Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

577 automation extrinsic pallet order check #710

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Jul 20, 2022

Conversation

chenzongxiong
Copy link
Contributor

@Kailai-Wang I think it would be better to merge into dev branch before testing workflow-run feature.

@chenzongxiong chenzongxiong linked an issue Jul 19, 2022 that may be closed by this pull request
2 tasks
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jul 19, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #710 (139a49a) into dev (4775b19) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              dev     #710   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.95%   95.95%           
=======================================
  Files          12       12           
  Lines        1683     1683           
=======================================
  Hits         1615     1615           
  Misses         68       68           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4775b19...139a49a. Read the comment docs.

@Kailai-Wang
Copy link
Collaborator

Sure we can do that
You just need to sync the dev branch

@chenzongxiong chenzongxiong changed the title 577 automation extrinsic pallet order check [WIP] 577 automation extrinsic pallet order check Jul 19, 2022
@chenzongxiong
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Kailai-Wang
In consideration of the following issues, I would like to create two PRs for #577

https://github.saobby.my.eu.orgmunity/t/workflow-run-not-working-as-expected/139342
github/docs#799

We need to merge the workflow into dev branch first. Then I can test the dependencies across different workflows

@Kailai-Wang
Copy link
Collaborator

Sure, we can do that

@chenzongxiong chenzongxiong changed the title [WIP] 577 automation extrinsic pallet order check 577 automation extrinsic pallet order check Jul 20, 2022
@Kailai-Wang Kailai-Wang merged commit a8ea466 into dev Jul 20, 2022
@chenzongxiong chenzongxiong deleted the 577-automation-extrinsic-pallet-order-check branch July 20, 2022 18:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants