Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Solved grammar mistakes, justifies sentences, updated home page content. #35

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

tansiret
Copy link

No description provided.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 25, 2019

This pull request is being automatically deployed with ZEIT Now (learn more).
To see the status of your deployment, click below or on the icon next to each commit.

🔍 Inspect: https://zeit.co/withmadico/legesher/lp62t5goo
🌍 Preview: https://legesher-git-fork-yutyo-master.withmadico.now.sh

@vercel vercel bot requested a deployment to staging October 25, 2019 19:30 Abandoned
Copy link
Member

@madiedgar madiedgar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hope this gives you a little more context behind the copy on this page. Would love to know your thoughts!

index.html Outdated
Comment on lines 225 to 229

<p class="text-sm">Innovation, creativity, and collaboration should never be lost in translation. That’s why we created Legesher!



Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please explain the purpose of the addition of these newlines in both this section and in lines 293-295

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, I haven't made those gaps originally. Github done that due to merge conflict.

index.html Outdated
Comment on lines 293 to 295

<h2 class="section-title mt-0">Be notified</h2>

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the suggestion 👍, but I prefer the prior version of the copy for this section.

index.html Outdated
Comment on lines 280 to 281
<p class="text-sm">We always want to add new spoken and programming languages to our repository. Please lege-<u>share</u> our mission.
</br></br>From beginners to professionals, learning how to code to collaborating with diverse teams around the world, Legesher connects us all.</p>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You're on the right track, let's refine this a little more.

The first

sentence's purpose is to encourage new dialect translations to be added / reviewed.
The second sentence is to showcase the different use cases of the tool:

  • people just starting to learn how to code
  • professional developers collaborating in (diverse) teams

@tansiret
Copy link
Author

tansiret commented Oct 27, 2019

I have pushed a new update according to your recommendations and refined the text more. Can you merge it? I really need this for Hacktoberfest.

P.S: How to join to Legesher? I have subscribed to the mail list, is it enough?

@madiedgar
Copy link
Member

Hey @Yutyo, that's awesome you're doing Hacktoberfest for it truly helps open source project receive quality contributions. It's best to tackle on bugs or new features that are properly described in issues, so the requirements of the pull request are clear. I'm going to close this pull request, as this copy of the home page needs to be clearly described/discussed in an issue.

If you're trying to finalize your hacktoberfest PR's, .this is a great place. I will accept multiple PR's if each contribution has at least 10 full entries added to the table. Quality > Quantity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants