Fix a bug with user-defined labels in priorityClass #3085
Conversation
kubevirt-bot
added
release-note
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 10679520351Details
💛 - Coveralls |
|
hco-e2e-kv-smoke-gcp lane succeeded. |
|
@hco-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of hco-bot: ci/prow/hco-e2e-kv-smoke-azure In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
nunnatsa
force-pushed
the
allow-custom-labels-pc
branch
from
49327c2
to
bd8b47b
Compare
kubevirt-bot
added
needs-rebase
nunnatsa
force-pushed
the
allow-custom-labels-pc
branch
2 times, most recently
from
3665280
to
e676ba6
Compare
kubevirt-bot
removed
the
needs-rebase
nunnatsa
force-pushed
the
allow-custom-labels-pc
branch
2 times, most recently
from
3f7d46f
to
8504f77
Compare
nunnatsa
force-pushed
the
allow-custom-labels-pc
branch
2 times, most recently
from
54965ec
to
4935c9c
Compare
|
hco-e2e-operator-sdk-sno-aws lane succeeded. |
|
@hco-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of hco-bot: ci/prow/hco-e2e-operator-sdk-sno-azure In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-sno-aws lane succeeded. |
|
@hco-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of hco-bot: ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-sno-azure In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/retest |
|
hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-sno-aws lane succeeded. |
|
@hco-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of hco-bot: ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-sno-azure In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-aws lane succeeded. |
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: tiraboschi The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
kubevirt-bot
added
the
approved
|
hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-aws lane succeeded. |
|
@hco-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of hco-bot: ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-azure In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
hco-e2e-consecutive-operator-sdk-upgrades-aws lane succeeded. |
|
@hco-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of hco-bot: ci/prow/hco-e2e-consecutive-operator-sdk-upgrades-azure In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
HCO already supports user-defined labels in priorityClass, but if another change is done to the priorityClass, either a change in a required label, or a change in the spec fields, the user-defined labels are deleted. This is also happens if the other modofication is done in different request. This PR fixes this issue, and makes sure that user-defined labels are stay in place on update of the priorityClass. As part of the fix, HCO now does not remove and re-create the priorityClass, if only label were changed, but updates it. As result, the update_priority_class was removed as it is not relevant anymore. Signed-off-by: Nahshon Unna-Tsameret <nunnatsa@redhat.com>
nunnatsa
force-pushed
the
allow-custom-labels-pc
branch
from
400c0dd
to
7da9ab0
Compare
|
|
hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-aws lane succeeded. |
|
@hco-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of hco-bot: ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-azure, ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-sno-azure In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-sno-aws lane succeeded. |
|
@hco-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of hco-bot: ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-prev-operator-sdk-sno-azure In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
hco-e2e-consecutive-operator-sdk-upgrades-aws lane succeeded. |
|
@hco-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of hco-bot: ci/prow/hco-e2e-consecutive-operator-sdk-upgrades-azure In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/retest |
|
@nunnatsa: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-aws lane succeeded. |
|
@hco-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of hco-bot: ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-azure In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-sno-aws lane succeeded. |
|
@hco-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of hco-bot: ci/prow/hco-e2e-upgrade-operator-sdk-sno-azure In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
HCO already supports user-defined labels in priorityClass, but if another change is done to the priorityClass, either a change in a required label, or a change in the spec fields, the user-defined labels are deleted. This is also happens if the other modofication is done in different request.
This PR fixes this issue, and makes sure that user-defined labels are stay in place on update of the priorityClass.
What this PR does / why we need it:
Reviewer Checklist
Jira Ticket:
Release note: