-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 382
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Change looks good to me as far as the correctness of the change.
/hold
for @duglin to add opinion.
@@ -96,7 +97,7 @@ func (m *BrokerClientManager) RemoveBrokerClient(brokerKey BrokerKey) { | |||
m.mu.Lock() | |||
defer m.mu.Unlock() | |||
|
|||
glog.V(4).Info("Removing OSB client for broker %s", brokerKey.String()) | |||
glog.V(4).Infof("Removing OSB client for broker %s", brokerKey.String()) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a correct change. Format string wasn't being used as one.
@duglin do you want a %q
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for your review. I also think %q
is better than %s
. If @duglin want a %q
, I will change them in the go file.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes %q
please
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes %q
please
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes %q
please
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes, please use a %q
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes, please use a %q
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes please use %q
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes please use %q
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes please use %q
1 similar comment
/hold cancel |
/ok-to-test |
Yes please use a %q
… On Oct 22, 2018, at 2:21 AM, 帝俊 ***@***.***> wrote:
@carlory commented on this pull request.
In pkg/controller/broker_client_manager.go <#2429 (comment)>:
> @@ -96,7 +97,7 @@ func (m *BrokerClientManager) RemoveBrokerClient(brokerKey BrokerKey) {
m.mu.Lock()
defer m.mu.Unlock()
- glog.V(4).Info("Removing OSB client for broker %s", brokerKey.String())
+ glog.V(4).Infof("Removing OSB client for broker %s", brokerKey.String())
Thanks for your review. I also think %q is better than %s. If @duglin <https://github.com/duglin> want a %q, I will change them in the go file.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#2429 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB2sX2AHyC3Q8s6BMY-5hfO2VeJOFK4Aks5unR2ugaJpZM4XylIx>.
|
/test pull-service-catalog-xbuild |
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: jboyd01 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
* fix invalid log * use `%q`
No description provided.