Skip to content

Conversation

@aibarbetta
Copy link
Member

@aibarbetta aibarbetta commented Aug 11, 2025

The following sections are pending:

  • Release name
  • Release theme and logo
  • Release Team
  • Release webinar date, time, and event link

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Aug 11, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/blog Issues or PRs related to the Kubernetes Blog subproject language/en Issues or PRs related to English language size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Aug 11, 2025
@aibarbetta
Copy link
Member Author

CC Comms Team @88abb @cloudmelon @dipesh-rawat @graz-dev

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Aug 11, 2025

Pull request preview available for checking

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 6ba9a3e
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/kubernetes-io-main-staging/deploys/689935aed740ba0008a797cd
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-51877--kubernetes-io-main-staging.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Aug 11, 2025

Pull request preview available for checking

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit e1fbc71
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/kubernetes-io-main-staging/deploys/68a72cbd5aa0e90008aa2f3e
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-51877--kubernetes-io-main-staging.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

@Serenity611 Serenity611 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Initial pass for proofreading, made some suggestions for consistent formatting/treatment of terms across sections.

Please let me know if you have questions, or if I suggested anything that we wouldn't change--I'm still learning, feedback/education is very welcome! :)

Copy link
Member

@lmktfy lmktfy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Folks, this doesn't look ready to merge. Consider labelling it as a work in progress.

It's impressive but I can also see many things that I think we must fix before we merge this as a draft; see inline feedback.


For people who use Kubernetes, what's the most relevant improvement in the v1.34 minor release? We should make that really clear.

Copy link
Member

@Vyom-Yadav Vyom-Yadav left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just skimmed through the stable portion

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Aug 13, 2025
Copy link
Member Author

@aibarbetta aibarbetta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Move KYAML to spotlight


This work was done as part of [KEP \#5295](https://kep.k8s.io/5295) led by SIG CLI.

### \<Stable/Beta/Alpha\>: \<THEME 4\>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

one thing in 1.34 that may be breaking customer is the static pod are not allowed to have API objects: kubernetes/kubernetes#131837

This is a change of behavior that may require to change static pod definition and deserves to be highlighted.

cc: @BenTheElder

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, there was an attempt to promote this to Action Require in the release notes, though I'm not sure if that happened in the release notes yet either.

kubernetes/kubernetes#131837 (comment)

I think we should mention this and make it clear that it's safe to drop these references because they would've been non-functional previously, static pods could not use references before this change, they were just silently ignored and the mirror pod failed to be created.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure we have a place for changes like this in the Release Announcement 🤔 I would make sure this is covered properly in the release notes.


This work was done as part of [KEP \#4802](https://kep.k8s.io/4802) led by SIG Windows.

### In-place Pod resize improvements
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cc @tallclair to review

Copy link
Member

@lmktfy lmktfy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If only one of these suggestions could land, I hope it'd be the one about the change to Pod security standards.

We don't have Pod security policies any more and should be wary of using "policy" in this context.


With all these rewordings, the specific wording isn't what's important. You can choose your own words—but what I do want is for the co-editors to work backwards from the suggested text to figure out what wasn't right about the original.

Any different new wording should try to ensure it fixes the concerns the blog team might have (about the previous text).

Copy link
Contributor

@soltysh soltysh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm the changes

Copy link
Contributor

@graz-dev graz-dev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

I'm happy to merge it as a draft.
We can always open a small PR to add the missing details (logo, webinar link...) and further SIGs reviews and adjustments if needed.

cc @lmktfy

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 21, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 3d69c1f123d60840d47e06f0bc4a482480e804e9

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 21, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from graz-dev August 21, 2025 14:14
fit front matter format

fit front matter format

Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Susan Sica <90214772+Serenity611@users.noreply.github.com>

add kep and events sections + fixes

fixes

Add project velocity

Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Tim Bannister <193443691+lmktfy@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Vyom Yadav <73882557+Vyom-Yadav@users.noreply.github.com>

Add KEP-1287

Add KEP-4568

Add KEP-740

Move KYAML to spotlight

Co-authored-by: Graziano Casto <graziano.casto@outlook.com>

Update content/en/blog/_posts/2025-08-27-Kubernetes-v1-34-Release/index.md

remove empty lines

Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Tim Bannister <193443691+lmktfy@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Graziano Casto <graziano.casto@outlook.com>

Update content/en/blog/_posts/2025-08-27-Kubernetes-v1-34-Release/index.md

Update content/en/blog/_posts/2025-08-27-Kubernetes-v1-34-Release/index.md

Add deprecations and removals section

Update content/en/blog/_posts/2025-08-27-Kubernetes-v1-34-Release/index.md

Move spotlight with deprecation to deprecations and removals section

drop 2340

drop 2831

Kubernetes to end containerd 1.x support

Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Susan Sica <90214772+Serenity611@users.noreply.github.com>

Update content/en/blog/_posts/2025-08-27-Kubernetes-v1-34-Release/index.md

Co-authored-by: Graziano Casto <graziano.casto@outlook.com>

relaxed DNS use case

add KYAML link

Update content/en/blog/_posts/2025-08-27-Kubernetes-v1-34-Release/index.md

Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Tim Bannister <193443691+lmktfy@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Susan Sica <90214772+Serenity611@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Dipesh Rawat <rawat.dipesh@gmail.com>

Update content/en/blog/_posts/2025-08-27-Kubernetes-v1-34-Release/index.md

Update content/en/blog/_posts/2025-08-27-Kubernetes-v1-34-Release/index.md

Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Susan Sica <90214772+Serenity611@users.noreply.github.com>

Update content/en/blog/_posts/2025-08-27-Kubernetes-v1-34-Release/index.md

Update content/en/blog/_posts/2025-08-27-Kubernetes-v1-34-Release/index.md

Update content/en/blog/_posts/2025-08-27-Kubernetes-v1-34-Release/index.md

Move structured parameters to spotlight

Move 2837

Add KEP-5307

Fix SIG refs

Apply suggestions in automated cgroup detection

Align KEP-3331 with highlight

Align DRA KEPs with highlight

style

Align KEP-2837 with highlight

Add Release Team section

Apply KYAML suggestions

Co-authored-by: Maciej Szulik <soltysh@gmail.com>

Update content/en/blog/_posts/2025-08-27-Kubernetes-v1-34-Release/index.md

Co-authored-by: Maciej Szulik <soltysh@gmail.com>

Update content/en/blog/_posts/2025-08-27-Kubernetes-v1-34-Release/index.md

Co-authored-by: 杨朱 · Kiki <baofa.fan@daocloud.io>

Update content/en/blog/_posts/2025-08-27-Kubernetes-v1-34-Release/index.md

Co-authored-by: Paco Xu <paco.xu@daocloud.io>

Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Dipesh Rawat <rawat.dipesh@gmail.com>
@aibarbetta aibarbetta force-pushed the add-release-announcement-blog branch from 2e41c30 to e1fbc71 Compare August 21, 2025 14:27
Copy link
Member

@lmktfy lmktfy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I confirmed this will merge as a draft!

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 21, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 8e91e320ecc60bd0e331dc42196a8a274fc5c7bc

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: lmktfy, soltysh

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 21, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 74b9e86 into kubernetes:main Aug 21, 2025
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/blog Issues or PRs related to the Kubernetes Blog subproject cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. language/en Issues or PRs related to English language lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.