-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
🌱 (CLI): Add unit tests and improve coverage for plugins/golang pkg #4959
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
🌱 (CLI): Add unit tests and improve coverage for plugins/golang pkg #4959
Conversation
|
Hi @mayuka-c. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/ok-to-test |
| } else { | ||
| Expect(res.Path).To(Equal(path.Join(cfg.GetRepository(), "api", gvk.Version))) | ||
| } | ||
| } else if len(options.ExternalAPIPath) > 0 { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We might want to cover those options
To know more about see: https://kubebuilder.io/reference/using_an_external_resource
Also, you can check sample values in testdata samples like:
https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kubebuilder/blob/master/testdata/project-v4/PROJECT#L66C1-L79C14
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But we can do that in follow ups :-)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure @camilamacedo86 I will take look into this :-)
camilamacedo86
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approved
Thank you so much for the nice contribution 🎉
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: camilamacedo86, mayuka-c The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Issue: #4925
Continuation from my previous UT PRs :-)