-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pod conditions around readiness to start containers after completion of pod sandbox creation #3085
Comments
/sig node |
Hi @ddebroy! 1.24 Enhancements team here. Just checking in as we approach enhancements freeze at 18:00pm PT on Thursday Feb 3rd. This enhancement is targeting Here’s where this enhancement currently stands:
Please plan to merge #3087 by enhancements freeze to complete the above items. The status of this enhancement is |
PRR for the KEP is complete for 1.24. Waiting on final reviews from sig-node. |
The Enhancements Freeze is now in effect and this enhancement is removed from the release. /milestone clear |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
/milestone v1.25 |
Hello @ddebroy 👋, 1.25 Enhancements team here. Just checking in as we approach enhancements freeze on 18:00 PST on Thursday June 16, 2022. For note, This enhancement is targeting for stage Here's where this enhancement currently stands:
Looks like for this one, we would need to update the open KEP PR #3087 for following & get it merged by Enhancements Freeze:
For note, the status of this enhancement is marked as |
I have updated the Test Plan section as recommended based on the latest template pointed out above. |
Thanks for the quick update, @ddebroy 🙂 |
With KEP PR #3087 merged, the enhancement is ready for the 1.25 Enhancements Freeze. For note, the status is now marked as |
Hello @ddebroy 👋, 1.25 Release Docs Shadow here. This enhancement is marked as ‘Needs Docs’ for the 1.25 release. Please follow the steps detailed in the documentation to open a PR against the dev-1.25 branch in the k/website repo. This PR can be just a placeholder at this time and must be created by August 4. Also, take a look at Documenting for a release to familiarize yourself with the docs requirement for the release. Thank you! |
Hey @ddebroy, I want to update the description to remove the beta field and add some PRs that I have waiting for this. I am unable to edit it as it was created by you. Can you add this under alpha (KEP (k/enhancements) update PR(s): #3778) And can you add kubernetes/website#40945 to the website section so we track some of the PRs in the issue. |
Hello @ddebroy! 1.28 Docs Shadow here. Does this enhancement work planned for 1.28 require any new docs or modification to existing docs? If so, please follows the steps here to open a PR against Also, take a look at Documenting for a release to get yourself familiarize with the docs requirement for the release. Thank you! |
Hey @ddebroy , could you please create a docs PR even if it is a draft PR with no content yet against dev-1.28 branch in the k/website repo. The deadline to create this draft PR is Thursday 20th July 2023. |
I believe this kubernetes/website#40945 should suffice. I have one where I need to update the blog post from last year to say that it has been renamed. |
Hey again @ddebroy 👋 Just checking in as we approach Code freeze at 01:00 UTC Friday, 19th July 2023. Here’s the enhancement’s state for the upcoming code freeze:
This is the code related PR/s that I found on this KEP issue:
Please keep the issue description up-to-date with all the PR/s that are associated with this KEP and let me know if there are other PR/s in k/k we should be tracking for this KEP. As always, we are here to help if any questions come up. Thanks! |
Thank you! I'm going to see if I can get some edit access to this issue so I can update the issue. |
Hey @kannon92 👋 Enhancements Lead here, |
Thank you @Atharva-Shinde! I'm planning on copying this and creating a new issue so I can keep this up-to-date. |
For next release, I'd like to target this for beta. One item I think may need to be addressed (kubernetes/kubernetes#117702 (comment)).
@liggitt is this a common way to add new conditions to pods? I guess in beta we would want to move the condition name to be here (https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/staging/src/k8s.io/api/core/v1/types.go#L2834?) |
once we commit to publishing named conditions, we have to assume that external integrators will start to trigger off of those, so we treat it like an API surface. Yes, moving the constant to the api types package would be a good place to put it, and would pull in API review as a side-effect |
That makes sense. I think that can be a good call for Beta for this issue. |
From @gracenng and sig-release (https://kubernetes.slack.com/archives/C0BP8PW9G/p1689178157530059), I am moving this to a new thread so I can keep the feature up-to-date since I will take over this feature. #4138 is the new issue. |
Thanks @kannon92! |
Closing this issue as it is superseded by #4138 |
/remove-label lead-opted-in |
/stage beta |
/label lead-opted-in |
/milestone clear |
See #4138 for latest update.
Enhancement Description
One-line enhancement description (can be used as a release note): Surface pod conditions around completion of pod sandbox creation marked by successful network configuration for the pod.
Kubernetes Enhancement Proposal: https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/master/keps/sig-node/3085-pod-conditions-for-starting-completition-of-sandbox-creation
Discussion Link: SIG Node Agenda [Jan 4th, 2022]
Primary contact (assignee): @ddebroy
Responsible SIGs: sig-node
Enhancement target (which target equals to which milestone):
Alpha
k/enhancements
) update PR(s):k/k
) update PR(s):k/website
) update PR(s): PodHasNetwork condition docs website#35704Beta
k/enhancements
) update PR(s): Update KEP with new name: PodReadyToStartContainers condition #3778k/k
) update PR(s):k/website
) update(s):KEP work continues on : #4138
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: