bpf: Support multi-attach for freplace programs #128
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Master branch: 00e8c44 |
|
Master branch: 9d9aae5 |
kernel-patches-bot
force-pushed
the
series/189431=>bpf-next
branch
from
23a9712 to
0d5e6bf
Compare
|
Master branch: f1fc8ec |
kernel-patches-bot
force-pushed
the
series/189431=>bpf-next
branch
from
0d5e6bf to
efe3fe6
Compare
|
Master branch: f970cbc |
kernel-patches-bot
force-pushed
the
series/189431=>bpf-next
branch
from
efe3fe6 to
1c2f548
Compare
In preparation for allowing multiple attachments of freplace programs, move the references to the target program and trampoline into the bpf_tracing_link structure when that is created. To do this atomically, introduce a new mutex in prog->aux to protect writing to the two pointers to target prog and trampoline, and rename the members to make it clear that they are related. With this change, it is no longer possible to attach the same tracing program multiple times (detaching in-between), since the reference from the tracing program to the target disappears on the first attach. However, since the next patch will let the caller supply an attach target, that will also make it possible to attach to the same place multiple times. Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
This enables support for attaching freplace programs to multiple attach points. It does this by amending the UAPI for bpf_link_Create with a target btf ID that can be used to supply the new attachment point along with the target program fd. The target must be compatible with the target that was supplied at program load time. The implementation reuses the checks that were factored out of check_attach_btf_id() to ensure compatibility between the BTF types of the old and new attachment. If these match, a new bpf_tracing_link will be created for the new attach target, allowing multiple attachments to co-exist simultaneously. The code could theoretically support multiple-attach of other types of tracing programs as well, but since I don't have a use case for any of those, there is no API support for doing so. Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Eelco reported we can't properly access arguments if the tracing
program is attached to extension program.
Having following program:
SEC("classifier/test_pkt_md_access")
int test_pkt_md_access(struct __sk_buff *skb)
with its extension:
SEC("freplace/test_pkt_md_access")
int test_pkt_md_access_new(struct __sk_buff *skb)
and tracing that extension with:
SEC("fentry/test_pkt_md_access_new")
int BPF_PROG(fentry, struct sk_buff *skb)
It's not possible to access skb argument in the fentry program,
with following error from verifier:
; int BPF_PROG(fentry, struct sk_buff *skb)
0: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0)
invalid bpf_context access off=0 size=8
The problem is that btf_ctx_access gets the context type for the
traced program, which is in this case the extension.
But when we trace extension program, we want to get the context
type of the program that the extension is attached to, so we can
access the argument properly in the trace program.
This version of the patch is tweaked slightly from Jiri's original one,
since the refactoring in the previous patches means we have to get the
target prog type from the new variable in prog->aux instead of directly
from the target prog.
Reported-by: Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
This adds support for supplying a target btf ID for the bpf_link_create() operation, and adds a new bpf_program__attach_freplace() high-level API for attaching freplace functions with a target. Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
This adds a selftest for attaching an freplace program to multiple targets simultaneously. Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Adding test that setup following program:
SEC("classifier/test_pkt_md_access")
int test_pkt_md_access(struct __sk_buff *skb)
with its extension:
SEC("freplace/test_pkt_md_access")
int test_pkt_md_access_new(struct __sk_buff *skb)
and tracing that extension with:
SEC("fentry/test_pkt_md_access_new")
int BPF_PROG(fentry, struct sk_buff *skb)
The test verifies that the tracing program can
dereference skb argument properly.
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
…replace This adds a selftest that ensures that modify_return tracing programs cannot be attached to freplace programs. The security_ prefix is added to the freplace program because that would otherwise let it pass the check for modify_return. Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
|
Master branch: 85e3f31 |
kernel-patches-bot
force-pushed
the
series/189431=>bpf-next
branch
from
1c2f548 to
a51cead
Compare
|
At least one diff in series https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?series=204867 irrelevant now. Closing PR. |
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 16, 2022
The BPF STX/LDX instruction uses offset relative to the FP to address
stack space. Since the BPF_FP locates at the top of the frame, the offset
is usually a negative number. However, arm64 str/ldr immediate instruction
requires that offset be a positive number. Therefore, this patch tries to
convert the offsets.
The method is to find the negative offset furthest from the FP firstly.
Then add it to the FP, calculate a bottom position, called FPB, and then
adjust the offsets in other STR/LDX instructions relative to FPB.
FPB is saved using the callee-saved register x27 of arm64 which is not
used yet.
Before adjusting the offset, the patch checks every instruction to ensure
that the FP does not change in run-time. If the FP may change, no offset
is adjusted.
For example, for the following bpftrace command:
bpftrace -e 'kprobe:do_sys_open { printf("opening: %s\n", str(arg1)); }'
Without this patch, jited code(fragment):
0: bti c
4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
8: mov x29, sp
c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]!
10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]!
14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]!
18: mov x25, sp
1c: mov x26, #0x0 // #0
20: bti j
24: sub sp, sp, #0x90
28: add x19, x0, #0x0
2c: mov x0, #0x0 // #0
30: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff78 // #-136
34: str x0, [x25, x10]
38: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff80 // #-128
3c: str x0, [x25, x10]
40: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff88 // #-120
44: str x0, [x25, x10]
48: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff90 // #-112
4c: str x0, [x25, x10]
50: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff98 // #-104
54: str x0, [x25, x10]
58: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa0 // #-96
5c: str x0, [x25, x10]
60: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa8 // #-88
64: str x0, [x25, x10]
68: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb0 // #-80
6c: str x0, [x25, x10]
70: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb8 // #-72
74: str x0, [x25, x10]
78: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc0 // #-64
7c: str x0, [x25, x10]
80: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc8 // #-56
84: str x0, [x25, x10]
88: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd0 // #-48
8c: str x0, [x25, x10]
90: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd8 // #-40
94: str x0, [x25, x10]
98: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe0 // #-32
9c: str x0, [x25, x10]
a0: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe8 // #-24
a4: str x0, [x25, x10]
a8: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff0 // #-16
ac: str x0, [x25, x10]
b0: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff8 // #-8
b4: str x0, [x25, x10]
b8: mov x10, #0x8 // #8
bc: ldr x2, [x19, x10]
[...]
With this patch, jited code(fragment):
0: bti c
4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
8: mov x29, sp
c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]!
10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]!
14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]!
18: stp x27, x28, [sp, #-16]!
1c: mov x25, sp
20: sub x27, x25, #0x88
24: mov x26, #0x0 // #0
28: bti j
2c: sub sp, sp, #0x90
30: add x19, x0, #0x0
34: mov x0, #0x0 // #0
38: str x0, [x27]
3c: str x0, [x27, #8]
40: str x0, [x27, #16]
44: str x0, [x27, #24]
48: str x0, [x27, #32]
4c: str x0, [x27, #40]
50: str x0, [x27, #48]
54: str x0, [x27, #56]
58: str x0, [x27, #64]
5c: str x0, [x27, #72]
60: str x0, [x27, #80]
64: str x0, [x27, #88]
68: str x0, [x27, #96]
6c: str x0, [x27, #104]
70: str x0, [x27, #112]
74: str x0, [x27, #120]
78: str x0, [x27, #128]
7c: ldr x2, [x19, #8]
[...]
Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 16, 2022
The BPF STX/LDX instruction uses offset relative to the FP to address
stack space. Since the BPF_FP locates at the top of the frame, the offset
is usually a negative number. However, arm64 str/ldr immediate instruction
requires that offset be a positive number. Therefore, this patch tries to
convert the offsets.
The method is to find the negative offset furthest from the FP firstly.
Then add it to the FP, calculate a bottom position, called FPB, and then
adjust the offsets in other STR/LDX instructions relative to FPB.
FPB is saved using the callee-saved register x27 of arm64 which is not
used yet.
Before adjusting the offset, the patch checks every instruction to ensure
that the FP does not change in run-time. If the FP may change, no offset
is adjusted.
For example, for the following bpftrace command:
bpftrace -e 'kprobe:do_sys_open { printf("opening: %s\n", str(arg1)); }'
Without this patch, jited code(fragment):
0: bti c
4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
8: mov x29, sp
c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]!
10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]!
14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]!
18: mov x25, sp
1c: mov x26, #0x0 // #0
20: bti j
24: sub sp, sp, #0x90
28: add x19, x0, #0x0
2c: mov x0, #0x0 // #0
30: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff78 // #-136
34: str x0, [x25, x10]
38: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff80 // #-128
3c: str x0, [x25, x10]
40: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff88 // #-120
44: str x0, [x25, x10]
48: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff90 // #-112
4c: str x0, [x25, x10]
50: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff98 // #-104
54: str x0, [x25, x10]
58: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa0 // #-96
5c: str x0, [x25, x10]
60: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa8 // #-88
64: str x0, [x25, x10]
68: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb0 // #-80
6c: str x0, [x25, x10]
70: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb8 // #-72
74: str x0, [x25, x10]
78: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc0 // #-64
7c: str x0, [x25, x10]
80: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc8 // #-56
84: str x0, [x25, x10]
88: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd0 // #-48
8c: str x0, [x25, x10]
90: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd8 // #-40
94: str x0, [x25, x10]
98: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe0 // #-32
9c: str x0, [x25, x10]
a0: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe8 // #-24
a4: str x0, [x25, x10]
a8: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff0 // #-16
ac: str x0, [x25, x10]
b0: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff8 // #-8
b4: str x0, [x25, x10]
b8: mov x10, #0x8 // #8
bc: ldr x2, [x19, x10]
[...]
With this patch, jited code(fragment):
0: bti c
4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
8: mov x29, sp
c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]!
10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]!
14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]!
18: stp x27, x28, [sp, #-16]!
1c: mov x25, sp
20: sub x27, x25, #0x88
24: mov x26, #0x0 // #0
28: bti j
2c: sub sp, sp, #0x90
30: add x19, x0, #0x0
34: mov x0, #0x0 // #0
38: str x0, [x27]
3c: str x0, [x27, #8]
40: str x0, [x27, #16]
44: str x0, [x27, #24]
48: str x0, [x27, #32]
4c: str x0, [x27, #40]
50: str x0, [x27, #48]
54: str x0, [x27, #56]
58: str x0, [x27, #64]
5c: str x0, [x27, #72]
60: str x0, [x27, #80]
64: str x0, [x27, #88]
68: str x0, [x27, #96]
6c: str x0, [x27, #104]
70: str x0, [x27, #112]
74: str x0, [x27, #120]
78: str x0, [x27, #128]
7c: ldr x2, [x19, #8]
[...]
Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 16, 2022
The BPF STX/LDX instruction uses offset relative to the FP to address
stack space. Since the BPF_FP locates at the top of the frame, the offset
is usually a negative number. However, arm64 str/ldr immediate instruction
requires that offset be a positive number. Therefore, this patch tries to
convert the offsets.
The method is to find the negative offset furthest from the FP firstly.
Then add it to the FP, calculate a bottom position, called FPB, and then
adjust the offsets in other STR/LDX instructions relative to FPB.
FPB is saved using the callee-saved register x27 of arm64 which is not
used yet.
Before adjusting the offset, the patch checks every instruction to ensure
that the FP does not change in run-time. If the FP may change, no offset
is adjusted.
For example, for the following bpftrace command:
bpftrace -e 'kprobe:do_sys_open { printf("opening: %s\n", str(arg1)); }'
Without this patch, jited code(fragment):
0: bti c
4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
8: mov x29, sp
c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]!
10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]!
14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]!
18: mov x25, sp
1c: mov x26, #0x0 // #0
20: bti j
24: sub sp, sp, #0x90
28: add x19, x0, #0x0
2c: mov x0, #0x0 // #0
30: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff78 // #-136
34: str x0, [x25, x10]
38: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff80 // #-128
3c: str x0, [x25, x10]
40: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff88 // #-120
44: str x0, [x25, x10]
48: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff90 // #-112
4c: str x0, [x25, x10]
50: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff98 // #-104
54: str x0, [x25, x10]
58: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa0 // #-96
5c: str x0, [x25, x10]
60: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa8 // #-88
64: str x0, [x25, x10]
68: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb0 // #-80
6c: str x0, [x25, x10]
70: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb8 // #-72
74: str x0, [x25, x10]
78: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc0 // #-64
7c: str x0, [x25, x10]
80: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc8 // #-56
84: str x0, [x25, x10]
88: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd0 // #-48
8c: str x0, [x25, x10]
90: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd8 // #-40
94: str x0, [x25, x10]
98: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe0 // #-32
9c: str x0, [x25, x10]
a0: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe8 // #-24
a4: str x0, [x25, x10]
a8: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff0 // #-16
ac: str x0, [x25, x10]
b0: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff8 // #-8
b4: str x0, [x25, x10]
b8: mov x10, #0x8 // #8
bc: ldr x2, [x19, x10]
[...]
With this patch, jited code(fragment):
0: bti c
4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
8: mov x29, sp
c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]!
10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]!
14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]!
18: stp x27, x28, [sp, #-16]!
1c: mov x25, sp
20: sub x27, x25, #0x88
24: mov x26, #0x0 // #0
28: bti j
2c: sub sp, sp, #0x90
30: add x19, x0, #0x0
34: mov x0, #0x0 // #0
38: str x0, [x27]
3c: str x0, [x27, #8]
40: str x0, [x27, #16]
44: str x0, [x27, #24]
48: str x0, [x27, #32]
4c: str x0, [x27, #40]
50: str x0, [x27, #48]
54: str x0, [x27, #56]
58: str x0, [x27, #64]
5c: str x0, [x27, #72]
60: str x0, [x27, #80]
64: str x0, [x27, #88]
68: str x0, [x27, #96]
6c: str x0, [x27, #104]
70: str x0, [x27, #112]
74: str x0, [x27, #120]
78: str x0, [x27, #128]
7c: ldr x2, [x19, #8]
[...]
Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 17, 2022
The BPF STX/LDX instruction uses offset relative to the FP to address
stack space. Since the BPF_FP locates at the top of the frame, the offset
is usually a negative number. However, arm64 str/ldr immediate instruction
requires that offset be a positive number. Therefore, this patch tries to
convert the offsets.
The method is to find the negative offset furthest from the FP firstly.
Then add it to the FP, calculate a bottom position, called FPB, and then
adjust the offsets in other STR/LDX instructions relative to FPB.
FPB is saved using the callee-saved register x27 of arm64 which is not
used yet.
Before adjusting the offset, the patch checks every instruction to ensure
that the FP does not change in run-time. If the FP may change, no offset
is adjusted.
For example, for the following bpftrace command:
bpftrace -e 'kprobe:do_sys_open { printf("opening: %s\n", str(arg1)); }'
Without this patch, jited code(fragment):
0: bti c
4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
8: mov x29, sp
c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]!
10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]!
14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]!
18: mov x25, sp
1c: mov x26, #0x0 // #0
20: bti j
24: sub sp, sp, #0x90
28: add x19, x0, #0x0
2c: mov x0, #0x0 // #0
30: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff78 // #-136
34: str x0, [x25, x10]
38: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff80 // #-128
3c: str x0, [x25, x10]
40: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff88 // #-120
44: str x0, [x25, x10]
48: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff90 // #-112
4c: str x0, [x25, x10]
50: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff98 // #-104
54: str x0, [x25, x10]
58: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa0 // #-96
5c: str x0, [x25, x10]
60: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa8 // #-88
64: str x0, [x25, x10]
68: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb0 // #-80
6c: str x0, [x25, x10]
70: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb8 // #-72
74: str x0, [x25, x10]
78: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc0 // #-64
7c: str x0, [x25, x10]
80: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc8 // #-56
84: str x0, [x25, x10]
88: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd0 // #-48
8c: str x0, [x25, x10]
90: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd8 // #-40
94: str x0, [x25, x10]
98: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe0 // #-32
9c: str x0, [x25, x10]
a0: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe8 // #-24
a4: str x0, [x25, x10]
a8: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff0 // #-16
ac: str x0, [x25, x10]
b0: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff8 // #-8
b4: str x0, [x25, x10]
b8: mov x10, #0x8 // #8
bc: ldr x2, [x19, x10]
[...]
With this patch, jited code(fragment):
0: bti c
4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
8: mov x29, sp
c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]!
10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]!
14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]!
18: stp x27, x28, [sp, #-16]!
1c: mov x25, sp
20: sub x27, x25, #0x88
24: mov x26, #0x0 // #0
28: bti j
2c: sub sp, sp, #0x90
30: add x19, x0, #0x0
34: mov x0, #0x0 // #0
38: str x0, [x27]
3c: str x0, [x27, #8]
40: str x0, [x27, #16]
44: str x0, [x27, #24]
48: str x0, [x27, #32]
4c: str x0, [x27, #40]
50: str x0, [x27, #48]
54: str x0, [x27, #56]
58: str x0, [x27, #64]
5c: str x0, [x27, #72]
60: str x0, [x27, #80]
64: str x0, [x27, #88]
68: str x0, [x27, #96]
6c: str x0, [x27, #104]
70: str x0, [x27, #112]
74: str x0, [x27, #120]
78: str x0, [x27, #128]
7c: ldr x2, [x19, #8]
[...]
Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 17, 2022
The BPF STX/LDX instruction uses offset relative to the FP to address
stack space. Since the BPF_FP locates at the top of the frame, the offset
is usually a negative number. However, arm64 str/ldr immediate instruction
requires that offset be a positive number. Therefore, this patch tries to
convert the offsets.
The method is to find the negative offset furthest from the FP firstly.
Then add it to the FP, calculate a bottom position, called FPB, and then
adjust the offsets in other STR/LDX instructions relative to FPB.
FPB is saved using the callee-saved register x27 of arm64 which is not
used yet.
Before adjusting the offset, the patch checks every instruction to ensure
that the FP does not change in run-time. If the FP may change, no offset
is adjusted.
For example, for the following bpftrace command:
bpftrace -e 'kprobe:do_sys_open { printf("opening: %s\n", str(arg1)); }'
Without this patch, jited code(fragment):
0: bti c
4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
8: mov x29, sp
c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]!
10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]!
14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]!
18: mov x25, sp
1c: mov x26, #0x0 // #0
20: bti j
24: sub sp, sp, #0x90
28: add x19, x0, #0x0
2c: mov x0, #0x0 // #0
30: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff78 // #-136
34: str x0, [x25, x10]
38: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff80 // #-128
3c: str x0, [x25, x10]
40: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff88 // #-120
44: str x0, [x25, x10]
48: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff90 // #-112
4c: str x0, [x25, x10]
50: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff98 // #-104
54: str x0, [x25, x10]
58: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa0 // #-96
5c: str x0, [x25, x10]
60: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa8 // #-88
64: str x0, [x25, x10]
68: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb0 // #-80
6c: str x0, [x25, x10]
70: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb8 // #-72
74: str x0, [x25, x10]
78: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc0 // #-64
7c: str x0, [x25, x10]
80: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc8 // #-56
84: str x0, [x25, x10]
88: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd0 // #-48
8c: str x0, [x25, x10]
90: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd8 // #-40
94: str x0, [x25, x10]
98: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe0 // #-32
9c: str x0, [x25, x10]
a0: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe8 // #-24
a4: str x0, [x25, x10]
a8: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff0 // #-16
ac: str x0, [x25, x10]
b0: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff8 // #-8
b4: str x0, [x25, x10]
b8: mov x10, #0x8 // #8
bc: ldr x2, [x19, x10]
[...]
With this patch, jited code(fragment):
0: bti c
4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
8: mov x29, sp
c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]!
10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]!
14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]!
18: stp x27, x28, [sp, #-16]!
1c: mov x25, sp
20: sub x27, x25, #0x88
24: mov x26, #0x0 // #0
28: bti j
2c: sub sp, sp, #0x90
30: add x19, x0, #0x0
34: mov x0, #0x0 // #0
38: str x0, [x27]
3c: str x0, [x27, #8]
40: str x0, [x27, #16]
44: str x0, [x27, #24]
48: str x0, [x27, #32]
4c: str x0, [x27, #40]
50: str x0, [x27, #48]
54: str x0, [x27, #56]
58: str x0, [x27, #64]
5c: str x0, [x27, #72]
60: str x0, [x27, #80]
64: str x0, [x27, #88]
68: str x0, [x27, #96]
6c: str x0, [x27, #104]
70: str x0, [x27, #112]
74: str x0, [x27, #120]
78: str x0, [x27, #128]
7c: ldr x2, [x19, #8]
[...]
Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 21, 2022
The BPF STX/LDX instruction uses offset relative to the FP to address
stack space. Since the BPF_FP locates at the top of the frame, the offset
is usually a negative number. However, arm64 str/ldr immediate instruction
requires that offset be a positive number. Therefore, this patch tries to
convert the offsets.
The method is to find the negative offset furthest from the FP firstly.
Then add it to the FP, calculate a bottom position, called FPB, and then
adjust the offsets in other STR/LDX instructions relative to FPB.
FPB is saved using the callee-saved register x27 of arm64 which is not
used yet.
Before adjusting the offset, the patch checks every instruction to ensure
that the FP does not change in run-time. If the FP may change, no offset
is adjusted.
For example, for the following bpftrace command:
bpftrace -e 'kprobe:do_sys_open { printf("opening: %s\n", str(arg1)); }'
Without this patch, jited code(fragment):
0: bti c
4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
8: mov x29, sp
c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]!
10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]!
14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]!
18: mov x25, sp
1c: mov x26, #0x0 // #0
20: bti j
24: sub sp, sp, #0x90
28: add x19, x0, #0x0
2c: mov x0, #0x0 // #0
30: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff78 // #-136
34: str x0, [x25, x10]
38: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff80 // #-128
3c: str x0, [x25, x10]
40: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff88 // #-120
44: str x0, [x25, x10]
48: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff90 // #-112
4c: str x0, [x25, x10]
50: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff98 // #-104
54: str x0, [x25, x10]
58: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa0 // #-96
5c: str x0, [x25, x10]
60: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa8 // #-88
64: str x0, [x25, x10]
68: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb0 // #-80
6c: str x0, [x25, x10]
70: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb8 // #-72
74: str x0, [x25, x10]
78: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc0 // #-64
7c: str x0, [x25, x10]
80: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc8 // #-56
84: str x0, [x25, x10]
88: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd0 // #-48
8c: str x0, [x25, x10]
90: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd8 // #-40
94: str x0, [x25, x10]
98: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe0 // #-32
9c: str x0, [x25, x10]
a0: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe8 // #-24
a4: str x0, [x25, x10]
a8: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff0 // #-16
ac: str x0, [x25, x10]
b0: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff8 // #-8
b4: str x0, [x25, x10]
b8: mov x10, #0x8 // #8
bc: ldr x2, [x19, x10]
[...]
With this patch, jited code(fragment):
0: bti c
4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
8: mov x29, sp
c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]!
10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]!
14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]!
18: stp x27, x28, [sp, #-16]!
1c: mov x25, sp
20: sub x27, x25, #0x88
24: mov x26, #0x0 // #0
28: bti j
2c: sub sp, sp, #0x90
30: add x19, x0, #0x0
34: mov x0, #0x0 // #0
38: str x0, [x27]
3c: str x0, [x27, #8]
40: str x0, [x27, #16]
44: str x0, [x27, #24]
48: str x0, [x27, #32]
4c: str x0, [x27, #40]
50: str x0, [x27, #48]
54: str x0, [x27, #56]
58: str x0, [x27, #64]
5c: str x0, [x27, #72]
60: str x0, [x27, #80]
64: str x0, [x27, #88]
68: str x0, [x27, #96]
6c: str x0, [x27, #104]
70: str x0, [x27, #112]
74: str x0, [x27, #120]
78: str x0, [x27, #128]
7c: ldr x2, [x19, #8]
[...]
Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2022
The BPF STX/LDX instruction uses offset relative to the FP to address
stack space. Since the BPF_FP locates at the top of the frame, the offset
is usually a negative number. However, arm64 str/ldr immediate instruction
requires that offset be a positive number. Therefore, this patch tries to
convert the offsets.
The method is to find the negative offset furthest from the FP firstly.
Then add it to the FP, calculate a bottom position, called FPB, and then
adjust the offsets in other STR/LDX instructions relative to FPB.
FPB is saved using the callee-saved register x27 of arm64 which is not
used yet.
Before adjusting the offset, the patch checks every instruction to ensure
that the FP does not change in run-time. If the FP may change, no offset
is adjusted.
For example, for the following bpftrace command:
bpftrace -e 'kprobe:do_sys_open { printf("opening: %s\n", str(arg1)); }'
Without this patch, jited code(fragment):
0: bti c
4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
8: mov x29, sp
c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]!
10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]!
14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]!
18: mov x25, sp
1c: mov x26, #0x0 // #0
20: bti j
24: sub sp, sp, #0x90
28: add x19, x0, #0x0
2c: mov x0, #0x0 // #0
30: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff78 // #-136
34: str x0, [x25, x10]
38: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff80 // #-128
3c: str x0, [x25, x10]
40: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff88 // #-120
44: str x0, [x25, x10]
48: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff90 // #-112
4c: str x0, [x25, x10]
50: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff98 // #-104
54: str x0, [x25, x10]
58: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa0 // #-96
5c: str x0, [x25, x10]
60: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa8 // #-88
64: str x0, [x25, x10]
68: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb0 // #-80
6c: str x0, [x25, x10]
70: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb8 // #-72
74: str x0, [x25, x10]
78: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc0 // #-64
7c: str x0, [x25, x10]
80: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc8 // #-56
84: str x0, [x25, x10]
88: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd0 // #-48
8c: str x0, [x25, x10]
90: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd8 // #-40
94: str x0, [x25, x10]
98: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe0 // #-32
9c: str x0, [x25, x10]
a0: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe8 // #-24
a4: str x0, [x25, x10]
a8: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff0 // #-16
ac: str x0, [x25, x10]
b0: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff8 // #-8
b4: str x0, [x25, x10]
b8: mov x10, #0x8 // #8
bc: ldr x2, [x19, x10]
[...]
With this patch, jited code(fragment):
0: bti c
4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
8: mov x29, sp
c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]!
10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]!
14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]!
18: stp x27, x28, [sp, #-16]!
1c: mov x25, sp
20: sub x27, x25, #0x88
24: mov x26, #0x0 // #0
28: bti j
2c: sub sp, sp, #0x90
30: add x19, x0, #0x0
34: mov x0, #0x0 // #0
38: str x0, [x27]
3c: str x0, [x27, #8]
40: str x0, [x27, #16]
44: str x0, [x27, #24]
48: str x0, [x27, #32]
4c: str x0, [x27, #40]
50: str x0, [x27, #48]
54: str x0, [x27, #56]
58: str x0, [x27, #64]
5c: str x0, [x27, #72]
60: str x0, [x27, #80]
64: str x0, [x27, #88]
68: str x0, [x27, #96]
6c: str x0, [x27, #104]
70: str x0, [x27, #112]
74: str x0, [x27, #120]
78: str x0, [x27, #128]
7c: ldr x2, [x19, #8]
[...]
Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2022
The BPF STX/LDX instruction uses offset relative to the FP to address
stack space. Since the BPF_FP locates at the top of the frame, the offset
is usually a negative number. However, arm64 str/ldr immediate instruction
requires that offset be a positive number. Therefore, this patch tries to
convert the offsets.
The method is to find the negative offset furthest from the FP firstly.
Then add it to the FP, calculate a bottom position, called FPB, and then
adjust the offsets in other STR/LDX instructions relative to FPB.
FPB is saved using the callee-saved register x27 of arm64 which is not
used yet.
Before adjusting the offset, the patch checks every instruction to ensure
that the FP does not change in run-time. If the FP may change, no offset
is adjusted.
For example, for the following bpftrace command:
bpftrace -e 'kprobe:do_sys_open { printf("opening: %s\n", str(arg1)); }'
Without this patch, jited code(fragment):
0: bti c
4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
8: mov x29, sp
c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]!
10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]!
14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]!
18: mov x25, sp
1c: mov x26, #0x0 // #0
20: bti j
24: sub sp, sp, #0x90
28: add x19, x0, #0x0
2c: mov x0, #0x0 // #0
30: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff78 // #-136
34: str x0, [x25, x10]
38: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff80 // #-128
3c: str x0, [x25, x10]
40: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff88 // #-120
44: str x0, [x25, x10]
48: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff90 // #-112
4c: str x0, [x25, x10]
50: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff98 // #-104
54: str x0, [x25, x10]
58: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa0 // #-96
5c: str x0, [x25, x10]
60: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa8 // #-88
64: str x0, [x25, x10]
68: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb0 // #-80
6c: str x0, [x25, x10]
70: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb8 // #-72
74: str x0, [x25, x10]
78: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc0 // #-64
7c: str x0, [x25, x10]
80: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc8 // #-56
84: str x0, [x25, x10]
88: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd0 // #-48
8c: str x0, [x25, x10]
90: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd8 // #-40
94: str x0, [x25, x10]
98: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe0 // #-32
9c: str x0, [x25, x10]
a0: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe8 // #-24
a4: str x0, [x25, x10]
a8: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff0 // #-16
ac: str x0, [x25, x10]
b0: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff8 // #-8
b4: str x0, [x25, x10]
b8: mov x10, #0x8 // #8
bc: ldr x2, [x19, x10]
[...]
With this patch, jited code(fragment):
0: bti c
4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
8: mov x29, sp
c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]!
10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]!
14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]!
18: stp x27, x28, [sp, #-16]!
1c: mov x25, sp
20: sub x27, x25, #0x88
24: mov x26, #0x0 // #0
28: bti j
2c: sub sp, sp, #0x90
30: add x19, x0, #0x0
34: mov x0, #0x0 // #0
38: str x0, [x27]
3c: str x0, [x27, #8]
40: str x0, [x27, #16]
44: str x0, [x27, #24]
48: str x0, [x27, #32]
4c: str x0, [x27, #40]
50: str x0, [x27, #48]
54: str x0, [x27, #56]
58: str x0, [x27, #64]
5c: str x0, [x27, #72]
60: str x0, [x27, #80]
64: str x0, [x27, #88]
68: str x0, [x27, #96]
6c: str x0, [x27, #104]
70: str x0, [x27, #112]
74: str x0, [x27, #120]
78: str x0, [x27, #128]
7c: ldr x2, [x19, #8]
[...]
Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2022
The BPF STX/LDX instruction uses offset relative to the FP to address
stack space. Since the BPF_FP locates at the top of the frame, the offset
is usually a negative number. However, arm64 str/ldr immediate instruction
requires that offset be a positive number. Therefore, this patch tries to
convert the offsets.
The method is to find the negative offset furthest from the FP firstly.
Then add it to the FP, calculate a bottom position, called FPB, and then
adjust the offsets in other STR/LDX instructions relative to FPB.
FPB is saved using the callee-saved register x27 of arm64 which is not
used yet.
Before adjusting the offset, the patch checks every instruction to ensure
that the FP does not change in run-time. If the FP may change, no offset
is adjusted.
For example, for the following bpftrace command:
bpftrace -e 'kprobe:do_sys_open { printf("opening: %s\n", str(arg1)); }'
Without this patch, jited code(fragment):
0: bti c
4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
8: mov x29, sp
c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]!
10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]!
14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]!
18: mov x25, sp
1c: mov x26, #0x0 // #0
20: bti j
24: sub sp, sp, #0x90
28: add x19, x0, #0x0
2c: mov x0, #0x0 // #0
30: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff78 // #-136
34: str x0, [x25, x10]
38: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff80 // #-128
3c: str x0, [x25, x10]
40: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff88 // #-120
44: str x0, [x25, x10]
48: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff90 // #-112
4c: str x0, [x25, x10]
50: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff98 // #-104
54: str x0, [x25, x10]
58: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa0 // #-96
5c: str x0, [x25, x10]
60: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa8 // #-88
64: str x0, [x25, x10]
68: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb0 // #-80
6c: str x0, [x25, x10]
70: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb8 // #-72
74: str x0, [x25, x10]
78: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc0 // #-64
7c: str x0, [x25, x10]
80: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc8 // #-56
84: str x0, [x25, x10]
88: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd0 // #-48
8c: str x0, [x25, x10]
90: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd8 // #-40
94: str x0, [x25, x10]
98: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe0 // #-32
9c: str x0, [x25, x10]
a0: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe8 // #-24
a4: str x0, [x25, x10]
a8: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff0 // #-16
ac: str x0, [x25, x10]
b0: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff8 // #-8
b4: str x0, [x25, x10]
b8: mov x10, #0x8 // #8
bc: ldr x2, [x19, x10]
[...]
With this patch, jited code(fragment):
0: bti c
4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
8: mov x29, sp
c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]!
10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]!
14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]!
18: stp x27, x28, [sp, #-16]!
1c: mov x25, sp
20: sub x27, x25, #0x88
24: mov x26, #0x0 // #0
28: bti j
2c: sub sp, sp, #0x90
30: add x19, x0, #0x0
34: mov x0, #0x0 // #0
38: str x0, [x27]
3c: str x0, [x27, #8]
40: str x0, [x27, #16]
44: str x0, [x27, #24]
48: str x0, [x27, #32]
4c: str x0, [x27, #40]
50: str x0, [x27, #48]
54: str x0, [x27, #56]
58: str x0, [x27, #64]
5c: str x0, [x27, #72]
60: str x0, [x27, #80]
64: str x0, [x27, #88]
68: str x0, [x27, #96]
6c: str x0, [x27, #104]
70: str x0, [x27, #112]
74: str x0, [x27, #120]
78: str x0, [x27, #128]
7c: ldr x2, [x19, #8]
[...]
Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 23, 2022
The BPF STX/LDX instruction uses offset relative to the FP to address
stack space. Since the BPF_FP locates at the top of the frame, the offset
is usually a negative number. However, arm64 str/ldr immediate instruction
requires that offset be a positive number. Therefore, this patch tries to
convert the offsets.
The method is to find the negative offset furthest from the FP firstly.
Then add it to the FP, calculate a bottom position, called FPB, and then
adjust the offsets in other STR/LDX instructions relative to FPB.
FPB is saved using the callee-saved register x27 of arm64 which is not
used yet.
Before adjusting the offset, the patch checks every instruction to ensure
that the FP does not change in run-time. If the FP may change, no offset
is adjusted.
For example, for the following bpftrace command:
bpftrace -e 'kprobe:do_sys_open { printf("opening: %s\n", str(arg1)); }'
Without this patch, jited code(fragment):
0: bti c
4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
8: mov x29, sp
c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]!
10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]!
14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]!
18: mov x25, sp
1c: mov x26, #0x0 // #0
20: bti j
24: sub sp, sp, #0x90
28: add x19, x0, #0x0
2c: mov x0, #0x0 // #0
30: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff78 // #-136
34: str x0, [x25, x10]
38: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff80 // #-128
3c: str x0, [x25, x10]
40: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff88 // #-120
44: str x0, [x25, x10]
48: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff90 // #-112
4c: str x0, [x25, x10]
50: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff98 // #-104
54: str x0, [x25, x10]
58: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa0 // #-96
5c: str x0, [x25, x10]
60: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa8 // #-88
64: str x0, [x25, x10]
68: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb0 // #-80
6c: str x0, [x25, x10]
70: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb8 // #-72
74: str x0, [x25, x10]
78: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc0 // #-64
7c: str x0, [x25, x10]
80: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc8 // #-56
84: str x0, [x25, x10]
88: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd0 // #-48
8c: str x0, [x25, x10]
90: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd8 // #-40
94: str x0, [x25, x10]
98: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe0 // #-32
9c: str x0, [x25, x10]
a0: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe8 // #-24
a4: str x0, [x25, x10]
a8: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff0 // #-16
ac: str x0, [x25, x10]
b0: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff8 // #-8
b4: str x0, [x25, x10]
b8: mov x10, #0x8 // #8
bc: ldr x2, [x19, x10]
[...]
With this patch, jited code(fragment):
0: bti c
4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
8: mov x29, sp
c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]!
10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]!
14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]!
18: stp x27, x28, [sp, #-16]!
1c: mov x25, sp
20: sub x27, x25, #0x88
24: mov x26, #0x0 // #0
28: bti j
2c: sub sp, sp, #0x90
30: add x19, x0, #0x0
34: mov x0, #0x0 // #0
38: str x0, [x27]
3c: str x0, [x27, #8]
40: str x0, [x27, #16]
44: str x0, [x27, #24]
48: str x0, [x27, #32]
4c: str x0, [x27, #40]
50: str x0, [x27, #48]
54: str x0, [x27, #56]
58: str x0, [x27, #64]
5c: str x0, [x27, #72]
60: str x0, [x27, #80]
64: str x0, [x27, #88]
68: str x0, [x27, #96]
6c: str x0, [x27, #104]
70: str x0, [x27, #112]
74: str x0, [x27, #120]
78: str x0, [x27, #128]
7c: ldr x2, [x19, #8]
[...]
Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 23, 2022
The BPF STX/LDX instruction uses offset relative to the FP to address
stack space. Since the BPF_FP locates at the top of the frame, the offset
is usually a negative number. However, arm64 str/ldr immediate instruction
requires that offset be a positive number. Therefore, this patch tries to
convert the offsets.
The method is to find the negative offset furthest from the FP firstly.
Then add it to the FP, calculate a bottom position, called FPB, and then
adjust the offsets in other STR/LDX instructions relative to FPB.
FPB is saved using the callee-saved register x27 of arm64 which is not
used yet.
Before adjusting the offset, the patch checks every instruction to ensure
that the FP does not change in run-time. If the FP may change, no offset
is adjusted.
For example, for the following bpftrace command:
bpftrace -e 'kprobe:do_sys_open { printf("opening: %s\n", str(arg1)); }'
Without this patch, jited code(fragment):
0: bti c
4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
8: mov x29, sp
c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]!
10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]!
14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]!
18: mov x25, sp
1c: mov x26, #0x0 // #0
20: bti j
24: sub sp, sp, #0x90
28: add x19, x0, #0x0
2c: mov x0, #0x0 // #0
30: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff78 // #-136
34: str x0, [x25, x10]
38: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff80 // #-128
3c: str x0, [x25, x10]
40: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff88 // #-120
44: str x0, [x25, x10]
48: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff90 // #-112
4c: str x0, [x25, x10]
50: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff98 // #-104
54: str x0, [x25, x10]
58: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa0 // #-96
5c: str x0, [x25, x10]
60: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa8 // #-88
64: str x0, [x25, x10]
68: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb0 // #-80
6c: str x0, [x25, x10]
70: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb8 // #-72
74: str x0, [x25, x10]
78: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc0 // #-64
7c: str x0, [x25, x10]
80: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc8 // #-56
84: str x0, [x25, x10]
88: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd0 // #-48
8c: str x0, [x25, x10]
90: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd8 // #-40
94: str x0, [x25, x10]
98: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe0 // #-32
9c: str x0, [x25, x10]
a0: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe8 // #-24
a4: str x0, [x25, x10]
a8: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff0 // #-16
ac: str x0, [x25, x10]
b0: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff8 // #-8
b4: str x0, [x25, x10]
b8: mov x10, #0x8 // #8
bc: ldr x2, [x19, x10]
[...]
With this patch, jited code(fragment):
0: bti c
4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
8: mov x29, sp
c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]!
10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]!
14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]!
18: stp x27, x28, [sp, #-16]!
1c: mov x25, sp
20: sub x27, x25, #0x88
24: mov x26, #0x0 // #0
28: bti j
2c: sub sp, sp, #0x90
30: add x19, x0, #0x0
34: mov x0, #0x0 // #0
38: str x0, [x27]
3c: str x0, [x27, #8]
40: str x0, [x27, #16]
44: str x0, [x27, #24]
48: str x0, [x27, #32]
4c: str x0, [x27, #40]
50: str x0, [x27, #48]
54: str x0, [x27, #56]
58: str x0, [x27, #64]
5c: str x0, [x27, #72]
60: str x0, [x27, #80]
64: str x0, [x27, #88]
68: str x0, [x27, #96]
6c: str x0, [x27, #104]
70: str x0, [x27, #112]
74: str x0, [x27, #120]
78: str x0, [x27, #128]
7c: ldr x2, [x19, #8]
[...]
Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 24, 2022
The BPF STX/LDX instruction uses offset relative to the FP to address
stack space. Since the BPF_FP locates at the top of the frame, the offset
is usually a negative number. However, arm64 str/ldr immediate instruction
requires that offset be a positive number. Therefore, this patch tries to
convert the offsets.
The method is to find the negative offset furthest from the FP firstly.
Then add it to the FP, calculate a bottom position, called FPB, and then
adjust the offsets in other STR/LDX instructions relative to FPB.
FPB is saved using the callee-saved register x27 of arm64 which is not
used yet.
Before adjusting the offset, the patch checks every instruction to ensure
that the FP does not change in run-time. If the FP may change, no offset
is adjusted.
For example, for the following bpftrace command:
bpftrace -e 'kprobe:do_sys_open { printf("opening: %s\n", str(arg1)); }'
Without this patch, jited code(fragment):
0: bti c
4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
8: mov x29, sp
c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]!
10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]!
14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]!
18: mov x25, sp
1c: mov x26, #0x0 // #0
20: bti j
24: sub sp, sp, #0x90
28: add x19, x0, #0x0
2c: mov x0, #0x0 // #0
30: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff78 // #-136
34: str x0, [x25, x10]
38: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff80 // #-128
3c: str x0, [x25, x10]
40: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff88 // #-120
44: str x0, [x25, x10]
48: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff90 // #-112
4c: str x0, [x25, x10]
50: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff98 // #-104
54: str x0, [x25, x10]
58: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa0 // #-96
5c: str x0, [x25, x10]
60: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa8 // #-88
64: str x0, [x25, x10]
68: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb0 // #-80
6c: str x0, [x25, x10]
70: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb8 // #-72
74: str x0, [x25, x10]
78: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc0 // #-64
7c: str x0, [x25, x10]
80: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc8 // #-56
84: str x0, [x25, x10]
88: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd0 // #-48
8c: str x0, [x25, x10]
90: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd8 // #-40
94: str x0, [x25, x10]
98: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe0 // #-32
9c: str x0, [x25, x10]
a0: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe8 // #-24
a4: str x0, [x25, x10]
a8: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff0 // #-16
ac: str x0, [x25, x10]
b0: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff8 // #-8
b4: str x0, [x25, x10]
b8: mov x10, #0x8 // #8
bc: ldr x2, [x19, x10]
[...]
With this patch, jited code(fragment):
0: bti c
4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
8: mov x29, sp
c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]!
10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]!
14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]!
18: stp x27, x28, [sp, #-16]!
1c: mov x25, sp
20: sub x27, x25, #0x88
24: mov x26, #0x0 // #0
28: bti j
2c: sub sp, sp, #0x90
30: add x19, x0, #0x0
34: mov x0, #0x0 // #0
38: str x0, [x27]
3c: str x0, [x27, #8]
40: str x0, [x27, #16]
44: str x0, [x27, #24]
48: str x0, [x27, #32]
4c: str x0, [x27, #40]
50: str x0, [x27, #48]
54: str x0, [x27, #56]
58: str x0, [x27, #64]
5c: str x0, [x27, #72]
60: str x0, [x27, #80]
64: str x0, [x27, #88]
68: str x0, [x27, #96]
6c: str x0, [x27, #104]
70: str x0, [x27, #112]
74: str x0, [x27, #120]
78: str x0, [x27, #128]
7c: ldr x2, [x19, #8]
[...]
Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 29, 2022
The BPF STX/LDX instruction uses offset relative to the FP to address
stack space. Since the BPF_FP locates at the top of the frame, the offset
is usually a negative number. However, arm64 str/ldr immediate instruction
requires that offset be a positive number. Therefore, this patch tries to
convert the offsets.
The method is to find the negative offset furthest from the FP firstly.
Then add it to the FP, calculate a bottom position, called FPB, and then
adjust the offsets in other STR/LDX instructions relative to FPB.
FPB is saved using the callee-saved register x27 of arm64 which is not
used yet.
Before adjusting the offset, the patch checks every instruction to ensure
that the FP does not change in run-time. If the FP may change, no offset
is adjusted.
For example, for the following bpftrace command:
bpftrace -e 'kprobe:do_sys_open { printf("opening: %s\n", str(arg1)); }'
Without this patch, jited code(fragment):
0: bti c
4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
8: mov x29, sp
c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]!
10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]!
14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]!
18: mov x25, sp
1c: mov x26, #0x0 // #0
20: bti j
24: sub sp, sp, #0x90
28: add x19, x0, #0x0
2c: mov x0, #0x0 // #0
30: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff78 // #-136
34: str x0, [x25, x10]
38: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff80 // #-128
3c: str x0, [x25, x10]
40: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff88 // #-120
44: str x0, [x25, x10]
48: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff90 // #-112
4c: str x0, [x25, x10]
50: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff98 // #-104
54: str x0, [x25, x10]
58: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa0 // #-96
5c: str x0, [x25, x10]
60: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa8 // #-88
64: str x0, [x25, x10]
68: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb0 // #-80
6c: str x0, [x25, x10]
70: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb8 // #-72
74: str x0, [x25, x10]
78: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc0 // #-64
7c: str x0, [x25, x10]
80: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc8 // #-56
84: str x0, [x25, x10]
88: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd0 // #-48
8c: str x0, [x25, x10]
90: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd8 // #-40
94: str x0, [x25, x10]
98: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe0 // #-32
9c: str x0, [x25, x10]
a0: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe8 // #-24
a4: str x0, [x25, x10]
a8: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff0 // #-16
ac: str x0, [x25, x10]
b0: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff8 // #-8
b4: str x0, [x25, x10]
b8: mov x10, #0x8 // #8
bc: ldr x2, [x19, x10]
[...]
With this patch, jited code(fragment):
0: bti c
4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
8: mov x29, sp
c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]!
10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]!
14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]!
18: stp x27, x28, [sp, #-16]!
1c: mov x25, sp
20: sub x27, x25, #0x88
24: mov x26, #0x0 // #0
28: bti j
2c: sub sp, sp, #0x90
30: add x19, x0, #0x0
34: mov x0, #0x0 // #0
38: str x0, [x27]
3c: str x0, [x27, #8]
40: str x0, [x27, #16]
44: str x0, [x27, #24]
48: str x0, [x27, #32]
4c: str x0, [x27, #40]
50: str x0, [x27, #48]
54: str x0, [x27, #56]
58: str x0, [x27, #64]
5c: str x0, [x27, #72]
60: str x0, [x27, #80]
64: str x0, [x27, #88]
68: str x0, [x27, #96]
6c: str x0, [x27, #104]
70: str x0, [x27, #112]
74: str x0, [x27, #120]
78: str x0, [x27, #128]
7c: ldr x2, [x19, #8]
[...]
Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 31, 2022
The BPF STX/LDX instruction uses offset relative to the FP to address
stack space. Since the BPF_FP locates at the top of the frame, the offset
is usually a negative number. However, arm64 str/ldr immediate instruction
requires that offset be a positive number. Therefore, this patch tries to
convert the offsets.
The method is to find the negative offset furthest from the FP firstly.
Then add it to the FP, calculate a bottom position, called FPB, and then
adjust the offsets in other STR/LDX instructions relative to FPB.
FPB is saved using the callee-saved register x27 of arm64 which is not
used yet.
Before adjusting the offset, the patch checks every instruction to ensure
that the FP does not change in run-time. If the FP may change, no offset
is adjusted.
For example, for the following bpftrace command:
bpftrace -e 'kprobe:do_sys_open { printf("opening: %s\n", str(arg1)); }'
Without this patch, jited code(fragment):
0: bti c
4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
8: mov x29, sp
c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]!
10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]!
14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]!
18: mov x25, sp
1c: mov x26, #0x0 // #0
20: bti j
24: sub sp, sp, #0x90
28: add x19, x0, #0x0
2c: mov x0, #0x0 // #0
30: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff78 // #-136
34: str x0, [x25, x10]
38: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff80 // #-128
3c: str x0, [x25, x10]
40: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff88 // #-120
44: str x0, [x25, x10]
48: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff90 // #-112
4c: str x0, [x25, x10]
50: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff98 // #-104
54: str x0, [x25, x10]
58: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa0 // #-96
5c: str x0, [x25, x10]
60: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa8 // #-88
64: str x0, [x25, x10]
68: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb0 // #-80
6c: str x0, [x25, x10]
70: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb8 // #-72
74: str x0, [x25, x10]
78: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc0 // #-64
7c: str x0, [x25, x10]
80: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc8 // #-56
84: str x0, [x25, x10]
88: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd0 // #-48
8c: str x0, [x25, x10]
90: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd8 // #-40
94: str x0, [x25, x10]
98: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe0 // #-32
9c: str x0, [x25, x10]
a0: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe8 // #-24
a4: str x0, [x25, x10]
a8: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff0 // #-16
ac: str x0, [x25, x10]
b0: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff8 // #-8
b4: str x0, [x25, x10]
b8: mov x10, #0x8 // #8
bc: ldr x2, [x19, x10]
[...]
With this patch, jited code(fragment):
0: bti c
4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
8: mov x29, sp
c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]!
10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]!
14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]!
18: stp x27, x28, [sp, #-16]!
1c: mov x25, sp
20: sub x27, x25, #0x88
24: mov x26, #0x0 // #0
28: bti j
2c: sub sp, sp, #0x90
30: add x19, x0, #0x0
34: mov x0, #0x0 // #0
38: str x0, [x27]
3c: str x0, [x27, #8]
40: str x0, [x27, #16]
44: str x0, [x27, #24]
48: str x0, [x27, #32]
4c: str x0, [x27, #40]
50: str x0, [x27, #48]
54: str x0, [x27, #56]
58: str x0, [x27, #64]
5c: str x0, [x27, #72]
60: str x0, [x27, #80]
64: str x0, [x27, #88]
68: str x0, [x27, #96]
6c: str x0, [x27, #104]
70: str x0, [x27, #112]
74: str x0, [x27, #120]
78: str x0, [x27, #128]
7c: ldr x2, [x19, #8]
[...]
Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 31, 2022
The BPF STX/LDX instruction uses offset relative to the FP to address
stack space. Since the BPF_FP locates at the top of the frame, the offset
is usually a negative number. However, arm64 str/ldr immediate instruction
requires that offset be a positive number. Therefore, this patch tries to
convert the offsets.
The method is to find the negative offset furthest from the FP firstly.
Then add it to the FP, calculate a bottom position, called FPB, and then
adjust the offsets in other STR/LDX instructions relative to FPB.
FPB is saved using the callee-saved register x27 of arm64 which is not
used yet.
Before adjusting the offset, the patch checks every instruction to ensure
that the FP does not change in run-time. If the FP may change, no offset
is adjusted.
For example, for the following bpftrace command:
bpftrace -e 'kprobe:do_sys_open { printf("opening: %s\n", str(arg1)); }'
Without this patch, jited code(fragment):
0: bti c
4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
8: mov x29, sp
c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]!
10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]!
14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]!
18: mov x25, sp
1c: mov x26, #0x0 // #0
20: bti j
24: sub sp, sp, #0x90
28: add x19, x0, #0x0
2c: mov x0, #0x0 // #0
30: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff78 // #-136
34: str x0, [x25, x10]
38: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff80 // #-128
3c: str x0, [x25, x10]
40: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff88 // #-120
44: str x0, [x25, x10]
48: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff90 // #-112
4c: str x0, [x25, x10]
50: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffff98 // #-104
54: str x0, [x25, x10]
58: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa0 // #-96
5c: str x0, [x25, x10]
60: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffa8 // #-88
64: str x0, [x25, x10]
68: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb0 // #-80
6c: str x0, [x25, x10]
70: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffb8 // #-72
74: str x0, [x25, x10]
78: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc0 // #-64
7c: str x0, [x25, x10]
80: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffc8 // #-56
84: str x0, [x25, x10]
88: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd0 // #-48
8c: str x0, [x25, x10]
90: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffd8 // #-40
94: str x0, [x25, x10]
98: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe0 // #-32
9c: str x0, [x25, x10]
a0: mov x10, #0xffffffffffffffe8 // #-24
a4: str x0, [x25, x10]
a8: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff0 // #-16
ac: str x0, [x25, x10]
b0: mov x10, #0xfffffffffffffff8 // #-8
b4: str x0, [x25, x10]
b8: mov x10, #0x8 // #8
bc: ldr x2, [x19, x10]
[...]
With this patch, jited code(fragment):
0: bti c
4: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
8: mov x29, sp
c: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-16]!
10: stp x21, x22, [sp, #-16]!
14: stp x25, x26, [sp, #-16]!
18: stp x27, x28, [sp, #-16]!
1c: mov x25, sp
20: sub x27, x25, #0x88
24: mov x26, #0x0 // #0
28: bti j
2c: sub sp, sp, #0x90
30: add x19, x0, #0x0
34: mov x0, #0x0 // #0
38: str x0, [x27]
3c: str x0, [x27, #8]
40: str x0, [x27, #16]
44: str x0, [x27, #24]
48: str x0, [x27, #32]
4c: str x0, [x27, #40]
50: str x0, [x27, #48]
54: str x0, [x27, #56]
58: str x0, [x27, #64]
5c: str x0, [x27, #72]
60: str x0, [x27, #80]
64: str x0, [x27, #88]
68: str x0, [x27, #96]
6c: str x0, [x27, #104]
70: str x0, [x27, #112]
74: str x0, [x27, #120]
78: str x0, [x27, #128]
7c: ldr x2, [x19, #8]
[...]
Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220321152852.2334294-4-xukuohai@huawei.com
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 26, 2024
Like commit 1cf3bfc ("bpf: Support 64-bit pointers to kfuncs") for s390x, add support for 64-bit pointers to kfuncs for LoongArch. Since the infrastructure is already implemented in BPF core, the only thing need to be done is to override bpf_jit_supports_far_kfunc_call(). Before this change, several test_verifier tests failed: # ./test_verifier | grep # | grep FAIL #119/p calls: invalid kfunc call: ptr_to_mem to struct with non-scalar FAIL #120/p calls: invalid kfunc call: ptr_to_mem to struct with nesting depth > 4 FAIL #121/p calls: invalid kfunc call: ptr_to_mem to struct with FAM FAIL #122/p calls: invalid kfunc call: reg->type != PTR_TO_CTX FAIL #123/p calls: invalid kfunc call: void * not allowed in func proto without mem size arg FAIL #124/p calls: trigger reg2btf_ids[reg->type] for reg->type > __BPF_REG_TYPE_MAX FAIL #125/p calls: invalid kfunc call: reg->off must be zero when passed to release kfunc FAIL #126/p calls: invalid kfunc call: don't match first member type when passed to release kfunc FAIL #127/p calls: invalid kfunc call: PTR_TO_BTF_ID with negative offset FAIL #128/p calls: invalid kfunc call: PTR_TO_BTF_ID with variable offset FAIL #129/p calls: invalid kfunc call: referenced arg needs refcounted PTR_TO_BTF_ID FAIL #130/p calls: valid kfunc call: referenced arg needs refcounted PTR_TO_BTF_ID FAIL #486/p map_kptr: ref: reference state created and released on xchg FAIL This is because the kfuncs in the loaded module are far away from __bpf_call_base: ffff800002009440 t bpf_kfunc_call_test_fail1 [bpf_testmod] 9000000002e128d8 T __bpf_call_base The offset relative to __bpf_call_base does NOT fit in s32, which breaks the assumption in BPF core. Enable bpf_jit_supports_far_kfunc_call() lifts this limit. Note that to reproduce the above result, tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config should be applied, and run the test with JIT enabled, unpriv BPF enabled. With this change, the test_verifier tests now all passed: # ./test_verifier ... Summary: 777 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Tested-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 12, 2024
copy_fd_bitmaps(new, old, count) is expected to copy the first count/BITS_PER_LONG bits from old->full_fds_bits[] and fill the rest with zeroes. What it does is copying enough words (BITS_TO_LONGS(count/BITS_PER_LONG)), then memsets the rest. That works fine, *if* all bits past the cutoff point are clear. Otherwise we are risking garbage from the last word we'd copied. For most of the callers that is true - expand_fdtable() has count equal to old->max_fds, so there's no open descriptors past count, let alone fully occupied words in ->open_fds[], which is what bits in ->full_fds_bits[] correspond to. The other caller (dup_fd()) passes sane_fdtable_size(old_fdt, max_fds), which is the smallest multiple of BITS_PER_LONG that covers all opened descriptors below max_fds. In the common case (copying on fork()) max_fds is ~0U, so all opened descriptors will be below it and we are fine, by the same reasons why the call in expand_fdtable() is safe. Unfortunately, there is a case where max_fds is less than that and where we might, indeed, end up with junk in ->full_fds_bits[] - close_range(from, to, CLOSE_RANGE_UNSHARE) with * descriptor table being currently shared * 'to' being above the current capacity of descriptor table * 'from' being just under some chunk of opened descriptors. In that case we end up with observably wrong behaviour - e.g. spawn a child with CLONE_FILES, get all descriptors in range 0..127 open, then close_range(64, ~0U, CLOSE_RANGE_UNSHARE) and watch dup(0) ending up with descriptor #128, despite #64 being observably not open. The minimally invasive fix would be to deal with that in dup_fd(). If this proves to add measurable overhead, we can go that way, but let's try to fix copy_fd_bitmaps() first. * new helper: bitmap_copy_and_expand(to, from, bits_to_copy, size). * make copy_fd_bitmaps() take the bitmap size in words, rather than bits; it's 'count' argument is always a multiple of BITS_PER_LONG, so we are not losing any information, and that way we can use the same helper for all three bitmaps - compiler will see that count is a multiple of BITS_PER_LONG for the large ones, so it'll generate plain memcpy()+memset(). Reproducer added to tools/testing/selftests/core/close_range_test.c Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 27, 2024
Include tests that check for rejection in erroneous cases, like unbalanced IRQ-disabled counts, within and across subprogs, invalid IRQ flag state or input to kfuncs, behavior upon overwriting IRQ saved state on stack, interaction with sleepable kfuncs/helpers, global functions, and out of order restore. Include some success scenarios as well to demonstrate usage. #128/1 irq/irq_save_bad_arg:OK #128/2 irq/irq_restore_bad_arg:OK #128/3 irq/irq_restore_missing_2:OK #128/4 irq/irq_restore_missing_3:OK #128/5 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_minus_2:OK #128/6 irq/irq_restore_missing_1_subprog:OK #128/7 irq/irq_restore_missing_2_subprog:OK #128/8 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_subprog:OK #128/9 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_minus_2_subprog:OK #128/10 irq/irq_balance:OK #128/11 irq/irq_balance_n:OK #128/12 irq/irq_balance_subprog:OK #128/13 irq/irq_global_subprog:OK #128/14 irq/irq_restore_ooo:OK #128/15 irq/irq_restore_ooo_3:OK #128/16 irq/irq_restore_3_subprog:OK #128/17 irq/irq_restore_4_subprog:OK #128/18 irq/irq_restore_ooo_3_subprog:OK #128/19 irq/irq_restore_invalid:OK #128/20 irq/irq_save_invalid:OK #128/21 irq/irq_restore_iter:OK #128/22 irq/irq_save_iter:OK #128/23 irq/irq_flag_overwrite:OK #128/24 irq/irq_flag_overwrite_partial:OK #128/25 irq/irq_sleepable_helper:OK #128/26 irq/irq_sleepable_kfunc:OK #128 irq:OK Summary: 1/26 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 27, 2024
Include tests that check for rejection in erroneous cases, like unbalanced IRQ-disabled counts, within and across subprogs, invalid IRQ flag state or input to kfuncs, behavior upon overwriting IRQ saved state on stack, interaction with sleepable kfuncs/helpers, global functions, and out of order restore. Include some success scenarios as well to demonstrate usage. #128/1 irq/irq_save_bad_arg:OK #128/2 irq/irq_restore_bad_arg:OK #128/3 irq/irq_restore_missing_2:OK #128/4 irq/irq_restore_missing_3:OK #128/5 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_minus_2:OK #128/6 irq/irq_restore_missing_1_subprog:OK #128/7 irq/irq_restore_missing_2_subprog:OK #128/8 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_subprog:OK #128/9 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_minus_2_subprog:OK #128/10 irq/irq_balance:OK #128/11 irq/irq_balance_n:OK #128/12 irq/irq_balance_subprog:OK #128/13 irq/irq_global_subprog:OK #128/14 irq/irq_restore_ooo:OK #128/15 irq/irq_restore_ooo_3:OK #128/16 irq/irq_restore_3_subprog:OK #128/17 irq/irq_restore_4_subprog:OK #128/18 irq/irq_restore_ooo_3_subprog:OK #128/19 irq/irq_restore_invalid:OK #128/20 irq/irq_save_invalid:OK #128/21 irq/irq_restore_iter:OK #128/22 irq/irq_save_iter:OK #128/23 irq/irq_flag_overwrite:OK #128/24 irq/irq_flag_overwrite_partial:OK #128/25 irq/irq_sleepable_helper:OK #128/26 irq/irq_sleepable_kfunc:OK #128 irq:OK Summary: 1/26 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
kkdwivedi
added a commit
to kkdwivedi/bpf-patches
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 27, 2024
Include tests that check for rejection in erroneous cases, like unbalanced IRQ-disabled counts, within and across subprogs, invalid IRQ flag state or input to kfuncs, behavior upon overwriting IRQ saved state on stack, interaction with sleepable kfuncs/helpers, global functions, and out of order restore. Include some success scenarios as well to demonstrate usage. kernel-patches#128/1 irq/irq_save_bad_arg:OK kernel-patches#128/2 irq/irq_restore_bad_arg:OK kernel-patches#128/3 irq/irq_restore_missing_2:OK kernel-patches#128/4 irq/irq_restore_missing_3:OK kernel-patches#128/5 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_minus_2:OK kernel-patches#128/6 irq/irq_restore_missing_1_subprog:OK kernel-patches#128/7 irq/irq_restore_missing_2_subprog:OK kernel-patches#128/8 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_subprog:OK kernel-patches#128/9 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_minus_2_subprog:OK kernel-patches#128/10 irq/irq_balance:OK kernel-patches#128/11 irq/irq_balance_n:OK kernel-patches#128/12 irq/irq_balance_subprog:OK kernel-patches#128/13 irq/irq_global_subprog:OK kernel-patches#128/14 irq/irq_restore_ooo:OK kernel-patches#128/15 irq/irq_restore_ooo_3:OK kernel-patches#128/16 irq/irq_restore_3_subprog:OK kernel-patches#128/17 irq/irq_restore_4_subprog:OK kernel-patches#128/18 irq/irq_restore_ooo_3_subprog:OK kernel-patches#128/19 irq/irq_restore_invalid:OK kernel-patches#128/20 irq/irq_save_invalid:OK kernel-patches#128/21 irq/irq_restore_iter:OK kernel-patches#128/22 irq/irq_save_iter:OK kernel-patches#128/23 irq/irq_flag_overwrite:OK kernel-patches#128/24 irq/irq_flag_overwrite_partial:OK kernel-patches#128/25 irq/irq_sleepable_helper:OK kernel-patches#128/26 irq/irq_sleepable_kfunc:OK kernel-patches#128 irq:OK Summary: 1/26 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 27, 2024
Include tests that check for rejection in erroneous cases, like unbalanced IRQ-disabled counts, within and across subprogs, invalid IRQ flag state or input to kfuncs, behavior upon overwriting IRQ saved state on stack, interaction with sleepable kfuncs/helpers, global functions, and out of order restore. Include some success scenarios as well to demonstrate usage. #128/1 irq/irq_save_bad_arg:OK #128/2 irq/irq_restore_bad_arg:OK #128/3 irq/irq_restore_missing_2:OK #128/4 irq/irq_restore_missing_3:OK #128/5 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_minus_2:OK #128/6 irq/irq_restore_missing_1_subprog:OK #128/7 irq/irq_restore_missing_2_subprog:OK #128/8 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_subprog:OK #128/9 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_minus_2_subprog:OK #128/10 irq/irq_balance:OK #128/11 irq/irq_balance_n:OK #128/12 irq/irq_balance_subprog:OK #128/13 irq/irq_global_subprog:OK #128/14 irq/irq_restore_ooo:OK #128/15 irq/irq_restore_ooo_3:OK #128/16 irq/irq_restore_3_subprog:OK #128/17 irq/irq_restore_4_subprog:OK #128/18 irq/irq_restore_ooo_3_subprog:OK #128/19 irq/irq_restore_invalid:OK #128/20 irq/irq_save_invalid:OK #128/21 irq/irq_restore_iter:OK #128/22 irq/irq_save_iter:OK #128/23 irq/irq_flag_overwrite:OK #128/24 irq/irq_flag_overwrite_partial:OK #128/25 irq/irq_sleepable_helper:OK #128/26 irq/irq_sleepable_kfunc:OK #128 irq:OK Summary: 1/26 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
kkdwivedi
added a commit
to kkdwivedi/bpf-patches
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 27, 2024
Include tests that check for rejection in erroneous cases, like unbalanced IRQ-disabled counts, within and across subprogs, invalid IRQ flag state or input to kfuncs, behavior upon overwriting IRQ saved state on stack, interaction with sleepable kfuncs/helpers, global functions, and out of order restore. Include some success scenarios as well to demonstrate usage. kernel-patches#128/1 irq/irq_save_bad_arg:OK kernel-patches#128/2 irq/irq_restore_bad_arg:OK kernel-patches#128/3 irq/irq_restore_missing_2:OK kernel-patches#128/4 irq/irq_restore_missing_3:OK kernel-patches#128/5 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_minus_2:OK kernel-patches#128/6 irq/irq_restore_missing_1_subprog:OK kernel-patches#128/7 irq/irq_restore_missing_2_subprog:OK kernel-patches#128/8 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_subprog:OK kernel-patches#128/9 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_minus_2_subprog:OK kernel-patches#128/10 irq/irq_balance:OK kernel-patches#128/11 irq/irq_balance_n:OK kernel-patches#128/12 irq/irq_balance_subprog:OK kernel-patches#128/13 irq/irq_global_subprog:OK kernel-patches#128/14 irq/irq_restore_ooo:OK kernel-patches#128/15 irq/irq_restore_ooo_3:OK kernel-patches#128/16 irq/irq_restore_3_subprog:OK kernel-patches#128/17 irq/irq_restore_4_subprog:OK kernel-patches#128/18 irq/irq_restore_ooo_3_subprog:OK kernel-patches#128/19 irq/irq_restore_invalid:OK kernel-patches#128/20 irq/irq_save_invalid:OK kernel-patches#128/21 irq/irq_restore_iter:OK kernel-patches#128/22 irq/irq_save_iter:OK kernel-patches#128/23 irq/irq_flag_overwrite:OK kernel-patches#128/24 irq/irq_flag_overwrite_partial:OK kernel-patches#128/25 irq/irq_sleepable_helper:OK kernel-patches#128/26 irq/irq_sleepable_kfunc:OK kernel-patches#128 irq:OK Summary: 1/26 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
kkdwivedi
added a commit
to kkdwivedi/bpf-patches
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 28, 2024
Include tests that check for rejection in erroneous cases, like unbalanced IRQ-disabled counts, within and across subprogs, invalid IRQ flag state or input to kfuncs, behavior upon overwriting IRQ saved state on stack, interaction with sleepable kfuncs/helpers, global functions, and out of order restore. Include some success scenarios as well to demonstrate usage. kernel-patches#128/1 irq/irq_save_bad_arg:OK kernel-patches#128/2 irq/irq_restore_bad_arg:OK kernel-patches#128/3 irq/irq_restore_missing_2:OK kernel-patches#128/4 irq/irq_restore_missing_3:OK kernel-patches#128/5 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_minus_2:OK kernel-patches#128/6 irq/irq_restore_missing_1_subprog:OK kernel-patches#128/7 irq/irq_restore_missing_2_subprog:OK kernel-patches#128/8 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_subprog:OK kernel-patches#128/9 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_minus_2_subprog:OK kernel-patches#128/10 irq/irq_balance:OK kernel-patches#128/11 irq/irq_balance_n:OK kernel-patches#128/12 irq/irq_balance_subprog:OK kernel-patches#128/13 irq/irq_global_subprog:OK kernel-patches#128/14 irq/irq_restore_ooo:OK kernel-patches#128/15 irq/irq_restore_ooo_3:OK kernel-patches#128/16 irq/irq_restore_3_subprog:OK kernel-patches#128/17 irq/irq_restore_4_subprog:OK kernel-patches#128/18 irq/irq_restore_ooo_3_subprog:OK kernel-patches#128/19 irq/irq_restore_invalid:OK kernel-patches#128/20 irq/irq_save_invalid:OK kernel-patches#128/21 irq/irq_restore_iter:OK kernel-patches#128/22 irq/irq_save_iter:OK kernel-patches#128/23 irq/irq_flag_overwrite:OK kernel-patches#128/24 irq/irq_flag_overwrite_partial:OK kernel-patches#128/25 irq/irq_sleepable_helper:OK kernel-patches#128/26 irq/irq_sleepable_kfunc:OK kernel-patches#128 irq:OK Summary: 1/26 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 28, 2024
Include tests that check for rejection in erroneous cases, like unbalanced IRQ-disabled counts, within and across subprogs, invalid IRQ flag state or input to kfuncs, behavior upon overwriting IRQ saved state on stack, interaction with sleepable kfuncs/helpers, global functions, and out of order restore. Include some success scenarios as well to demonstrate usage. #128/1 irq/irq_save_bad_arg:OK #128/2 irq/irq_restore_bad_arg:OK #128/3 irq/irq_restore_missing_2:OK #128/4 irq/irq_restore_missing_3:OK #128/5 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_minus_2:OK #128/6 irq/irq_restore_missing_1_subprog:OK #128/7 irq/irq_restore_missing_2_subprog:OK #128/8 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_subprog:OK #128/9 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_minus_2_subprog:OK #128/10 irq/irq_balance:OK #128/11 irq/irq_balance_n:OK #128/12 irq/irq_balance_subprog:OK #128/13 irq/irq_global_subprog:OK #128/14 irq/irq_restore_ooo:OK #128/15 irq/irq_restore_ooo_3:OK #128/16 irq/irq_restore_3_subprog:OK #128/17 irq/irq_restore_4_subprog:OK #128/18 irq/irq_restore_ooo_3_subprog:OK #128/19 irq/irq_restore_invalid:OK #128/20 irq/irq_save_invalid:OK #128/21 irq/irq_restore_iter:OK #128/22 irq/irq_save_iter:OK #128/23 irq/irq_flag_overwrite:OK #128/24 irq/irq_flag_overwrite_partial:OK #128/25 irq/irq_sleepable_helper:OK #128/26 irq/irq_sleepable_kfunc:OK #128 irq:OK Summary: 1/26 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
kkdwivedi
added a commit
to kkdwivedi/bpf-patches
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 29, 2024
Include tests that check for rejection in erroneous cases, like unbalanced IRQ-disabled counts, within and across subprogs, invalid IRQ flag state or input to kfuncs, behavior upon overwriting IRQ saved state on stack, interaction with sleepable kfuncs/helpers, global functions, and out of order restore. Include some success scenarios as well to demonstrate usage. kernel-patches#128/1 irq/irq_save_bad_arg:OK kernel-patches#128/2 irq/irq_restore_bad_arg:OK kernel-patches#128/3 irq/irq_restore_missing_2:OK kernel-patches#128/4 irq/irq_restore_missing_3:OK kernel-patches#128/5 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_minus_2:OK kernel-patches#128/6 irq/irq_restore_missing_1_subprog:OK kernel-patches#128/7 irq/irq_restore_missing_2_subprog:OK kernel-patches#128/8 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_subprog:OK kernel-patches#128/9 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_minus_2_subprog:OK kernel-patches#128/10 irq/irq_balance:OK kernel-patches#128/11 irq/irq_balance_n:OK kernel-patches#128/12 irq/irq_balance_subprog:OK kernel-patches#128/13 irq/irq_global_subprog:OK kernel-patches#128/14 irq/irq_restore_ooo:OK kernel-patches#128/15 irq/irq_restore_ooo_3:OK kernel-patches#128/16 irq/irq_restore_3_subprog:OK kernel-patches#128/17 irq/irq_restore_4_subprog:OK kernel-patches#128/18 irq/irq_restore_ooo_3_subprog:OK kernel-patches#128/19 irq/irq_restore_invalid:OK kernel-patches#128/20 irq/irq_save_invalid:OK kernel-patches#128/21 irq/irq_restore_iter:OK kernel-patches#128/22 irq/irq_save_iter:OK kernel-patches#128/23 irq/irq_flag_overwrite:OK kernel-patches#128/24 irq/irq_flag_overwrite_partial:OK kernel-patches#128/25 irq/irq_sleepable_helper:OK kernel-patches#128/26 irq/irq_sleepable_kfunc:OK kernel-patches#128 irq:OK Summary: 1/26 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
kkdwivedi
added a commit
to kkdwivedi/bpf-patches
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 29, 2024
Include tests that check for rejection in erroneous cases, like unbalanced IRQ-disabled counts, within and across subprogs, invalid IRQ flag state or input to kfuncs, behavior upon overwriting IRQ saved state on stack, interaction with sleepable kfuncs/helpers, global functions, and out of order restore. Include some success scenarios as well to demonstrate usage. kernel-patches#128/1 irq/irq_save_bad_arg:OK kernel-patches#128/2 irq/irq_restore_bad_arg:OK kernel-patches#128/3 irq/irq_restore_missing_2:OK kernel-patches#128/4 irq/irq_restore_missing_3:OK kernel-patches#128/5 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_minus_2:OK kernel-patches#128/6 irq/irq_restore_missing_1_subprog:OK kernel-patches#128/7 irq/irq_restore_missing_2_subprog:OK kernel-patches#128/8 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_subprog:OK kernel-patches#128/9 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_minus_2_subprog:OK kernel-patches#128/10 irq/irq_balance:OK kernel-patches#128/11 irq/irq_balance_n:OK kernel-patches#128/12 irq/irq_balance_subprog:OK kernel-patches#128/13 irq/irq_global_subprog:OK kernel-patches#128/14 irq/irq_restore_ooo:OK kernel-patches#128/15 irq/irq_restore_ooo_3:OK kernel-patches#128/16 irq/irq_restore_3_subprog:OK kernel-patches#128/17 irq/irq_restore_4_subprog:OK kernel-patches#128/18 irq/irq_restore_ooo_3_subprog:OK kernel-patches#128/19 irq/irq_restore_invalid:OK kernel-patches#128/20 irq/irq_save_invalid:OK kernel-patches#128/21 irq/irq_restore_iter:OK kernel-patches#128/22 irq/irq_save_iter:OK kernel-patches#128/23 irq/irq_flag_overwrite:OK kernel-patches#128/24 irq/irq_flag_overwrite_partial:OK kernel-patches#128/25 irq/irq_ooo_refs_array:OK kernel-patches#128/26 irq/irq_sleepable_helper:OK kernel-patches#128/27 irq/irq_sleepable_kfunc:OK kernel-patches#128 irq:OK Summary: 1/27 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 29, 2024
Include tests that check for rejection in erroneous cases, like unbalanced IRQ-disabled counts, within and across subprogs, invalid IRQ flag state or input to kfuncs, behavior upon overwriting IRQ saved state on stack, interaction with sleepable kfuncs/helpers, global functions, and out of order restore. Include some success scenarios as well to demonstrate usage. #128/1 irq/irq_save_bad_arg:OK #128/2 irq/irq_restore_bad_arg:OK #128/3 irq/irq_restore_missing_2:OK #128/4 irq/irq_restore_missing_3:OK #128/5 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_minus_2:OK #128/6 irq/irq_restore_missing_1_subprog:OK #128/7 irq/irq_restore_missing_2_subprog:OK #128/8 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_subprog:OK #128/9 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_minus_2_subprog:OK #128/10 irq/irq_balance:OK #128/11 irq/irq_balance_n:OK #128/12 irq/irq_balance_subprog:OK #128/13 irq/irq_global_subprog:OK #128/14 irq/irq_restore_ooo:OK #128/15 irq/irq_restore_ooo_3:OK #128/16 irq/irq_restore_3_subprog:OK #128/17 irq/irq_restore_4_subprog:OK #128/18 irq/irq_restore_ooo_3_subprog:OK #128/19 irq/irq_restore_invalid:OK #128/20 irq/irq_save_invalid:OK #128/21 irq/irq_restore_iter:OK #128/22 irq/irq_save_iter:OK #128/23 irq/irq_flag_overwrite:OK #128/24 irq/irq_flag_overwrite_partial:OK #128/25 irq/irq_ooo_refs_array:OK #128/26 irq/irq_sleepable_helper:OK #128/27 irq/irq_sleepable_kfunc:OK #128 irq:OK Summary: 1/27 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 29, 2024
Include tests that check for rejection in erroneous cases, like unbalanced IRQ-disabled counts, within and across subprogs, invalid IRQ flag state or input to kfuncs, behavior upon overwriting IRQ saved state on stack, interaction with sleepable kfuncs/helpers, global functions, and out of order restore. Include some success scenarios as well to demonstrate usage. #128/1 irq/irq_save_bad_arg:OK #128/2 irq/irq_restore_bad_arg:OK #128/3 irq/irq_restore_missing_2:OK #128/4 irq/irq_restore_missing_3:OK #128/5 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_minus_2:OK #128/6 irq/irq_restore_missing_1_subprog:OK #128/7 irq/irq_restore_missing_2_subprog:OK #128/8 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_subprog:OK #128/9 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_minus_2_subprog:OK #128/10 irq/irq_balance:OK #128/11 irq/irq_balance_n:OK #128/12 irq/irq_balance_subprog:OK #128/13 irq/irq_global_subprog:OK #128/14 irq/irq_restore_ooo:OK #128/15 irq/irq_restore_ooo_3:OK #128/16 irq/irq_restore_3_subprog:OK #128/17 irq/irq_restore_4_subprog:OK #128/18 irq/irq_restore_ooo_3_subprog:OK #128/19 irq/irq_restore_invalid:OK #128/20 irq/irq_save_invalid:OK #128/21 irq/irq_restore_iter:OK #128/22 irq/irq_save_iter:OK #128/23 irq/irq_flag_overwrite:OK #128/24 irq/irq_flag_overwrite_partial:OK #128/25 irq/irq_ooo_refs_array:OK #128/26 irq/irq_sleepable_helper:OK #128/27 irq/irq_sleepable_kfunc:OK #128 irq:OK Summary: 1/27 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 29, 2024
Include tests that check for rejection in erroneous cases, like unbalanced IRQ-disabled counts, within and across subprogs, invalid IRQ flag state or input to kfuncs, behavior upon overwriting IRQ saved state on stack, interaction with sleepable kfuncs/helpers, global functions, and out of order restore. Include some success scenarios as well to demonstrate usage. #128/1 irq/irq_save_bad_arg:OK #128/2 irq/irq_restore_bad_arg:OK #128/3 irq/irq_restore_missing_2:OK #128/4 irq/irq_restore_missing_3:OK #128/5 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_minus_2:OK #128/6 irq/irq_restore_missing_1_subprog:OK #128/7 irq/irq_restore_missing_2_subprog:OK #128/8 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_subprog:OK #128/9 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_minus_2_subprog:OK #128/10 irq/irq_balance:OK #128/11 irq/irq_balance_n:OK #128/12 irq/irq_balance_subprog:OK #128/13 irq/irq_global_subprog:OK #128/14 irq/irq_restore_ooo:OK #128/15 irq/irq_restore_ooo_3:OK #128/16 irq/irq_restore_3_subprog:OK #128/17 irq/irq_restore_4_subprog:OK #128/18 irq/irq_restore_ooo_3_subprog:OK #128/19 irq/irq_restore_invalid:OK #128/20 irq/irq_save_invalid:OK #128/21 irq/irq_restore_iter:OK #128/22 irq/irq_save_iter:OK #128/23 irq/irq_flag_overwrite:OK #128/24 irq/irq_flag_overwrite_partial:OK #128/25 irq/irq_ooo_refs_array:OK #128/26 irq/irq_sleepable_helper:OK #128/27 irq/irq_sleepable_kfunc:OK #128 irq:OK Summary: 1/27 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 2, 2024
Include tests that check for rejection in erroneous cases, like unbalanced IRQ-disabled counts, within and across subprogs, invalid IRQ flag state or input to kfuncs, behavior upon overwriting IRQ saved state on stack, interaction with sleepable kfuncs/helpers, global functions, and out of order restore. Include some success scenarios as well to demonstrate usage. #128/1 irq/irq_save_bad_arg:OK #128/2 irq/irq_restore_bad_arg:OK #128/3 irq/irq_restore_missing_2:OK #128/4 irq/irq_restore_missing_3:OK #128/5 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_minus_2:OK #128/6 irq/irq_restore_missing_1_subprog:OK #128/7 irq/irq_restore_missing_2_subprog:OK #128/8 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_subprog:OK #128/9 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_minus_2_subprog:OK #128/10 irq/irq_balance:OK #128/11 irq/irq_balance_n:OK #128/12 irq/irq_balance_subprog:OK #128/13 irq/irq_global_subprog:OK #128/14 irq/irq_restore_ooo:OK #128/15 irq/irq_restore_ooo_3:OK #128/16 irq/irq_restore_3_subprog:OK #128/17 irq/irq_restore_4_subprog:OK #128/18 irq/irq_restore_ooo_3_subprog:OK #128/19 irq/irq_restore_invalid:OK #128/20 irq/irq_save_invalid:OK #128/21 irq/irq_restore_iter:OK #128/22 irq/irq_save_iter:OK #128/23 irq/irq_flag_overwrite:OK #128/24 irq/irq_flag_overwrite_partial:OK #128/25 irq/irq_ooo_refs_array:OK #128/26 irq/irq_sleepable_helper:OK #128/27 irq/irq_sleepable_kfunc:OK #128 irq:OK Summary: 1/27 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 2, 2024
Include tests that check for rejection in erroneous cases, like unbalanced IRQ-disabled counts, within and across subprogs, invalid IRQ flag state or input to kfuncs, behavior upon overwriting IRQ saved state on stack, interaction with sleepable kfuncs/helpers, global functions, and out of order restore. Include some success scenarios as well to demonstrate usage. #128/1 irq/irq_save_bad_arg:OK #128/2 irq/irq_restore_bad_arg:OK #128/3 irq/irq_restore_missing_2:OK #128/4 irq/irq_restore_missing_3:OK #128/5 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_minus_2:OK #128/6 irq/irq_restore_missing_1_subprog:OK #128/7 irq/irq_restore_missing_2_subprog:OK #128/8 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_subprog:OK #128/9 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_minus_2_subprog:OK #128/10 irq/irq_balance:OK #128/11 irq/irq_balance_n:OK #128/12 irq/irq_balance_subprog:OK #128/13 irq/irq_global_subprog:OK #128/14 irq/irq_restore_ooo:OK #128/15 irq/irq_restore_ooo_3:OK #128/16 irq/irq_restore_3_subprog:OK #128/17 irq/irq_restore_4_subprog:OK #128/18 irq/irq_restore_ooo_3_subprog:OK #128/19 irq/irq_restore_invalid:OK #128/20 irq/irq_save_invalid:OK #128/21 irq/irq_restore_iter:OK #128/22 irq/irq_save_iter:OK #128/23 irq/irq_flag_overwrite:OK #128/24 irq/irq_flag_overwrite_partial:OK #128/25 irq/irq_ooo_refs_array:OK #128/26 irq/irq_sleepable_helper:OK #128/27 irq/irq_sleepable_kfunc:OK #128 irq:OK Summary: 1/27 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 2, 2024
Include tests that check for rejection in erroneous cases, like unbalanced IRQ-disabled counts, within and across subprogs, invalid IRQ flag state or input to kfuncs, behavior upon overwriting IRQ saved state on stack, interaction with sleepable kfuncs/helpers, global functions, and out of order restore. Include some success scenarios as well to demonstrate usage. #128/1 irq/irq_save_bad_arg:OK #128/2 irq/irq_restore_bad_arg:OK #128/3 irq/irq_restore_missing_2:OK #128/4 irq/irq_restore_missing_3:OK #128/5 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_minus_2:OK #128/6 irq/irq_restore_missing_1_subprog:OK #128/7 irq/irq_restore_missing_2_subprog:OK #128/8 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_subprog:OK #128/9 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_minus_2_subprog:OK #128/10 irq/irq_balance:OK #128/11 irq/irq_balance_n:OK #128/12 irq/irq_balance_subprog:OK #128/13 irq/irq_global_subprog:OK #128/14 irq/irq_restore_ooo:OK #128/15 irq/irq_restore_ooo_3:OK #128/16 irq/irq_restore_3_subprog:OK #128/17 irq/irq_restore_4_subprog:OK #128/18 irq/irq_restore_ooo_3_subprog:OK #128/19 irq/irq_restore_invalid:OK #128/20 irq/irq_save_invalid:OK #128/21 irq/irq_restore_iter:OK #128/22 irq/irq_save_iter:OK #128/23 irq/irq_flag_overwrite:OK #128/24 irq/irq_flag_overwrite_partial:OK #128/25 irq/irq_ooo_refs_array:OK #128/26 irq/irq_sleepable_helper:OK #128/27 irq/irq_sleepable_kfunc:OK #128 irq:OK Summary: 1/27 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 3, 2024
Include tests that check for rejection in erroneous cases, like unbalanced IRQ-disabled counts, within and across subprogs, invalid IRQ flag state or input to kfuncs, behavior upon overwriting IRQ saved state on stack, interaction with sleepable kfuncs/helpers, global functions, and out of order restore. Include some success scenarios as well to demonstrate usage. #128/1 irq/irq_save_bad_arg:OK #128/2 irq/irq_restore_bad_arg:OK #128/3 irq/irq_restore_missing_2:OK #128/4 irq/irq_restore_missing_3:OK #128/5 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_minus_2:OK #128/6 irq/irq_restore_missing_1_subprog:OK #128/7 irq/irq_restore_missing_2_subprog:OK #128/8 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_subprog:OK #128/9 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_minus_2_subprog:OK #128/10 irq/irq_balance:OK #128/11 irq/irq_balance_n:OK #128/12 irq/irq_balance_subprog:OK #128/13 irq/irq_global_subprog:OK #128/14 irq/irq_restore_ooo:OK #128/15 irq/irq_restore_ooo_3:OK #128/16 irq/irq_restore_3_subprog:OK #128/17 irq/irq_restore_4_subprog:OK #128/18 irq/irq_restore_ooo_3_subprog:OK #128/19 irq/irq_restore_invalid:OK #128/20 irq/irq_save_invalid:OK #128/21 irq/irq_restore_iter:OK #128/22 irq/irq_save_iter:OK #128/23 irq/irq_flag_overwrite:OK #128/24 irq/irq_flag_overwrite_partial:OK #128/25 irq/irq_ooo_refs_array:OK #128/26 irq/irq_sleepable_helper:OK #128/27 irq/irq_sleepable_kfunc:OK #128 irq:OK Summary: 1/27 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 4, 2024
Include tests that check for rejection in erroneous cases, like unbalanced IRQ-disabled counts, within and across subprogs, invalid IRQ flag state or input to kfuncs, behavior upon overwriting IRQ saved state on stack, interaction with sleepable kfuncs/helpers, global functions, and out of order restore. Include some success scenarios as well to demonstrate usage. #128/1 irq/irq_save_bad_arg:OK #128/2 irq/irq_restore_bad_arg:OK #128/3 irq/irq_restore_missing_2:OK #128/4 irq/irq_restore_missing_3:OK #128/5 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_minus_2:OK #128/6 irq/irq_restore_missing_1_subprog:OK #128/7 irq/irq_restore_missing_2_subprog:OK #128/8 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_subprog:OK #128/9 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_minus_2_subprog:OK #128/10 irq/irq_balance:OK #128/11 irq/irq_balance_n:OK #128/12 irq/irq_balance_subprog:OK #128/13 irq/irq_global_subprog:OK #128/14 irq/irq_restore_ooo:OK #128/15 irq/irq_restore_ooo_3:OK #128/16 irq/irq_restore_3_subprog:OK #128/17 irq/irq_restore_4_subprog:OK #128/18 irq/irq_restore_ooo_3_subprog:OK #128/19 irq/irq_restore_invalid:OK #128/20 irq/irq_save_invalid:OK #128/21 irq/irq_restore_iter:OK #128/22 irq/irq_save_iter:OK #128/23 irq/irq_flag_overwrite:OK #128/24 irq/irq_flag_overwrite_partial:OK #128/25 irq/irq_ooo_refs_array:OK #128/26 irq/irq_sleepable_helper:OK #128/27 irq/irq_sleepable_kfunc:OK #128 irq:OK Summary: 1/27 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 4, 2024
Include tests that check for rejection in erroneous cases, like unbalanced IRQ-disabled counts, within and across subprogs, invalid IRQ flag state or input to kfuncs, behavior upon overwriting IRQ saved state on stack, interaction with sleepable kfuncs/helpers, global functions, and out of order restore. Include some success scenarios as well to demonstrate usage. #128/1 irq/irq_save_bad_arg:OK #128/2 irq/irq_restore_bad_arg:OK #128/3 irq/irq_restore_missing_2:OK #128/4 irq/irq_restore_missing_3:OK #128/5 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_minus_2:OK #128/6 irq/irq_restore_missing_1_subprog:OK #128/7 irq/irq_restore_missing_2_subprog:OK #128/8 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_subprog:OK #128/9 irq/irq_restore_missing_3_minus_2_subprog:OK #128/10 irq/irq_balance:OK #128/11 irq/irq_balance_n:OK #128/12 irq/irq_balance_subprog:OK #128/13 irq/irq_global_subprog:OK #128/14 irq/irq_restore_ooo:OK #128/15 irq/irq_restore_ooo_3:OK #128/16 irq/irq_restore_3_subprog:OK #128/17 irq/irq_restore_4_subprog:OK #128/18 irq/irq_restore_ooo_3_subprog:OK #128/19 irq/irq_restore_invalid:OK #128/20 irq/irq_save_invalid:OK #128/21 irq/irq_restore_iter:OK #128/22 irq/irq_save_iter:OK #128/23 irq/irq_flag_overwrite:OK #128/24 irq/irq_flag_overwrite_partial:OK #128/25 irq/irq_ooo_refs_array:OK #128/26 irq/irq_sleepable_helper:OK #128/27 irq/irq_sleepable_kfunc:OK #128 irq:OK Summary: 1/27 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241204030400.208005-8-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull request for series with
subject: bpf: Support multi-attach for freplace programs
version: 10
url: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?series=204867