nodeup: if apt-get tells us to run dpkg configure, run it

[justinsb]

This is a fallback against some of nastier edge cases we can fall into
otherwise.

[hakman]

This looks good. Probably #16751 should be combined with this to pass all the tests.

[hakman]

/lgtm

[justinsb]

Added the skiplist here, but I think there's something happening on GCE also which might still fail....

[hakman]

Added the skiplist here, but I think there's something happening on GCE also which might still fail....

One step closer.

[hakman]

/retest

[justinsb]

/test pull-kops-e2e-k8s-gce-cilium

/test pull-kops-e2e-k8s-gce-ipalias

[rifelpet]

The GCE failures seem to be new. The test was passing (not skipped) with 1.30.3, but the next invocation was with 1.31.0 and failed.

  I0816 13:52:10.440180 50617 utils.go:352] encountered error during dial (received unexpected responses... 
  Attempt 0
  Command curl -g -q -s 'http://100.96.4.106:9080/dial?request=hostname&protocol=http&host=100.67.208.27&port=80&tries=1'
  retrieved map[nodes-us-east1-d-8ht1.c.k8s-infra-e2e-boskos-068.internal:{}]
  expected map[nodes-us-east1-d-1c9k:{} nodes-us-east1-d-8ht1:{} nodes-us-east1-d-gqhq:{} nodes-us-east1-d-zzq6:{}])
  [FAILED] in [It] - k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/network/networking.go:479 @ 08/16/24 13:52:10.44 

The retrieved vs expected sounds related to kubernetes/kubernetes#121018 (comment)

Both jobs have identical --cloud-provider=external and --hostname-override flags though.

[justinsb]

/override pull-kops-e2e-k8s-aws-calico
/override pull-kops-e2e-k8s-gce-cilium
/override pull-kops-e2e-k8s-gce-ipalias

[k8s-ci-robot]

@justinsb: Overrode contexts on behalf of justinsb: pull-kops-e2e-k8s-aws-calico, pull-kops-e2e-k8s-gce-cilium, pull-kops-e2e-k8s-gce-ipalias

In response to this:

/override pull-kops-e2e-k8s-aws-calico
/override pull-kops-e2e-k8s-gce-cilium
/override pull-kops-e2e-k8s-gce-ipalias

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[hakman]

/lgtm
/approve

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: hakman

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [hakman]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[hakman]

/lgtm cancel

[hakman]

/test all

[hakman]

/override pull-kops-e2e-k8s-aws-calico
/override pull-kops-e2e-k8s-gce-cilium
/override pull-kops-e2e-k8s-gce-ipalias

[k8s-ci-robot]

@hakman: Overrode contexts on behalf of hakman: pull-kops-e2e-k8s-aws-calico, pull-kops-e2e-k8s-gce-cilium, pull-kops-e2e-k8s-gce-ipalias

In response to this:

/override pull-kops-e2e-k8s-aws-calico
/override pull-kops-e2e-k8s-gce-cilium
/override pull-kops-e2e-k8s-gce-ipalias

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[hakman]

/override pull-kops-e2e-k8s-aws-amazonvpc
/override pull-kops-kubernetes-e2e-ubuntu-gce-build

[k8s-ci-robot]

@hakman: Overrode contexts on behalf of hakman: pull-kops-e2e-k8s-aws-amazonvpc, pull-kops-kubernetes-e2e-ubuntu-gce-build

In response to this:

/override pull-kops-e2e-k8s-aws-amazonvpc
/override pull-kops-kubernetes-e2e-ubuntu-gce-build

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[hakman]

/override pull-kops-build

[k8s-ci-robot]

@hakman: Overrode contexts on behalf of hakman: pull-kops-build

In response to this:

/override pull-kops-build

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[rifelpet]

/lgtm

[rifelpet]

@justinsb I believe this is causing some regressions in GCE:

https://testgrid.k8s.io/kops-network-plugins#kops-gce-cni-cilium-k8s-ci

A node is failing to join the cluster, with:

W0828 12:39:10.230865    4618 executor.go:141] error running task "Package/cgroupfs-mount" (6m19s remaining to succeed): error installing package "cgroupfs-mount": exit status 100: Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
Reading state information...
cgroupfs-mount is already the newest version (1.4).
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 103 not upgraded.
1 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0 B/316 kB of archives.
After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used.
dpkg: error processing package chrony (--configure):
 package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should
 reinstall it before attempting configuration
Errors were encountered while processing:
 chrony
needrestart is being skipped since dpkg has failed
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)