-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 600
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Messaging storage v1 #3925
Messaging storage v1 #3925
Conversation
6988412
to
2e773f5
Compare
/hold I thought all resources' reconcilers are updated to use v1 shape, but Let me exclude |
/unhold Excluded Created this ticket to track things: #3929 |
@@ -58,3 +58,16 @@ rules: | |||
- "delete" | |||
- "patch" | |||
- "watch" | |||
- apiGroups: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can we just add the groups and resources here to LOC 48 and 50?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@nlopezgi you mean messaging api group should come before eventing api group? or something else?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it should be possible to have a single apiGroups
statement that includes the following resources:
- "containersources"
- "sinkbindings"
- "channels"
- "inmemorychannels"
- "brokers"
- "triggers"
given that for all resources the same verbs are listed?
Just to reduce a bit of verbosity, but in all senses a nit, so totally your choice to leave as is or collapse.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@nlopezgi not sure if that would work. These resources are from different apiGroups (eventing, messaging, etc.).
Let's leave as is and we can have a look later?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks! yeah, you are probably right. I think with #3943 my concern is addressed
small nit, feel free to resolve or leave as is if you think its cleaner. Otherwise |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: aliok, matzew The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/lgtm |
Fixes #3583
Proposed Changes
Release Note
Docs
No docs change necessary. The content at https://knative.dev/docs/install/upgrade-installation/#run-pre-install-tools-before-upgrade is good enough