-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 247
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Helm: Add revision history limit for master replica #1782
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-nfd ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @omerap12 for the contribution!
For the sake of consistency, I think we should add this parameter to nfd-gc, too (templates/nfd-gc.yaml
, gc.revisionHistoryLimit
in values). Also, we need to document the new parameter(s) in docs/deployment/helm.md
.
sure. adding |
2fe8188
to
c26d609
Compare
fixed @TessaIO |
Signed-off-by: Omer Aplatony <omerap12@gmail.com>
Friendly reminder :) @marquiz |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, now 👍
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: marquiz, omerap12, TessaIO The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/assign @TessaIO |
@AhmedThresh: changing LGTM is restricted to collaborators In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/lgtm |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 9f11225ec91e940defb754615380867aed0646c4
|
@ArangoGutierrez @TessaIO maybe we should consider cherry-picking this to v0.16.3. It's such a tiny change even if not strictly a bug fix, WDYT? |
no objections, we can go with that |
/cherry-pick release-0.16 |
@marquiz: #1782 failed to apply on top of branch "release-0.16":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@omerap12 is there a specific reason you didn't add the field for the daemonset? I think the same applies, no? |
Hey, no good reason. I can raise another PR to add this field to the daemon set as well if you'd like :) |
Already done :) |
Fixes: #1759
Tested locally. Output: