-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 268
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Expose available ResourceFlavors from the ClusterQueue in the LocalQueue status. #3143
Expose available ResourceFlavors from the ClusterQueue in the LocalQueue status. #3143
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-kueue canceled.
|
/cc @alculquicondor |
/retest pull-kueue-test-integration-main |
@mbobrovskyi: The
Use
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/test pull-kueue-test-integration-main Due to #3144. |
c9a0f42
to
61629ef
Compare
Is there any decision to implement this API in the LocalQueue level? |
I don't see any high-level concerns. Do you have any? |
61629ef
to
eba6ab5
Compare
I don't have any high-level concerns about the approach. However, from the process perspective it might be better to include a small one-pager KEP for it? WDYT @alculquicondor @tenzen-y ? |
Yeah, it doesn't hurt |
Basically, I agree with this enhancement. |
I did not indicate that we should expose that information. But, evaluations would be worth it. |
Created #3181. |
/hold for #3181 |
d63f561
to
fd0ed8b
Compare
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 40d0a6fd0c55999a398b2f1b1e14e38d04b6e4fc
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: mbobrovskyi, mimowo The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
bb5673e
to
045b4f1
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Remaining comment would be good to address. Other than that LGTM
06e74f0
to
216aba1
Compare
I believe all comments are addressed, so ready to go |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 13974c483c80f16db679b619367f153e80c9724b
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for addressing my comments!
/lgtm
…eue status. (kubernetes-sigs#3143) * Expose Flavors in LocalQueue Status. * Initialize flavors after check that feature enabled. * Sort flavors list. * Propagate gomega to eventually. * Get sorted list on Resources slice. * Sort flavor list by flavor order.
…eue status. (kubernetes-sigs#3143) * Expose Flavors in LocalQueue Status. * Initialize flavors after check that feature enabled. * Sort flavors list. * Propagate gomega to eventually. * Get sorted list on Resources slice. * Sort flavor list by flavor order.
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
What this PR does / why we need it:
Expose available ResourceFlavors from the ClusterQueue in the LocalQueue status.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #3122
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?