Skip to content

Conversation

@bgergely0
Copy link
Contributor

@bgergely0 bgergely0 commented Nov 10, 2025

This function contains most of the logic for BTI:

  • it takes the BasicBlock and the instruction used to jump to it.
  • then it checks if the first non-pseudo instruction is a sufficient
    landing pad for the used call.
  • if not, it generates the correct BTI instruction.

Also introduce the isCallCoveredByBTI helper to simplify the logic.

Copy link
Contributor Author

bgergely0 commented Nov 10, 2025

@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Nov 19, 2025

@llvm/pr-subscribers-bolt

Author: Gergely Bálint (bgergely0)

Changes

This function contains most of the logic for BTI:

  • it takes the BasicBlock and the instruction used to jump to it.
  • then it checks if the first non-pseudo instruction is a sufficient
    landing pad for the used call.
  • if not, it generates the correct BTI instruction.

Also introduce the isBTIVariantCoveringCall helper to simplify the logic.


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/167329.diff

3 Files Affected:

  • (modified) bolt/include/bolt/Core/MCPlusBuilder.h (+13)
  • (modified) bolt/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64MCPlusBuilder.cpp (+75)
  • (modified) bolt/unittests/Core/MCPlusBuilder.cpp (+105)
diff --git a/bolt/include/bolt/Core/MCPlusBuilder.h b/bolt/include/bolt/Core/MCPlusBuilder.h
index 660c1c64b06cf..4eaf444c320bf 100644
--- a/bolt/include/bolt/Core/MCPlusBuilder.h
+++ b/bolt/include/bolt/Core/MCPlusBuilder.h
@@ -1890,6 +1890,19 @@ class MCPlusBuilder {
     llvm_unreachable("not implemented");
   }
 
+  /// Checks if the indirect call / jump is accepted by the landing pad at the
+  /// start of the target BasicBlock.
+  virtual bool isBTIVariantCoveringCall(MCInst &Call, MCInst &Pad) const {
+    llvm_unreachable("not implemented");
+    return false;
+  }
+
+  /// Adds a BTI landing pad to the start of the BB, that matches the indirect
+  /// call/jump inst.
+  virtual void addBTItoBBStart(BinaryBasicBlock &BB, MCInst &Call) const {
+    llvm_unreachable("not implemented");
+  }
+
   /// Store \p Target absolute address to \p RegName
   virtual InstructionListType materializeAddress(const MCSymbol *Target,
                                                  MCContext *Ctx,
diff --git a/bolt/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64MCPlusBuilder.cpp b/bolt/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64MCPlusBuilder.cpp
index cb0a9cc0c12db..a5c88e113f726 100644
--- a/bolt/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64MCPlusBuilder.cpp
+++ b/bolt/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64MCPlusBuilder.cpp
@@ -2738,6 +2738,81 @@ class AArch64MCPlusBuilder : public MCPlusBuilder {
     Inst.addOperand(MCOperand::createImm(HintNum));
   }
 
+  bool isBTIVariantCoveringCall(MCInst &Call, MCInst &Pad) const override {
+    assert((isIndirectCall(Call) || isIndirectBranch(Call)) &&
+           "Not an indirect call or branch.");
+
+    // A BLR can be accepted by a BTI c.
+    if (isIndirectCall(Call))
+      return isBTILandingPad(Pad, true, false) ||
+             isBTILandingPad(Pad, true, true);
+
+    // A BR can be accepted by a BTI j or BTI c (and BTI jc) IF the operand is
+    // x16 or x17. If the operand is not x16 or x17, it can be accepted by a BTI
+    // j or BTI jc (and not BTI c).
+    if (isIndirectBranch(Call)) {
+      assert(Call.getNumOperands() == 1 &&
+             "Indirect branch needs to have 1 operand.");
+      assert(Call.getOperand(0).isReg() &&
+             "Indirect branch does not have a register operand.");
+      MCPhysReg Reg = Call.getOperand(0).getReg();
+      if (Reg == AArch64::X16 || Reg == AArch64::X17)
+        return isBTILandingPad(Pad, true, false) ||
+               isBTILandingPad(Pad, false, true) ||
+               isBTILandingPad(Pad, true, true);
+      return isBTILandingPad(Pad, false, true) ||
+             isBTILandingPad(Pad, true, true);
+    }
+    return false;
+  }
+
+  void addBTItoBBStart(BinaryBasicBlock &BB, MCInst &Call) const override {
+    auto II = BB.getFirstNonPseudo();
+    if (II != BB.end()) {
+      if (isBTIVariantCoveringCall(Call, *II))
+        return;
+      // A BLR can be accepted by a BTI c.
+      if (isIndirectCall(Call)) {
+        // if we have a BTI j at the start, extend it to a BTI jc,
+        // otherwise insert a new BTI c.
+        if (isBTILandingPad(*II, false, true)) {
+          updateBTIVariant(*II, true, true);
+        } else {
+          MCInst BTIInst;
+          createBTI(BTIInst, true, false);
+          BB.insertInstruction(II, BTIInst);
+        }
+      }
+
+      // A BR can be accepted by a BTI j or BTI c (and BTI jc) IF the operand is
+      // x16 or x17. If the operand is not x16 or x17, it can be accepted by a
+      // BTI j or BTI jc (and not BTI c).
+      if (isIndirectBranch(Call)) {
+        assert(Call.getNumOperands() == 1 &&
+               "Indirect branch needs to have 1 operand.");
+        assert(Call.getOperand(0).isReg() &&
+               "Indirect branch does not have a register operand.");
+        MCPhysReg Reg = Call.getOperand(0).getReg();
+        if (Reg == AArch64::X16 || Reg == AArch64::X17) {
+          // Add a new BTI c
+          MCInst BTIInst;
+          createBTI(BTIInst, true, false);
+          BB.insertInstruction(II, BTIInst);
+        } else {
+          // If BB starts with a BTI c, extend it to BTI jc,
+          // otherwise insert a new BTI j.
+          if (isBTILandingPad(*II, true, false)) {
+            updateBTIVariant(*II, true, true);
+          } else {
+            MCInst BTIInst;
+            createBTI(BTIInst, false, true);
+            BB.insertInstruction(II, BTIInst);
+          }
+        }
+      }
+    }
+  }
+
   InstructionListType materializeAddress(const MCSymbol *Target, MCContext *Ctx,
                                          MCPhysReg RegName,
                                          int64_t Addend = 0) const override {
diff --git a/bolt/unittests/Core/MCPlusBuilder.cpp b/bolt/unittests/Core/MCPlusBuilder.cpp
index 02ecb87b4a5e3..e08ae09e76027 100644
--- a/bolt/unittests/Core/MCPlusBuilder.cpp
+++ b/bolt/unittests/Core/MCPlusBuilder.cpp
@@ -196,6 +196,111 @@ TEST_P(MCPlusBuilderTester, AArch64_BTI) {
   ASSERT_TRUE(BC->MIB->isImplicitBTIC(*II));
 }
 
+TEST_P(MCPlusBuilderTester, AArch64_addBTItoBBStart_0) {
+  if (GetParam() != Triple::aarch64)
+    GTEST_SKIP();
+  BinaryFunction *BF = BC->createInjectedBinaryFunction("BF", true);
+  std::unique_ptr<BinaryBasicBlock> BB = BF->createBasicBlock();
+  MCInst Inst = MCInstBuilder(AArch64::RET).addReg(AArch64::LR);
+  BB->addInstruction(Inst);
+  // BR x16 needs BTI c or BTI j. We prefer adding a BTI c.
+  MCInst CallInst = MCInstBuilder(AArch64::BR).addReg(AArch64::X16);
+  BC->MIB->addBTItoBBStart(*BB, CallInst);
+  auto II = BB->begin();
+  ASSERT_TRUE(BC->MIB->isBTILandingPad(*II, true, false));
+}
+
+TEST_P(MCPlusBuilderTester, AArch64_addBTItoBBStart_1) {
+  if (GetParam() != Triple::aarch64)
+    GTEST_SKIP();
+  BinaryFunction *BF = BC->createInjectedBinaryFunction("BF", true);
+  std::unique_ptr<BinaryBasicBlock> BB = BF->createBasicBlock();
+  MCInst BTIc;
+  BC->MIB->createBTI(BTIc, true, false);
+  BB->addInstruction(BTIc);
+  // BR x16 needs BTI c or BTI j. We have a BTI c, no change is needed.
+  MCInst CallInst = MCInstBuilder(AArch64::BR).addReg(AArch64::X16);
+  BC->MIB->addBTItoBBStart(*BB, CallInst);
+  auto II = BB->begin();
+  ASSERT_TRUE(BC->MIB->isBTILandingPad(*II, true, false));
+}
+
+TEST_P(MCPlusBuilderTester, AArch64_addBTItoBBStart_2) {
+  if (GetParam() != Triple::aarch64)
+    GTEST_SKIP();
+  BinaryFunction *BF = BC->createInjectedBinaryFunction("BF", true);
+  std::unique_ptr<BinaryBasicBlock> BB = BF->createBasicBlock();
+  MCInst BTIc;
+  BC->MIB->createBTI(BTIc, true, false);
+  BB->addInstruction(BTIc);
+  // BR x5 needs BTI j
+  // we have BTI c -> extend it to BTI jc.
+  MCInst CallInst = MCInstBuilder(AArch64::BR).addReg(AArch64::X5);
+  BC->MIB->addBTItoBBStart(*BB, CallInst);
+  auto II = BB->begin();
+  ASSERT_TRUE(BC->MIB->isBTILandingPad(*II, true, true));
+}
+
+TEST_P(MCPlusBuilderTester, AArch64_addBTItoBBStart_3) {
+  if (GetParam() != Triple::aarch64)
+    GTEST_SKIP();
+  BinaryFunction *BF = BC->createInjectedBinaryFunction("BF", true);
+  std::unique_ptr<BinaryBasicBlock> BB = BF->createBasicBlock();
+  MCInst Inst = MCInstBuilder(AArch64::RET).addReg(AArch64::LR);
+  BB->addInstruction(Inst);
+  // BR x5 needs BTI j
+  MCInst CallInst = MCInstBuilder(AArch64::BR).addReg(AArch64::X5);
+  BC->MIB->addBTItoBBStart(*BB, CallInst);
+  auto II = BB->begin();
+  ASSERT_TRUE(BC->MIB->isBTILandingPad(*II, false, true));
+}
+
+TEST_P(MCPlusBuilderTester, AArch64_addBTItoBBStart_4) {
+  if (GetParam() != Triple::aarch64)
+    GTEST_SKIP();
+  BinaryFunction *BF = BC->createInjectedBinaryFunction("BF", true);
+  std::unique_ptr<BinaryBasicBlock> BB = BF->createBasicBlock();
+  MCInst Inst = MCInstBuilder(AArch64::RET).addReg(AArch64::LR);
+  BB->addInstruction(Inst);
+  // BLR needs BTI c, regardless of the register used.
+  MCInst CallInst = MCInstBuilder(AArch64::BLR).addReg(AArch64::X5);
+  BC->MIB->addBTItoBBStart(*BB, CallInst);
+  auto II = BB->begin();
+  ASSERT_TRUE(BC->MIB->isBTILandingPad(*II, true, false));
+}
+
+TEST_P(MCPlusBuilderTester, AArch64_addBTItoBBStart_5) {
+  if (GetParam() != Triple::aarch64)
+    GTEST_SKIP();
+  BinaryFunction *BF = BC->createInjectedBinaryFunction("BF", true);
+  std::unique_ptr<BinaryBasicBlock> BB = BF->createBasicBlock();
+  MCInst BTIj;
+  BC->MIB->createBTI(BTIj, false, true);
+  BB->addInstruction(BTIj);
+  // BLR needs BTI c, regardless of the register used.
+  // We have a BTI j -> extend it to BTI jc.
+  MCInst CallInst = MCInstBuilder(AArch64::BLR).addReg(AArch64::X5);
+  BC->MIB->addBTItoBBStart(*BB, CallInst);
+  auto II = BB->begin();
+  ASSERT_TRUE(BC->MIB->isBTILandingPad(*II, true, true));
+}
+
+TEST_P(MCPlusBuilderTester, AArch64_addBTItoBBStart_6) {
+  if (GetParam() != Triple::aarch64)
+    GTEST_SKIP();
+  BinaryFunction *BF = BC->createInjectedBinaryFunction("BF", true);
+  std::unique_ptr<BinaryBasicBlock> BB = BF->createBasicBlock();
+  MCInst Paciasp =
+      MCInstBuilder(AArch64::PACIASP).addReg(AArch64::LR).addReg(AArch64::SP);
+  BB->addInstruction(Paciasp);
+  // PACI(AB)SP are implicit BTI c, no change needed.
+  MCInst CallInst = MCInstBuilder(AArch64::BR).addReg(AArch64::X17);
+  BC->MIB->addBTItoBBStart(*BB, CallInst);
+  auto II = BB->begin();
+  ASSERT_TRUE(BC->MIB->isBTILandingPad(*II, true, false));
+  ASSERT_TRUE(BC->MIB->isPSignOnLR(*II));
+}
+
 TEST_P(MCPlusBuilderTester, AArch64_CmpJNE) {
   if (GetParam() != Triple::aarch64)
     GTEST_SKIP();

@bgergely0 bgergely0 force-pushed the users/bgergely0/bolt-add-bti-to-bb branch from 4fd7521 to a7a53e6 Compare November 20, 2025 11:58
@bgergely0 bgergely0 force-pushed the users/bgergely0/bolt-update-bti branch 2 times, most recently from 43aa2de to 905a5ea Compare November 20, 2025 12:18
@bgergely0 bgergely0 force-pushed the users/bgergely0/bolt-add-bti-to-bb branch from a7a53e6 to b40af54 Compare November 20, 2025 12:18
@bgergely0 bgergely0 force-pushed the users/bgergely0/bolt-update-bti branch from 905a5ea to c668bf8 Compare November 24, 2025 09:21
@bgergely0 bgergely0 force-pushed the users/bgergely0/bolt-add-bti-to-bb branch from b40af54 to 7ae084c Compare November 24, 2025 09:21
@bgergely0 bgergely0 force-pushed the users/bgergely0/bolt-update-bti branch from c668bf8 to f155e7b Compare November 24, 2025 09:46
@bgergely0 bgergely0 force-pushed the users/bgergely0/bolt-add-bti-to-bb branch from 7ae084c to 6d45e32 Compare November 24, 2025 09:46
@bgergely0 bgergely0 force-pushed the users/bgergely0/bolt-add-bti-to-bb branch from 6d45e32 to fbd3fc2 Compare November 25, 2025 08:53
@bgergely0 bgergely0 force-pushed the users/bgergely0/bolt-update-bti branch from f155e7b to 7c2404b Compare November 25, 2025 08:53
@bgergely0 bgergely0 force-pushed the users/bgergely0/bolt-add-bti-to-bb branch from fbd3fc2 to 654d40c Compare November 25, 2025 15:26
@bgergely0 bgergely0 force-pushed the users/bgergely0/bolt-update-bti branch from 7c2404b to ab5b8ea Compare November 25, 2025 15:26
@bgergely0 bgergely0 force-pushed the users/bgergely0/bolt-update-bti branch from ab5b8ea to c3f271f Compare November 25, 2025 17:39
@bgergely0 bgergely0 force-pushed the users/bgergely0/bolt-add-bti-to-bb branch from 654d40c to bab0310 Compare November 25, 2025 17:39
Base automatically changed from users/bgergely0/bolt-update-bti to main November 26, 2025 16:48
@bgergely0 bgergely0 force-pushed the users/bgergely0/bolt-add-bti-to-bb branch from bab0310 to 103728d Compare November 26, 2025 16:50
@bgergely0 bgergely0 force-pushed the users/bgergely0/bolt-add-bti-to-bb branch from 103728d to bb5e556 Compare December 5, 2025 12:30
@bgergely0 bgergely0 changed the title [BOLT][BTI] Add MCPlusBuilder::addBTItoBBStart [BOLT][BTI] Add MCPlusBuilder::insertBTI Dec 5, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 5, 2025

✅ With the latest revision this PR passed the C/C++ code formatter.

@bgergely0 bgergely0 force-pushed the users/bgergely0/bolt-add-bti-to-bb branch from 1e6c918 to fc7b7bb Compare December 5, 2025 12:52
Copy link
Contributor

@peterwaller-arm peterwaller-arm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The assertion needs fixing before this can land, but otherwise LGTM - will give approval once fixed. Also made some other minor suggestions.

This function contains most of the logic for BTI:
- it takes the BasicBlock and the instruction used to jump to it.
- then it checks if the first non-pseudo instruction is a sufficient
landing pad for the used call.
- if not, it generates the correct BTI instruction.

Also introduce the isBTIVariantCoveringCall helper to simplify the logic.
BOLT may generate empty BBs, e.g. around function splitting, to hold
temporary labels. If they are the target of a new indirect branch, the
BTI should be inserted into the first "real" BasicBlock.
@bgergely0 bgergely0 force-pushed the users/bgergely0/bolt-add-bti-to-bb branch from 046edf0 to 6f63c8d Compare December 9, 2025 11:34
- this way the order of the parameters matches the order in the name of
  the function
@bgergely0 bgergely0 merged commit fbc121c into main Dec 11, 2025
10 checks passed
@bgergely0 bgergely0 deleted the users/bgergely0/bolt-add-bti-to-bb branch December 11, 2025 10:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants