-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 268
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
KEP-3122: Expose Flavors in LocalQueue Status. #3181
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-kueue canceled.
|
de22c76
to
49f8a71
Compare
/cc @mimowo |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the KEP
edbee25
to
9a21200
Compare
6ca0be3
to
de539a4
Compare
de539a4
to
21a8718
Compare
/lgtm I think this is a good starting point. The API model is flexible so we can extend it in the future by the list of resources, or quotas. For now, I'm not fully sure if publishing the resource quotas would not be leaking too much admin information to the end users for some environments, so maybe we can defer it for later when we have some more concrete use-cases. |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 0b8d7fb3a18f033e58fb8e203efe76df85f5652a
|
296b526
to
a2579aa
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry for the late review, and thank you for driving this enhancement!
059078f
to
b296cc0
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
b296cc0
to
c542b2f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you!
/lgtm
/approve
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: f7869bdb39ea45270b290dd684ae4c3b3ee3ddda
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: mbobrovskyi, mimowo, tenzen-y The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/hold cancel |
* KEP-3122: Expose Flavors in LocalQueue Status. * Add resources field on AvailableFlavor struct. * Add Risks and Mitigations section. * Add additional fields to AvailableFlavor struct. * Add future work section. * Add additional test case. * Add stopPolicies non-goal. * Rename availableFlavors to flavors. * Add feature gate.
What type of PR is this?
/kind documentation
What this PR does / why we need it:
KEP for Expose Flavors in LocalQueue Status.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Part of #3122
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?