Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ignore deleting worker nodes that are not in cluster #9244

Merged

Conversation

HoKim98
Copy link
Contributor

@HoKim98 HoKim98 commented Sep 1, 2022

What type of PR is this?
/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:

There is a bug that remove-node.yml tries to remove the worker nodes that are actually not in the cluster and emits an error.

In fact, there have been several mechanisms to exclude 'ghost' nodes from deleting such as:

However, this implementation was not applied in the post-remove process, and this caused the process to eventually crash.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

No more errors are emitted when attempting to delete worker nodes that do not exist.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Sep 1, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @kerryeon. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 1, 2022
Copy link
Member

@floryut floryut left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@kerryeon Thanks!
/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Sep 1, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: floryut, kerryeon

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 1, 2022
@oomichi
Copy link
Contributor

oomichi commented Sep 6, 2022

Nice work!

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 6, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit ad7cefa into kubernetes-sigs:master Sep 6, 2022
@floryut floryut mentioned this pull request Sep 19, 2022
enneitex pushed a commit to enneitex/kubespray that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2023
nolimitkun pushed a commit to nolimitkun/kubespray that referenced this pull request Mar 19, 2023
LuckySB pushed a commit to southbridgeio/kubespray that referenced this pull request Jul 7, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants