10204> 298043ed 28c8632c 0010c5ef 0010bc84 0014ed8c ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- ''' This is because "sg_page(sge)" is NULL in that case. This patch adds null check for it in sk_msg_memcopy_from_iter() to fix this error. Fixes: 604326b ("bpf, sockmap: convert to generic sk_msg interface") Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 26, 2024
Run the following BPF selftests on Loongarch: ./test_sockmap A Kernel panic occurs: ''' Oops[#1]: CPU: 20 PID: 23245 Comm: test_sockmap Tainted: G OE 6.10.0-rc2+ #32 Hardware name: LOONGSON Dabieshan/Loongson-TC542F0, BIOS Loongson-UDK2018-V4.0.11 pc 900000000426cd1c ra 90000000043a315c tp 900010008bfbc000 sp 900010008bfbf8a0 a0 ffffffffffffffe4 a1 900010008bfbfe20 a2 9000100089cd9400 a3 0000000000000003 a4 900010008bfbfb80 a5 900010008bfbfe20 a6 0000000000000000 a7 00000000000000d3 t0 0000000000000000 t1 0000000000000000 t2 0000000000008000 t3 0000000000000000 t4 0000000000000000 t5 0000000000000000 t6 0000000000000006 t7 fffffef1fea12c80 t8 fffffffffffffffc u0 0000000400000005 s9 0000000000000003 s0 0000000000000000 s1 0000000000000012 s2 900010008b9bbc00 s3 0000000000000018 s4 0000020000000000 s5 fffffffffffffffc s6 000000007fffffff s7 0000000000000002 s8 9000100089cd9400 ra: 90000000043a315c tcp_bpf_sendmsg+0x23c/0x420 ERA: 900000000426cd1c sk_msg_memcopy_from_iter+0xbc/0x220 CRMD: 000000b0 (PLV0 -IE -DA +PG DACF=CC DACM=CC -WE) PRMD: 0000000c (PPLV0 +PIE +PWE) EUEN: 00000007 (+FPE +SXE +ASXE -BTE) ECFG: 00071c1d (LIE=0,2-4,10-12 VS=7) ESTAT: 00010000 [PIL] (IS= ECode=1 EsubCode=0) BADV: 0000000000000040 PRID: 0014c011 (Loongson-64bit, Loongson-3C5000) Modules linked in: tls xt_CHECKSUM xt_MASQUERADE xt_conntrack ipt_REJECT Process test_sockmap (pid: 23245, threadinfo=00000000aeb68043, task=00000000781bb2f1) Stack : 0000000000000000 900010008bfbfe20 0000000000000000 0000000000000003 0000000000000000 900010008bfbf94c 900010008bfbf950 0000000000000000 0000000000000003 0000000000000003 900010008bfbfe10 900010008beeb400 9000100089cd9400 0000000000000003 900010008b9bbc00 90000000043a315c 0000000000084000 900010008bfbfe20 900010008bfbf958 900010008beeb5ac 900010087fffd500 0000000000000000 7fffffffffffffff 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ... Call Trace: [<900000000426cd1c>] sk_msg_memcopy_from_iter+0xbc/0x220 [<90000000043a315c>] tcp_bpf_sendmsg+0x23c/0x420 [<90000000041cafc8>] __sock_sendmsg+0x68/0xe0 [<90000000041cc4bc>] ____sys_sendmsg+0x2bc/0x360 [<90000000041cea18>] ___sys_sendmsg+0xb8/0x120 [<90000000041cf1f8>] __sys_sendmsg+0x98/0x100 [<90000000045b76ec>] do_syscall+0x8c/0xc0 [<90000000030e1da4>] handle_syscall+0xc4/0x160 Code: 001532f7 0014f210 001036ed <28c10204> 298043ed 28c8632c 0010c5ef 0010bc84 0014ed8c ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- ''' This is because "sg_page(sge)" is NULL in that case. This patch adds null check for it in sk_msg_memcopy_from_iter() to fix this error. Fixes: 604326b ("bpf, sockmap: convert to generic sk_msg interface") Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 27, 2024
Run the following BPF selftests on Loongarch: ./test_sockmap A Kernel panic occurs: ''' Oops[#1]: CPU: 20 PID: 23245 Comm: test_sockmap Tainted: G OE 6.10.0-rc2+ #32 Hardware name: LOONGSON Dabieshan/Loongson-TC542F0, BIOS Loongson-UDK2018-V4.0.11 pc 900000000426cd1c ra 90000000043a315c tp 900010008bfbc000 sp 900010008bfbf8a0 a0 ffffffffffffffe4 a1 900010008bfbfe20 a2 9000100089cd9400 a3 0000000000000003 a4 900010008bfbfb80 a5 900010008bfbfe20 a6 0000000000000000 a7 00000000000000d3 t0 0000000000000000 t1 0000000000000000 t2 0000000000008000 t3 0000000000000000 t4 0000000000000000 t5 0000000000000000 t6 0000000000000006 t7 fffffef1fea12c80 t8 fffffffffffffffc u0 0000000400000005 s9 0000000000000003 s0 0000000000000000 s1 0000000000000012 s2 900010008b9bbc00 s3 0000000000000018 s4 0000020000000000 s5 fffffffffffffffc s6 000000007fffffff s7 0000000000000002 s8 9000100089cd9400 ra: 90000000043a315c tcp_bpf_sendmsg+0x23c/0x420 ERA: 900000000426cd1c sk_msg_memcopy_from_iter+0xbc/0x220 CRMD: 000000b0 (PLV0 -IE -DA +PG DACF=CC DACM=CC -WE) PRMD: 0000000c (PPLV0 +PIE +PWE) EUEN: 00000007 (+FPE +SXE +ASXE -BTE) ECFG: 00071c1d (LIE=0,2-4,10-12 VS=7) ESTAT: 00010000 [PIL] (IS= ECode=1 EsubCode=0) BADV: 0000000000000040 PRID: 0014c011 (Loongson-64bit, Loongson-3C5000) Modules linked in: tls xt_CHECKSUM xt_MASQUERADE xt_conntrack ipt_REJECT Process test_sockmap (pid: 23245, threadinfo=00000000aeb68043, task=00000000781bb2f1) Stack : 0000000000000000 900010008bfbfe20 0000000000000000 0000000000000003 0000000000000000 900010008bfbf94c 900010008bfbf950 0000000000000000 0000000000000003 0000000000000003 900010008bfbfe10 900010008beeb400 9000100089cd9400 0000000000000003 900010008b9bbc00 90000000043a315c 0000000000084000 900010008bfbfe20 900010008bfbf958 900010008beeb5ac 900010087fffd500 0000000000000000 7fffffffffffffff 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ... Call Trace: [<900000000426cd1c>] sk_msg_memcopy_from_iter+0xbc/0x220 [<90000000043a315c>] tcp_bpf_sendmsg+0x23c/0x420 [<90000000041cafc8>] __sock_sendmsg+0x68/0xe0 [<90000000041cc4bc>] ____sys_sendmsg+0x2bc/0x360 [<90000000041cea18>] ___sys_sendmsg+0xb8/0x120 [<90000000041cf1f8>] __sys_sendmsg+0x98/0x100 [<90000000045b76ec>] do_syscall+0x8c/0xc0 [<90000000030e1da4>] handle_syscall+0xc4/0x160 Code: 001532f7 0014f210 001036ed <28c10204> 298043ed 28c8632c 0010c5ef 0010bc84 0014ed8c ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- ''' This is because "sg_page(sge)" is NULL in that case. This patch adds null check for it in sk_msg_memcopy_from_iter() to fix this error. Fixes: 604326b ("bpf, sockmap: convert to generic sk_msg interface") Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 5, 2024
KMSAN reported uninit-value access in __unix_walk_scc() [1]. In the list_for_each_entry_reverse() loop, when the vertex's index equals it's scc_index, the loop uses the variable vertex as a temporary variable that points to a vertex in scc. And when the loop is finished, the variable vertex points to the list head, in this case scc, which is a local variable on the stack (more precisely, it's not even scc and might underflow the call stack of __unix_walk_scc(): container_of(&scc, struct unix_vertex, scc_entry)). However, the variable vertex is used under the label prev_vertex. So if the edge_stack is not empty and the function jumps to the prev_vertex label, the function will access invalid data on the stack. This causes the uninit-value access issue. Fix this by introducing a new temporary variable for the loop. [1] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in __unix_walk_scc net/unix/garbage.c:478 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in unix_walk_scc net/unix/garbage.c:526 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in __unix_gc+0x2589/0x3c20 net/unix/garbage.c:584 __unix_walk_scc net/unix/garbage.c:478 [inline] unix_walk_scc net/unix/garbage.c:526 [inline] __unix_gc+0x2589/0x3c20 net/unix/garbage.c:584 process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3231 [inline] process_scheduled_works+0xade/0x1bf0 kernel/workqueue.c:3312 worker_thread+0xeb6/0x15b0 kernel/workqueue.c:3393 kthread+0x3c4/0x530 kernel/kthread.c:389 ret_from_fork+0x6e/0x90 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244 Uninit was stored to memory at: unix_walk_scc net/unix/garbage.c:526 [inline] __unix_gc+0x2adf/0x3c20 net/unix/garbage.c:584 process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3231 [inline] process_scheduled_works+0xade/0x1bf0 kernel/workqueue.c:3312 worker_thread+0xeb6/0x15b0 kernel/workqueue.c:3393 kthread+0x3c4/0x530 kernel/kthread.c:389 ret_from_fork+0x6e/0x90 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244 Local variable entries created at: ref_tracker_free+0x48/0xf30 lib/ref_tracker.c:222 netdev_tracker_free include/linux/netdevice.h:4058 [inline] netdev_put include/linux/netdevice.h:4075 [inline] dev_put include/linux/netdevice.h:4101 [inline] update_gid_event_work_handler+0xaa/0x1b0 drivers/infiniband/core/roce_gid_mgmt.c:813 CPU: 1 PID: 12763 Comm: kworker/u8:31 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc4-00217-g35bb670d65fc #32 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014 Workqueue: events_unbound __unix_gc Fixes: 3484f06 ("af_unix: Detect Strongly Connected Components.") Reported-by: syzkaller <syzkaller@googlegroups.com> Signed-off-by: Shigeru Yoshida <syoshida@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240702160428.10153-1-syoshida@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 5, 2024
KMSAN reported uninit-value access in raw_lookup() [1]. Diag for raw sockets uses the pad field in struct inet_diag_req_v2 for the underlying protocol. This field corresponds to the sdiag_raw_protocol field in struct inet_diag_req_raw. inet_diag_get_exact_compat() converts inet_diag_req to inet_diag_req_v2, but leaves the pad field uninitialized. So the issue occurs when raw_lookup() accesses the sdiag_raw_protocol field. Fix this by initializing the pad field in inet_diag_get_exact_compat(). Also, do the same fix in inet_diag_dump_compat() to avoid the similar issue in the future. [1] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in raw_lookup net/ipv4/raw_diag.c:49 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in raw_sock_get+0x657/0x800 net/ipv4/raw_diag.c:71 raw_lookup net/ipv4/raw_diag.c:49 [inline] raw_sock_get+0x657/0x800 net/ipv4/raw_diag.c:71 raw_diag_dump_one+0xa1/0x660 net/ipv4/raw_diag.c:99 inet_diag_cmd_exact+0x7d9/0x980 inet_diag_get_exact_compat net/ipv4/inet_diag.c:1404 [inline] inet_diag_rcv_msg_compat+0x469/0x530 net/ipv4/inet_diag.c:1426 sock_diag_rcv_msg+0x23d/0x740 net/core/sock_diag.c:282 netlink_rcv_skb+0x537/0x670 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2564 sock_diag_rcv+0x35/0x40 net/core/sock_diag.c:297 netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1335 [inline] netlink_unicast+0xe74/0x1240 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1361 netlink_sendmsg+0x10c6/0x1260 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1905 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline] __sock_sendmsg+0x332/0x3d0 net/socket.c:745 ____sys_sendmsg+0x7f0/0xb70 net/socket.c:2585 ___sys_sendmsg+0x271/0x3b0 net/socket.c:2639 __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2668 [inline] __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2677 [inline] __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2675 [inline] __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x27e/0x4a0 net/socket.c:2675 x64_sys_call+0x135e/0x3ce0 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:47 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xd9/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Uninit was stored to memory at: raw_sock_get+0x650/0x800 net/ipv4/raw_diag.c:71 raw_diag_dump_one+0xa1/0x660 net/ipv4/raw_diag.c:99 inet_diag_cmd_exact+0x7d9/0x980 inet_diag_get_exact_compat net/ipv4/inet_diag.c:1404 [inline] inet_diag_rcv_msg_compat+0x469/0x530 net/ipv4/inet_diag.c:1426 sock_diag_rcv_msg+0x23d/0x740 net/core/sock_diag.c:282 netlink_rcv_skb+0x537/0x670 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2564 sock_diag_rcv+0x35/0x40 net/core/sock_diag.c:297 netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1335 [inline] netlink_unicast+0xe74/0x1240 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1361 netlink_sendmsg+0x10c6/0x1260 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1905 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline] __sock_sendmsg+0x332/0x3d0 net/socket.c:745 ____sys_sendmsg+0x7f0/0xb70 net/socket.c:2585 ___sys_sendmsg+0x271/0x3b0 net/socket.c:2639 __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2668 [inline] __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2677 [inline] __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2675 [inline] __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x27e/0x4a0 net/socket.c:2675 x64_sys_call+0x135e/0x3ce0 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:47 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xd9/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Local variable req.i created at: inet_diag_get_exact_compat net/ipv4/inet_diag.c:1396 [inline] inet_diag_rcv_msg_compat+0x2a6/0x530 net/ipv4/inet_diag.c:1426 sock_diag_rcv_msg+0x23d/0x740 net/core/sock_diag.c:282 CPU: 1 PID: 8888 Comm: syz-executor.6 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc4-00217-g35bb670d65fc #32 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014 Fixes: 432490f ("net: ip, diag -- Add diag interface for raw sockets") Reported-by: syzkaller <syzkaller@googlegroups.com> Signed-off-by: Shigeru Yoshida <syoshida@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240703091649.111773-1-syoshida@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 3, 2024
Currently, BPF_CALL is always jited to indirect call. When target is within the range of direct call, BPF_CALL can be jited to direct call. For example, the following BPF_CALL call __htab_map_lookup_elem is always jited to indirect call: mov x10, #0xffffffffffff18f4 movk x10, #0x821, lsl #16 movk x10, #0x8000, lsl #32 blr x10 When the address of target __htab_map_lookup_elem is within the range of direct call, the BPF_CALL can be jited to: bl 0xfffffffffd33bc98 This patch does such jit optimization by emitting arm64 direct calls for BPF_CALL when possible, indirect calls otherwise. Without this patch, the jit works as follows. 1. First pass A. Determine jited position and size for each bpf instruction. B. Computed the jited image size. 2. Allocate jited image with size computed in step 1. 3. Second pass A. Adjust jump offset for jump instructions B. Write the final image. This works because, for a given bpf prog, regardless of where the jited image is allocated, the jited result for each instruction is fixed. The second pass differs from the first only in adjusting the jump offsets, like changing "jmp imm1" to "jmp imm2", while the position and size of the "jmp" instruction remain unchanged. Now considering whether to jit BPF_CALL to arm64 direct or indirect call instruction. The choice depends solely on the jump offset: direct call if the jump offset is within 128MB, indirect call otherwise. For a given BPF_CALL, the target address is known, so the jump offset is decided by the jited address of the BPF_CALL instruction. In other words, for a given bpf prog, the jited result for each BPF_CALL is determined by its jited address. The jited address for a BPF_CALL is the jited image address plus the total jited size of all preceding instructions. For a given bpf prog, there are clearly no BPF_CALL instructions before the first BPF_CALL instruction. Since the jited result for all other instructions other than BPF_CALL are fixed, the total jited size preceding the first BPF_CALL is also fixed. Therefore, once the jited image is allocated, the jited address for the first BPF_CALL is fixed. Now that the jited result for the first BPF_CALL is fixed, the jited results for all instructions preceding the second BPF_CALL are fixed. So the jited address and result for the second BPF_CALL are also fixed. Similarly, we can conclude that the jited addresses and results for all subsequent BPF_CALL instructions are fixed. This means that, for a given bpf prog, once the jited image is allocated, the jited address and result for all instructions, including all BPF_CALL instructions, are fixed. Based on the observation, with this patch, the jit works as follows. 1. First pass Estimate the maximum jited image size. In this pass, all BPF_CALLs are jited to arm64 indirect calls since the jump offsets are unknown because the jited image is not allocated. 2. Allocate jited image with size estimated in step 1. 3. Second pass A. Determine the jited result for each BPF_CALL. B. Determine jited address and size for each bpf instruction. 4. Third pass A. Adjust jump offset for jump instructions. B. Write the final image. Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 4, 2024
Currently, BPF_CALL is always jited to indirect call. When target is within the range of direct call, BPF_CALL can be jited to direct call. For example, the following BPF_CALL call __htab_map_lookup_elem is always jited to indirect call: mov x10, #0xffffffffffff18f4 movk x10, #0x821, lsl #16 movk x10, #0x8000, lsl #32 blr x10 When the address of target __htab_map_lookup_elem is within the range of direct call, the BPF_CALL can be jited to: bl 0xfffffffffd33bc98 This patch does such jit optimization by emitting arm64 direct calls for BPF_CALL when possible, indirect calls otherwise. Without this patch, the jit works as follows. 1. First pass A. Determine jited position and size for each bpf instruction. B. Computed the jited image size. 2. Allocate jited image with size computed in step 1. 3. Second pass A. Adjust jump offset for jump instructions B. Write the final image. This works because, for a given bpf prog, regardless of where the jited image is allocated, the jited result for each instruction is fixed. The second pass differs from the first only in adjusting the jump offsets, like changing "jmp imm1" to "jmp imm2", while the position and size of the "jmp" instruction remain unchanged. Now considering whether to jit BPF_CALL to arm64 direct or indirect call instruction. The choice depends solely on the jump offset: direct call if the jump offset is within 128MB, indirect call otherwise. For a given BPF_CALL, the target address is known, so the jump offset is decided by the jited address of the BPF_CALL instruction. In other words, for a given bpf prog, the jited result for each BPF_CALL is determined by its jited address. The jited address for a BPF_CALL is the jited image address plus the total jited size of all preceding instructions. For a given bpf prog, there are clearly no BPF_CALL instructions before the first BPF_CALL instruction. Since the jited result for all other instructions other than BPF_CALL are fixed, the total jited size preceding the first BPF_CALL is also fixed. Therefore, once the jited image is allocated, the jited address for the first BPF_CALL is fixed. Now that the jited result for the first BPF_CALL is fixed, the jited results for all instructions preceding the second BPF_CALL are fixed. So the jited address and result for the second BPF_CALL are also fixed. Similarly, we can conclude that the jited addresses and results for all subsequent BPF_CALL instructions are fixed. This means that, for a given bpf prog, once the jited image is allocated, the jited address and result for all instructions, including all BPF_CALL instructions, are fixed. Based on the observation, with this patch, the jit works as follows. 1. First pass Estimate the maximum jited image size. In this pass, all BPF_CALLs are jited to arm64 indirect calls since the jump offsets are unknown because the jited image is not allocated. 2. Allocate jited image with size estimated in step 1. 3. Second pass A. Determine the jited result for each BPF_CALL. B. Determine jited address and size for each bpf instruction. 4. Third pass A. Adjust jump offset for jump instructions. B. Write the final image. Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240903094407.601107-1-xukuohai@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 1, 2024
During the migration of Soundwire runtime stream allocation from the Qualcomm Soundwire controller to SoC's soundcard drivers the sdm845 soundcard was forgotten. At this point any playback attempt or audio daemon startup, for instance on sdm845-db845c (Qualcomm RB3 board), will result in stream pointer NULL dereference: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000020 Mem abort info: ESR = 0x0000000096000004 EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits SET = 0, FnV = 0 EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault Data abort info: ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004, ISS2 = 0x00000000 CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0 GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0 user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000101ecf000 [0000000000000020] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000 Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP Modules linked in: ... CPU: 5 UID: 0 PID: 1198 Comm: aplay Not tainted 6.12.0-rc2-qcomlt-arm64-00059-g9d78f315a362-dirty #18 Hardware name: Thundercomm Dragonboard 845c (DT) pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : sdw_stream_add_slave+0x44/0x380 [soundwire_bus] lr : sdw_stream_add_slave+0x44/0x380 [soundwire_bus] sp : ffff80008a2035c0 x29: ffff80008a2035c0 x28: ffff80008a203978 x27: 0000000000000000 x26: 00000000000000c0 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: ffff1676025f4800 x23: ffff167600ff1cb8 x22: ffff167600ff1c98 x21: 0000000000000003 x20: ffff167607316000 x19: ffff167604e64e80 x18: 0000000000000000 x17: 0000000000000000 x16: ffffcec265074160 x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000 x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000000 x9 : 0000000000000000 x8 : 0000000000000000 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : ffff167600ff1cec x5 : ffffcec22cfa2010 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000003 x2 : ffff167613f836c0 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : ffff16761feb60b8 Call trace: sdw_stream_add_slave+0x44/0x380 [soundwire_bus] wsa881x_hw_params+0x68/0x80 [snd_soc_wsa881x] snd_soc_dai_hw_params+0x3c/0xa4 __soc_pcm_hw_params+0x230/0x660 dpcm_be_dai_hw_params+0x1d0/0x3f8 dpcm_fe_dai_hw_params+0x98/0x268 snd_pcm_hw_params+0x124/0x460 snd_pcm_common_ioctl+0x998/0x16e8 snd_pcm_ioctl+0x34/0x58 __arm64_sys_ioctl+0xac/0xf8 invoke_syscall+0x48/0x104 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x40/0xe0 do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x28 el0_svc+0x34/0xe0 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x120/0x12c el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 Code: aa0403fb f9418400 9100e000 9400102f (f8420f22) ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- 0000000000006108 <sdw_stream_add_slave>: 6108: d503233f paciasp 610c: a9b97bfd stp x29, x30, [sp, #-112]! 6110: 910003fd mov x29, sp 6114: a90153f3 stp x19, x20, [sp, #16] 6118: a9025bf5 stp x21, x22, [sp, #32] 611c: aa0103f6 mov x22, x1 6120: 2a0303f5 mov w21, w3 6124: a90363f7 stp x23, x24, [sp, #48] 6128: aa0003f8 mov x24, x0 612c: aa0203f7 mov x23, x2 6130: a9046bf9 stp x25, x26, [sp, #64] 6134: aa0403f9 mov x25, x4 <-- x4 copied to x25 6138: a90573fb stp x27, x28, [sp, #80] 613c: aa0403fb mov x27, x4 6140: f9418400 ldr x0, [x0, #776] 6144: 9100e000 add x0, x0, #0x38 6148: 94000000 bl 0 <mutex_lock> 614c: f8420f22 ldr x2, [x25, #32]! <-- offset 0x44 ^^^ This is 0x6108 + offset 0x44 from the beginning of sdw_stream_add_slave() where data abort happens. wsa881x_hw_params() is called with stream = NULL and passes it further in register x4 (5th argument) to sdw_stream_add_slave() without any checks. Value from x4 is copied to x25 and finally it aborts on trying to load a value from address in x25 plus offset 32 (in dec) which corresponds to master_list member in struct sdw_stream_runtime: struct sdw_stream_runtime { const char * name; /* 0 8 */ struct sdw_stream_params params; /* 8 12 */ enum sdw_stream_state state; /* 20 4 */ enum sdw_stream_type type; /* 24 4 */ /* XXX 4 bytes hole, try to pack */ here-> struct list_head master_list; /* 32 16 */ int m_rt_count; /* 48 4 */ /* size: 56, cachelines: 1, members: 6 */ /* sum members: 48, holes: 1, sum holes: 4 */ /* padding: 4 */ /* last cacheline: 56 bytes */ Fix this by adding required calls to qcom_snd_sdw_startup() and sdw_release_stream() to startup and shutdown routines which restores the previous correct behaviour when ->set_stream() method is called to set a valid stream runtime pointer on playback startup. Reproduced and then fix was tested on db845c RB3 board. Reported-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 15c7fab ("ASoC: qcom: Move Soundwire runtime stream alloc to soundcards") Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> Cc: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Cc: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@linaro.org> Tested-by: Steev Klimaszewski <steev@kali.org> # Lenovo Yoga C630 Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241009213922.999355-1-alexey.klimov@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull request for series with
subject: selftests/bpf: fix crash in core_reloc when bpftool btfgen fails
version: 1
url: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=615518