-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
release/20.x: [ValueTracking] Skip incoming values that are the same as the phi in isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison
(#130111)
#130474
Conversation
@nikic What do you think about merging this PR to the release branch? |
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-analysis Author: None (llvmbot) ChangesBackport 462eb7e Requested by: @nikic Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130474.diff 2 Files Affected:
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp b/llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
index 8a674914641a8..43013294e2b4c 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
@@ -7776,6 +7776,8 @@ static bool isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison(
unsigned Num = PN->getNumIncomingValues();
bool IsWellDefined = true;
for (unsigned i = 0; i < Num; ++i) {
+ if (PN == PN->getIncomingValue(i))
+ continue;
auto *TI = PN->getIncomingBlock(i)->getTerminator();
if (!isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison(PN->getIncomingValue(i), AC, TI,
DT, Depth + 1, Kind)) {
diff --git a/llvm/test/Analysis/ValueTracking/phi-self.ll b/llvm/test/Analysis/ValueTracking/phi-self.ll
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..17afd872cab03
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/test/Analysis/ValueTracking/phi-self.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --version 5
+; RUN: opt -S -passes=instsimplify < %s | FileCheck %s
+
+; Test `%r` can be replaced by `%nonpoison`.
+
+define i32 @other_noundef(i32 noundef %arg) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: define i32 @other_noundef(
+; CHECK-SAME: i32 noundef [[ARG:%.*]]) {
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[START:.*]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: br label %[[LOOP:.*]]
+; CHECK: [[LOOP]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[NONPOISON:%.*]] = phi i32 [ 0, %[[START]] ], [ [[NONPOISON]], %[[BB0:.*]] ], [ [[ARG]], %[[BB1:.*]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[I:%.*]] = call i32 @opaque()
+; CHECK-NEXT: switch i32 [[I]], label %[[EXIT:.*]] [
+; CHECK-NEXT: i32 0, label %[[BB0]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: i32 1, label %[[BB1]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: ]
+; CHECK: [[EXIT]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 [[NONPOISON]]
+; CHECK: [[BB0]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: br label %[[LOOP]]
+; CHECK: [[BB1]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: br label %[[LOOP]]
+;
+start:
+ br label %loop
+
+loop:
+ %nonpoison = phi i32 [ 0, %start ], [ %nonpoison, %bb0 ], [ %arg, %bb1 ]
+ %i = call i32 @opaque()
+ switch i32 %i, label %exit [
+ i32 0, label %bb0
+ i32 1, label %bb1
+ ]
+
+exit:
+ %r = freeze i32 %nonpoison
+ ret i32 %r
+
+bb0:
+ br label %loop
+
+bb1:
+ br label %loop
+}
+
+define i32 @other_poison(i32 %arg) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: define i32 @other_poison(
+; CHECK-SAME: i32 [[ARG:%.*]]) {
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[START:.*]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: br label %[[LOOP:.*]]
+; CHECK: [[LOOP]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[MAYPOISON:%.*]] = phi i32 [ 0, %[[START]] ], [ [[MAYPOISON]], %[[BB0:.*]] ], [ [[ARG]], %[[BB1:.*]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[I:%.*]] = call i32 @opaque()
+; CHECK-NEXT: switch i32 [[I]], label %[[EXIT:.*]] [
+; CHECK-NEXT: i32 0, label %[[BB0]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: i32 1, label %[[BB1]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: ]
+; CHECK: [[EXIT]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[R:%.*]] = freeze i32 [[MAYPOISON]]
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 [[R]]
+; CHECK: [[BB0]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: br label %[[LOOP]]
+; CHECK: [[BB1]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT: br label %[[LOOP]]
+;
+start:
+ br label %loop
+
+loop:
+ %maypoison = phi i32 [ 0, %start ], [ %maypoison, %bb0 ], [ %arg, %bb1 ]
+ %i = call i32 @opaque()
+ switch i32 %i, label %exit [
+ i32 0, label %bb0
+ i32 1, label %bb1
+ ]
+
+exit:
+ %r = freeze i32 %maypoison
+ ret i32 %r
+
+bb0:
+ br label %loop
+
+bb1:
+ br label %loop
+}
+
+declare i32 @opaque()
|
…`isGuaranteedNotToBeUndefOrPoison` (llvm#130111) Fixes (keep it open) llvm#130110. If the incoming value is PHI itself, we can skip this. If we can guarantee that the other incoming values are neither undef nor poison, then we can also guarantee that the value isn't either. If we cannot guarantee that, it makes no sense in calculating it. (cherry picked from commit 462eb7e)
@nikic (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this fix in the release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment with a one or two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please add the release:note label to this PR. |
Backport 462eb7e
Requested by: @nikic