Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[hi] Umbrella issue for translating glossary entries to Hindi #35600

Closed
rolfedh opened this issue Aug 1, 2022 · 43 comments · Fixed by #36186, #38131, #38132, #40712 or #40747
Closed

[hi] Umbrella issue for translating glossary entries to Hindi #35600

rolfedh opened this issue Aug 1, 2022 · 43 comments · Fixed by #36186, #38131, #38132, #40712 or #40747
Assignees
Labels
language/hi Issues or PRs related to Hindi language triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on.

Comments

@rolfedh
Copy link
Contributor

rolfedh commented Aug 1, 2022

This is a Feature Request

What would you like to be added

We plan to hold a "team localization jam" for translating glossary entries to Hindi.

Why is this needed

Glossary entries provide building blocks of content that many topics include. Translating these first is a strategic priority.

Comments

@rolfedh rolfedh added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Aug 1, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. label Aug 1, 2022
@rolfedh
Copy link
Contributor Author

rolfedh commented Aug 1, 2022

/assign rolfedh

@AmanSarraf
Copy link

/assign AmanSarraf

@sftim
Copy link
Contributor

sftim commented Aug 1, 2022

/language hi
/retitle [hi] Umbrella issue for translating glossary entries to Hindi

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot changed the title Conduct a "team localization jam" for translating glossary entries. [hi] Umbrella issue for translating glossary entries to Hindi Aug 1, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the language/hi Issues or PRs related to Hindi language label Aug 1, 2022
@sftim
Copy link
Contributor

sftim commented Aug 1, 2022

/remove-kind feature

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Aug 1, 2022
@taniaduggal
Copy link
Contributor

taniaduggal commented Aug 1, 2022

I also want to work on this. May I @rolfedh

@AmanSarraf
Copy link

I also want to work on this. May I @rolfedh

yes sure welcome, you can assign this to yourself as /assign

@anubha-v-ardhan
Copy link
Member

anubha-v-ardhan commented Aug 1, 2022

/triage accepted

Thank you @rolfedh

@AmanSarraf @taniaduggal and others, this being an umbrella issue, my suggestion would be to not assign ourselves since GitHub has a limit of 10 assigneed and we can easily have more than 10 contributors on this issue.

Also, addition of a checklist in issue description would make tracking the work easier, just like we did localizing the content intiitally (#29353) unless we have another method to organize work.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on. and removed needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. labels Aug 1, 2022
@taniaduggal
Copy link
Contributor

Oky @anubha-v-ardhan

@taniaduggal
Copy link
Contributor

I am working on content/en/docs/reference/glossary/cidr.md
@AmanSarraf @rolfedh

@taniaduggal
Copy link
Contributor

Now , I am working on content/en/docs/reference/glossary/annotation.md @rolfedh

@rolfedh
Copy link
Contributor Author

rolfedh commented Aug 5, 2022 via email

@rolfedh
Copy link
Contributor Author

rolfedh commented Aug 7, 2022

Status update

Based on some initial experiences I've seen contributors encounter, I've been working on a several issues to clear a smoother path for contributors:

git fetch upstream dev-1.22-hi.1
git rebase upstream/dev-1.22-hi.1

@rolfedh
Copy link
Contributor Author

rolfedh commented Aug 7, 2022

@anubha-v-ardhan For translating glossary entries, should we be guiding contributors to translate the content from main or dev-1.22?

I lean toward working from main because these glossary entries contain have substantial improvements since 1.22. WDYT?

@anubha-v-ardhan
Copy link
Member

@rolfedh I'd say main too, I see no harm in having the latest glossary localized.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@bishal7679: Reopened this issue.

In response to this:

/reopen

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@bishal7679
Copy link
Member

/reopen

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot reopened this Jan 16, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@bishal7679: Reopened this issue.

In response to this:

/reopen

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@anubha-v-ardhan
Copy link
Member

/reopen

Folks, this is an umbrella issue. please don't tag individual PRs as fixing this issue.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@anubha-v-ardhan: Reopened this issue.

In response to this:

/reopen

Folks, this is an umbrella issue. please don't tag individual PRs as fixing this issue.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot reopened this Jun 23, 2023
@anubha-v-ardhan
Copy link
Member

anubha-v-ardhan commented Jun 23, 2023

Are we still using this issue to coordinate our efforts on localizing glossary or should we close this issue, review open PRs and again calibrate our efforts fresh?

cc @bishal7679 @Babapool

@Babapool
Copy link
Member

@anubha-v-ardhan I think it is better to review to open PRs and calibrate a fresh efforts especially for tracking the glossary localization.

@bishal7679
Copy link
Member

@anubha-v-ardhan Yes it would be better to review all the already opened PRs and merge those
and let this issue be closed as for now!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment