Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Development: Refactor tutorial group tests #9419

Merged
merged 113 commits into from
Oct 19, 2024

Conversation

MaximilianAnzinger
Copy link
Collaborator

@MaximilianAnzinger MaximilianAnzinger commented Oct 3, 2024

Checklist

General

Server

Motivation and Context

Description

Introduces AbstractTutorialGroupIntegrationTest.

Review Progress

Code Review

  • Code Review 1
  • Code Review 2

Test Coverage

unchanged

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a new test class for validating the architecture of the tutorial group module.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Updated test methods to ensure correct behavior regarding user permissions and tutorial group functionalities.
  • Refactor
    • Restructured existing test classes to enhance organization and accessibility of dependencies.
    • Removed certain dependencies from TutorialGroupIntegrationTest to streamline the testing process.

MaximilianAnzinger and others added 30 commits September 13, 2024 13:18
…ory and prevent unambiguous bean exception
@MaximilianAnzinger MaximilianAnzinger marked this pull request as ready for review October 6, 2024 04:23
@MaximilianAnzinger MaximilianAnzinger requested a review from a team as a code owner October 6, 2024 04:23
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 6, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve significant modifications to the AbstractTutorialGroupIntegrationTest, TutorialGroupIntegrationTest, and the introduction of a new class TutorialGroupTestArchitectureTest. The AbstractTutorialGroupIntegrationTest class has been restructured to enhance accessibility and organization of dependencies, changing its visibility to public and updating several field access modifiers. The TutorialGroupIntegrationTest class has had certain dependencies removed and its test methods restructured. A new architecture test class has been added to facilitate testing specific to the tutorial group module.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/tutorialgroup/AbstractTutorialGroupIntegrationTest.java Changed from abstract class extending AbstractSpringIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest to public abstract class extending AbstractSpringIntegrationIndependentTest. Updated field visibility from @Autowired to protected for multiple repositories and services. Added new fields: PostTestRepository and ConversationUtilService.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/tutorialgroup/TutorialGroupIntegrationTest.java Removed @Autowired dependencies for ConversationUtilService and PostTestRepository. Restructured test methods to align with the updated dependencies and ensure proper functionality validation.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/tutorialgroup/architecture/TutorialGroupTestArchitectureTest.java Introduced a new test class that extends AbstractModuleTestArchitectureTest, providing module-specific architecture testing for the tutorial group.

Possibly related PRs

  • Development: Refactor atlas tests #9352: The changes in AbstractTutorialGroupIntegrationTest and the introduction of AbstractAtlasIntegrationTest suggest a similar restructuring of test classes, focusing on enhancing the testing framework.
  • Development: Refactor lti tests #9375: This PR introduces AbstractLtiIntegrationTest, which also extends AbstractSpringIntegrationIndependentTest, indicating a broader effort to standardize integration tests across different modules.
  • Development: Execute architecture tests on module basis #9409: The focus on modular architecture testing aligns with the restructuring of the AbstractTutorialGroupIntegrationTest, aiming to improve the organization of integration tests.

Suggested labels

ready for review, small

Suggested reviewers

  • JohannesStoehr
  • ole-ve
  • SimonEntholzer

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 7

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between eee133f and 5b3ecf4.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/tutorialgroup/AbstractTutorialGroupIntegrationTest.java (2 hunks)
  • src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/tutorialgroup/TutorialGroupIntegrationTest.java (0 hunks)
  • src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/tutorialgroup/architecture/TutorialGroupTestArchitectureTest.java (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/tutorialgroup/TutorialGroupIntegrationTest.java
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/tutorialgroup/AbstractTutorialGroupIntegrationTest.java (1)

Pattern src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: true

src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/tutorialgroup/architecture/TutorialGroupTestArchitectureTest.java (1)

Pattern src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: true

🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/tutorialgroup/architecture/TutorialGroupTestArchitectureTest.java (2)

1-5: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are correct.

The package declaration matches the file path, and the imports are necessary and correctly used.


13-16: LGTM: getAbstractModuleIntegrationTestClass method is correctly implemented.

The method properly overrides the superclass method and returns the expected class object for AbstractTutorialGroupIntegrationTest, which matches the type parameter of the class.

Copy link
Contributor

@JohannesStoehr JohannesStoehr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approve refactoring

Copy link
Member

@BBesrour BBesrour left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

code

Copy link
Contributor

@iyannsch iyannsch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code LGTM

@MaximilianAnzinger MaximilianAnzinger added this to the 7.6.1 milestone Oct 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready for review tests tutorialgroup Pull requests that affect the corresponding module
Projects
Archived in project
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants