Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Development: Fix some failing Postgres tests and LinkPreviewIntegrationTest #8037

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Feb 19, 2024

Conversation

reschandreas
Copy link
Contributor

@reschandreas reschandreas commented Feb 15, 2024

Checklist

General

Server

  • Important: I implemented the changes with a very good performance and prevented too many (unnecessary) database calls.
  • I strictly followed the server coding and design guidelines.

Motivation and Context

This PR fixes some postgres tests because an invalid SQL construct was used. It also fixes the now constantly failing LinkPreviewIntegrationTest which should be completely refactored, I'll open an issue -> #8054

The postgres tests still don't pass completely, one to two tests are very flacky and I can't reproduce that on my machine.

Description

Steps for Testing

Check if the SQL has changed, because it should not

Testserver States

Note

These badges show the state of the test servers.
Green = Currently available, Red = Currently locked







Review Progress

Code Review

  • Code Review 1
  • Code Review 2

Test Coverage

Screenshots

Summary by CodeRabbit

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Improved query efficiency and accuracy in the results repository.
  • Tests
    • Updated integration tests to reflect changes in referenced URLs, enhancing test reliability.
  • Chores
    • Updated import statements and domain class list in the ResultRepository.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the server Pull requests that update Java code. (Added Automatically!) label Feb 15, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the tests label Feb 15, 2024
@reschandreas reschandreas changed the title Development: Fix Postgres Tests Development: Fix some constantly failing Postgres tests and LinkPreviewIntegrationTest Feb 19, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 19, 2024

Walkthrough

This update involves refining the ResultRepository and LinkPreviewIntegrationTest within a Java project. Changes include enhancing SQL queries for better data grouping, adjusting domain class imports, and revising integration tests to use internal URLs instead of external ones, ensuring tests are less dependent on external services. This aims to improve the reliability and maintainability of both data handling and testing frameworks.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/main/java/de/tum/in/www1/artemis/repository/ResultRepository.java Importing specific classes, modifying group-by clauses in queries, and updating imported domain classes.
src/test/java/de/tum/in/www1/artemis/metis/linkpreview/LinkPreviewIntegrationTest.java Updated URLs in tests to point to different locations, including GitHub pull requests and maintaining references to https://github.com and https://google.com.

Related issues

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link
Contributor

@MichaelOwenDyer MichaelOwenDyer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for fixing this!

Comment on lines 25 to 26
private static final String GOOGLE_URL = "https://google.com";

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this still calls a foreign url

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

all of them do, I tried it with artemis URLs but then the test failed, I hope someone fixes this when someone takes on #8054 as I don't want to loose much time right now

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You are right, my bad 💀

Copy link
Contributor

@laurenzfb laurenzfb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✅ ✅ ✅

Copy link
Contributor

@milljoniaer milljoniaer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for fixing this 🍏

Comment on lines 25 to 26
private static final String GOOGLE_URL = "https://google.com";

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You are right, my bad 💀

@bassner bassner added this to the 6.8.2 milestone Feb 19, 2024
@bassner bassner merged commit b2d7e1f into develop Feb 19, 2024
47 checks passed
@bassner bassner deleted the chore/fix-postgres-tests branch February 19, 2024 14:19
@bassner bassner changed the title Development: Fix some constantly failing Postgres tests and LinkPreviewIntegrationTest Development: Fix some failing Postgres tests and LinkPreviewIntegrationTest Feb 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready to merge server Pull requests that update Java code. (Added Automatically!) small tests
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants