-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[RISCV][Clang][TargetParser] Support getting feature unaligned-scalar-mem from mcpu. #71513
Conversation
…-mem from mcpu. This patch suppots a soft coding way to identify whether a cpu has a feature "unaligned-scalar-mem" by RISCVProcessors.td. This patch does not provide test case since there is no cpu support unaligned-scalar-mem in llvm upstream now.
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-risc-v @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver Author: Yeting Kuo (yetingk) ChangesThis patch reference ac1ffd3 to suppot a soft coding way to identify whether a cpu has a feature Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71513.diff 4 Files Affected:
diff --git a/clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Arch/RISCV.cpp b/clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Arch/RISCV.cpp
index a05f4b7ea64b487..346fb67ff277e9c 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Arch/RISCV.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Arch/RISCV.cpp
@@ -63,6 +63,9 @@ static void getRISCFeaturesFromMcpu(const Driver &D, const Arg *A,
D.Diag(clang::diag::err_drv_unsupported_option_argument)
<< A->getSpelling() << Mcpu;
}
+
+ if (llvm::RISCV::hasFastUnalignedAccess(Mcpu))
+ Features.push_back("+unaligned-scalar-mem");
}
void riscv::getRISCVTargetFeatures(const Driver &D, const llvm::Triple &Triple,
diff --git a/llvm/include/llvm/TargetParser/RISCVTargetParser.h b/llvm/include/llvm/TargetParser/RISCVTargetParser.h
index a4cb7988eb398b7..5cc8a4a95304537 100644
--- a/llvm/include/llvm/TargetParser/RISCVTargetParser.h
+++ b/llvm/include/llvm/TargetParser/RISCVTargetParser.h
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ bool parseTuneCPU(StringRef CPU, bool IsRV64);
StringRef getMArchFromMcpu(StringRef CPU);
void fillValidCPUArchList(SmallVectorImpl<StringRef> &Values, bool IsRV64);
void fillValidTuneCPUArchList(SmallVectorImpl<StringRef> &Values, bool IsRV64);
+bool hasFastUnalignedAccess(StringRef CPU);
} // namespace RISCV
} // namespace llvm
diff --git a/llvm/lib/TargetParser/RISCVTargetParser.cpp b/llvm/lib/TargetParser/RISCVTargetParser.cpp
index 30a1023c0673208..85cdd1289a9538f 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/TargetParser/RISCVTargetParser.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/TargetParser/RISCVTargetParser.cpp
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ namespace llvm {
namespace RISCV {
enum CPUKind : unsigned {
-#define PROC(ENUM, NAME, DEFAULT_MARCH) CK_##ENUM,
+#define PROC(ENUM, NAME, DEFAULT_MARCH, FAST_UNALIGN) CK_##ENUM,
#define TUNE_PROC(ENUM, NAME) CK_##ENUM,
#include "llvm/TargetParser/RISCVTargetParserDef.inc"
};
@@ -28,12 +28,13 @@ enum CPUKind : unsigned {
struct CPUInfo {
StringLiteral Name;
StringLiteral DefaultMarch;
+ bool FastUnalignedAccess;
bool is64Bit() const { return DefaultMarch.starts_with("rv64"); }
};
constexpr CPUInfo RISCVCPUInfo[] = {
-#define PROC(ENUM, NAME, DEFAULT_MARCH) \
- {NAME, DEFAULT_MARCH},
+#define PROC(ENUM, NAME, DEFAULT_MARCH, FAST_UNALIGN) \
+ {NAME, DEFAULT_MARCH, FAST_UNALIGN},
#include "llvm/TargetParser/RISCVTargetParserDef.inc"
};
@@ -44,6 +45,11 @@ static const CPUInfo *getCPUInfoByName(StringRef CPU) {
return nullptr;
}
+bool hasFastUnalignedAccess(StringRef CPU) {
+ const CPUInfo *Info = getCPUInfoByName(CPU);
+ return Info && Info->FastUnalignedAccess;
+}
+
bool parseCPU(StringRef CPU, bool IsRV64) {
const CPUInfo *Info = getCPUInfoByName(CPU);
diff --git a/llvm/utils/TableGen/RISCVTargetDefEmitter.cpp b/llvm/utils/TableGen/RISCVTargetDefEmitter.cpp
index 12174fd83f56648..593b5613825ca50 100644
--- a/llvm/utils/TableGen/RISCVTargetDefEmitter.cpp
+++ b/llvm/utils/TableGen/RISCVTargetDefEmitter.cpp
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ static std::string getMArch(const Record &Rec) {
static void EmitRISCVTargetDef(RecordKeeper &RK, raw_ostream &OS) {
OS << "#ifndef PROC\n"
- << "#define PROC(ENUM, NAME, DEFAULT_MARCH)\n"
+ << "#define PROC(ENUM, NAME, DEFAULT_MARCH, FAST_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)\n"
<< "#endif\n\n";
// Iterate on all definition records.
@@ -60,9 +60,14 @@ static void EmitRISCVTargetDef(RecordKeeper &RK, raw_ostream &OS) {
if (MArch.empty())
MArch = getMArch(*Rec);
+ bool FastUnalignedAccess =
+ any_of(Rec->getValueAsListOfDefs("Features"), [&](auto &Feature) {
+ return Feature->getValueAsString("Name") == "unaligned-scalar-mem";
+ });
+
OS << "PROC(" << Rec->getName() << ", "
<< "{\"" << Rec->getValueAsString("Name") << "\"}, "
- << "{\"" << MArch << "\"})\n";
+ << "{\"" << MArch << "\"}, " << FastUnalignedAccess << ")\n";
}
OS << "\n#undef PROC\n";
OS << "\n";
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, with a couple of minor nits.
Thanks!
This patch reference ac1ffd3 to suppot a soft coding way to identify whether a cpu has a feature
unaligned-scalar-mem
byRISCVProcessors.td
.This patch does not provide test case since there is no risc-v cpu support
unaligned-scalar-mem
in llvm upstream now.