Development: Refactor programming server tests
#9506
Conversation
…test classes per module (that don't share the same common class)
github-actions
bot
added
tests
atlas
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces significant refactoring across multiple integration test classes in the ARTEMIS framework. Key changes include updates to method documentation, the addition of new test cases, and the restructuring of classes to extend new abstract base classes. Several autowired dependencies have been removed, indicating a shift towards a more streamlined testing approach. The modifications enhance the coverage and organization of tests related to learning paths and programming exercises, ensuring that various scenarios are adequately tested. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces significant refactoring and structural changes across various test classes in the project. Key updates include the removal of generic type parameters from several classes, the conversion of some classes to abstract types, and the introduction of new abstract classes for integration testing. Additionally, many existing tests have been modified to extend these new abstract classes, and numerous Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 61
🧹 Outside diff range comments (60)
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/MultipleHostKeyProviderTest.java (1)
Line range hint
1-32: Overall adherence to coding guidelines is good, with room for minor improvements.The test class follows most of the specified coding guidelines:
- Descriptive test naming
- Small and specific test
- Use of fixed data
- JUnit 5 features (implied by @test annotation)
- Use of assertThat for assertions
- Specific assertions
Consider the following improvements:
- Add ArchUnit tests to enforce package rules if not already present in the base class.
- If applicable, implement DB query count tracking for performance monitoring.
- Consider using static mocks if mocking is needed in future tests.
- Ensure that the base class minimizes context restarts for efficiency.
Would you like assistance in implementing any of these improvements?
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/SharedQueueManagementServiceTest.java (1)
Line range hint
16-50: Verify dependency management and consider enhancing assertion specificity.The removal of
@Autowiredannotations forSharedQueueManagementServiceandHazelcastInstancesuggests a change in dependency management. However, these services are still used in the test method. Please verify that these dependencies are correctly provided, possibly through the new base classAbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest.The test method
testPushDockerImageCleanupInfofollows the coding guidelines well:
- It has a descriptive name.
- It uses
assertThatfor assertions.- It tests a specific scenario.
- It doesn't appear to directly access the database.
To further improve the test, consider enhancing the assertion specificity:
Instead of just comparing seconds, consider using
isCloseTo()with a small tolerance to account for potential minor timing differences:assertThat(dockerImageCleanupInfo.get("image1")).isCloseTo(now, within(1, ChronoUnit.SECONDS)); assertThat(dockerImageCleanupInfo.get("image2")).isCloseTo(now.plusMinutes(1), within(1, ChronoUnit.SECONDS)); assertThat(dockerImageCleanupInfo.get("image3")).isCloseTo(now.plusMinutes(2), within(1, ChronoUnit.SECONDS));This change would make the test more robust against small timing variations while still effectively verifying the correct behavior.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ConsistencyCheckGitlabJenkinsIntegrationTest.java (2)
Line range hint
22-61: Test methods are well-structured. Consider adding more specific assertions.The test methods are well-organized and cover various consistency check scenarios. They follow the naming conventions specified in the coding guidelines and use appropriate annotations for security context setup.
The delegation of test logic to
consistencyCheckTestServicepromotes code reuse and maintainability, which is a good practice.To further improve the tests:
- Consider adding more specific assertions within each test method to verify the expected outcomes, rather than relying solely on the
consistencyCheckTestServicemethods. This would enhance the test specificity as per the coding guidelines.- You might want to add comments or documentation for each test method to clearly describe the scenario being tested and the expected outcome.
Line range hint
1-63: Overall, the refactoring improves test organization and maintainability.The changes in this file successfully implement the intended refactoring of the test hierarchy. By extending
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestand removing the@Autowiredannotation, the code now aligns better with the PR objectives of addressing scattered use of autowired components.Key points:
- The test structure is improved while maintaining coverage of various consistency check scenarios.
- The use of a shared
consistencyCheckTestServicepromotes code reuse across tests.- The file generally adheres to the specified coding guidelines, including test naming conventions and mock strategies.
To further enhance the test architecture:
- Consider implementing more granular assertions within each test method to improve test specificity.
- Evaluate if any additional scenarios need to be covered in light of the new abstract test class structure.
- Ensure that the
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestclass properly manages the lifecycle and injection of shared components likeconsistencyCheckTestService.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/fileupload/AbstractFileUploadIntegrationTest.java (2)
Line range hint
27-71: Refactor: Consider reducing the number of @Autowired fieldsThe class contains a large number of
@Autowiredfields, which can lead to reduced test isolation and increased setup time. Consider refactoring to use more focused test classes or employing the builder pattern for test data setup.Here's a suggestion to start reducing the number of
@Autowiredfields:
- Identify which fields are actually used in the subclasses.
- Move unused fields to the specific subclasses where they are needed.
- For commonly used fields, consider creating protected methods that lazily initialize these dependencies when needed.
Example of lazy initialization:
private FileUploadExerciseRepository fileUploadExerciseRepository; protected FileUploadExerciseRepository getFileUploadExerciseRepository() { if (fileUploadExerciseRepository == null) { fileUploadExerciseRepository = applicationContext.getBean(FileUploadExerciseRepository.class); } return fileUploadExerciseRepository; }This approach can help reduce the number of
@Autowiredfields and improve test isolation.
Line range hint
24-71: Consider implementing utility methods for common test operationsTo improve code reuse and maintainability, consider adding utility methods in this abstract class for common operations that subclasses might need to perform. This can help reduce duplication in test code and make it easier to write new tests.
For example, you could add methods like:
protected FileUploadExercise createDefaultFileUploadExercise() { // Implementation } protected FileUploadSubmission createDefaultFileUploadSubmission(FileUploadExercise exercise) { // Implementation } protected void cleanupTestData() { // Implementation to clean up created test data }These methods can encapsulate common setup and teardown operations, making it easier for subclasses to focus on their specific test scenarios.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/PlantUmlIntegrationTest.java (3)
Line range hint
41-52: Consider using a more specific assertion.While the test follows most coding guidelines, the assertion could be more specific. Instead of just checking equality, consider asserting specific properties of the response.
For example, you could add assertions for the content type and length of the response:
assertThat(pngResponse) .isEqualTo(UML_PNG) .hasSize(4) .startsWith((byte) 3);This provides more detailed verification of the response content.
Line range hint
55-69: Enhance assertion specificity.While the test adheres to most coding guidelines, the assertion could be more specific. Consider asserting additional properties of the SVG response.
You could enhance the assertion as follows:
assertThat(svgResponse) .isEqualTo(UML_SVG) .startsWith("<svg") .endsWith("</svg>");This provides a more comprehensive verification of the SVG content.
Line range hint
72-81: Improve test structure and assertions.While the test covers important error scenarios, it can be improved in several ways:
- Split the test into two separate tests for better clarity and adherence to the small_specific guideline.
- Use
assertThatfor assertions as per the coding guidelines.- Make assertions more specific by checking the response body or error message.
Here's a suggested refactor:
@Test @WithMockUser(username = TEST_PREFIX + "student1", roles = "USER") void generateSvg_asStudent_emptyStringError() throws Exception { final var paramMap = new LinkedMultiValueMap<String, String>(); paramMap.setAll(Map.of("plantuml", "")); // empty string var response = request.get("/api/plantuml/svg", HttpStatus.INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR, String.class, paramMap); assertThat(response).isNotBlank().contains("error"); } @Test @WithMockUser(username = TEST_PREFIX + "student1", roles = "USER") void generateSvg_asStudent_veryLongStringError() throws Exception { final var paramMap = new LinkedMultiValueMap<String, String>(); var veryLongString = new String(new char[10001]).replace('\0', 'a'); paramMap.setAll(Map.of("plantuml", veryLongString)); var response = request.get("/api/plantuml/svg", HttpStatus.INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR, String.class, paramMap); assertThat(response).isNotBlank().contains("error"); }This refactor improves test clarity, uses
assertThat, and makes assertions more specific.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/JenkinsInternalUriServiceTest.java (1)
Line range hint
1-105: Overall alignment with coding guidelines.The changes in this file generally align with the provided coding guidelines:
- Test methods remain descriptive and specific.
- Assertions use
assertThatas required.- Fixed data is used in tests.
To further improve alignment with the guidelines, consider the following:
- Explore opportunities to use JUnit 5 specific features where applicable.
- If relevant to this test class, consider adding ArchUnit tests to enforce package rules.
- If this test involves database operations, consider adding DB query count tracking for performance monitoring.
These suggestions are for potential future improvements and are not critical for the current changes.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/JenkinsJobServiceTest.java (2)
Line range hint
52-107: LGTM: Test methods maintain good practices, minor suggestion for consistency.The test methods adhere to the coding guidelines:
- Descriptive naming convention
- Small and specific tests
- Use of assertThat for assertions
- Consistent use of static mocks
For improved consistency and clarity, consider adding a comment at the class level explaining how
jenkinsJobServiceis now provided (presumably by the parent class).Add a class-level comment explaining the source of
jenkinsJobService:/** * Test class for JenkinsJobService. * Note: jenkinsJobService is provided by the parent class AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest. */ class JenkinsJobServiceTest extends AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest { // ... existing code ... }
Issues Found with Dependency Injection in JenkinsJobServiceTest.java
userUtilServiceis still being used ininitTestCase, which may compromise test isolation.jenkinsJobServicemethods are referenced directly without visible dependency injection, potentially affecting maintainability and adherence to coding guidelines.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
33-50: Verify test isolation and database access after removing @Autowired annotations.The removal of
@Autowiredannotations forJenkinsJobServiceandUserUtilServicealigns with the PR objectives to address scattered use of autowired components. However, please clarify:
- How is test isolation maintained without adding users in
initTestCase?- How are database queries tracked for performance as per the coding guidelines?
- Is the
jenkinsJobServicenow provided by the parent class? If so, consider documenting this in a comment for clarity.To check for potential issues, please run:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for remaining @Autowired annotations and usage of removed services rg --type java '@Autowired|userUtilService|jenkinsJobService' src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/JenkinsJobServiceTest.javaLength of output: 795
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/JenkinsAuthorizationInterceptorTest.java (1)
Line range hint
52-127: LGTM: Test methods are well-structured and cover key scenariosThe test methods follow good practices with descriptive names, small and specific tests, and appropriate use of assertions and mocking. They cover key scenarios for the
jenkinsAuthorizationInterceptor.For consistency, consider using static imports for Mockito methods. Apply this change:
-import org.mockito.Mockito; +import static org.mockito.Mockito.doReturn; +import static org.mockito.Mockito.mock; // In the test methods, replace: -Mockito.mock(ClientHttpRequestExecution.class) +mock(ClientHttpRequestExecution.class)src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/TestwiseCoverageIntegrationTest.java (1)
Line range hint
1-124: LGTM: Overall structure and test coverage maintained.The refactoring has successfully maintained the existing test coverage and structure. The class adheres to JUnit 5 conventions and the provided coding guidelines for test classes.
To improve test naming and make it more descriptive, consider renaming the test methods to clearly indicate the scenario being tested and the expected outcome. For example:
@Test @WithMockUser(username = TEST_PREFIX + "student1", roles = "USER") void getLatestFullCoverageReport_AsStudent_ShouldReturnForbidden() throws Exception { // ... (existing test code) } @Test @WithMockUser(username = TEST_PREFIX + "tutor1", roles = "TA") void getLatestFullCoverageReport_AsTutor_ShouldReturnReportWithCorrectData() throws Exception { // ... (existing test code) }This naming convention makes it easier to understand the purpose of each test at a glance.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalCIServiceTest.java (1)
Line range hint
44-52: LGTM: Simplified setUp method.The setUp method has been simplified by removing the initialization of several services, which are likely now handled in the parent class. This change aligns with the PR objectives of better managing dependencies through autowiring in the abstract test classes.
Consider updating the comment to clarify that the listener removal is still necessary:
// Remove listener to avoid triggering build job processing during tests sharedQueueProcessingService.removeListener();src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/AuxiliaryRepositoryServiceTest.java (2)
Line range hint
24-36: LGTM! Consider extracting the setup logic for better readability.The removal of
@Autowiredfields and the use of utility services directly in thesetUpmethod improves maintainability and reduces dependency injection boilerplate. This change aligns well with the new base class structure.To further improve readability, consider extracting the setup logic into a private method:
@BeforeEach void setUp() { + initializeProgrammingExercise(); +} + +private void initializeProgrammingExercise() { var course = programmingExerciseUtilService.addCourseWithOneProgrammingExercise(); programmingExerciseBeforeUpdate = exerciseUtilService.getFirstExerciseWithType(course, ProgrammingExercise.class); programmingExerciseBeforeUpdate.setReleaseDate(null); programmingExerciseBeforeUpdate.setAuxiliaryRepositories(new ArrayList<>()); programmingExerciseRepository.save(programmingExerciseBeforeUpdate); updatedProgrammingExercise = programmingExerciseRepository.findById(programmingExerciseBeforeUpdate.getId()).orElseThrow(); updatedProgrammingExercise.setAuxiliaryRepositories(new ArrayList<>()); auxiliaryRepositoryRepository.deleteAll(); }This change would make the
setUpmethod more concise and the initialization logic more self-contained.
Line range hint
38-189: LGTM! Consider using more specific assertions in some tests.The test methods adhere well to the coding guidelines. They use descriptive names, are focused on specific scenarios, and use appropriate assertion methods. The use of
assertThatand JUnit 5 features is consistent throughout the class.To further improve the tests, consider using more specific assertions in some cases. For example, in the
shouldAddAuxiliaryRepositoriesSuccessfullytest:@Test void shouldAddAuxiliaryRepositoriesSuccessfully() { AuxiliaryRepository auxiliaryRepository = createAuxiliaryRepository("test", "test", "test", programmingExerciseBeforeUpdate, null); AuxiliaryRepository auxiliaryRepository2 = createAuxiliaryRepository("test2", "test2", "test2", programmingExerciseBeforeUpdate, null); auxiliaryRepositoryRepository.save(auxiliaryRepository); programmingExerciseBeforeUpdate.setAuxiliaryRepositories(List.of(auxiliaryRepository)); auxiliaryRepositoryService.validateAndAddAuxiliaryRepositoriesOfProgrammingExercise(programmingExerciseBeforeUpdate, List.of(auxiliaryRepository2)); - assertThat(programmingExerciseBeforeUpdate.getAuxiliaryRepositories()).containsExactly(auxiliaryRepository, auxiliaryRepository2); + assertThat(programmingExerciseBeforeUpdate.getAuxiliaryRepositories()) + .hasSize(2) + .containsExactly(auxiliaryRepository, auxiliaryRepository2) + .extracting(AuxiliaryRepository::getName) + .containsExactly("test", "test2"); }This change provides more specific assertions about the size and content of the auxiliary repositories list, making the test more robust and informative.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/BuildLogEntryServiceTest.java (2)
Line range hint
232-240: LGTM! Consider adding more test scenarios.The test methods are well-structured and use parameterized testing with
@ValueSource, which is an excellent practice for testing multiple scenarios efficiently. ThetestScenariomethod tests both Gradle and Maven scenarios, which provides good coverage.Consider adding more diverse scenarios to further improve test coverage. For example, you could add scenarios for different programming languages or edge cases.
Line range hint
1-257: Overall, the changes improve the test class structure and maintainability.The refactoring of this test class, including the change to extend
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTestand the removal of the@Autowiredannotation, appears to be part of a larger effort to enhance the testing framework for programming-related tests. These changes likely contribute to better organization and potentially more efficient test execution.The existing test methods and utility functions are well-implemented, making good use of parameterized testing and Java 8+ features. This promotes code reuse and readability.
To further improve this test class:
- Ensure that all similar test classes have been updated consistently.
- Verify that
buildLogEntryServiceis properly initialized in the new context.- Consider adding more diverse test scenarios to increase coverage.
- If not already present, consider adding a brief class-level Javadoc comment explaining the purpose of this test class and any important setup details.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/connectors/jenkins/build_plan/JenkinsPipelineScriptCreatorTest.java (1)
Line range hint
62-69: Avoid direct database access in testsAccording to the coding guidelines (
avoid_db_access: true), tests should avoid direct database interactions. The test methods interact with repositories to save and retrieve entities, which involves database access. Consider refactoring the tests to use static mocks or in-memory data structures instead of accessing the database directly.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/RepositoryAccessServiceTest.java (1)
Line range hint
33-42: Avoid direct database access in testsPer the coding guidelines (
avoid_db_access: true), direct database access should be minimized in tests. In thesetup()method, calls likeuserUtilService.addUsers(...),userRepository.findOneByLogin(...), andprogrammingExerciseRepository.save(...)may involve database operations. Consider refactoring the test to use mocks or test data builders to avoid direct database interactions, which can improve test isolation and performance.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/BuildPlanIntegrationTest.java (1)
Line range hint
20-37: Avoid direct database access in testsThe
init()method directly saves entities to the database using repositories:
programmingExerciseBuildConfigRepository.save(buildConfig);programmingExerciseRepository.save(programmingExercise);According to the coding guidelines (
avoid_db_access: true), tests should avoid direct database access to improve performance and test isolation.Suggestion:
Use utility services or factory patterns to manage test data, adhering to the
util_service_factory_pattern: trueguideline. This will enhance maintainability and reduce test execution time.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseGitIntegrationTest.java (2)
Line range hint
91-104: RenametestRepositoryMethods()to a more descriptive nameThe method name
testRepositoryMethods()is not sufficiently descriptive of the test's purpose. Since this test verifies that theProgrammingExerciseRepositorymethods throwEntityNotFoundExceptionwhen provided with invalid IDs, consider renaming the method to better reflect this behavior.Apply this diff to rename the method:
-void testRepositoryMethods() { +void testProgrammingExerciseRepositoryThrowsEntityNotFoundExceptionForInvalidIds() {
Line range hint
106-125: Ensure proper cleanup of temporary repositoriesIn the
testCombineTemplateRepositoryCommits()method, temporary repositories are created but not explicitly closed or deleted within the test. Although the@AfterEachtearDown()method attempts to clean up, it's good practice to ensure that resources are properly closed within the test to prevent resource leaks.Consider explicitly closing and deleting the repositories at the end of the test or verifying that
tearDown()reliably handles all scenarios.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/ProgrammingExerciseTaskIntegrationTest.java (1)
Line range hint
38-51: Prefer utility services over direct repository access in testsThe test method
initTestCases()directly uses repositories liketestCaseRepositoryandprogrammingExerciseSolutionEntryRepositoryto manage test data. According to the coding guidelines, tests should avoid direct database access (avoid_db_access: true) and utilize utility services or factory patterns (util_service_factory_pattern: true) for better abstraction and maintainability.Consider refactoring
initTestCases()to use utility services provided byprogrammingExerciseUtilServiceor similar helpers to create and manage test cases and solution entries. This will enhance test readability and adhere to the project's best practices.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/ProgrammingExerciseSolutionEntryIntegrationTest.java (1)
Line range hint
35-58: Avoid direct database access in tests by utilizing utility servicesIn the
initTestCase()method, the test directly accesses the database using repositories to fetch and save entities. As per the coding guidelines (avoid_db_access: trueandutil_service_factory_pattern: true), tests should avoid direct database interactions. Consider using utility services or factory patterns to manage test data setup.You can utilize existing utility services like
programmingExerciseUtilServiceor create dedicated methods to handle test data creation without direct repository access.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseTemplateIntegrationTest.java (7)
Line range hint
119-119: Usage of Removed FieldprogrammingExerciseTestServiceThe field
programmingExerciseTestServicehas been removed but is still being used here. This will lead to a compilation error.To resolve this issue, you can obtain an instance of
ProgrammingExerciseTestServiceby autowiring it or adjusting the test setup to accommodate the changes. For example:+@Autowired +private ProgrammingExerciseTestService programmingExerciseTestService; void setup() throws Exception { programmingExerciseTestService.setupTestUsers(TEST_PREFIX, 1, 1, 0, 1);
Line range hint
128-129: Usage of Removed FieldprogrammingExerciseTestServiceThe
programmingExerciseTestServiceis used here but has been removed from the class fields. This will cause a compilation error.Consider reintroducing the field by autowiring it:
+@Autowired +private ProgrammingExerciseTestService programmingExerciseTestService; //... programmingExerciseTestService.setup(this, versionControlService, continuousIntegrationService); programmingExerciseTestService.setupRepositoryMocks(exercise, exerciseRepo, solutionRepo, testRepo, auxRepo);
Line range hint
157-157: Usage of Removed FieldprogrammingLanguageFeatureServiceThe
programmingLanguageFeatureServiceis being used but has been removed from the class fields. This will result in a compilation error.To fix this, reintroduce the field with autowiring:
+@Autowired +private ProgrammingLanguageFeatureService programmingLanguageFeatureService; //... var languageFeatures = programmingLanguageFeatureService.getProgrammingLanguageFeatures(language);
Line range hint
153-193: Consider RefactoringlanguageTypeBuilderMethodThe
languageTypeBuildermethod is quite complex and deeply nested, which might affect readability and maintainability.Consider simplifying the method by extracting inner loops or conditions into separate methods or by using more descriptive variable names to enhance clarity.
Line range hint
118-129: Avoid Using Hardcoded Time ValuesIn the
setupmethod,ZonedDateTime.now().minusDays(1)andZonedDateTime.now().plusDays(7)are used directly.Consider using constants or variables to define these time offsets for better readability and easier maintenance.
Line range hint
190-215: Ensure Proper Error Handling ininvokeGradleMethodThe
invokeGradlemethod catches a generalExceptionand returns-1upon any error, which might mask specific issues.Consider catching specific exceptions and providing more detailed error handling to help diagnose issues during test execution.
Line range hint
226-240: Simplify thereadTestReportsMethodThe method reads test reports and processes them. There might be an opportunity to simplify the stream operations for better readability.
Consider refactoring the stream chain to improve readability, possibly by breaking it into intermediate variables.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalCIResourceIntegrationTest.java (3)
Line range hint
70-93: Avoid direct database access in testsIn the
createJobs()method, the test directly interacts with the database by savingResultentities usingresultRepository.save()(lines 85-88). According to the coding guidelineavoid_db_access: true, it's recommended to avoid direct database access in tests to improve performance and isolation.Consider using static mocks or test doubles for the
Resultentities instead of persisting them to the database. This can be achieved by mocking theresultRepositoryand configuring it to return the desired results without actual database interactions.Example refactor:
// Mock the result repository when(resultRepository.save(any(Result.class))).thenAnswer(invocation -> invocation.getArgument(0));This approach adheres to the
mock_strategy: static_mocksguideline and enhances test efficiency.
Line range hint
85-88: Potential issue with shared state in testsThe direct manipulation of shared queues and maps (lines 102-104) might lead to test flakiness due to shared mutable state. According to the guideline
context_restart_minimize: true, it's important to ensure that tests are isolated and do not interfere with each other.Ensure that the shared data structures are properly isolated or reset between tests to prevent side effects. You might consider encapsulating the setup and teardown logic to maintain test independence.
Example:
@BeforeEach void setUp() { // Initialize or reset shared resources } @AfterEach void tearDown() { // Clean up shared resources }
Line range hint
185-193: Enhance assertion specificity in testtestGetBuildJobStatisticsIn the test method
testGetBuildJobStatistics()(lines 185-193), the assertions verify the counts of total, successful, failed, and cancelled builds. While the current assertions check the expected values, ensuring that they are as specific as possible improves test clarity and maintainability.Consider adding messages to the assertions to clarify the intent and provide better diagnostics in case of test failures.
Example:
assertThat(response.totalBuilds()).as("Total builds should be 2").isEqualTo(2); assertThat(response.successfulBuilds()).as("There should be 1 successful build").isEqualTo(1); assertThat(response.failedBuilds()).as("There should be 1 failed build").isEqualTo(1); assertThat(response.cancelledBuilds()).as("There should be no cancelled builds").isEqualTo(0);src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/JenkinsServiceTest.java (4)
Line range hint
97-99: Rename duplicate test methods for clarityThere are two test methods named
testCreateBuildPlanForExerciseThrowsExceptionOnTemplateError. Having test methods with the same name can lead to confusion and make test reports harder to interpret. Consider renaming one of the methods to provide a more descriptive name.Apply this diff to rename the parameterized test method:
- void testCreateBuildPlanForExerciseThrowsExceptionOnTemplateError(ProgrammingLanguage programmingLanguage) { + void testCreateBuildPlanForUnsupportedProgrammingLanguages(ProgrammingLanguage programmingLanguage) {Also applies to: 115-117
Line range hint
141-150: Duplicate test methods detectedThe methods
testImportBuildPlansThrowsExceptionOnGivePermissionsandtestDeleteBuildPlanhave identical implementations. This duplication may be unintended. Please check if both methods are necessary or if they can be consolidated into a single test.Also applies to: 154-163
Line range hint
119-120: Avoid direct database access in testsDirectly saving entities using
programmingExerciseRepository.save(programmingExercise);in tests violates the guidelineavoid_db_access: true. Instead, use utility services or factory methods to manage test data, which enhances test isolation and maintainability.Apply this diff to use the utility service:
- programmingExercise = programmingExerciseRepository.save(programmingExercise); + programmingExercise = programmingExerciseUtilService.save(programmingExercise);
Line range hint
238-246: Avoid direct database access in testsThe test directly interacts with the database using
programmingExerciseRepository.save(sourceExercise);andbuildPlanRepository.setBuildPlanForExercise(...). According to the guidelinesavoid_db_access: trueandutil_service_factory_pattern: true, consider using utility services or factory patterns to handle test data, improving test performance and reliability.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/ProgrammingExerciseFeedbackCreationServiceTest.java (6)
Line range hint
33-41: Avoid Direct Database Access in TestsAccording to the coding guidelines (
avoid_db_access: true), tests should avoid direct database interactions. Theinit()method accesses repositories to save entities, which entails database operations. Consider refactoring to use mocks or in-memory data structures to set up test data without database access.
Line range hint
110-113: Minimize Database Access in Test MethodsThe test method is directly accessing the
testCaseRepositoryto retrieve data. To comply with the guideline to avoid database access in tests, consider using mock repositories or test utilities that simulate repository behavior without real database interactions.
Line range hint
130-133: Consistent Use of Mocks for RepositoriesIn this test method, direct calls to
testCaseRepository.deleteAll()involve database operations. To reduce dependency on the database, use mocking frameworks to mock the behavior of repositories.
Line range hint
185-188: Ensure Test Isolation from DatabaseDirect database access can lead to flaky tests and longer execution times. Refactoring to eliminate database interactions in this method will enhance test reliability and speed.
Line range hint
226-234: Refactor Test Data Setup to Avoid Database OperationsThe loop over programming languages initializes test cases with database entities. Align with the
avoid_db_access: trueguideline by mocking the test cases and programming exercises instead of persisting them.
Line range hint
247-258: Simplify Feedback Creation Without Database DependenceThe creation of the
StaticCodeAnalysisReportDTOand associated feedback does not require database entities. Refactor the test to use simple objects or mocks to decouple from the database.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/StructuralTestCaseServiceTest.java (3)
Line range hint
45-47: Undefined References tocourseUtilServiceanduserUtilServiceThe methods
courseUtilService.addEmptyCourse()anduserUtilService.addUsers()are being called, butcourseUtilServiceanduserUtilServiceare not defined in this class anymore since the@Autowiredfields have been removed. This will result in compilation errors.To fix this issue, you should either:
- Reintroduce the
@Autowiredfields for these services, or- Utilize the methods or utilities provided by the new base class
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBasefor setting up courses and users.
Line range hint
64-64: Undefined Reference totestCaseRepositoryand Avoid Direct Database AccessThe method
testCaseRepository.save(testCase)is used, buttestCaseRepositoryis not defined in this class since the@Autowiredfield has been removed. Additionally, according to the coding guidelines, direct database access should be avoided in tests.To fix this issue, you should:
- Use the utility methods provided by the new base class or other test utilities to handle test case creation without directly accessing the repository.
- Remove or refactor the direct call to
testCaseRepository.save(testCase)to comply with the guideline to avoid database access.
Line range hint
70-71: Undefined Reference tohestiaUtilTestServiceThe method
hestiaUtilTestService.setupSolution()is called, buthestiaUtilTestServiceis not defined in this class since the@Autowiredfield has been removed. This will cause compilation errors.To fix this issue, you should either:
- Reintroduce the
@Autowiredfield forhestiaUtilTestService, or- Use alternative setup methods provided by the new base class or refactor the code to initialize the required setups differently.
Note: This issue occurs in multiple test methods where
hestiaUtilTestServiceis used.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/TestRepositoryResourceIntegrationTest.java (2)
Line range hint
63-78: Avoid database access in tests according to coding guidelinesPer the coding guidelines (
avoid_db_access: true), tests should avoid accessing the database. In thesetupmethod, the call toprogrammingExerciseBuildConfigRepository.save(programmingExercise.getBuildConfig());persists data to the database. Consider using mocks or in-memory objects instead of saving to the database to improve test performance and isolation.
Line range hint
88-292: Avoid database access in test methodsIn multiple test methods, such as
testGetFiles(),testGetFile(), and others, there are calls toprogrammingExerciseRepository.save(programmingExercise);, which access the database. According to the coding guidelines (avoid_db_access: true), tests should avoid database interactions. Please refactor these tests to use mocks or in-memory data structures instead of persisting data to the database to adhere to the guidelines and enhance test performance.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/CourseGitlabJenkinsIntegrationTest.java (2)
Line range hint
75-86: EnsurechangeUserGroupmethod adheres to the utility service patternThe method
changeUserGroupis defined within this test class. To promote code reuse and adhere to the utility service factory pattern as per coding guidelines, consider moving this method to a utility or service class if it's used across multiple test classes.Apply this change to move the method to a utility class:
- private void changeUserGroup(String userLogin, Set<String> groups) { - Optional<User> user = userTestRepository.findOneWithGroupsByLogin(userLogin); - assertThat(user).isPresent(); - - User updatedUser = user.get(); - updatedUser.setGroups(groups); - - userTestRepository.save(updatedUser); - }Then, use the method from the utility class in your test:
// Example usage after moving the method UserUtilService.changeUserGroup(userLogin, groups);
Line range hint
259-264: Avoid direct usage ofgitlabRequestMockProviderandjenkinsRequestMockProviderAccording to the mock strategy guideline (
mock_strategy: static_mocks), prefer using static mocks over direct mocking within test classes. Ensure that mocking is centralized and consistent across tests.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalVCLocalCIIntegrationTest.java (1)
Remaining usages of removed dependencies detected
Several usages of the removed dependencies (
examUtilService,buildJobRepository,localCITriggerService,sharedQueueProcessingService,hazelcastInstance) are still present inLocalVCLocalCIIntegrationTest.java:
hazelcastInstance.getQueue("buildJobQueue");buildJobRepository.findFirstByParticipationIdOrderByBuildStartDateDesc(...)examUtilService.addExamWithExerciseGroup(...)sharedQueueProcessingService.removeListener();localCITriggerService.triggerBuild(...)These remaining usages indicate that the dependencies have not been fully refactored, which could lead to
NullPointerExceptionor other issues during test execution.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
53-79: Ensure the removal of@Autowireddependencies does not impact test functionalitySeveral
@Autowiredfields have been removed:
examUtilServicebuildJobRepositorylocalCITriggerServicesharedQueueProcessingServicehazelcastInstancePlease verify that all usages of these dependencies have been refactored appropriately or are now provided by the new base class
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBase. This ensures that there are noNullPointerExceptionor other issues during test execution.Run the following script to check for any remaining usages of the removed dependencies:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for any remaining usages of the removed dependencies in the test class. # Test: Ensure there are no occurrences of the removed dependencies. Expect: No matches found. rg 'examUtilService|buildJobRepository|localCITriggerService|sharedQueueProcessingService|hazelcastInstance' src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalVCLocalCIIntegrationTest.javaLength of output: 2926
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseTestCaseServiceTest.java (6)
Line range hint
37-39: Replace removed service usages with superclass utilities insetUp()The
setUp()method usesuserUtilService,programmingExerciseUtilService, andexerciseUtilService, which are no longer declared in the class. These services were removed and need to be replaced with the corresponding utilities provided by the superclass.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
- userUtilService.addUsers(TEST_PREFIX, 5, 1, 0, 1); - var course = programmingExerciseUtilService.addCourseWithOneProgrammingExerciseAndTestCases(); - programmingExercise = exerciseUtilService.getFirstExerciseWithType(course, ProgrammingExercise.class); + database.addUsers(TEST_PREFIX, 5, 1, 0, 1); + var course = database.addCourseWithOneProgrammingExerciseAndTestCases(); + programmingExercise = database.getFirstExerciseWithType(course, ProgrammingExercise.class);This change utilizes the
databaseutility provided by the superclass, ensuring that the setup operations are correctly performed.
Line range hint
41-42: EnsureprogrammingExerciseRepositoryis properly initializedThe variable
programmingExerciseRepositoryis used but not declared in the class. Since@Autowired private ProgrammingExerciseRepository programmingExerciseRepositorywas removed, you should access it through the superclass or reintroduce it if necessary.If
programmingExerciseRepositoryis accessible via the superclass, adjust the code accordingly. Otherwise, consider adding the following declaration:+ @Autowired + private ProgrammingExerciseRepository programmingExerciseRepository;Or, if available through the superclass, replace
programmingExerciseRepositorywithprogrammingExerciseUtilService.getProgrammingExerciseRepository()or an equivalent method.
Line range hint
55-58: Update usage ofparticipationUtilServicein test methodsIn the
testResetTestCases()method,participationUtilServiceis used but not declared. Replace it with the appropriate utility from the superclass.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
- participationUtilService.addProgrammingParticipationWithResultForExercise(programmingExercise, TEST_PREFIX + "student1"); + database.addProgrammingParticipationForExercise(programmingExercise, TEST_PREFIX + "student1");This change leverages the
databaseutility to add a programming participation for the exercise.
Line range hint
57-58: Correct usage oftestCaseRepositoryandtestCaseServiceThe variables
testCaseRepositoryandtestCaseServiceare no longer declared. Replace their usages with the appropriate methods or utilities.If these services are accessible through the superclass or a common utility, adjust the code accordingly. For example:
- new ArrayList<>(testCaseRepository.findByExerciseId(programmingExercise.getId())).getFirst().weight(50.0); + var testCases = programmingExerciseTestCaseRepository.findByExerciseId(programmingExercise.getId()); + testCases.iterator().next().setWeight(50.0);Ensure that
programmingExerciseTestCaseRepositoryis properly initialized or accessed via the superclass.
Line range hint
68-72: ReplacegitServicemock setup with superclass utilityThe
gitServiceis being mocked usingdoReturnandwhen. Ensure that thegitServiceis appropriately accessed from the superclass or adjust the mocking strategy as per the new architecture.If
gitServiceis provided by the superclass, you may not need to mock it here. Otherwise, adjust the code to match the new mocking strategy.
Line range hint
95-113: Update test data creation inshouldAllowTestCaseWeightSumZeroIn the
shouldAllowTestCaseWeightSumZeromethod,programmingExerciseRepository,gitService, andfeedbackCreationServiceare used but not declared.Modify the code to use the utilities provided by the superclass or reintroduce the necessary services. For example, adjust the repository access and service usages to ensure the test functions correctly.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (79)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/atlas/architecture/AtlasTestArchitectureTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/atlas/learningpath/LearningPathIntegrationTest.java (5 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/fileupload/AbstractFileUploadIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/fileupload/architecture/FileUploadTestArchitectureTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/lti/architecture/LtiTestArchitectureTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/AbstractProgrammingIntegrationGitlabCIGitlabSamlTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBase.java (2 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/AuxiliaryRepositoryServiceTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/BuildPlanIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ConsistencyCheckGitlabJenkinsIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/CourseGitlabJenkinsIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/GitServiceTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/GitlabServiceTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/IdePreferencesIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/PlantUmlIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingAssessmentIntegrationTest.java (2 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseBuildPlanTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseGitIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseGitlabJenkinsIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseGradingServiceTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseParticipationIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseRepositoryServiceTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseResultJenkinsIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseScheduleServiceTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseServiceIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseServiceTest.java (2 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseTemplateIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseTest.java (3 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseTestCaseServiceTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingSubmissionAndResultGitlabJenkinsIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingSubmissionIntegrationTest.java (4 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/RepositoryIntegrationTest.java (3 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/RepositoryProgrammingExerciseParticipationJenkinsIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/StaticCodeAnalysisIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/SubmissionPolicyIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/TestRepositoryResourceIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/architecture/ProgrammingTestArchitectureTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/CodeHintIntegrationTest.java (2 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/CodeHintServiceTest.java (8 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/ExerciseHintIntegrationTest.java (2 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/ExerciseHintServiceTest.java (3 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/HestiaDatabaseTest.java (6 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/ProgrammingExerciseGitDiffReportIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/ProgrammingExerciseGitDiffReportServiceTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/ProgrammingExerciseSolutionEntryIntegrationTest.java (11 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/ProgrammingExerciseTaskIntegrationTest.java (5 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/ProgrammingExerciseTaskServiceTest.java (14 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/StructuralTestCaseServiceTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/TestwiseCoverageIntegrationTest.java (3 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/TestwiseCoverageReportServiceTest.java (3 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/behavioral/BehavioralTestCaseServiceLocalCILocalVCTest.java (4 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalCIIntegrationTest.java (2 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalCIResourceIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalCIResultServiceTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalCIServiceTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalVCIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalVCLocalCIIntegrationTest.java (2 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalVCLocalCIParticipationIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalVCServiceTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalVCSshIntegrationTest.java (0 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/MultipleHostKeyProviderTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/ProgrammingExerciseLocalVCLocalCIIntegrationTest.java (2 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/SharedQueueManagementServiceTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/BuildLogEntryServiceTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/GitlabCIServiceTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/JenkinsAuthorizationInterceptorTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/JenkinsInternalUriServiceTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/JenkinsJobPermissionServiceTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/JenkinsJobServiceTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/JenkinsServiceTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/ProgrammingExerciseFeedbackCreationServiceTest.java (2 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/RepositoryAccessServiceTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/connectors/gitlab/GitLabPersonalAccessTokenManagementServiceTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/connectors/jenkins/build_plan/JenkinsPipelineScriptCreatorTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/shared/architecture/module/AbstractModuleTestArchitectureTest.java (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalVCSshIntegrationTest.java
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (78)
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/atlas/architecture/AtlasTestArchitectureTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/atlas/learningpath/LearningPathIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/fileupload/AbstractFileUploadIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/fileupload/architecture/FileUploadTestArchitectureTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/lti/architecture/LtiTestArchitectureTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/AbstractProgrammingIntegrationGitlabCIGitlabSamlTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBase.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/AuxiliaryRepositoryServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/BuildPlanIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ConsistencyCheckGitlabJenkinsIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/CourseGitlabJenkinsIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/GitServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/GitlabServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/IdePreferencesIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/PlantUmlIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingAssessmentIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseBuildPlanTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseGitIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseGitlabJenkinsIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseGradingServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseParticipationIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseRepositoryServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseResultJenkinsIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseScheduleServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseServiceIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseTemplateIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseTestCaseServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingSubmissionAndResultGitlabJenkinsIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingSubmissionIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/RepositoryIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/RepositoryProgrammingExerciseParticipationJenkinsIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/StaticCodeAnalysisIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/SubmissionPolicyIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/TestRepositoryResourceIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/architecture/ProgrammingTestArchitectureTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/CodeHintIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/CodeHintServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/ExerciseHintIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/ExerciseHintServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/HestiaDatabaseTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/ProgrammingExerciseGitDiffReportIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/ProgrammingExerciseGitDiffReportServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/ProgrammingExerciseSolutionEntryIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/ProgrammingExerciseTaskIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/ProgrammingExerciseTaskServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/StructuralTestCaseServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/TestwiseCoverageIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/TestwiseCoverageReportServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/behavioral/BehavioralTestCaseServiceLocalCILocalVCTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalCIIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalCIResourceIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalCIResultServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalCIServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalVCIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalVCLocalCIIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalVCLocalCIParticipationIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalVCServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/MultipleHostKeyProviderTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/ProgrammingExerciseLocalVCLocalCIIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/SharedQueueManagementServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/BuildLogEntryServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/GitlabCIServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/JenkinsAuthorizationInterceptorTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/JenkinsInternalUriServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/JenkinsJobPermissionServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/JenkinsJobServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/JenkinsServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/ProgrammingExerciseFeedbackCreationServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/RepositoryAccessServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/connectors/gitlab/GitLabPersonalAccessTokenManagementServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/connectors/jenkins/build_plan/JenkinsPipelineScriptCreatorTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/shared/architecture/module/AbstractModuleTestArchitectureTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: true
📓 Learnings (2)
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseServiceIntegrationTest.java (2)
Learnt from: Hialus PR: ls1intum/Artemis#7451 File: src/test/java/de/tum/in/www1/artemis/exercise/programmingexercise/ProgrammingExerciseTestService.java:9-9 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:35:48.767Z Learning: The use of wildcard imports is acceptable in this project as specified in the `.editorconfig` file.Learnt from: Hialus PR: ls1intum/Artemis#7451 File: src/test/java/de/tum/in/www1/artemis/exercise/programmingexercise/ProgrammingExerciseTestService.java:9-9 Timestamp: 2024-01-19T15:49:43.303Z Learning: The use of wildcard imports is acceptable in this project as specified in the `.editorconfig` file.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseServiceTest.java (2)
Learnt from: Hialus PR: ls1intum/Artemis#7451 File: src/test/java/de/tum/in/www1/artemis/exercise/programmingexercise/ProgrammingExerciseTestService.java:9-9 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:35:48.767Z Learning: The use of wildcard imports is acceptable in this project as specified in the `.editorconfig` file.Learnt from: Hialus PR: ls1intum/Artemis#7451 File: src/test/java/de/tum/in/www1/artemis/exercise/programmingexercise/ProgrammingExerciseTestService.java:9-9 Timestamp: 2024-01-19T15:49:43.303Z Learning: The use of wildcard imports is acceptable in this project as specified in the `.editorconfig` file.
🔇 Additional comments (157)
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/lti/architecture/LtiTestArchitectureTest.java (4)
3-3: LGTM: Import statement added for Set.The addition of the
java.util.Setimport is appropriate and necessary for the changes made to thegetAbstractModuleIntegrationTestClassesmethod.
8-8: LGTM: Removed generic type parameter from class signature.The removal of the generic type parameter
<AbstractLtiIntegrationTest>from the class signature aligns with the PR objectives of refactoring the test architecture. This change makes the class more flexible and supports the goal of adapting the architecture to accommodate multiple abstract test classes.
16-17: LGTM: Updated method to return a Set of test classes.The changes to
getAbstractModuleIntegrationTestClassesmethod are well-implemented:
- The method now returns a
Set<Class<?>>, allowing for multiple abstract test classes, which aligns with the PR objectives.- The use of
Set.of()is a modern Java feature, adhering to the guideline of using JUnit 5 features.- The method name remains descriptive, following the test naming guideline.
These changes support the goal of improving the organization and flexibility of the test architecture.
Line range hint
1-20: Overall assessment: Changes align well with PR objectives and guidelines.The modifications to
LtiTestArchitectureTestsuccessfully contribute to the refactoring of the test architecture as outlined in the PR objectives. The changes adhere to the provided coding guidelines, particularly in terms of test naming, use of modern Java features, and adapting the architecture for multiple abstract test classes. These updates should improve the flexibility and organization of the testing framework.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/atlas/architecture/AtlasTestArchitectureTest.java (3)
3-3: LGTM: Import statement added correctly.The addition of
import java.util.Set;is consistent with the changes in the method signature ofgetAbstractModuleIntegrationTestClasses.
8-8: LGTM: Class signature updated to improve flexibility.The removal of the generic type parameter
<AbstractAtlasIntegrationTest>from the class signature allows for more flexibility in the test architecture. This change is consistent with the PR objectives of refactoring the test architecture and potentially supporting multiple abstract test classes.
Line range hint
1-20: Summary: Successful refactoring of AtlasTestArchitectureTestThe changes in this file successfully refactor the
AtlasTestArchitectureTestclass to support a more flexible test architecture. The removal of the generic type parameter and the modification of thegetAbstractModuleIntegrationTestClassesmethod align well with the PR objectives of improving the organization and maintainability of the testing framework.These changes lay the groundwork for potentially supporting multiple abstract test classes in the future, which could lead to better management of dependencies and improved test structure.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/fileupload/architecture/FileUploadTestArchitectureTest.java (2)
3-4: LGTM: Import statement addition is appropriate.The addition of the
java.util.Setimport is consistent with the changes in the method signature and usage in the class.
8-8: LGTM: Class signature update improves flexibility.The removal of the generic type parameter from the class signature allows for handling multiple integration test classes, which is consistent with the method changes. This update adheres to the coding guidelines and improves the flexibility of the test architecture.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/MultipleHostKeyProviderTest.java (2)
11-11: LGTM: Import statement added correctly.The new import statement for
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBaseis correctly placed and aligns with the change in class extension.
15-15: LGTM: Class extension updated as per refactoring objectives.The change to extend
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBasealigns with the PR objectives to refactor programming tests and create new abstract test classes for different test setups.To ensure this change adheres to the coding guidelines, please run the following verification:
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalCIResultServiceTest.java (4)
11-11: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly.The import statement has been updated to reflect the new base class being extended. This change is consistent with the class signature modification.
14-14: LGTM: Class extension updated to improve test organization.The change from extending
AbstractLocalCILocalVCIntegrationTesttoAbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBasealigns well with the PR objectives. This modification contributes to better organization of test code and potentially improves dependency management through the new abstract test classes.
Line range hint
1-33: Overall adherence to coding guidelines is good.The file follows the provided coding guidelines well:
- Test naming is descriptive (LocalCIResultServiceTest).
- The test class is small and specific to LocalCIResultService.
- assertThat is used for assertions.
- The test method is specific and uses fixed data.
No violations of other guidelines (like JUnit 5 features, ArchUnit rules, or database access) were observed in this file.
14-14: Verify localCIResultService availability in the base class.The removal of the
@Autowired LocalCIResultServicefield aligns with the PR objectives of addressing scattered use of autowired components. However, the test method still useslocalCIResultService.Please ensure that
localCIResultServiceis properly provided by the new base classAbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBase. Run the following script to verify:src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/architecture/ProgrammingTestArchitectureTest.java (3)
1-12: LGTM: Class structure and package declaration are well-defined.The class
ProgrammingTestArchitectureTestis correctly placed in thede.tum.cit.aet.artemis.programming.architecturepackage. It extendsAbstractModuleTestArchitectureTest, which is appropriate for a module-specific test architecture class. The naming convention follows the project guidelines for test classes.
14-17: LGTM:getModulePackage()method is correctly implemented.The
getModulePackage()method is properly overridden and returns the correct package for the programming module. The use of theARTEMIS_PACKAGEconstant ensures consistency with other parts of the project.
1-31: Overall, excellent implementation of theProgrammingTestArchitectureTestclass.This new test class adheres well to the project's coding guidelines and best practices for test classes. It correctly extends the abstract module test architecture class and provides appropriate implementations for the required methods. The class structure is clean, and the code is well-organized.
Key points:
- The class name is descriptive and follows the naming convention for test classes.
- The package structure aligns with the module being tested (programming).
- Both overridden methods (
getModulePackage()andgetAbstractModuleIntegrationTestClasses()) are correctly implemented.- The use of
Set.of()ingetAbstractModuleIntegrationTestClasses()adheres to the util service factory pattern guideline.The only minor suggestion is to add brief comments explaining the purpose of each included test class in
getAbstractModuleIntegrationTestClasses()to further improve code readability and maintainability.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/SharedQueueManagementServiceTest.java (2)
11-11: LGTM: Import change aligns with class extension modification.The import of
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestis consistent with the change in the class extension. This refactoring appears to be part of the broader effort to create more specific abstract test classes for different test setups, as mentioned in the PR objectives.
14-14: Verify features of the new base class.The change to extend
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestaligns with the PR objectives to create more specific abstract test classes. This should provide better-tailored utilities for programming tests.To ensure all necessary features are available in the new base class, please run the following script:
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseServiceTest.java (4)
14-14: LGTM: Class extension change aligns with PR objectives.The change from extending
AbstractSpringIntegrationIndependentTesttoAbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTestis in line with the PR's goal of creating new abstract test classes for different test setups. This should improve the organization and maintainability of the test code.
Line range hint
20-33: Verify test setup completeness after removing @Autowired fields.The removal of @Autowired fields and simplification of the init() method aligns with the PR objectives of addressing scattered use of autowired components. This change should improve the organization of the test code.
However, please ensure that:
- The test still has access to all necessary dependencies.
- The test setup is still complete and correct.
- The removed setup logic (e.g., adding users and courses) is now handled in the abstract class or elsewhere appropriately.
To verify the completeness of the test setup, please run the following script:
Line range hint
1-48: Verify JUnit 5 usage and overall structure.The test class generally adheres to the coding guidelines:
- The test class and method names are descriptive.
- The test is small and specific.
- It uses assertThat for assertions.
- It uses @WithMockUser for authentication.
To fully comply with the guidelines, please ensure:
- The test is using JUnit 5 features as required.
- The test is using fixed data where appropriate.
- The assertions are specific enough.
To verify JUnit 5 usage and other guideline adherence, please run the following script:
45-46: Verify repository functionality after changing from programmingExerciseTestRepository to programmingExerciseRepository.The change from using
programmingExerciseTestRepositorytoprogrammingExerciseRepositorysuggests a consolidation of repository usage, which can improve consistency and maintainability.Please ensure that:
- The
programmingExerciseRepositoryprovides the same functionality as the previously usedprogrammingExerciseTestRepository.- The method
findAllWithBuildAndTestAfterDueDateInFuture()is available and functions correctly in the new repository.To verify the repository functionality, please run the following script:
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ConsistencyCheckGitlabJenkinsIntegrationTest.java (1)
Line range hint
10-20: Setup and teardown methods look good.The
setup()andtearDown()methods are well-structured and follow JUnit5 conventions. They properly initialize and clean up the test environment, including setting up mock providers for Jenkins and GitLab requests. This approach aligns with the specified mock strategy in the coding guidelines.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseBuildPlanTest.java (3)
12-12: Improved test class hierarchyThe change to extend
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationGitlabCIGitlabSamlTestaligns well with the PR objectives. This more specific parent class should provide better organization and management of dependencies for programming exercise tests.
Line range hint
24-29: Improved test setup with reduced dependenciesThe removal of @Autowired fields and simplification of the
initmethod align well with the PR objectives. This change reduces setup complexity and improves maintainability. It also adheres to the coding guidelines, particularly the utility service factory pattern and minimizing context restarts.
Line range hint
31-62: Verify test methods with new setupWhile the test methods remain unchanged, they may now rely on methods or fields from the parent class
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationGitlabCIGitlabSamlTest. Please verify that all test methods still function correctly with the new setup, especially regarding access toprogrammingExerciseRepositoryandprogrammingExerciseUtilService.To assist in verifying the test methods, you can run the following script:
If the script returns any results, please ensure that these usages are properly handled by the new parent class or update the test methods accordingly.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalVCServiceTest.java (1)
13-13: LGTM: Import statement added for new base class.The import statement for
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTesthas been correctly added, which aligns with the change in the class extension.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/fileupload/AbstractFileUploadIntegrationTest.java (2)
24-24: LGTM: Class declaration changed to abstractThe change from a regular class to an abstract class is appropriate for a base test class. This modification aligns with the PR objectives of creating abstract test classes for different test setups.
Line range hint
24-71: Verify: Ensure all @Autowired fields are necessaryThe large number of
@Autowiredfields might indicate that this abstract class is trying to do too much. It's important to verify if all these dependencies are actually needed in the subclasses.To help with this verification, you can run the following script to check the usage of these fields in the subclasses:
This script will help identify which fields are actually used in the subclasses, allowing you to make informed decisions about which fields to keep in the abstract class and which to move to specific subclasses.
✅ Verification successful
All
@Autowiredfields are necessary
- Verified that each dependency annotated with
@AutowiredinAbstractFileUploadIntegrationTest.javais actively used in subclasses.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check usage of @Autowired fields in subclasses # Get all field names fields=$(ast-grep --lang java --pattern '$_ $_' src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/fileupload/AbstractFileUploadIntegrationTest.java | grep -oP '(?<=protected ).*(?=;)' | awk '{print $NF}') # Check usage in subclasses for field in $fields; do echo "Checking usage of $field:" rg "\b$field\b" src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/fileupload/ --type java --glob '!AbstractFileUploadIntegrationTest.java' echo "---" doneLength of output: 196
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check usage of @Autowired fields in subclasses # Extract fields with @Autowired annotation fields=$(ast-grep --lang java --pattern ' @Autowired protected $_ $$_; ' src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/fileupload/AbstractFileUploadIntegrationTest.java | grep -oP '(?<=protected ).*(?=;)' | awk '{print $NF}') # Check if fields were extracted if [ -z "$fields" ]; then echo "No @Autowired fields found." exit 0 fi # Check usage in subclasses for field in $fields; do echo "Checking usage of $field:" rg "\b$field\b" src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/fileupload/ --type java --glob '!AbstractFileUploadIntegrationTest.java' echo "---" doneLength of output: 315
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Enhanced check for usage of @Autowired fields in subclasses # Extract fields with @Autowired annotation, accounting for possible formatting variations fields=$(ast-grep --lang java --pattern ' @Autowired protected $_ $$_; ' src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/fileupload/AbstractFileUploadIntegrationTest.java | grep -oP '(?<=protected ).*(?=;)' | awk '{print $NF}') # If no fields found, attempt alternative pattern matching if [ -z "$fields" ]; then echo "No @Autowired fields found with the initial pattern. Attempting alternative pattern." fields=$(ast-grep --lang java --pattern ' @Autowired private $_ $$_; ' src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/fileupload/AbstractFileUploadIntegrationTest.java | grep -oP '(?<=private ).*(?=;)' | awk '{print $NF}') fi # Check if fields were extracted after alternative pattern if [ -z "$fields" ]; then echo "No @Autowired fields found after alternative pattern." exit 0 fi # Check usage in subclasses for field in $fields; do echo "Checking usage of $field:" rg "\b$field\b" src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/fileupload/ --type java --glob '!AbstractFileUploadIntegrationTest.java' echo "---" doneLength of output: 790
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Robust check for usage of @Autowired fields in subclasses # Attempt to extract fields with @Autowired annotation using ast-grep fields=$(ast-grep --lang java --pattern ' @Autowired ($_) $_ $_; ' src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/fileupload/AbstractFileUploadIntegrationTest.java | grep -oP '(?<=protected |private |public )\w+(?=;)') # If no fields found with ast-grep, attempt extraction using ripgrep if [ -z "$fields" ]; then echo "No @Autowired fields found with ast-grep. Attempting extraction with ripgrep." fields=$(rg "@Autowired\s*(?:\n|\s)+(?:protected|private|public)\s+\w+\s+(\w+);" src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/fileupload/AbstractFileUploadIntegrationTest.java --only-matching --replace '$1') fi # Check if fields were extracted if [ -z "$fields" ]; then echo "No @Autowired fields found after trying both ast-grep and ripgrep patterns." exit 0 fi # Check usage in subclasses for field in $fields; do echo "Checking usage of $field:" rg "\b$field\b" src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/fileupload/ --type java --glob '!AbstractFileUploadIntegrationTest.java' echo "---" doneLength of output: 980
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Robust extraction of @Autowired fields using ripgrep with multiline support # Attempt to extract fields with @Autowired annotation using ripgrep with multiline flag fields=$(rg --multiline "@Autowired\s*\n\s*(protected|private|public)\s+\w+\s+(\w+);" \ src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/fileupload/AbstractFileUploadIntegrationTest.java \ --only-matching --replace '$2') # Check if fields were extracted if [ -z "$fields" ]; then echo "No @Autowired fields found after enabling multiline mode." exit 0 fi # Check usage in subclasses for field in $fields; do echo "Checking usage of $field:" rg "\b$field\b" src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/fileupload/ --type java --glob '!AbstractFileUploadIntegrationTest.java' echo "---" doneLength of output: 72654
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/RepositoryProgrammingExerciseParticipationJenkinsIntegrationTest.java (1)
Line range hint
41-75: LGTM! Verify DB query count tracking in parent class.The test method
testGetLatestBuildLogsFailsfollows good practices:
- Descriptive name
- Appropriate size and specificity
- Use of mocking for Jenkins behavior
- Specific assertion using
assertThatThese align well with the provided coding guidelines.
To ensure full compliance with the coding guidelines, please verify if DB query count tracking is handled by the parent class
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest. Run the following script to check for DB query tracking in the parent class:If DB query count tracking is not found in the parent class, consider adding it to comply with the coding guideline for
db_query_count_tests: track_performance.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/PlantUmlIntegrationTest.java (2)
23-23: LGTM: Class now extends the appropriate abstract test class.The change to extend
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTestaligns with the PR objectives to improve test organization and dependency management.
Line range hint
1-83: Overall, the changes align with PR objectives and improve test structure.The refactoring to use
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTestaligns with the PR goals. The tests cover various scenarios for PlantUML integration, including success and error cases. While some improvements in assertion specificity and test structure have been suggested, the overall changes contribute positively to the codebase.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/JenkinsInternalUriServiceTest.java (2)
19-19: LGTM: Import statement updated to reflect new base class.The import of
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestaligns with the change in the class extension, indicating a more specific base class for programming integration tests with Jenkins and GitLab.
22-22: Verify initialization ofjenkinsInternalUrlService.The removal of the
@Autowiredannotation forjenkinsInternalUrlServicealigns with the PR objectives of addressing scattered use of autowired components. However, please ensure thatjenkinsInternalUrlServiceis properly initialized, possibly by the new base classAbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest.To prevent potential
NullPointerExceptions, consider adding a null check forjenkinsInternalUrlServicein the@BeforeEachmethod:@BeforeEach void initTestCase() throws Exception { // Existing initialization code... assertThat(jenkinsInternalUrlService).isNotNull(); }Also, run the following script to check for any remaining
@Autowiredannotations in this file:src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/JenkinsJobServiceTest.java (1)
30-33: LGTM: Class extension and import changes align with PR objectives.The change to extend
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestaligns with the PR objectives to create new abstract test classes for different test setups. The import statement is correctly placed, and the class naming convention is maintained.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/IdePreferencesIntegrationTest.java (2)
22-22: Summary of changes and recommendationsThe changes in this file align well with the PR objectives to refactor and improve the organization of test code. The main modifications include:
- Updating the base class to
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest.- Removing @Autowired annotations for repositories.
- Modifying the tearDown method by removing explicit cleanup calls.
These changes contribute to better management of dependencies and potentially improve the overall structure of the testing framework. However, there are a few points that require attention:
- Verify that all necessary setup and utility methods from the previous base class are still available in the new base class.
- Ensure that test methods still have proper access to the required repositories.
- Confirm that test isolation is maintained, and cleanup is handled appropriately, possibly by the new base class.
The core functionality of the test methods remains unchanged, which is a positive sign for maintaining the existing test coverage.
Please address the verification points mentioned in the previous comments to ensure the refactoring doesn't introduce any unintended side effects.
Line range hint
41-44: Verify test isolation after removing repository cleanup.The removal of
userIdeMappingRepository.deleteAll()andideRepository.deleteAll()calls from thetearDownmethod is consistent with the removal of @Autowired annotations. However, this change may affect test isolation between test runs.Please verify that test isolation is maintained and that cleanup is handled properly, possibly by the new base class. Consider running the following script to check for any potential issues:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential test isolation issues after removing cleanup calls # Test: Check if there are any remaining references to deleteAll() calls in the test class rg --type java -e "deleteAll\(\)" src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/IdePreferencesIntegrationTest.java # Test: Verify that the new base class handles cleanup ast-grep --lang java --pattern 'class AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest { $$$ @AfterEach void $_($$) { $$$ $_Repository.deleteAll(); $$$ } $$$ }'If the new base class doesn't handle cleanup, consider reintroducing the cleanup calls or implementing a different cleanup mechanism to ensure proper test isolation.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/TestwiseCoverageReportServiceTest.java (4)
16-16: LGTM: Import statement added for new base class.The import statement for
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBasehas been correctly added to support the change in the class extension.
Line range hint
1-108: Overall assessment: Well-executed refactoring with consistent changes.The changes in this file align well with the PR objectives of refactoring the test setup and improving dependency management. Key points:
- The class now extends a more specific base class, potentially providing better support for programming exercise tests.
- Consistent updates to repository usage (
testCaseRepositoryinstead ofprogrammingExerciseTestCaseRepository) throughout the file.- Removal of several
@Autowiredfields, likely now managed by the new base class.These changes contribute to a more organized and maintainable test structure. The suggested verification steps should help ensure that the refactoring hasn't introduced any unintended side effects.
76-76: LGTM: Consistent update of repository usage in test method.The change to use
testCaseRepository.findByExerciseId()is consistent with the updates made in thesetupmethod and aligns with the overall refactoring approach.To ensure the functionality remains intact, please run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Updated repository usage confirmed in test method.
The usage of
testCaseRepository.findByExerciseId()has been successfully updated in theshouldCreateFullTestwiseCoverageReportmethod, consistent with the refactoring approach.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the test execution and coverage # Test: Run the specific test and check its output ./gradlew test --tests TestwiseCoverageReportServiceTest.shouldCreateFullTestwiseCoverageReport # Test: Verify test coverage for the changed lines ./gradlew jacocoTestReport cat build/reports/jacoco/test/html/de.tum.cit.aet.artemis.programming.hestia/TestwiseCoverageReportServiceTest.java.html | grep -A 10 -B 10 "testCaseRepository.findByExerciseId"Length of output: 823
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of testCaseRepository.findByExerciseId in the test method # Search for the method call within the TestwiseCoverageReportServiceTest.java file rg "testCaseRepository\.findByExerciseId" src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/TestwiseCoverageReportServiceTest.java -C 10Length of output: 1706
25-25: LGTM: Class extension updated to new base class.The change to extend
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBasealigns with the PR objectives to create new abstract test classes for different test setups. This likely provides more specific functionality for programming exercise tests.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any unintended side effects, please run the following script:
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/JenkinsAuthorizationInterceptorTest.java (2)
29-29: LGTM: Removed autowired fields for better dependency managementThe removal of
@Valueand@Autowiredfields aligns with the PR objectives of addressing scattered use of autowired components. This should lead to better dependency management through the new abstract test classes.To ensure the dependencies are correctly managed in the new setup, please run the following script:
31-31: LGTM: Class now extends AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestThe change to extend
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestaligns with the PR objectives of creating new abstract test classes for different test setups. This should improve the organization and maintainability of the test code.To ensure the new base class provides all necessary functionality, please run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest contains necessary fields
All removed fields (
jenkinsServerUrl,jenkinsAuthorizationInterceptor, andrestTemplate) are present in the new base classAbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest. This ensures that the test class maintains the required functionality and adheres to the refactoring objectives.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the contents of the new base class # Test: Check if the new base class exists and contains expected methods/fields ast-grep --lang java --pattern 'abstract class AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest { $$$ }'Length of output: 536
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and contents of AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest class, excluding files with encoding issues # Find all Java files excluding those with encoding issues fd --extension java --type f | grep -v 'EncodingISO_8559_1.java' | xargs ast-grep --lang java --pattern 'abstract class AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest { $$$ }'Length of output: 176
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest class using ripgrep rg 'abstract\s+class\s+AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest' --type javaLength of output: 310
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest contains necessary fields # Search for field declarations in the new base class ast-grep --lang java --pattern ' abstract class AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest { $$$ $_ jenkinsServerUrl; $_ jenkinsAuthorizationInterceptor; $_ restTemplate; $$$ }'Length of output: 318
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the presence of necessary fields in AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest # Define the file path FILE="src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest.java" # Check for jenkinsServerUrl rg 'jenkinsServerUrl' "$FILE" # Check for jenkinsAuthorizationInterceptor rg 'jenkinsAuthorizationInterceptor' "$FILE" # Check for restTemplate rg 'restTemplate' "$FILE"Length of output: 647
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalVCLocalCIParticipationIntegrationTest.java (4)
15-15: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly.The import statement for
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTesthas been added, which aligns with the change in the class extension. This change is appropriate and consistent with the refactoring objectives.
25-25: LGTM: Class extension updated appropriately.The class now extends
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest, which aligns with the PR objectives to refactor programming tests and create new abstract test classes. This change likely provides a more specific base class for programming exercises with local CI and VC setup.
Line range hint
38-106: LGTM: Test methods comply with coding guidelines.The test methods in this file adhere to the specified coding guidelines:
- Test naming is descriptive and clear.
- Tests use
assertThatfor assertions, as required.- Each test focuses on a specific functionality, keeping tests small and specific.
- No direct database access is observed in the test methods.
- The tests appear to use fixed data for consistency.
The overall structure and implementation of these tests align well with the project's coding standards for test classes.
25-25: Verify the removal of autowired services.The autowired services (
ProgrammingExerciseUtilService,VcsAccessLogRepository, andParticipationUtilService) have been removed, which aligns with the PR objectives. However, these services are still used in the test methods. Please verify that these services are now provided by the new abstract base classAbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestto avoid potential compilation errors.To verify this, you can run the following script:
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/JenkinsJobPermissionServiceTest.java (3)
19-19: LGTM: Import statement added correctly.The import for
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTesthas been added, which aligns with the class extension modification.
Line range hint
1-124: Summary: Changes align with PR objectives and coding guidelines.The modifications to this test class, including the updated base class and removal of the
@Autowiredannotation, align well with the PR objectives to refactor programming tests and address scattered use of autowired components. The test methods remain unchanged, preserving existing test coverage.The file adheres to the specified coding guidelines for test files, including:
- Descriptive test naming
- Small and specific tests
- Use of JUnit 5 features
- Use of
assertThatfor assertions- Specific assertions
- Mocking strategy using static mocks
No issues were found regarding database access or context restart minimization, as these aspects are not directly relevant to the changes made in this file.
23-23: LGTM: Class extension updated correctly.The class now extends
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest, which aligns with the PR objectives to refactor programming tests. The removal of the@Autowiredannotation forjenkinsJobPermissionsServicesuggests a change in dependency management.To ensure the new base class provides all necessary functionality, please run the following verification script:
This script will help verify the existence and proper setup of the new base class, ensuring that the refactoring has been applied consistently across related test classes.
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: Class extension and dependency management are correct.
All changes align with the refactoring objectives:
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestexists and is correctly extended.jenkinsJobPermissionsServiceis now managed by the new base class.- No remaining
@Autowiredannotations are present in the test class.- Other related test classes have been consistently updated.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new base class and its usage # Test 1: Check if the new base class exists echo "Checking for AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest..." fd -t f "AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest.java" # Test 2: Verify if jenkinsJobPermissionsService is provided by the new base class echo "Checking for jenkinsJobPermissionsService in the base class..." rg -t java "protected\s+JenkinsJobPermissionsService\s+jenkinsJobPermissionsService" $(fd -t f "AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest.java") # Test 3: Check for any remaining @Autowired annotations in this test class echo "Checking for remaining @Autowired annotations..." rg -t java "@Autowired" src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/JenkinsJobPermissionServiceTest.java # Test 4: Verify if other test classes have been updated similarly echo "Checking for other test classes extending AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest..." rg -t java "extends\s+AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest" src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/Length of output: 2863
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/TestwiseCoverageIntegrationTest.java (3)
14-14: LGTM: Import statement added for new base class.The import statement for
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTesthas been correctly added to support the change in the class extension.
Line range hint
1-124: Overall assessment: Refactoring successfully implemented.The refactoring of
TestwiseCoverageIntegrationTesthas been successfully implemented, aligning with the PR objectives. Key points:
- The class now extends the new
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest, improving test organization.- Repository usage has been updated to reflect new naming conventions or structure.
- Existing test coverage and structure have been maintained.
- The class adheres to JUnit 5 conventions and provided coding guidelines.
Minor suggestions for improvement have been made, including:
- Extracting test case creation into a separate method.
- Improving test method naming for better clarity.
These changes enhance the maintainability and readability of the test code without compromising its functionality.
23-23: Verify the impact of the new base class.The change to extend
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTestaligns with the PR objectives for refactoring programming tests. This likely improves the organization of test code.Please ensure that:
- All necessary methods and fields from the old base class are still accessible.
- Any new methods or fields introduced by the new base class are properly utilized.
Run the following script to check for any potential issues:
✅ Verification successful
Base class change verified successfully.
The transition to
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTesthas been validated:
- No methods from the old base class are in use.
- All methods from the new base class are appropriately utilized.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential issues after changing the base class # Test 1: Check if any methods from the old base class are still being used echo "Checking for usage of methods from AbstractSpringIntegrationIndependentTest:" rg --type java 'AbstractSpringIntegrationIndependentTest\.' src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/TestwiseCoverageIntegrationTest.java # Test 2: Check if any new methods from the new base class are not being used echo "Checking for unused methods from AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest:" ast-grep --lang java --pattern 'class AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest { $$$1 }' | rg 'public|protected' | while read -r method; do if ! rg --type java "$method" src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/TestwiseCoverageIntegrationTest.java > /dev/null; then echo "Unused method: $method" fi doneLength of output: 747
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential issues after changing the base class with encoding handling # Test 1: Check if any methods from the old base class are still being used echo "Checking for usage of methods from AbstractSpringIntegrationIndependentTest:" rg --type java 'AbstractSpringIntegrationIndependentTest\.' src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/TestwiseCoverageIntegrationTest.java # Test 2: Check if any new methods from AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest are not being used echo "Checking for unused methods from AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest:" ast-grep --lang java --pattern 'class AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest { $$$1 }' 2>/dev/null | rg 'public|protected' | while read -r method; do if ! rg --type java "$method" src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/TestwiseCoverageIntegrationTest.java > /dev/null; then echo "Unused method: $method" fi doneLength of output: 623
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/ProgrammingExerciseGitDiffReportServiceTest.java (4)
15-15: LGTM: Import statement added for the new base class.The import statement for
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBasehas been correctly added to support the change in the class extension.
24-24: Verify the impact of the new base class.The change to extend
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBaseis approved. This refactoring aligns with the PR objectives to create new abstract test classes for different test setups.Please ensure that:
- All necessary setup methods from the old base class are still available or properly overridden in the new base class.
- The new base class provides all required utilities for the tests in this class.
Run the following script to verify the base class structure:
24-24: Verify the impact of removed @Autowired fields on test methods.The removal of @Autowired fields aligns with the PR objectives to address scattered use of autowired components. This change is approved as it likely improves the organization of the test code.
Please ensure that:
- All removed services are still accessible within the test methods, either through the new base class or other means.
- The removal of these fields doesn't break any existing test logic.
Run the following script to verify the usage of the removed services in the test methods:
Line range hint
1-204: Summary: Refactoring aligns with PR objectives, final verification needed.The changes in this file, including the new base class extension and removal of @Autowired fields, align well with the PR objectives to refactor programming tests and address scattered use of autowired components. The overall structure of the test methods remains intact, which is good for maintaining existing test coverage.
To ensure the refactoring doesn't introduce any regressions:
- Run all tests in this class to verify they still pass with the new setup.
- Check if any test utility methods previously used from the old base class are still accessible or properly replaced.
- Verify that the removed @Autowired fields don't cause any issues in the test methods' execution.
Run the following command to execute the tests in this class:
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalCIServiceTest.java (5)
28-28: LGTM: Class extension change aligns with PR objectives.The change from extending
AbstractSpringIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTesttoAbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestaligns well with the PR objectives of creating new abstract test classes for different test setups. This refactoring should help in better organizing the test code and managing dependencies.Also applies to: 38-38
Line range hint
165-217: LGTM: GetCheckoutDirectoriesTests remain unchanged and valid.The
GetCheckoutDirectoriesTestsnested class and its test methods remain unchanged. These tests don't rely on the removed autowired services and continue to effectively verify the behavior of thegetCheckoutDirectoriesmethod for different programming languages and scenarios. This consistency is good and doesn't require any modifications in light of the other changes in the class.
Line range hint
1-218: Overall assessment: Refactoring aligns with PR objectives, but requires verification.The refactoring of
LocalCIServiceTestaligns well with the PR objectives of creating new abstract test classes and better managing dependencies. The change to extendAbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestand the removal of several autowired services indicate a shift towards a more organized and maintainable test structure.Key points:
- The core test logic remains valid and continues to cover important functionality.
- The removal of autowired services suggests these are now managed in the parent class, which aligns with the goal of better dependency management.
- The
GetCheckoutDirectoriesTestsnested class remains unchanged and valid.Action items:
- Verify the availability of previously autowired services in the new structure, particularly for
testReturnCorrectBuildStatusandtestRecreateBuildPlanForExercisemethods.- Consider updating comments in the
setUpmethod for clarity.These changes contribute positively to the overall goal of refactoring the programming tests, but careful verification is needed to ensure all dependencies are correctly managed in the new structure.
Line range hint
110-131: LGTM: Test logic remains valid, but verify service availability.The test logic in
testRecreateBuildPlanForExerciseremains valid and effectively tests therecreateBuildPlansForExercisemethod's behavior. However, like the previous test, this method still uses services that were previously autowired and have been removed from this class (e.g.,programmingExerciseUtilService,exerciseUtilService,buildScriptProviderService,aeolusTemplateService).Please verify that these services are now properly provided by the parent class
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestor through another mechanism to ensure the test's continued functionality.#!/bin/bash # Verify that the required services are available in the parent class or through another mechanism # Check for the presence of required methods in the parent class parent_class_file=$(fd -t f -e java AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest) if [ -n "$parent_class_file" ]; then echo "Checking parent class for required services:" grep -n "protected.*Service" "$parent_class_file" || echo "No Service fields found in parent class" echo "---" grep -n "get.*Service" "$parent_class_file" || echo "No getter methods for Services found in parent class" else echo "Parent class file not found" fi # Check for any new mechanism to provide these services in the current class echo "Checking current class for new service provision mechanisms:" grep -n "get.*Service" src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalCIServiceTest.java || echo "No new service provision mechanisms found in current class"
Line range hint
62-97: LGTM: Test logic remains valid, but verify service availability.The test logic in
testReturnCorrectBuildStatusremains valid and effectively tests thegetBuildStatusmethod's behavior. However, the method still uses services that were previously autowired and have been removed from this class (e.g.,programmingExerciseUtilService,exerciseUtilService,participationUtilService).Please verify that these services are now properly provided by the parent class
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestor through another mechanism to ensure the test's continued functionality.✅ Verification successful
Verification Complete: Services are properly inherited.
The
LocalCIServiceTestclass successfully inherits the requiredUtilServiceinstances from its parent classes. ThetestReturnCorrectBuildStatusmethod remains valid and functional.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the required services are available in the parent class or through another mechanism # Check for the presence of required methods in the parent class parent_class_file=$(fd -t f -e java AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest) if [ -n "$parent_class_file" ]; then echo "Checking parent class for required methods:" grep -n "protected.*UtilService" "$parent_class_file" || echo "No UtilService fields found in parent class" echo "---" grep -n "get.*UtilService" "$parent_class_file" || echo "No getter methods for UtilServices found in parent class" else echo "Parent class file not found" fi # Check for any new mechanism to provide these services in the current class echo "Checking current class for new service provision mechanisms:" grep -n "get.*UtilService" src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalCIServiceTest.java || echo "No new service provision mechanisms found in current class"Length of output: 2327
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the required services are available in the parent class or through another mechanism # Find all parent class files parent_class_files=$(fd -t f -e java AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest) if [ -n "$parent_class_files" ]; then for file in $parent_class_files; do echo "Checking parent class for required services in $file:" grep -n "protected.*UtilService" "$file" || echo "No UtilService fields found in $file" echo "---" grep -n "get.*UtilService" "$file" || echo "No getter methods for UtilServices found in $file" echo "===============================" done else echo "Parent class file not found" fi # Check for any new mechanism to provide these services in the current class current_class_file="src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalCIServiceTest.java" echo "Checking current class for new service provision mechanisms in $current_class_file:" if [ -f "$current_class_file" ]; then grep -n "get.*UtilService" "$current_class_file" || echo "No new service provision mechanisms found in current class" else echo "Current class file not found: $current_class_file" fiLength of output: 3710
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/connectors/gitlab/GitLabPersonalAccessTokenManagementServiceTest.java (3)
32-36: LGTM: Class extension change aligns with PR objectivesThe change from extending
AbstractSpringIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTesttoAbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestaligns well with the PR objectives of creating new abstract test classes for different test setups. This refactoring should help in better organization and management of dependencies through autowiring.
Line range hint
38-255: LGTM: Adherence to coding guidelines in existing testsThe existing test methods in this file adhere well to the provided coding guidelines:
- Test naming is descriptive (e.g.,
testCreateAccessToken,testRenewAccessToken)- JUnit 5 features are utilized (@ParameterizedTest, @CsvSource)
- AssertJ is used for assertions (assertThat)
- Mockito is employed for mocking
- Tests appear to be small and specific
These practices contribute to maintainable and readable test code.
36-36: Verify service accessibility after @Autowired removalThe removal of @Autowired fields for
gitLabPersonalAccessTokenManagementService,userRepository, anduserUtilServicealigns with the PR objectives to address scattered use of autowired components. However, please ensure that these services are still accessible within the test methods, possibly through the new abstract classAbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest.To verify the accessibility of these services, you can run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Verified removal of @Autowired fields
The removal of
@Autowiredfields forgitLabPersonalAccessTokenManagementService,userRepository, anduserUtilServicehas been successfully verified. These services remain accessible through the superclassAbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest, ensuring that all test methods continue to function correctly.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if the removed @Autowired fields are accessible through the superclass or other means # Test: Search for usage of the removed services in the test methods echo "Searching for usage of removed services in test methods:" rg --type java 'gitLabPersonalAccessTokenManagementService|userRepository|userUtilService' src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/connectors/gitlab/GitLabPersonalAccessTokenManagementServiceTest.java # Test: Check if these services are defined in the superclass echo "Checking if services are defined in the superclass:" rg --type java 'protected.*gitLabPersonalAccessTokenManagementService|protected.*userRepository|protected.*userUtilService' src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest.javaLength of output: 4054
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/AuxiliaryRepositoryServiceTest.java (2)
Line range hint
1-189: Overall, the changes improve the test structure and align with the refactoring objectives.The refactoring of
AuxiliaryRepositoryServiceTestachieves the following improvements:
- Better organization: By extending
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest, the class now uses a more specific base for programming-related tests.- Improved dependency management: Removal of
@Autowiredfields reduces scattered use of autowired components, as mentioned in the PR objectives.- Maintained test coverage: The core test methods remain unchanged, ensuring that existing functionality is still being tested.
These changes contribute to a more maintainable and organized test structure, aligning well with the goals of the pull request.
16-16: LGTM! Verify the new base class functionality.The change to extend
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTestis appropriate for a programming-specific test class. This likely provides more tailored setup and utilities for programming exercises.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any unexpected behavior, please verify that all necessary setup from the previous base class is still being performed, either in this class or in the new base class. Run the following command to check the new base class implementation:
✅ Verification successful
Base class functionality verified
The
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTestclass extendsAbstractSpringIntegrationIndependentTest, ensuring that all necessary setup and dependencies are maintained. No issues found with the class extension.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the implementation of AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest # Expected result: The file should exist and contain relevant setup methods for programming exercises rg --type java -g 'AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest.java' -A 10 'class AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest'Length of output: 1618
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/GitlabCIServiceTest.java (2)
30-30: LGTM: Import statement aligns with class extension change.The new import of
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationGitlabCIGitlabSamlTestis consistent with the updated class extension. This change suggests a move towards a more integrated testing approach, which is a positive step in improving test organization.
39-39: LGTM: Class extension updated to more specific test base class.The change from
AbstractSpringIntegrationGitlabCIGitlabSamlTesttoAbstractProgrammingIntegrationGitlabCIGitlabSamlTestaligns with the PR objectives of refactoring programming tests. This new base class likely provides more specific functionality for programming exercise tests, which should improve test organization and reduce code duplication.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseResultJenkinsIntegrationTest.java (3)
28-28: LGTM: Class extension change improves test specificityThe change from
AbstractSpringIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTesttoAbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestaligns well with the PR objectives. This new superclass name is more descriptive and specific to programming integration tests, which should improve the organization and maintainability of the test code.
Line range hint
1-283: Overall impact of changes is positiveThe changes in this file are focused on improving the test class structure and dependency management, which aligns well with the PR objectives. The key points are:
- The class now extends a more specific abstract test class, improving organization and maintainability.
- The removal of the
@Autowiredannotation suggests a move towards a more centralized service management approach.- The test methods and their implementations remain unchanged, preserving existing test coverage.
These changes contribute to a better overall architecture while maintaining the integrity of the tests. The refactoring appears to be successful in addressing the scattered use of autowired components without disrupting the existing test logic.
Line range hint
33-39: Verify new service management approachThe removal of the
@Autowiredannotation forprogrammingExerciseResultTestServicealigns with the PR objectives of reducing scattered autowired components. This change likely indicates that the service is now being managed through the new abstract superclass or a different mechanism.Please ensure that:
- The
programmingExerciseResultTestServiceis properly initialized and accessible in the new setup.- The change doesn't introduce any null pointer exceptions or unintended side effects.
- The new approach adheres to the util_service_factory_pattern as per our coding guidelines.
To verify the new service management approach, please run the following script:
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/GitServiceTest.java (2)
Line range hint
1-524: Overall, the test class adheres to good practices and guidelinesThe
GitServiceTestclass follows the provided coding guidelines and demonstrates good testing practices:
- Test names are descriptive and follow the convention.
- Tests are small and specific to individual functionalities.
- JUnit 5 features, including parameterized tests, are effectively utilized.
- Assertions use the
assertThatstyle as recommended.- The tests cover various scenarios and edge cases for the
GitService.The main change in this file is the parent class, which may affect dependency management. Ensure that all necessary dependencies are properly injected in the new setup.
42-42: Verify the impact of changing the parent classThe test class now extends
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTestinstead ofAbstractSpringIntegrationIndependentTest. This change suggests a more specific test setup for programming-related tests.Please ensure that:
- All necessary dependencies and configurations from the previous parent class are still available in the new parent class.
- The new parent class doesn't introduce any conflicts with existing test methods.
Additionally, the
@Autowiredannotation forgitUtilServicehas been removed. Verify that this service is now properly injected, possibly through constructor injection in the parent class or another mechanism.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalVCIntegrationTest.java (1)
32-32: Superclass change: Verify impact on existing testsThe superclass of
LocalVCIntegrationTesthas been changed fromAbstractLocalCILocalVCIntegrationTesttoAbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBase. This change might affect how the test class interacts with the underlying system or framework.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any regressions:
- Check if all existing test methods still work as expected.
- Verify if any setup or teardown procedures need to be adjusted.
- Confirm that this change aligns with the project's overall testing strategy.
Also applies to: 39-39
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/BuildLogEntryServiceTest.java (3)
Line range hint
242-257: LGTM! Utility methods are well-implemented.The utility methods for converting strings to
BuildLogEntryobjects are well-implemented. They make good use of Java 8+ features like streams, which enhances readability and conciseness.These methods provide a convenient way to create test data, which is crucial for maintaining clean and readable tests.
20-20: Verify initialization ofbuildLogEntryService.The removal of the
@Autowiredannotation forbuildLogEntryServiceis noted. This change likely aligns with the new base class's dependency management approach.Let's confirm that
buildLogEntryServiceis properly initialized in the new context:#!/bin/bash # Search for the initialization of buildLogEntryService in the base class or this class rg -t java "buildLogEntryService\s*=|protected\s+BuildLogEntryService" src/test/java
20-20: LGTM! Consider reviewing similar test classes.The change to extend
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTestis appropriate for a programming-specific test class. This base class likely provides more relevant setup and utilities for programming-related tests.To ensure consistency across the codebase, let's check if other similar test classes have been updated:
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/AbstractProgrammingIntegrationGitlabCIGitlabSamlTest.java (1)
59-59: Service naming conventionEnsure that the service name reflects its functionality. If
GitLabCIResultServiceprocesses results from GitLab CI, the naming is appropriate. Otherwise, consider renaming it for clarity.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/connectors/jenkins/build_plan/JenkinsPipelineScriptCreatorTest.java (4)
Line range hint
25-25: UndefinedcourseUtilServicemay cause errorsIn line 25,
courseUtilServiceis used to add an empty course:var course = courseUtilService.addEmptyCourse();Since the
@Autowiredfield forcourseUtilServicehas been removed, please ensure that it is accessible from the new base class or is properly initialized to avoid undefined variable errors.
Line range hint
38-40: Usage of repositories without initializationLines 38-40 utilize
programmingExerciseBuildConfigRepositoryandprogrammingExerciseRepository:var savedBuildConfig = programmingExerciseBuildConfigRepository.save(programmingExercise.getBuildConfig()); programmingExercise.setBuildConfig(savedBuildConfig); programmingExercise = programmingExerciseRepository.save(programmingExercise);With the removal of the
@Autowiredfields, these repositories may not be initialized, leading to runtime exceptions. Please confirm that these repositories are available via the new base class or initialize them appropriately.
Line range hint
43-47: Undefined services used in test methodsIn the
testBuildPlanCreation()method,jenkinsPipelineScriptCreatorandbuildPlanRepositoryare used:jenkinsPipelineScriptCreator.createBuildPlanForExercise(programmingExercise); Optional<BuildPlan> optionalBuildPlan = buildPlanRepository.findByProgrammingExercises_IdWithProgrammingExercises(programmingExercise.getId()); assertThat(optionalBuildPlan).isPresent();Since the
@Autowiredfields have been removed, verify that these services are provided by the new base class or are properly instantiated to preventNullPointerException.
17-17:⚠️ Potential issueEnsure services are accessible in the new base class
By changing the base class to
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest, the@Autowiredfields have been removed. Please verify that the services and repositories (courseUtilService,programmingExerciseBuildConfigRepository,programmingExerciseRepository,jenkinsPipelineScriptCreator, andbuildPlanRepository) are accessible through the new base class or properly instantiated. This will prevent anyNullPointerExceptionor undefined variable errors during test execution.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest.java (1)
29-103: The abstract test class is well-structured and aligns with the refactoring objectivesThe introduction of
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTesteffectively organizes shared dependencies for programming exercise integration tests, enhancing code maintainability and clarity.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/RepositoryAccessServiceTest.java (1)
31-31: Verify inherited dependencies from the new base classBy changing the base class to
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestand removing several@Autowiredfields (e.g.,userRepository,userUtilService,programmingExerciseRepository,repositoryAccessService,programmingExerciseGradingService), please ensure that these services are properly provided by the new base class. If these dependencies are not inherited or initialized, it could lead toNullPointerExceptionduring test execution.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/BuildPlanIntegrationTest.java (1)
17-17: Update test class to extend new abstract base classThe test class now extends
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest, which aligns with the new test architecture and improves dependency management as outlined in the PR objectives.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/behavioral/BehavioralTestCaseServiceLocalCILocalVCTest.java (1)
15-15: Verify the compatibility of the new base class and class nameThe test class
BehavioralTestCaseServiceLocalCILocalVCTestnow extendsAbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBase(line 28), and the import statement reflects this change (line 15). Please ensure that this new base class provides all the required functionalities and aligns with the intended testing setup for behavioral tests. Additionally, confirm that the class name is descriptive and follows the project's naming conventions for test classes.Also applies to: 28-28
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/CodeHintIntegrationTest.java (2)
16-16: Import statement updated appropriatelyThe import of
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTestaligns with the updated inheritance and is necessary for the test class.
22-22: Verify compatibility with new base classAbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTestThe test class now extends
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTestinstead ofAbstractSpringIntegrationIndependentTest. Ensure that this change maintains the desired test context and that all required beans and configurations are properly initialized. This change might affect the initialization of@Autowiredcomponents or the application context in your tests.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest.java (1)
48-180: Class structure and naming are appropriateThe
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTestclass is well-structured and follows descriptive naming conventions. ExtendingAbstractSpringIntegrationIndependentTestaligns with the project's architecture for integration tests.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/GitlabServiceTest.java (1)
34-34: Extending the appropriate abstract test classThe test class
GitlabServiceTestnow extendsAbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestinstead ofAbstractSpringIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest. This change aligns with the refactoring objectives to improve the test structure and organization.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest.java (1)
173-209: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionEnsure proper use of utility services following the factory pattern
Several utility services are autowired in this test class (e.g.,
CourseUtilService,ExerciseUtilService,UserUtilService). According to the coding guidelines, we should adhere to theutil_service_factory_pattern(util_service_factory_pattern: true) to manage dependencies effectively.Please verify that these utility services are used appropriately within the tests and consider refactoring to instantiate them using a factory pattern if not already done. This approach enhances modularity and reusability, and aligns with best practices.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBase.java (1)
1-1: Ensure package change adheres to architectural guidelinesThe package declaration has been changed from
de.tum.cit.aet.artemis.programming.icltode.tum.cit.aet.artemis.programming. Please verify that this change aligns with the project's package structure and complies with the architectural constraints enforced by ArchUnit tests (archunit_use: enforce_package_rules).src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseRepositoryServiceTest.java (1)
17-17: Verify dependency initialization after changing the base classBy changing the base class from
AbstractSpringIntegrationIndependentTesttoAbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest, ensure that all necessary dependencies and configurations are properly inherited. Since several@Autowiredfields have been removed, please confirm that the new base class provides the required services and that the tests continue to function correctly without additional modifications.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/ProgrammingExerciseTaskIntegrationTest.java (5)
18-18: Appropriate extension ofAbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTestChanging the base class from
AbstractSpringIntegrationIndependentTesttoAbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTestaligns with the refactoring objectives outlined in the PR. This change facilitates better organization of test code for different setups and is consistent with the project's testing architecture.Also applies to: 24-24
Line range hint
117-140: Consider verifying the correctness of task extraction logicThe test
testTaskExtractionForProgrammingExercise()includes complex logic for extracting tasks and associating test cases. Ensure that all possible edge cases are covered, and consider adding assertions to verify the completeness and accuracy of the task extraction process.Would you like assistance in reviewing the test coverage or enhancing the assertions to cover additional scenarios?
142-142: Confirm that empty problem statements are handled correctlyIn
testTaskExtractionForEmptyProblemStatement(), the assertion checks thattaskRepository.findByExerciseId(programmingExercise.getId())is empty. Ensure that this behavior is expected and that the system appropriately handles exercises with empty problem statements without causing unintended side effects.
38-38: EnsuretestCaseRepositoryandprogrammingExerciseSolutionEntryRepositoryare properly initializedThe repositories
testCaseRepositoryandprogrammingExerciseSolutionEntryRepositoryare used but not declared within this class. Verify that these repositories are inherited fromAbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTestor another superclass. If not, they should be declared and initialized to prevent potentialNullPointerException.Run the following script to verify if these repositories are declared in
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest:✅ Verification successful
testCaseRepositoryandprogrammingExerciseSolutionEntryRepositoryare properly initialized through inheritance.No further action is needed.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that 'testCaseRepository' and 'programmingExerciseSolutionEntryRepository' are declared in 'AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest' # Find the file 'AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest.java' file=$(fd 'AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest.java' --type f) # Search for the declarations of the repositories in the file if [[ -n "$file" ]]; then echo "Searching for 'testCaseRepository'..." rg 'protected\s+\w+\s+testCaseRepository;' "$file" echo "Searching for 'programmingExerciseSolutionEntryRepository'..." rg 'protected\s+\w+\s+programmingExerciseSolutionEntryRepository;' "$file" else echo "AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest.java not found" fiLength of output: 1004
80-80: EnsuretaskRepositoryis properly initializedThe
taskRepositoryis used in multiple locations but is not declared within this class. Confirm thattaskRepositoryis inherited fromAbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTestor appropriately declared in this class to prevent any runtime issues.Run the following script to verify if
taskRepositoryis declared inAbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest:Also applies to: 83-83, 117-117, 142-142
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful:
taskRepositoryis properly initialized via inheritance.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that 'taskRepository' is declared in 'AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest' # Find the file 'AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest.java' file=$(fd 'AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest.java' --type f) # Search for the declaration of 'taskRepository' in the file if [[ -n "$file" ]]; then rg 'protected\s+\w+\s+taskRepository;' "$file" else echo "AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest.java not found" fiLength of output: 488
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that 'ProgrammingExerciseTaskIntegrationTest' extends 'AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest' # Find the file 'ProgrammingExerciseTaskIntegrationTest.java' file=$(fd 'ProgrammingExerciseTaskIntegrationTest.java' --type f) # Search for the inheritance declaration if [[ -n "$file" ]]; then rg 'class\s+ProgrammingExerciseTaskIntegrationTest\s+extends\s+AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest' "$file" else echo "ProgrammingExerciseTaskIntegrationTest.java not found" fiLength of output: 589
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/ProgrammingExerciseGitDiffReportIntegrationTest.java (2)
14-14: Import the new abstract test base classThe import of
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBaseis appropriate and aligns with the refactoring efforts to improve test code structure.
24-24: Update the base class to enhance test organizationChanging the base class to
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBasereflects the PR objective of creating tailored abstract test classes for different setups. This change enhances the organization and dependency management within the test code.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/CodeHintServiceTest.java (1)
20-20: Ensure the new superclass provides necessary configurationsBy changing the superclass from
AbstractSpringIntegrationIndependentTesttoAbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest, please verify that all required configurations, beans, and dependencies are correctly set up for the tests. This change may affect the Spring context initialization and the availability of necessary components.Also applies to: 29-29
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/ProgrammingExerciseSolutionEntryIntegrationTest.java (1)
14-14: Update of superclass aligns with refactoring objectivesChanging the superclass to
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTestis appropriate and aligns with the refactoring goals stated in the PR objectives. This change ensures that the test class benefits from the new structure tailored for programming exercises.Also applies to: 21-21
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseTest.java (3)
39-39: Update base class to improve test specificityThe test class now extends
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest, which is more appropriate for programming exercise integration tests involving Jenkins and GitLab. This change enhances the test's alignment with its specific testing context.
139-139: Refactor repository usage totestCaseRepositoryThe repository reference has been updated from
programmingExerciseTestCaseRepositorytotestCaseRepository. This change promotes consistency in dependency management and aligns with the refactoring goals outlined in the PR.
167-169: Consistent use oftestCaseRepositoryfor test casesThe code now uses
testCaseRepositoryto retrieve and save test cases, ensuring consistency across the test class after the refactoring.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/ExerciseHintServiceTest.java (1)
21-29: Update test class to use new abstract test base classChanging the superclass to
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTestand updating the import statement align with the refactoring goals mentioned in the PR objectives. This promotes better test organization and dependency management for programming exercises.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseTemplateIntegrationTest.java (3)
61-61: Verify the Change of Base ClassThe class now extends
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestinstead ofAbstractSpringIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest. Ensure that the new base class provides all the necessary setup and dependencies required for this test. This change might affect the test execution environment and injected services.
Line range hint
218-224: Potential Resource Leak inmoveAssignmentSourcesOfMethodThe method uses
FileUtils.moveDirectory, which can throw anIOException. Ensure that resources are properly closed or handled in case of exceptions.Review the method to ensure that any opened resources are properly closed even if an exception occurs.
Line range hint
243-249: EnumTestResultMight Need Additional Test CasesThe
TestResultenum maps the results fromReportTestCase. Ensure that all possible test case outcomes are accounted for.Add tests to confirm that all possible test results are correctly mapped, especially if
ReportTestCasebehavior changes.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalCIResourceIntegrationTest.java (2)
32-32: Verify the compatibility of the new base classThe test class now imports
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBase(line 32), replacing the previous base class. Ensure that this new base class provides all the necessary configurations and dependencies required for the tests. This change might affect the test setup and execution.To confirm, please run the full test suite and check for any failures or unexpected behavior.
38-38: Ensure the new superclass supports all test requirementsChanging the superclass to
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBase(line 38) may impact inherited methods and test utilities. Verify that all inherited methods function correctly and that no essential functionality from the previous superclass is missing.Consider reviewing the methods provided by the new superclass to ensure they align with the test cases in this class.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/JenkinsServiceTest.java (1)
41-41: Update class inheritance to new abstract test classThe class
JenkinsServiceTestnow extendsAbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest, which aligns with the new test architecture focused on programming exercises. This change improves test setup and organization.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/ProgrammingExerciseFeedbackCreationServiceTest.java (2)
19-19: Import Statement is AppropriateThe added import statement for
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTestis correct and necessary for the new class inheritance.
31-31: Extending the Updated Base Test ClassChanging the base class to
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTestaligns with the refactoring goals and the new test structure.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseServiceIntegrationTest.java (1)
29-29: 💡 Codebase verification
⚠️ Potential issueMissing service declarations in the new superclass
The services
UserUtilService,ExerciseUtilService, andCourseUtilServiceare not declared inAbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest. Please ensure these services are declared either in the superclass or withinProgrammingExerciseServiceIntegrationTestto prevent potentialNullPointerExceptionor compilation errors.🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the accessibility of required services after changing the superclass
Changing the superclass from
AbstractSpringIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTesttoAbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestmay affect the availability of certain services used within this test class. Specifically, services likeuserUtilService,programmingExerciseUtilService,exerciseUtilService,courseUtilService, andpageableSearchUtilServiceare utilized but their declarations are not present in this class anymore.Please ensure that these services are appropriately provided by the new superclass or are declared in this class to prevent
NullPointerExceptionor compilation errors.Run the following script to verify that the required services are accessible through the new superclass:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the required services are declared in the new superclass. # Expected result: Declarations of the services are found in the superclass. # Find the superclass file SUPERCLASS_FILE=$(fd 'AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest.java' src/test/java) if [ -n "$SUPERCLASS_FILE" ]; then echo "Found superclass file: $SUPERCLASS_FILE" echo "Checking for service declarations..." # Check for declarations of the required services rg 'protected\s+UserUtilService\s+userUtilService;' "$SUPERCLASS_FILE" rg 'protected\s+ProgrammingExerciseUtilService\s+programmingExerciseUtilService;' "$SUPERCLASS_FILE" rg 'protected\s+ExerciseUtilService\s+exerciseUtilService;' "$SUPERCLASS_FILE" rg 'protected\s+CourseUtilService\s+courseUtilService;' "$SUPERCLASS_FILE" rg 'protected\s+PageableSearchUtilService\s+pageableSearchUtilService;' "$SUPERCLASS_FILE" else echo "Superclass file not found." fiLength of output: 1645
⛔ Skipped due to learnings
Learnt from: Hialus PR: ls1intum/Artemis#7451 File: src/test/java/de/tum/in/www1/artemis/exercise/programmingexercise/ProgrammingExerciseTestService.java:9-9 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:35:48.767Z Learning: The use of wildcard imports is acceptable in this project as specified in the `.editorconfig` file.Learnt from: Hialus PR: ls1intum/Artemis#7451 File: src/test/java/de/tum/in/www1/artemis/exercise/programmingexercise/ProgrammingExerciseTestService.java:9-9 Timestamp: 2024-01-19T15:49:43.303Z Learning: The use of wildcard imports is acceptable in this project as specified in the `.editorconfig` file.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/ProgrammingExerciseLocalVCLocalCIIntegrationTest.java (2)
35-35: Import updated to reflect new base classThe import statement for
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestis correctly updated to match the new abstract test class.
58-58: Class now extends the appropriate abstract test classThe test class now extends
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest, which aligns with the refactoring to use specialized abstract test classes tailored for different test setups.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/ProgrammingExerciseTaskServiceTest.java (2)
16-16: Verify the impact of changing the superclassThe test class now extends
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTestinstead ofAbstractSpringIntegrationIndependentTest. Please ensure that this change aligns with the intended refactoring objectives and that all necessary configurations, bean injections, and test contexts are correctly handled with the new superclass.Also applies to: 22-22
Line range hint
139-149: Ensure proper cleanup of dependent entitiesWhen deleting a
ProgrammingExerciseTaskthat has associatedCodeHintentities, it's important to ensure all related data is cleanly removed to prevent orphaned records. The code correctly deletes thetaskand checks thatcodeHintRepositoryis empty.However, double-check that cascading deletes or manual cleanup are properly configured to handle any additional related entities that might not be covered.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/ExerciseHintIntegrationTest.java (2)
23-23: Import statement updated appropriatelyThe import of
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTestaligns with the new inheritance structure and supports the refactoring goals.
32-32: Class now extends the correct abstract test classUpdating the class to extend
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTestreflects the intended architectural changes and ensures consistency with the new test framework.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingSubmissionAndResultGitlabJenkinsIntegrationTest.java (1)
41-41: Updated base class aligns with refactored test architectureChanging the base class to
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestaligns the test with the new abstract classes designed for specific test setups. This enhances code organization and maintainability in accordance with the refactoring objectives.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/StructuralTestCaseServiceTest.java (1)
16-16: Refactoring to New Base Test Class ConfirmedThe test class now extends
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBase, and the import statement has been updated accordingly. This change is in line with the PR objectives to create new abstract test classes and enhances the organization of the test code.Also applies to: 28-28
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalCIIntegrationTest.java (3)
58-58: Approved Import ChangeThe addition of the import statement for
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBaseis necessary due to the change in the base class. This aligns with the refactoring objectives mentioned in the PR.
77-77: Update Base Class to Enhance Test ArchitectureChanging the base class to
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBasereflects the new test architecture and improves the organization of integration tests as per the PR objectives.
Line range hint
88-92: Ensure 'localVCUsername' and 'localVCPassword' Are AccessibleIn the
setupAll()method, the variableslocalVCUsernameandlocalVCPasswordare being used but are not declared within this class. Since the@Valueannotations and fields were removed, please verify that these variables are properly inherited from the new base classAbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBaseor defined elsewhere to prevent potentialNullPointerException.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/SubmissionPolicyIntegrationTest.java (5)
34-34: Appropriate superclass change toAbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestChanging the superclass to
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestaligns the test class with the new test architecture. This superclass likely provides the necessary configurations and utility services for programming integration tests with Jenkins and GitLab, streamlining dependencies and adhering to the project's testing framework.
Line range hint
261-261: Check usage ofprogrammingExerciseUtilServiceThe
programmingExerciseUtilServicehas been removed but is still referenced in methods likeaddSubmissionPolicyToExercise:programmingExerciseUtilService.addSubmissionPolicyToExercise(policy, programmingExercise);Ensure that this utility service is accessible through the new superclass or refactor the code to correctly initialize and use the required services.
Run the following script to verify if
programmingExerciseUtilServiceis defined in the class hierarchy:#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if `programmingExerciseUtilService` is defined in a superclass. # Test: Search for the field definition in superclass hierarchy. # Expected: `programmingExerciseUtilService` field should be defined in a superclass. ast-grep --lang java --pattern $'class $_ { $$$ protected ProgrammingExerciseUtilService programmingExerciseUtilService; $$$ }'
Line range hint
271-271: EnsureparticipationUtilServiceis availableThe
participationUtilServiceis still being used in methods likeaddAnySubmissionPolicyToExercise:participationUtilService.addSubmission(participation, submission);Please verify that
participationUtilServiceis properly initialized, possibly via the new superclass, to prevent null references and compilation issues.Run the following script to verify if
participationUtilServiceis defined in the class hierarchy:#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if `participationUtilService` is defined in a superclass. # Test: Search for the field definition in superclass hierarchy. # Expected: `participationUtilService` field should be defined in a superclass. ast-grep --lang java --pattern $'class $_ { $$$ protected ParticipationUtilService participationUtilService; $$$ }'
Line range hint
222-222: Potential undefined references to removed@AutowiredfieldsThe
@Autowiredfields such asprogrammingExerciseRepository,programmingExerciseUtilService,participationUtilService, andgradingServicehave been removed, but methods in the test class still reference them. For example,programmingExerciseRepositoryis used intest_enforceSubmissionPenaltyPolicyOnStudentParticipation:programmingExerciseRepository.save(programmingExercise);Please verify that these dependencies are now provided by the new superclass
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestor adjust the code to access these services appropriately to avoid compilation errors.Run the following script to verify if
programmingExerciseRepositoryis defined in the class hierarchy:
Line range hint
164-164: Verify accessibility ofgradingServiceThe
gradingServicehas been removed but is still used in tests liketest_enforceLockRepositoryPolicyOnStudentParticipation:var result = gradingService.processNewProgrammingExerciseResult(participation, resultRequestBody);Ensure that
gradingServiceis accessible and properly initialized to avoid compilation errors and ensure test correctness.Run the following script to verify if
gradingServiceis defined in the class hierarchy:src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseScheduleServiceTest.java (1)
45-45: Base class updated to new abstract test classThe test class now extends
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationGitlabCIGitlabSamlTestinstead ofAbstractSpringIntegrationGitlabCIGitlabSamlTest. This change aligns with the PR objectives to create new abstract test classes tailored for different test setups, enhancing the organization and maintainability of the test code.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/CourseGitlabJenkinsIntegrationTest.java (2)
Line range hint
29-269: Tests should be small and specificThe test methods in this class delegate to methods in
courseTestService. Ensure that each test is small and specific as per the coding guidelines. Consider whether the delegation is necessary or if the tests can be directly implemented here to improve clarity and maintainability.
24-24: Verify dependency injection after changing the superclassThe class now extends
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestinstead ofAbstractSpringIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest. Ensure that all required beans and services (e.g.,courseTestService,programmingExerciseRepository,objectMapper,programmingExerciseUtilService) are correctly provided by the new superclass or properly instantiated. This change should not affect the functionality of the tests.To confirm that the dependencies are correctly managed, you can check for the declarations of these services in the superclass:
✅ Verification successful
Dependency Injection Verified Successfully
All required services (
CourseTestService,ProgrammingExerciseTestRepository,ObjectMapper,ProgrammingExerciseUtilService) are correctly provided by the new superclassAbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest. The change does not affect the functionality of the tests.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the new superclass provides the necessary services. # Test: Search for field declarations of the required services in the superclass. # Expect: The services should be declared in the superclass. fd 'AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest.java' --type file --exec cat {} \| \ rg --multiline 'protected\s+(CourseTestService|ProgrammingExerciseTestRepository|ObjectMapper|ProgrammingExerciseUtilService)\s+\w+;'Length of output: 301
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the new superclass provides the necessary services. # Test: Search for field declarations of the required services in the superclass. # Expect: The services should be declared in the superclass. fd 'AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest.java' --type file --exec cat {} | \ rg 'protected\s+(CourseTestService|ProgrammingExerciseTestRepository|ObjectMapper|ProgrammingExerciseUtilService)\s+\w+;'Length of output: 457
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest.java (1)
25-25: Verify that dependencies are correctly inherited from the new superclassChanging the superclass to
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestmodifies how dependencies are injected. Ensure that all required services, such asprogrammingExerciseIntegrationTestService, are properly declared and initialized in the new superclass to preventNullPointerExceptionand maintain the functionality of the test methods.Run the following script to verify that
programmingExerciseIntegrationTestServiceis declared in the new superclass:✅ Verification successful
Dependencies are correctly inherited from the new superclass.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that programmingExerciseIntegrationTestService is declared in the superclass. # Expected: The superclass declares programmingExerciseIntegrationTestService. ast-grep --lang java --pattern $' class AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest extends $_ { $$$ protected ProgrammingExerciseIntegrationTestService programmingExerciseIntegrationTestService; $$$ }'Length of output: 343
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that programmingExerciseIntegrationTestService is declared in AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest.java. # Expected: The superclass declares programmingExerciseIntegrationTestService. rg 'protected ProgrammingExerciseIntegrationTestService programmingExerciseIntegrationTestService;' src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest.javaLength of output: 302
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseParticipationIntegrationTest.java (1)
40-40: Change of base class toAbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTestis appropriate.Switching the base class from
AbstractSpringIntegrationIndependentTesttoAbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTestaligns the test class with the new testing strategy outlined in the PR objectives. This enhances the organization of the test code and allows for better management of dependencies, improving maintainability and consistency across programming exercise tests.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingSubmissionIntegrationTest.java (1)
59-59: Class Extension Updated CorrectlyThe test class now extends
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestinstead ofAbstractSpringIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest. This change aligns with the refactoring efforts to enhance the test architecture.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingAssessmentIntegrationTest.java (1)
55-55: Change of base test class aligns with refactoring goalsUpdating the base class from
AbstractSpringIntegrationIndependentTesttoAbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTestenhances test specificity and reflects the refactoring towards better test organization for programming exercises.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/RepositoryIntegrationTest.java (1)
82-82: Verify the impact of changing the base class on test functionality.The class now extends
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestinstead ofAbstractSpringIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest. Ensure that all necessary configurations, dependencies, and initializations required by the tests are provided by the new base class to avoid any unintended side effects.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseTestCaseServiceTest.java (1)
31-31: Update class extension to match new test architectureThe class now extends
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest. Ensure that this change aligns with the new test class hierarchy introduced in the refactoring. Verify that all necessary setup methods and utilities are correctly inherited from the new superclass.Run the following script to confirm that the superclass
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestprovides all required methods and fields:src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/HestiaDatabaseTest.java (14)
13-25: Appropriate extension to the new abstract test classThe class now extends
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest, which aligns with the refactoring objectives to use new abstract test classes for different test setups. This change adheres to the updated testing framework.
62-62: Avoid direct database queries in assertionsPer the coding guidelines (
avoid_db_access: true), direct database queries in tests should be avoided. Consider verifying expected behavior through the service layer or using mocks to assert the test outcomes.
69-69: Duplicate issue regarding direct database accessAs previously noted, please avoid direct database queries in tests. This practice aligns with the guideline to avoid database access in tests (
avoid_db_access: true).
76-76: Duplicate issue regarding direct database accessAs mentioned earlier, tests should not perform direct database queries. Consider using mocks or utility services instead.
88-89: Duplicate issue regarding direct database access in assertionsPlease avoid direct database queries in assertions. Aligning with the coding guidelines will improve test performance and reliability.
96-96: Duplicate issue regarding direct database accessAvoid direct calls to the database in tests. Utilize the appropriate service methods or mocks as per the guidelines.
100-102: Duplicate issue regarding direct database accessDirect database operations in tests should be replaced with utility services or mocked interactions to adhere to the coding standards.
109-109: Duplicate issue regarding direct database accessConsistent with previous comments, avoid direct database queries in tests.
113-113: Duplicate issue regarding direct database accessPlease use utility services or mocks instead of direct database access.
132-132: Duplicate issue regarding direct database accessRemember to avoid direct database interactions in tests as per the guidelines.
142-143: Duplicate issue regarding direct database accessDirect database queries should be avoided in tests. Refer to earlier comments for guidance.
150-153: Duplicate issue regarding direct database accessAvoiding direct database access in tests will help maintain test isolation and speed.
159-160: Duplicate issue regarding direct database accessPlease refrain from direct database operations in tests.
162-162: Duplicate issue regarding direct database accessEnsure consistency with coding guidelines by avoiding direct database queries.
| protected Set<Class<?>> getAbstractModuleIntegrationTestClasses() { | ||
| return Set.of(AbstractAtlasIntegrationTest.class); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
LGTM: Method updated to support multiple abstract test classes.
The change from returning a single Class<AbstractAtlasIntegrationTest> to a Set<Class<?>> allows for greater flexibility in the test architecture, aligning with the PR objectives. The implementation using Set.of() is concise and appropriate.
Consider using a more extensible approach for future additions:
@Override
protected Set<Class<?>> getAbstractModuleIntegrationTestClasses() {
return new HashSet<>(Arrays.asList(
AbstractAtlasIntegrationTest.class
// Add more classes here as needed
));
}This structure will make it easier to add more test classes in the future without changing the method signature.
| protected Set<Class<?>> getAbstractModuleIntegrationTestClasses() { | ||
| return Set.of(AbstractFileUploadIntegrationTest.class); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
LGTM: Method update enhances flexibility. Consider a minor naming improvement.
The changes to the getAbstractModuleIntegrationTestClasses() method improve the flexibility of the test architecture by allowing multiple integration test classes. The implementation is correct and adheres to the coding guidelines.
Consider renaming the method to getAbstractModuleIntegrationTestClassSet() to be more explicit about the return type. This would improve code readability and maintain consistency with Java naming conventions for methods returning collections.
- protected Set<Class<?>> getAbstractModuleIntegrationTestClasses() {
+ protected Set<Class<?>> getAbstractModuleIntegrationTestClassSet() {
return Set.of(AbstractFileUploadIntegrationTest.class);
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| protected Set<Class<?>> getAbstractModuleIntegrationTestClasses() { | |
| return Set.of(AbstractFileUploadIntegrationTest.class); | |
| protected Set<Class<?>> getAbstractModuleIntegrationTestClassSet() { | |
| return Set.of(AbstractFileUploadIntegrationTest.class); |
| @Override | ||
| protected Set<Class<?>> getAbstractModuleIntegrationTestClasses() { | ||
| // @formatter:off | ||
| return Set.of( | ||
| AbstractProgrammingIntegrationGitlabCIGitlabSamlTest.class, | ||
| AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest.class, | ||
| AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest.class, | ||
| AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest.class, | ||
| AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBase.class | ||
| ); | ||
| // @formatter:on | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
LGTM: getAbstractModuleIntegrationTestClasses() method is well-implemented.
The method correctly returns a set of abstract integration test classes for the programming module. The use of Set.of() is an efficient way to create an immutable set, adhering to the util service factory pattern guideline.
Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of each included test class to improve code readability and maintainability. For example:
@Override
protected Set<Class<?>> getAbstractModuleIntegrationTestClasses() {
// @formatter:off
return Set.of(
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationGitlabCIGitlabSamlTest.class, // Tests for GitLab CI with SAML
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest.class, // Independent integration tests
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest.class, // Tests for Jenkins with GitLab
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest.class, // Tests for local CI and VC
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBase.class // Base class for local CI and VC tests
);
// @formatter:on
}|
|
||
| @Autowired | ||
| private ConsistencyCheckTestService consistencyCheckTestService; | ||
| class ConsistencyCheckGitlabJenkinsIntegrationTest extends AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
LGTM! Consider adding a brief class-level Javadoc.
The change to extend AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest aligns with the PR objectives of refactoring the test structure. The removal of the @Autowired annotation suggests that dependency injection is now handled in the superclass, which is a good practice for reducing duplication.
To further improve the code:
Consider adding a brief class-level Javadoc comment to describe the purpose of this test class and its relationship to the new abstract test hierarchy.
|
|
||
| class LocalVCServiceTest extends AbstractSpringIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest { | ||
| class LocalVCServiceTest extends AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Issues Found: Missing @Autowired Annotations in New Base Class
The new base class AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest does not contain any @Autowired annotations. This suggests that dependencies previously managed by @Autowired in LocalVCServiceTest may no longer be injected, potentially leading to test failures or incomplete setups.
- File Affected:
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest.java
Please verify that dependency injection is correctly handled in the new base class to ensure all tests function as expected.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM: Class extension updated and dependencies simplified.
The change to extend AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest aligns with the PR objectives to refactor and improve the organization of test code. The removal of @Autowired fields suggests that these dependencies are now managed in the new base class, which should simplify the test setup.
To ensure that the refactoring hasn't inadvertently affected test coverage, please run the following command:
To ensure that the new base class AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest properly manages dependencies, please run the following command:
To confirm that the @Autowired annotations are present in the new base class AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest, please execute the following command:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify test coverage for LocalVCServiceTest
# Test: Check if all test methods are still present and being executed
rg --type java -n "void test" src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalVCServiceTest.java
# Test: Verify that the new base class contains the necessary setup
ast-grep --lang java --pattern 'class AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest {
$$$
@Autowired
$$$
}'
Length of output: 494
Script:
#
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify @Autowired annotations in AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest
# Locate the file defining the new base class
fd --type f --search-path src/test/java "AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest.java" | while read -r file; do
ast-grep --lang java --pattern 'class AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest {
$$$
@Autowired
$$$
}' "$file"
done
Length of output: 355
Script:
#
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify presence of @Autowired annotations in AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest
# Locate and search for @Autowired in the new base class
rg "@Autowired" $(fd --type f --search-path src/test/java "AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest.java")
Length of output: 500
| @@ -394,7 +357,7 @@ | |||
| submission.setCommitHash(TestConstants.COMMIT_HASH_STRING); | |||
| submission.setType(SubmissionType.MANUAL); | |||
| submission = programmingExerciseUtilService.addProgrammingSubmission(exercise, submission, TEST_PREFIX + "student1"); | |||
| var optionalParticipation = programmingExerciseStudentParticipationRepository.findById(submission.getParticipation().getId()); | |||
| var optionalParticipation = participationRepository.findById(submission.getParticipation().getId()); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Avoid Direct Database Access in Tests
The test accesses the database directly using participationRepository.findById(...). According to the coding guidelines, tests should avoid direct DB access. Consider using utility services or mocks instead to manage participations.
Apply this refactor:
-var optionalParticipation = participationRepository.findById(submission.getParticipation().getId());
+var participation = participationUtilService.findParticipationById(submission.getParticipation().getId());Note: Use the appropriate method from participationUtilService to retrieve the participation without direct DB access.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| @@ -1011,7 +965,7 @@ void overrideProgrammingAssessmentAfterComplaint() throws Exception { | |||
| void unlockFeedbackRequestAfterAssessment() throws Exception { | |||
| programmingExercise.setAllowFeedbackRequests(true); | |||
| programmingExercise.setDueDate(ZonedDateTime.now().plusDays(1)); | |||
| exerciseRepository.save(programmingExercise); | |||
| programmingExerciseRepository.save(programmingExercise); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid direct database access in tests
According to the coding guidelines (avoid_db_access: true), tests should minimize direct interactions with the database. The call to programmingExerciseRepository.save(programmingExercise); introduces a database operation. Consider using test utilities or mocks to manage the programmingExercise state within the test context.
| @@ -1081,7 +1027,7 @@ void testCommitChangesNotAllowedForLockedParticipation() throws Exception { | |||
| programmingExercise.setReleaseDate(ZonedDateTime.now().minusHours(2)); | |||
| programmingExercise.setDueDate(ZonedDateTime.now().minusHours(1)); | |||
| programmingExerciseRepository.save(programmingExercise); | |||
| this.programmingExerciseStudentParticipationRepository.updateLockedById(participation.getId(), true); | |||
| participationRepository.updateLockedById(participation.getId(), true); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid direct repository access in tests; use service methods to update participation lock status.
According to the coding guidelines, tests should avoid direct database access and use service layer methods instead. Replace the direct call to participationRepository.updateLockedById(...) with an appropriate service method to maintain consistency and adhere to best practices.
Apply this diff to address the issue:
- participationRepository.updateLockedById(participation.getId(), true);
+ programmingExerciseParticipationService.lockStudentRepositoryAndParticipation(programmingExercise, participation);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| participationRepository.updateLockedById(participation.getId(), true); | |
| programmingExerciseParticipationService.lockStudentRepositoryAndParticipation(programmingExercise, participation); |
| @@ -1104,7 +1050,7 @@ | |||
| programmingExercise.setReleaseDate(ZonedDateTime.now().minusHours(2)); | |||
| programmingExercise.setDueDate(ZonedDateTime.now().minusHours(1)); | |||
| programmingExerciseRepository.save(programmingExercise); | |||
| this.programmingExerciseStudentParticipationRepository.updateLockedById(participation.getId(), true); | |||
| participationRepository.updateLockedById(participation.getId(), true); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid direct repository access in tests; use service methods to update participation lock status.
Consistent with the coding guidelines to avoid direct database access in tests, replace the call to participationRepository.updateLockedById(...) with a service method. This ensures the test respects the service layer abstraction and maintains maintainability.
Apply this diff to correct the code:
- participationRepository.updateLockedById(participation.getId(), true);
+ programmingExerciseParticipationService.lockStudentRepositoryAndParticipation(programmingExercise, participation);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| participationRepository.updateLockedById(participation.getId(), true); | |
| programmingExerciseParticipationService.lockStudentRepositoryAndParticipation(programmingExercise, participation); |
| @@ -72,7 +39,7 @@ ProgrammingExerciseTask addTaskToProgrammingExercise(String taskName) { | |||
| var task = new ProgrammingExerciseTask(); | |||
| task.setTaskName(taskName); | |||
| task.setExercise(programmingExerciseRepository.getReferenceById(programmingExerciseId)); | |||
| task = programmingExerciseTaskRepository.save(task); | |||
| task = taskRepository.save(task); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid direct database access in tests
According to the coding guidelines (avoid_db_access: true), tests should avoid direct database access. Instead of directly calling taskRepository.save(task);, consider using utility services or factory methods to handle data operations, adhering to the utility service factory pattern (util_service_factory_pattern: true).
WalkthroughThe pull request primarily updates the class and method signatures across various test files to streamline the architecture of integration tests. This includes the introduction of new abstract classes and the modification of existing classes to extend from these new abstractions. Additionally, certain fields have been removed from several test classes to simplify the structure. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 52
🧹 Outside diff range comments (60)
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/SharedQueueManagementServiceTest.java (1)
Line range hint
16-49: Ensure full compliance with coding guidelines.The test method
testPushDockerImageCleanupInfolargely adheres to the coding guidelines:
- It has a descriptive name and is small and specific.
- It uses fixed data for testing.
- It correctly uses
assertThatfor assertions with good specificity.However, consider the following improvements to fully align with the guidelines:
- Utilize JUnit 5 features where applicable (e.g.,
@DisplayName,@Nestedfor grouping related tests).- Implement ArchUnit tests to enforce package rules, if not done elsewhere.
- Add DB query count tracking to monitor performance, if relevant to this test.
- Ensure the util service factory pattern is used for creating test data, if applicable.
- Verify that DB access is avoided in favor of mocking, if possible.
- Consider using static mocks as per the mocking strategy guideline.
- Minimize context restarts to improve test performance, if relevant.
Would you like assistance in implementing any of these suggestions?
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseServiceTest.java (1)
Action Required: Incomplete Test Setup Refactoring
The simplification of the
initmethod removed service calls but the test class still utilizesuserUtilService,programmingExerciseUtilService, andexerciseUtilService. This indicates that some necessary setup steps may not have been fully refactored, potentially affecting the reliability of the tests.
- Files to Review:
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseServiceTest.java🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
21-33: Verify completeness of test setup after simplification.The simplification of the
initmethod by removing service calls and directly usingprogrammingExerciseRepositoryis a good change that aligns with our test setup guidelines. However, please verify that all necessary setup steps for the test cases in this class are still being performed, either in this method or in the parent class.To ensure the completeness of the test setup, please run the following script:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that removed setup steps are handled in the parent class or are no longer necessary. # Test: Check for the presence of removed setup steps in the parent class ast-grep --lang java --pattern 'class AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest { $$$ @BeforeEach $$$ userUtilService.addUsers($$$); $$$ programmingExerciseUtilService.addCourseWithOneProgrammingExercise(); $$$ exerciseUtilService.getFirstExerciseWithType($$$); $$$ }' # Test: Check for any remaining usages of the removed services in this test class rg --type java 'userUtilService|programmingExerciseUtilService|exerciseUtilService' src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseServiceTest.javaLength of output: 1056
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalVCServiceTest.java (1)
Line range hint
1-58: Overall, the changes improve test architecture and maintainability.The refactoring of
LocalVCServiceTestaligns well with the PR objectives. By extending the new abstract class and removing unnecessary dependencies, the test becomes more focused and potentially more maintainable. The preservation of existing test methods suggests that the functionality remains intact.However, to ensure the refactoring hasn't introduced any regressions:
- Verify that all tests still pass after these changes.
- Confirm that the new abstract class (
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest) provides all necessary setup and utilities previously supplied by the removed@Autowiredfields.- Consider adding a comment explaining the rationale behind this architectural change for future maintainers.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/fileupload/AbstractFileUploadIntegrationTest.java (1)
Line range hint
24-85: Consider breaking down this large abstract class for better maintainability.While the change to make this class abstract is good, the class itself contains a large number of autowired components. This might violate the Single Responsibility Principle and make the class harder to maintain.
Consider breaking this abstract class into smaller, more focused abstract classes. For example:
BaseFileUploadRepositoryTestfor repository-related componentsBaseFileUploadServiceTestfor service-related componentsBaseFileUploadUtilTestfor utility-related componentsThis refactoring would improve maintainability and allow for more granular test class inheritance.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/PlantUmlIntegrationTest.java (1)
Line range hint
29-93: LGTM! Consider extracting test data to constants.The test methods adhere well to the coding guidelines and best practices for integration testing. They are descriptive, specific, use fixed data, leverage JUnit 5 features, use appropriate assertions, and follow the recommended mocking strategy.
To further improve maintainability, consider extracting the test data (e.g.,
UML_DIAGRAM_STRING,UML_SVG,UML_PNG) to private static final fields at the class level. This would centralize the test data management and make it easier to update if needed.Here's an example of how you could refactor the test data:
private static final String UML_DIAGRAM_STRING = "@somePlantUml"; private static final String UML_SVG = "foobar"; private static final byte[] UML_PNG = new byte[] { 3, 4, 2, 1 };src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/JenkinsJobServiceTest.java (1)
Verify test isolation after removal of user setup.
The call to
userUtilService.addUsers(TEST_PREFIX, 1, 0, 0, 0);has been removed from theinitTestCasemethod. However, global search results indicate thatuserUtilService.addUsersis still extensively used across multiple test classes. This change may impact test isolation and reliability.Please ensure that:
- All necessary user setups are still performed within each affected test class.
- If centralizing user setup was intended, implement it in a shared base class to maintain consistency and proper test isolation.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
42-54: Verify test isolation after removal of user setup.The call to
userUtilService.addUsers(TEST_PREFIX, 1, 0, 0, 0);has been removed from theinitTestCasemethod. This change suggests that user setup is now handled differently, possibly in the new abstract base classAbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest.To ensure test isolation is maintained, please verify:
- The new base class or another mechanism is handling the necessary user setup.
- These tests don't rely on specific user data that was previously set up in this method.
Run the following script to check if user setup is handled in the new base class:
If no results are found, consider adding appropriate user setup to maintain test isolation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for user setup in AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest # Test: Search for user setup methods in the new base class ast-grep --lang java --pattern $'class AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest { $$$ $_($$) { $$$ userUtilService.addUsers($$$) $$$ } $$$ }'Length of output: 293
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for user setup in AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest using ripgrep rg 'userUtilService\.addUsers' src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest.javaLength of output: 292
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Globally search for user setup calls in the codebase rg 'userUtilService\.addUsers'Length of output: 33550
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/IdePreferencesIntegrationTest.java (1)
tearDown()Method Still ContainsdeleteAll()CallsThe
tearDownmethod inIdePreferencesIntegrationTest.javastill includesdeleteAll()calls foruserIdeMappingRepositoryandideRepository. This indicates that the intended removal was not fully implemented.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/IdePreferencesIntegrationTest.javalines 18-28🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
41-44: Verify cleanup process after removing repository deletions.The removal of
deleteAll()calls in thetearDownmethod is consistent with the earlier changes. However, it's crucial to ensure that proper cleanup is still performed after each test to maintain test isolation.Please confirm that the cleanup process is handled appropriately, possibly in the parent class. Run the following script to verify:
Please run the following scripts to verify the cleanup process more effectively:
Please run the following scripts to gather additional information about the cleanup process:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for cleanup methods in the parent class or other mechanisms # Test: Check for cleanup methods in AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest ast-grep --lang java --pattern 'class AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest { $$$ @AfterEach void $_($$_) { $$$ } $$$ }' # Test: Check for any other cleanup mechanisms in the test class rg -U --type java '@AfterEach|@After|cleanup|clear|reset' src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/IdePreferencesIntegrationTest.javaLength of output: 522
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for cleanup methods in the parent class or other mechanisms, excluding files with encoding issues # Find all Java files excluding those with known encoding issues fd --type file --extension java --exclude 'EncodingISO_8559_1.java' -x ast-grep --lang java --pattern 'class AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest { $$$ @AfterEach void $_($$_) { $$$ } $$$ }' # Corrected rg command to search for cleanup mechanisms in the test class rg -U --type java '@AfterEach|@After|cleanup|clear|reset' src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/IdePreferencesIntegrationTest.javaLength of output: 372
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for all cleanup-related methods across the test suite # 1. Find all methods annotated with @AfterEach or @After fd --type file --extension java -E 'EncodingISO_8559_1.java' | xargs ast-grep --lang java --pattern ' @AfterEach void $_($$_) { $$$ } ' fd --type file --extension java -E 'EncodingISO_8559_1.java' | xargs ast-grep --lang java --pattern ' @After void $_($$_) { $$$ } ' # 2. Search for methods with names that suggest cleanup actions fd --type file --extension java -E 'EncodingISO_8559_1.java' | xargs rg -U -A 2 'void\s+(cleanup|reset|tearDown)\s*\(' # 3. Search for custom cleanup annotations fd --type file --extension java -E 'EncodingISO_8559_1.java' | xargs ast-grep --lang java --pattern ' @$_CustomCleanupAnnotation void $_($$_) { $$$ } 'Length of output: 47708
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/JenkinsJobPermissionServiceTest.java (1)
Line range hint
41-115: LGTM! Consider enhancing test coverage and performance tracking.The test methods are well-structured and align with the coding guidelines. They use descriptive names, focus on specific scenarios, utilize JUnit 5 features, and employ static mocks as recommended.
Suggestions for improvement:
- Consider adding tests to track DB query count for performance monitoring, as per the
db_query_count_tests: track_performanceguideline.- If not already implemented in the base class, consider adding ArchUnit tests to enforce package rules (
archunit_use: enforce_package_rules).To implement DB query count tracking, you could add a test method similar to:
@Test @WithMockUser(username = TEST_PREFIX + "student1") void testAddPermissionsForUsersToFolderDBQueryCount() { String folderName = "JenkinsFolder"; Set<JenkinsJobPermission> permissions = JenkinsJobPermission.getTeachingAssistantPermissions(); Set<String> logins = Set.of(TEST_PREFIX + "ta1"); jenkinsRequestMockProvider.mockGetFolderConfig(folderName); TestTransaction.flagForCommit(); int queryCount = TestEntityManager.getEntityManager().getEntityManagerFactory() .getStatistics().getPrepareStatementCount(); jenkinsJobPermissionsService.addPermissionsForUsersToFolder(logins, folderName, permissions); TestTransaction.end(); int newQueryCount = TestEntityManager.getEntityManager().getEntityManagerFactory() .getStatistics().getPrepareStatementCount(); assertThat(newQueryCount - queryCount).isLessThanOrEqualTo(expectedQueryCount); }Replace
expectedQueryCountwith the appropriate value for your use case.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseResultJenkinsIntegrationTest.java (3)
Line range hint
33-39: Setup method refactored to align with util_service_factory_pattern.The removal of the
@Autowiredannotation and direct usage ofprogrammingExerciseResultTestServicealigns with the util_service_factory_pattern guideline. This change improves the test structure and reduces dependency on Spring's autowiring.Consider adding a comment explaining how
programmingExerciseResultTestServiceis now being initialized or managed, to improve code readability.
Line range hint
41-44: TearDown method updated for consistency with setup changes.The
tearDown()method has been updated to directly useprogrammingExerciseResultTestService, consistent with the changes in thesetup()method. The addition ofthrows Exceptionimproves error handling.Consider adding a comment explaining the potential exceptions that might be thrown during teardown, to improve code maintainability.
Line range hint
46-219: Ensure all test methods adhere to coding guidelines.The test methods generally follow good practices, but consider the following improvements to fully align with the coding guidelines:
- Utilize more JUnit 5 features (junit5_features: true). For example, consider using
@ParameterizedTestfor similar test cases with different inputs.- Ensure that all assertions use
assertThatand are specific (assert_specificity: true).- Verify that these tests are not directly accessing the database (avoid_db_access: true). If DB access is necessary, consider mocking or using in-memory databases for testing.
- Add tests to track query count and performance (db_query_count_tests: track_performance) if not already present in the base class.
- Consider using static mocks where appropriate (mock_strategy: static_mocks).
These changes will enhance the test suite's alignment with the project's coding guidelines and improve overall test quality.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/BuildLogEntryServiceTest.java (1)
Line range hint
374-388: LGTM: Well-designed helper methods.These
convertToBuildLogsmethods are well-implemented and make good use of Java 8+ features. They provide flexibility in creating test data, which is beneficial for maintaining and extending tests.For improved readability, consider using method references more consistently. For example, you could refactor the last method like this:
- private List<BuildLogEntry> convertToBuildLogs(Stream<String> content) { - return content.map(text -> new BuildLogEntry(ZonedDateTime.now(), text)).collect(Collectors.toCollection(ArrayList::new)); - } + private List<BuildLogEntry> convertToBuildLogs(Stream<String> content) { + return content.map(this::createBuildLogEntry).collect(Collectors.toCollection(ArrayList::new)); + } + + private BuildLogEntry createBuildLogEntry(String text) { + return new BuildLogEntry(ZonedDateTime.now(), text); + }This change would make the code more consistent with the functional programming style used elsewhere in the class.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/SubmissionPolicyIntegrationTest.java (2)
Line range hint
458-523: Well-structured helper methods and SubmissionPolicyBuilder.The private helper methods and the
SubmissionPolicyBuilderinner record are well-organized and promote code reuse within the test class. This structure enhances readability and maintainability of the tests.Consider extracting the
SubmissionPolicyBuilderto a separate file in the test package. This would allow its reuse in other test classes if needed and improve the overall organization of the test code. For example:// In a new file: src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/util/SubmissionPolicyBuilder.java package de.tum.cit.aet.artemis.programming.util; public record SubmissionPolicyBuilder(SubmissionPolicy policy) { // ... (existing methods) } // In SubmissionPolicyIntegrationTest.java import de.tum.cit.aet.artemis.programming.util.SubmissionPolicyBuilder; // ... (rest of the test class)This change would make the
SubmissionPolicyBuildermore accessible and potentially reusable across different test classes.
Line range hint
1-523: Overall improvement in test structure and organization.The changes in this file, including the removal of @Autowired fields and the change in base class, appear to be part of a larger refactoring effort to improve the organization and structure of the test code. The test coverage remains comprehensive, and the helper methods are well-structured.
Consider adding a class-level JavaDoc comment to explain the purpose of this test class and any significant changes made during the refactoring. This would help other developers understand the context and reasons for the current structure. For example:
/** * Integration tests for SubmissionPolicy functionality in Programming Exercises. * <p> * This test class has been refactored to use AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest * as its base class, centralizing common setup and utility methods for programming exercise tests. * Direct @Autowired dependencies have been removed in favor of using methods provided by the base class. */ class SubmissionPolicyIntegrationTest extends AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest { // ... (rest of the class) }This documentation would provide valuable context for future maintainers of the test suite.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/atlas/learningpath/LearningPathIntegrationTest.java (1)
Line range hint
1-1010: Overall compliance with coding guidelinesThe test file generally adheres to the provided coding guidelines. Here are some observations:
- Test naming is descriptive, following the guideline.
- JUnit 5 features are used throughout the file.
- AssertThat is consistently used for assertions.
- Nested test classes are used for better organization.
However, there are a few areas where improvements could be made:
- Some test methods are quite long and could potentially be split into smaller, more focused tests.
- Consider adding more specific assertions in some test methods to improve test clarity.
Consider reviewing longer test methods for potential refactoring into smaller, more focused tests to improve maintainability and readability.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseBuildPlanTest.java (3)
Line range hint
25-27: Address the usage ofprogrammingExerciseRepositorywithout declarationIn the test methods
testGetBuildPlanSuccess,testGetBuildPlanInvalidSecret, andtestGetBuildPlanInvalidExerciseId, theprogrammingExerciseRepositoryis used but is no longer declared as a field in this class. If the repository is not provided by the new base class, consider adding it back to ensure the tests function correctly.Apply this diff to reintroduce the
programmingExerciseRepositoryfield:+ @Autowired + private ProgrammingExerciseTestRepository programmingExerciseRepository;Also applies to: 33-35, 41-43
Line range hint
17-19: Minimize direct database access in testsPer the coding guidelines (
avoid_db_access: true), consider reducing direct database interactions in your tests. In theinit()method, the use ofprogrammingExerciseUtilService.addCourseWithOneProgrammingExercise()andexerciseUtilService.getFirstExerciseWithType()may involve database access. Evaluate the possibility of using mocks or test factories to provide the necessary data without relying on the database.
Line range hint
24-47: Enhance test method names for clarity and descriptivenessAccording to the coding guidelines (
test_naming: descriptive), consider renaming your test methods to more clearly convey their purpose:
testGetBuildPlanSuccess→shouldReturnBuildPlanWhenSecretIsValidtestGetBuildPlanInvalidSecret→shouldReturnForbiddenWhenSecretIsInvalidtestGetBuildPlanInvalidExerciseId→shouldReturnBadRequestWhenExerciseIdIsInvalidsrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/connectors/jenkins/build_plan/JenkinsPipelineScriptCreatorTest.java (2)
Line range hint
23-31: Refactor initialization logic using superclass utilitiesConsider refactoring the
init()method to leverage any setup utilities provided byAbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest. This can reduce code duplication and enhance maintainability.For example, if the superclass offers a method to create and save a
ProgrammingExercise, you can use it instead of manually setting up and saving the exercise.
Line range hint
36-57: Avoid direct repository access in test methodsAccessing repositories directly in test methods (e.g.,
buildPlanRepository.findByProgrammingExercises_IdWithProgrammingExercises(...)) goes against the guideline to minimize direct database interactions in tests.Consider the following alternatives:
- Use service methods: Interact with the data layer through service methods that encapsulate repository access.
- Mock repository interactions: If appropriate, use static mocks to simulate repository behavior without hitting the actual database.
This approach aligns with the mock strategy of using static mocks and helps to keep tests focused and performant.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/TestwiseCoverageIntegrationTest.java (1)
Line range hint
38-46: Refactor to remove direct repository usage in test setupIn the
setup()method, repositories are directly used to save entities:
solutionEntryRepository.findWithEagerResultsAndSubmissionsByProgrammingExerciseId(...)programmingSubmissionRepository.save(...)This direct interaction with the database should be avoided in tests per the coding guidelines.
Refactor the setup to use test utilities or mocks that provide the necessary data without direct database access. For example, utilize methods from
programmingExerciseUtilServiceor create in-memory data structures.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseTestCaseServiceTest.java (3)
Line range hint
37-43: Potential NullPointerException due to undefined services insetUpmethodIn the
setUpmethod, services such asuserUtilService,programmingExerciseUtilService,exerciseUtilService, andprogrammingExerciseRepositoryare used but not declared in this class. Ensure these services are properly inherited from the new superclass or declared in this class to preventNullPointerException.If these services are not available after the superclass change, consider injecting them or adjusting the test setup to include them.
Line range hint
55-58: EnsureparticipationUtilServiceandtestCaseRepositoryare accessibleWithin the
testResetTestCasesmethod,participationUtilServiceandtestCaseRepositoryare utilized but are not defined within this class. Verify that these services are inherited fromAbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestor properly injected to avoid runtime errors.
Line range hint
100-127: Verify access tofeedbackCreationServiceinshouldAllowTestCaseWeightSumZeroThe method
shouldAllowTestCaseWeightSumZerousesfeedbackCreationService, which is not declared in this class. Ensure thatfeedbackCreationServiceis inherited or otherwise accessible to avoid issues during test execution.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseGitIntegrationTest.java (2)
Line range hint
46-46: Avoid Direct Database Access in TestsAccording to the coding guidelines (
avoid_db_access: true), tests should avoid direct database access. The call toprogrammingExerciseRepository.findWithEagerStudentParticipationsById(...)in theinitTestCase()method directly accesses the database. Consider mocking the repository method or using predefined test data to avoid direct interaction with the database.
Line range hint
70-72: Ensure Test Size Is Small and SpecificPer the coding guidelines (
test_size: small_specific), test methods should focus on specific functionalities. ThetestCombineTemplateRepositoryCommits()method performs multiple operations, including initializing repositories, pushing commits, and verifying commit counts. Consider splitting this test into smaller, more focused tests to improve readability and maintainability.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/ProgrammingExerciseGitDiffReportServiceTest.java (5)
Line range hint
33-39: Update test setup to use base class utilitiesIn the
initTestCase()method, replace the calls to the removed services with the base class utilities:
- Use
database.addUsers(TEST_PREFIX, 1, 1, 1, 1);instead ofuserUtilService.addUsers(...).- Use
exercise = programmingExercise;assumingprogrammingExerciseis initialized in the base class.This ensures that the test setup aligns with the utilities provided by
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBase.
Line range hint
49-112: Resolve undefined references tohestiaUtilTestService,reportService, andreportRepositoryThe fields
hestiaUtilTestService,reportService, andreportRepositoryhave been removed but are still used in your test methods. This will result in compilation errors.
- Replace
hestiaUtilTestServicemethod calls with equivalent methods from the base class or initialize it appropriately.- Access
reportServiceandreportRepositorythrough the base class if available, or mock them using a mocking framework like Mockito.
Line range hint
49-112: Mock services to adhere to the static mock strategyPer the coding guideline
mock_strategy: static_mocks, consider mocking external services and repositories used in your tests.Use static mocks for
reportServiceandreportRepositoryto improve test isolation and reduce dependencies on actual implementations.
Line range hint
113-128: Avoid direct database access in testsThe test method
ensureDeletionOfDuplicateReports()directly interacts with the database viareportRepository.save()andreportRepository.findByProgrammingExerciseId(). According to the coding guidelineavoid_db_access: true, tests should avoid direct database operations.Consider mocking the
reportRepositoryand simulate its behavior within the test. This will help to isolate the test logic and comply with the testing guidelines.
Line range hint
113-128: Ensure test methods are self-contained and minimize context restartsTo adhere to
context_restart_minimize: true, ensure that your tests do not require unnecessary context reloads, which can slow down the test suite.Review your test configurations and annotations to confirm that context restarts are minimized between tests.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBase.java (1)
Line range hint
173-192: Avoid direct database access in tests; use mocks or test utilities insteadPer the coding guidelines, tests should avoid accessing the database directly to improve performance and maintain test isolation. The
initUsersAndExercisemethod performs database operations such as adding users and saving entities. Consider using mocks or test utility patterns to set up test data without interacting with the database.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalCIServiceTest.java (5)
Line range hint
45-51:hazelcastInstanceandsharedQueueProcessingServicemay not be initializedThe
@Autowiredfields forhazelcastInstanceandsharedQueueProcessingServicehave been removed, but they are still used in thesetUp()method. This may lead toNullPointerExceptionif these fields are not initialized elsewhere.Consider re-adding the autowiring or updating the code to properly initialize these dependencies.
+@Autowired +@Qualifier("hazelcastInstance") +private HazelcastInstance hazelcastInstance; + +@Autowired +private SharedQueueProcessingService sharedQueueProcessingService;
Line range hint
61-66:hazelcastInstanceandsharedQueueProcessingServiceusage intearDown()Similar to the
setUp()method, thetearDown()method relies onhazelcastInstanceandsharedQueueProcessingService, which may not be initialized due to the removal of the@Autowiredannotations.Ensure these services are properly initialized before use or modify the methods to avoid using uninitialized fields.
+@Autowired +@Qualifier("hazelcastInstance") +private HazelcastInstance hazelcastInstance; + +@Autowired +private SharedQueueProcessingService sharedQueueProcessingService;
Line range hint
105-121: Consider removing unnecessarynullchecksIn the
testRecreateBuildPlanForExercise()method, the exercise is checked fornullat the end with a comment indicating that the method does not throw an exception when the exercise isnull. If it's intended for the method to handlenullvalues, consider adding a proper test case to assert this behavior.Add a test to explicitly check the behavior when
exerciseisnull.@Test void testRecreateBuildPlanForNullExercise() { // Ensure no exception is thrown when exercise is null assertThatCode(() -> continuousIntegrationService.recreateBuildPlansForExercise(null)).doesNotThrowAnyException(); }
Line range hint
123-134: InitializescriptCacheproperly intestGetScriptForWithoutCache()The
scriptCacheis re-initialized usingnew ConcurrentHashMap<>(). Ensure that this does not interfere with other tests by affecting shared state. It might be better to use dependency injection or mock thebuildScriptProviderService.Consider using a fresh instance of
buildScriptProviderServiceor resetting thescriptCacheappropriately to avoid side effects.
Line range hint
136-150: Re-evaluate the need for empty method overrides intestUnsupportedMethods()The method
testUnsupportedMethods()calls several methods that do nothing or return default values. If these methods are not supported, consider adding@Disabledannotations or removing the test if it's not providing value.If the intent is to document unsupported methods, add comments explaining why they are unsupported.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/ProgrammingExerciseGitDiffReportIntegrationTest.java (2)
Line range hint
48-49: Prevent potentialNullPointerExceptionby initializing used services.The methods are invoking
hestiaUtilTestServiceandreportService, but without proper initialization, these references arenull. This will cause aNullPointerExceptionduring test execution.Ensure that
hestiaUtilTestServiceandreportServiceare initialized before use. Depending on your testing framework and the changes in the base class, you might:
- Access the services from the application context.
- Inject the services in the setup method if they are provided by the base class.
- Reintroduce the
@Autowiredannotations as shown previously.Verify that all dependencies are correctly set up to maintain test integrity.
Also applies to: 52-52, 60-61, 64-64, 72-73, 76-76, 80-81, 84-84, 88-89, 92-92, 96-97, 100-100, 104-105, 108-108
Line range hint
48-108: Avoid direct database access in tests as per coding guidelines.The test methods seem to interact with the database through service calls, which might violate the guideline
avoid_db_access: true. Direct database access can slow down tests and make them less reliable.Consider mocking database interactions or using in-memory databases to comply with the guidelines. Utilize static mocks (
mock_strategy: static_mocks) to simulate database operations, and ensure that the tests remain fast and isolated.Would you like assistance in refactoring these tests to minimize direct database access?
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/CodeHintServiceTest.java (1)
Line range hint
29-246: Refactor Tests to Avoid Direct Database AccessAccording to the coding guidelines (
avoid_db_access: true), tests should minimize direct database interactions to improve performance and maintainability. Consider refactoring the test setup to use mocking or test utilities instead of direct repository calls.Apply the following changes to use test utilities or mocks:
- private ProgrammingExerciseTestCase addTestCaseToExercise(String name) { - var testCase = new ProgrammingExerciseTestCase(); - testCase.setTestName(name); - testCase.setExercise(exercise); - // Additional setup... - return testCaseRepository.save(testCase); - } + // Use utility service to create test case without direct database access + private ProgrammingExerciseTestCase addTestCaseToExercise(String name) { + return programmingExerciseUtilService.createTestCaseForExercise(exercise, name); + }This approach reduces database dependencies in tests and adheres to the project's coding guidelines.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/ProgrammingExerciseSolutionEntryIntegrationTest.java (1)
Line range hint
167-173: Correct the test: 'testUpdateSolutionEntryWithInvalidId' uses valid IDsThe test method
testUpdateSolutionEntryWithInvalidIdis intended to verify the behavior when an invalid solution entry ID is used. However, it currently uses a validentryIdand expectsHttpStatus.OK, which is identical to thetestUpdateSolutionEntrymethod.To properly test the invalid ID scenario, update the
entryIdto an invalid value (e.g.,Long.MAX_VALUE) and expect an error response such asHttpStatus.NOT_FOUND.Apply this diff to correct the test:
void testUpdateSolutionEntryWithInvalidId() throws Exception { ProgrammingExerciseTestCase testCase = testCaseRepository.findByExerciseIdWithSolutionEntries(programmingExercise.getId()).stream().findFirst().orElseThrow(); ProgrammingExerciseSolutionEntry entry = testCase.getSolutionEntries().stream().findFirst().orElseThrow(); - Long entryId = entry.getId(); + Long entryId = Long.MAX_VALUE; String updatedFilePath = "NewPath.java"; entry.setFilePath(updatedFilePath); - request.put("/api/programming-exercises/" + programmingExercise.getId() + "/test-cases/" + testCase.getId() + "/solution-entries/" + entryId, entry, HttpStatus.OK); + request.put("/api/programming-exercises/" + programmingExercise.getId() + "/test-cases/" + testCase.getId() + "/solution-entries/" + entryId, entry, HttpStatus.NOT_FOUND); - Optional<ProgrammingExerciseSolutionEntry> entryAfterUpdate = programmingExerciseSolutionEntryRepository.findById(entryId); - assertThat(entryAfterUpdate).isPresent(); - assertThat(entryAfterUpdate.get().getFilePath()).isEqualTo(updatedFilePath); }src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalCIResourceIntegrationTest.java (7)
Line range hint
54-54: Undefined variablesharedQueueProcessingServicedue to removed dependencyThe
sharedQueueProcessingServiceis used here, but the@Autowired SharedQueueProcessingService sharedQueueProcessingService;field has been removed. This will result in a compilation error becausesharedQueueProcessingServiceis not defined.To resolve this, consider accessing
sharedQueueProcessingServicethrough the new base classAbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBaseif it provides this service, or re-add the@Autowiredfield if necessary.
Line range hint
73-73: Undefined variablesharedQueueProcessingServicedue to removed dependencyThe
sharedQueueProcessingServiceis also used here, but it has been removed from the class. This will cause a compilation error.As mentioned earlier, ensure that you have access to
sharedQueueProcessingServiceeither through the base class or by re-injecting it into the test class.
Line range hint
62-65: Undefined variablehazelcastInstancedue to removed dependencyThe
hazelcastInstanceis used to obtain queues and maps, but the@Autowired HazelcastInstance hazelcastInstance;field has been removed. This will lead to a compilation error becausehazelcastInstanceis not defined.Check if the new base class
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBaseprovides access tohazelcastInstance. If not, consider re-adding the@Autowiredfield or refactoring the code to obtain theHazelcastInstancedifferently.
Line range hint
260-260: Undefined variablebuildLogEntryServicedue to removed dependencyThe
buildLogEntryServiceis used here, but the@Autowired BuildLogEntryService buildLogEntryService;field has been removed. This will result in a compilation error.Ensure that
buildLogEntryServiceis accessible, possibly through the base class or by re-injecting it into the test class.
Line range hint
250-251: Avoid direct database access in testsAccording to the coding guidelines (
avoid_db_access: true), tests should avoid direct database access. The usage ofbuildJobRepository.deleteAll()andbuildJobRepository.save(...)directly interacts with the database.Consider using mocks or in-memory databases to simulate database operations. This can improve test performance and avoid side effects.
Example using Mockito:
@Mock private BuildJobRepository buildJobRepository; // In your setup method Mockito.when(buildJobRepository.save(Mockito.any())).thenReturn(savedBuildJob);Also applies to: 285-286
Line range hint
105-107: Potential race condition due to shared stateAdding jobs to
queuedJobswithin the test may lead to flaky tests since the jobs are processed quickly due to mocking. This could cause the size assertions to fail intermittently.Consider mocking the job processing to control the state of
queuedJobs, ensuring consistent test results.Example:
// Mock the job processor to prevent automatic processing during the test doNothing().when(jobProcessor).processJobs(); // Then proceed with adding jobs and assertions
Line range hint
150-152: Repeated code for setting up pageable search DTOThe code for configuring
pageableSearchDTOis repeated in multiple tests.Extract this setup code into a helper method or utilize a test utility class to improve code reusability and maintainability.
Also applies to: 180-182
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/ProgrammingExerciseFeedbackCreationServiceTest.java (1)
Line range hint
36-43: Avoid direct database access in testsThe
init()method performs database operations by saving entities directly using repositories:
programmingExerciseBuildConfigRepository.save(programmingExercise.getBuildConfig())programmingExerciseRepository.save(programmingExercise)According to the coding guidelines (
avoid_db_access: true), tests should avoid accessing the database and utilize static mocks instead.Suggestion:
Refactor the test setup to use mock services or in-memory data structures. This approach will improve test performance and reliability by eliminating the overhead and side effects of database interactions.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/StaticCodeAnalysisIntegrationTest.java (1)
Line range hint
41-46: Avoid direct database access in testsPer the coding guidelines (
avoid_db_access: true), tests should avoid direct database access to improve performance and test isolation. In theinitTestCase()method, the test accesses the database viacourseRepository.findWithEagerExercisesById(...). Consider using mocks or test utilities to eliminate direct database interactions.You can refactor the
initTestCase()method to use a test utility method that provides a mockCourseobject without accessing the database:@BeforeEach void initTestCase() { userUtilService.addUsers(TEST_PREFIX, 2, 1, 1, 1); programmingExerciseSCAEnabled = programmingExerciseUtilService.addCourseWithOneProgrammingExerciseAndStaticCodeAnalysisCategories(); - course = courseRepository.findWithEagerExercisesById(programmingExerciseSCAEnabled.getCourseViaExerciseGroupOrCourseMember().getId()); + course = programmingExerciseSCAEnabled.getCourseViaExerciseGroupOrCourseMember(); var tempProgrammingEx = ProgrammingExerciseFactory.generateProgrammingExercise(ZonedDateTime.now(), ZonedDateTime.now().plusDays(1), programmingExerciseSCAEnabled.getCourseViaExerciseGroupOrCourseMember()); tempProgrammingEx.setBuildConfig(programmingExerciseBuildConfigRepository.save(tempProgrammingEx.getBuildConfig())); programmingExercise = programmingExerciseRepository.save(tempProgrammingEx); }By retrieving the course directly from
programmingExerciseSCAEnabled, you avoid the database call and adhere to the guideline.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/TestRepositoryResourceIntegrationTest.java (2)
Line range hint
58-59: Usage of removedprogrammingExerciseBuildConfigRepositorycauses compilation errorThe field
programmingExerciseBuildConfigRepositoryhas been removed but is still being used in thesetup()method. This will lead to a compilation error. Please update the code to remove or replace the usage of this repository.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
- programmingExercise.setBuildConfig(programmingExerciseBuildConfigRepository.save(programmingExercise.getBuildConfig())); + // Removed the usage of programmingExerciseBuildConfigRepository to fix compilation error.
Line range hint
85-85: Avoid direct database access in testsThe test methods are directly accessing the database by calling
programmingExerciseRepository.save(programmingExercise);, which violates the guidelineavoid_db_access: true. Direct database operations can slow down tests and introduce dependencies on the database state.Consider the following refactor to avoid direct database access:
- Use mocks for the repository interactions.
- Utilize predefined test data or test factories to provide necessary objects without persisting them.
- Ensure that any necessary data is set up in-memory rather than relying on the database.
Example:
- programmingExerciseRepository.save(programmingExercise); + // Mock the repository or use in-memory objects to avoid database access.Also applies to: 110-110, 131-131, 148-148, 167-167, 186-186, 205-205, 226-226, 253-253, 276-276, 283-283, 319-319, 365-365
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseScheduleServiceTest.java (2)
Line range hint
73-86: Potential compilation errors due to undefined servicesThe
init()method and other parts of the test class reference services likeuserUtilService,programmingExerciseUtilService, andexerciseUtilService, which were previously autowired but are now removed. This will lead to compilation errors as these services are undefined.Consider obtaining these services from the new superclass if it provides them, or reintroduce them into the class with proper initialization. Alternatively, adjust the test methods to operate without direct dependency on these services.
Line range hint
73-86: Avoid direct database access in testsAccording to the coding guidelines (
avoid_db_access: true), tests should avoid direct database interactions. Theinit()method and several test methods use repositories to access the database (e.g.,programmingExerciseRepository.saveAndFlush()).Refactor the tests to use mocks or in-memory databases to simulate database operations. Employ static mocks as per the
mock_strategy: static_mocksguideline to prevent actual database access and improve test performance.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseParticipationIntegrationTest.java (1)
Line range hint
49-54: Check for missing dependencies ininitTestCasemethodThe
initTestCasemethod usesprogrammingExerciseRepository, which was previously injected via@Autowiredand has been removed according to the AI summary. Ensure thatprogrammingExerciseRepositoryis now properly initialized or accessible through the new superclass to preventNullPointerExceptionor other runtime errors.Apply this diff to inject the necessary repository:
+ @Autowired + private ProgrammingExerciseRepository programmingExerciseRepository;src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingAssessmentIntegrationTest.java (5)
Line range hint
67-91: Avoid direct database access in tests.According to the coding guidelines (
avoid_db_access: true), tests should avoid accessing the database directly. In theinitTestCase()method, there are several calls that interact with the database, such asuserUtilService.addUsers()andprogrammingExerciseUtilService.addCourseWithOneProgrammingExerciseAndTestCases(). Consider using mocks or test data factories to isolate tests and improve performance.
Line range hint
226-279: Reduce code duplication by using parameterized tests.The test methods
createManualProgrammingExerciseResult_IncludedCompletelyWithBonusPointsExercise(),createManualProgrammingExerciseResult_IncludedCompletelyWithoutBonusPointsExercise(),createManualProgrammingExerciseResult_IncludedAsBonusExercise(), andcreateManualProgrammingExerciseResult_NotIncludedExercise()share similar logic with variations in exercise configuration. Consider refactoring them into a single parameterized test to reduce duplication and enhance maintainability.
Line range hint
522-569: Avoid database interactions within test methods.In the
overrideAssessment()method, there are database interactions such as fetching participations and saving results. As per the coding guidelines (avoid_db_access: true), consider mocking these interactions to prevent direct database access, which can improve test performance and isolation.
Line range hint
631-672: Use fixed data for deterministic tests.The
multipleCorrectionRoundsForExam()method dynamically sets up exams, exercises, and submissions. To adhere to the guideline of using fixed data (fixed_data: true), consider predefining test data or using test fixtures. This approach enhances test reliability and makes debugging easier.
Line range hint
798-829: Enhance assertion specificity for clearer test failures.In the
testDeleteResult()method, assertions verify the state of submissions and results after deletion. To follow the guideline on assertion specificity (assert_specificity: true), include descriptive messages or use assertion methods that provide detailed failure information.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (79)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/atlas/architecture/AtlasTestArchitectureTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/atlas/learningpath/LearningPathIntegrationTest.java (5 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/fileupload/AbstractFileUploadIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/fileupload/architecture/FileUploadTestArchitectureTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/lti/architecture/LtiTestArchitectureTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/AbstractProgrammingIntegrationGitlabCIGitlabSamlTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBase.java (2 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/AuxiliaryRepositoryServiceTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/BuildPlanIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ConsistencyCheckGitlabJenkinsIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/CourseGitlabJenkinsIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/GitServiceTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/GitlabServiceTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/IdePreferencesIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/PlantUmlIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingAssessmentIntegrationTest.java (2 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseBuildPlanTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseGitIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseGitlabJenkinsIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseGradingServiceTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseParticipationIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseRepositoryServiceTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseResultJenkinsIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseScheduleServiceTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseServiceIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseServiceTest.java (2 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseTemplateIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseTest.java (3 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseTestCaseServiceTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingSubmissionAndResultGitlabJenkinsIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingSubmissionIntegrationTest.java (4 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/RepositoryIntegrationTest.java (3 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/RepositoryProgrammingExerciseParticipationJenkinsIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/StaticCodeAnalysisIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/SubmissionPolicyIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/TestRepositoryResourceIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/architecture/ProgrammingTestArchitectureTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/CodeHintIntegrationTest.java (2 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/CodeHintServiceTest.java (8 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/ExerciseHintIntegrationTest.java (2 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/ExerciseHintServiceTest.java (3 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/HestiaDatabaseTest.java (6 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/ProgrammingExerciseGitDiffReportIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/ProgrammingExerciseGitDiffReportServiceTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/ProgrammingExerciseSolutionEntryIntegrationTest.java (11 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/ProgrammingExerciseTaskIntegrationTest.java (5 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/ProgrammingExerciseTaskServiceTest.java (14 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/StructuralTestCaseServiceTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/TestwiseCoverageIntegrationTest.java (3 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/TestwiseCoverageReportServiceTest.java (3 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/behavioral/BehavioralTestCaseServiceLocalCILocalVCTest.java (4 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalCIIntegrationTest.java (2 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalCIResourceIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalCIResultServiceTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalCIServiceTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalVCIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalVCLocalCIIntegrationTest.java (2 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalVCLocalCIParticipationIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalVCServiceTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalVCSshIntegrationTest.java (0 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/MultipleHostKeyProviderTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/ProgrammingExerciseLocalVCLocalCIIntegrationTest.java (2 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/SharedQueueManagementServiceTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/BuildLogEntryServiceTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/GitlabCIServiceTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/JenkinsAuthorizationInterceptorTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/JenkinsInternalUriServiceTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/JenkinsJobPermissionServiceTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/JenkinsJobServiceTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/JenkinsServiceTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/ProgrammingExerciseFeedbackCreationServiceTest.java (2 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/RepositoryAccessServiceTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/connectors/gitlab/GitLabPersonalAccessTokenManagementServiceTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/connectors/jenkins/build_plan/JenkinsPipelineScriptCreatorTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/shared/architecture/module/AbstractModuleTestArchitectureTest.java (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalVCSshIntegrationTest.java
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (78)
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/atlas/architecture/AtlasTestArchitectureTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/atlas/learningpath/LearningPathIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/fileupload/AbstractFileUploadIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/fileupload/architecture/FileUploadTestArchitectureTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/lti/architecture/LtiTestArchitectureTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/AbstractProgrammingIntegrationGitlabCIGitlabSamlTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBase.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/AuxiliaryRepositoryServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/BuildPlanIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ConsistencyCheckGitlabJenkinsIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/CourseGitlabJenkinsIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/GitServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/GitlabServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/IdePreferencesIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/PlantUmlIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingAssessmentIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseBuildPlanTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseGitIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseGitlabJenkinsIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseGradingServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseParticipationIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseRepositoryServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseResultJenkinsIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseScheduleServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseServiceIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseTemplateIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseTestCaseServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingSubmissionAndResultGitlabJenkinsIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingSubmissionIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/RepositoryIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/RepositoryProgrammingExerciseParticipationJenkinsIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/StaticCodeAnalysisIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/SubmissionPolicyIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/TestRepositoryResourceIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/architecture/ProgrammingTestArchitectureTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/CodeHintIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/CodeHintServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/ExerciseHintIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/ExerciseHintServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/HestiaDatabaseTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/ProgrammingExerciseGitDiffReportIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/ProgrammingExerciseGitDiffReportServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/ProgrammingExerciseSolutionEntryIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/ProgrammingExerciseTaskIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/ProgrammingExerciseTaskServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/StructuralTestCaseServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/TestwiseCoverageIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/TestwiseCoverageReportServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/behavioral/BehavioralTestCaseServiceLocalCILocalVCTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalCIIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalCIResourceIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalCIResultServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalCIServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalVCIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalVCLocalCIIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalVCLocalCIParticipationIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalVCServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/MultipleHostKeyProviderTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/ProgrammingExerciseLocalVCLocalCIIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/SharedQueueManagementServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/BuildLogEntryServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/GitlabCIServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/JenkinsAuthorizationInterceptorTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/JenkinsInternalUriServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/JenkinsJobPermissionServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/JenkinsJobServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/JenkinsServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/ProgrammingExerciseFeedbackCreationServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/RepositoryAccessServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/connectors/gitlab/GitLabPersonalAccessTokenManagementServiceTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/connectors/jenkins/build_plan/JenkinsPipelineScriptCreatorTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/shared/architecture/module/AbstractModuleTestArchitectureTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: true
📓 Learnings (2)
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseServiceIntegrationTest.java (2)
Learnt from: Hialus PR: ls1intum/Artemis#7451 File: src/test/java/de/tum/in/www1/artemis/exercise/programmingexercise/ProgrammingExerciseTestService.java:9-9 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:35:48.767Z Learning: The use of wildcard imports is acceptable in this project as specified in the `.editorconfig` file.Learnt from: Hialus PR: ls1intum/Artemis#7451 File: src/test/java/de/tum/in/www1/artemis/exercise/programmingexercise/ProgrammingExerciseTestService.java:9-9 Timestamp: 2024-01-19T15:49:43.303Z Learning: The use of wildcard imports is acceptable in this project as specified in the `.editorconfig` file.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseServiceTest.java (2)
Learnt from: Hialus PR: ls1intum/Artemis#7451 File: src/test/java/de/tum/in/www1/artemis/exercise/programmingexercise/ProgrammingExerciseTestService.java:9-9 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:35:48.767Z Learning: The use of wildcard imports is acceptable in this project as specified in the `.editorconfig` file.Learnt from: Hialus PR: ls1intum/Artemis#7451 File: src/test/java/de/tum/in/www1/artemis/exercise/programmingexercise/ProgrammingExerciseTestService.java:9-9 Timestamp: 2024-01-19T15:49:43.303Z Learning: The use of wildcard imports is acceptable in this project as specified in the `.editorconfig` file.
🔇 Additional comments (164)
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/lti/architecture/LtiTestArchitectureTest.java (3)
3-3: LGTM: Import statement added correctly.The addition of the
java.util.Setimport is necessary for the updated method signature and is placed correctly with other imports.
8-8: LGTM: Class signature updated to improve flexibility.The removal of the generic type parameter
<AbstractLtiIntegrationTest>from the class signature makesLtiTestArchitectureTestmore flexible. This change aligns well with the updated method signature and improves the class's extensibility.
Line range hint
1-20: Overall, excellent refactoring to improve test architecture flexibility.The changes in this file successfully contribute to the PR's objective of refactoring programming tests. By modifying the class and method signatures, you've enhanced the flexibility and extensibility of the test architecture. This allows for easier addition of multiple integration test classes in the future if needed.
Key improvements:
- Removal of the generic type constraint on the class.
- Update of the method to return a Set of Classes instead of a single Class.
- Consistent naming updates to reflect these changes.
These modifications align well with good software engineering practices, promoting more maintainable and adaptable code.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/atlas/architecture/AtlasTestArchitectureTest.java (3)
3-3: LGTM: Import statement addition is appropriate.The addition of the
java.util.Setimport is necessary and correctly supports the changes made to thegetAbstractModuleIntegrationTestClassesmethod.
8-8: LGTM: Class signature update improves flexibility.The removal of the generic type parameter from the class signature aligns with the PR objectives of refactoring the test architecture. This change allows for more flexibility in the implementation and is consistent with the modifications in the parent class.
Line range hint
1-20: Summary: Architectural improvements enhance test flexibility and extensibility.The changes made to
AtlasTestArchitectureTestalign well with the PR objectives of refactoring and improving the test architecture. The removal of the generic type parameter in the class signature and the modification of thegetAbstractModuleIntegrationTestClassesmethod provide increased flexibility and allow for future extensibility.These changes adhere to the provided coding guidelines, particularly:
- Maintaining descriptive test naming
- Utilizing JUnit 5 features
- Enforcing package rules (as part of the architecture test)
The modifications lay a solid foundation for potential future enhancements to the test structure, allowing for the inclusion of multiple integration test classes if needed.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/fileupload/architecture/FileUploadTestArchitectureTest.java (2)
3-3: LGTM: Import statement added correctly.The addition of the
java.util.Setimport is consistent with the changes in the method signature and is necessary for the new implementation.
8-8: LGTM: Class signature updated appropriately.The removal of the generic type parameter simplifies the class signature and allows for more flexibility in handling multiple integration test classes. This change is consistent with the method signature update and adheres to the coding guidelines for test architecture.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/MultipleHostKeyProviderTest.java (4)
11-11: Updated import statement for the new base class.The import statement has been updated to reflect the new base class
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBase. This change aligns with the class extension modification.
Line range hint
1-32: Overall structure and adherence to coding guidelines.The test class structure adheres well to the provided coding guidelines:
- The test name is descriptive (
MultipleHostKeyProviderTest).- The test size is small and specific, focusing on a single functionality.
- The test uses
assertThat()for assertions, as recommended.- The
@Profile(PROFILE_LOCALVC)annotation is correctly applied.The change in the base class doesn't affect the existing test method or class-level annotation, maintaining the test's original functionality while potentially benefiting from the new abstract base class.
Line range hint
1-32: Summary of changes and their impact.The changes made to
MultipleHostKeyProviderTest.javaare part of the larger refactoring effort described in the PR objectives. The main modifications are:
- Updated import statement for the new base class.
- Changed the extended base class from
AbstractLocalCILocalVCIntegrationTesttoAbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBase.These changes align with the PR's goal of creating new abstract test classes for various test setups. The modifications don't introduce any apparent issues and maintain the original functionality of the test. The refactoring should improve the organization and maintainability of the test code as intended.
15-15: Class now extends AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBase.The test class now extends
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBaseinstead ofAbstractLocalCILocalVCIntegrationTest. This change appears to be part of the refactoring effort mentioned in the PR objectives to create new abstract test classes for various test setups.To ensure this change is consistent across the codebase, let's verify the usage of the new base class:
✅ Verification successful
Verification successful: AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBase usage consistent
All relevant classes have been updated to extend
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBase, and no remaining usages ofAbstractLocalCILocalVCIntegrationTestwere found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBase # Test: Search for classes extending AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBase echo "Classes extending AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBase:" rg --type java "class \w+ extends AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBase" # Test: Search for remaining usages of AbstractLocalCILocalVCIntegrationTest echo "Remaining usages of AbstractLocalCILocalVCIntegrationTest:" rg --type java "AbstractLocalCILocalVCIntegrationTest"Length of output: 2567
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalCIResultServiceTest.java (4)
11-11: LGTM: Import change aligns with class refactoring.The addition of the import for
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBaseis consistent with the PR's objective to introduce new abstract test classes for various test setups.
Line range hint
16-31: LGTM: Overall structure and unchanged parts align with guidelines.The test class structure, including the unchanged
getTestPrefix()method and the test methodtestThrowsExceptionWhenResultIsNotLocalCIBuildResult(), aligns well with the provided coding guidelines:
- The test naming is descriptive.
- The test size is small and specific, focusing on a single scenario.
- The assert use is specific, using
assertThatExceptionOfType.- The class follows the naming convention for test classes.
These aspects contribute to maintaining a clear and maintainable test suite.
Line range hint
26-31: VerifylocalCIResultServiceusage after field removal.The
@Autowired private LocalCIResultService localCIResultServicefield has been removed, but the test method still useslocalCIResultService. Please verify if this is intentional and if thelocalCIResultServiceis now provided by the new base class.To ensure the
localCIResultServiceis properly available, please run the following script:#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the availability of localCIResultService in the base class or current class # Test: Check if localCIResultService is defined in the base class ast-grep --lang java --pattern 'abstract class AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBase { $$$ protected LocalCIResultService localCIResultService; $$$ }' # Test: Check if localCIResultService is still defined in the current class ast-grep --lang java --pattern 'class LocalCIResultServiceTest extends AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBase { $$$ private LocalCIResultService localCIResultService; $$$ }'If
localCIResultServiceis not found in either location, consider updating the test method to use the correct reference or inject the service if needed.
14-14: LGTM: Class signature updated to use new abstract base class.The change to extend
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBasealigns with the PR's objective to refactor programming tests and introduce new abstract test classes.To ensure the new base class provides the necessary functionality, please run the following script:
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/architecture/ProgrammingTestArchitectureTest.java (4)
1-10: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are correct.The package declaration matches the file path, and all imports are relevant and properly organized.
12-12: LGTM: Class declaration is appropriate.The class name
ProgrammingTestArchitectureTestis descriptive and follows the naming convention for test classes. ExtendingAbstractModuleTestArchitectureTestaligns with the PR objectives of refactoring programming tests.
14-17: LGTM:getModulePackage()method is correctly implemented.The method properly overrides the superclass method and returns the expected package name for the programming module.
1-31: Overall assessment: Well-implemented architecture test for programming module.This new file introduces a well-structured
ProgrammingTestArchitectureTestclass that extendsAbstractModuleTestArchitectureTest. The implementation aligns with the PR objectives of refactoring programming tests and addresses the issue of scattered autowired components by centralizing abstract test classes.The code follows good practices, including:
- Proper package and import organization
- Descriptive class and method names
- Correct method overrides
- Use of constants and immutable collections
- Improved readability with formatted blocks
This implementation contributes to enhancing the organization and maintainability of the test code as intended by the PR.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/SharedQueueManagementServiceTest.java (2)
11-11: Update import statement to reflect new base class.The import statement has been correctly updated to import the new base class
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest. This change aligns with the modification of the class signature.
Line range hint
1-49: Overall assessment of changes and potential impact.The changes to this test class align with the PR objectives of refactoring programming tests and creating new abstract test classes. The main modifications include:
- Extending a new base class
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest.- Removing explicit
@Autowiredannotations forSharedQueueManagementServiceandHazelcastInstance.These changes likely contribute to a more streamlined and consistent testing structure across the project. However, to ensure the refactoring doesn't introduce any issues:
- Verify that the new base class correctly provides the necessary dependencies (e.g.,
sharedQueueManagementService,hazelcastInstance).- Ensure that the test setup and teardown processes are still functioning as expected with the new base class.
- Consider adding a comment explaining the role of the new base class and how it manages dependencies, to improve code maintainability.
To confirm the proper functioning of the new structure, consider running this test class along with other refactored tests:
As this change is part of a larger refactoring effort, consider creating or updating architecture tests to enforce the new structure across all relevant test classes. This will help maintain consistency and prevent regression to the old structure in future development.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseServiceTest.java (1)
14-14: LGTM: Class extension change aligns with PR objectives.The change from extending
AbstractSpringIntegrationIndependentTesttoAbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTestaligns well with the PR objectives. This new parent class is likely more specific to programming exercises, which should improve test organization and reduce code duplication across the test suite.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ConsistencyCheckGitlabJenkinsIntegrationTest.java (3)
Line range hint
1-62: Verify compliance with specific coding guidelines.The changes align with most of the coding guidelines. However, please ensure the following:
- Use
assertThatfor assertions in the test methods.- Track DB query counts for performance in the tests.
- Minimize context restarts if possible.
To verify compliance with these guidelines, please run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify compliance with specific coding guidelines # Test 1: Check for use of assertThat echo "Checking for use of assertThat:" rg -t java "assertThat" src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ConsistencyCheckGitlabJenkinsIntegrationTest.java # Test 2: Check for DB query count tracking echo "Checking for DB query count tracking:" rg -t java "verifyNumberOfQueries" src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ConsistencyCheckGitlabJenkinsIntegrationTest.java # Test 3: Check for context restart minimization echo "Checking for context restart minimization:" rg -t java "@DirtiesContext" src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ConsistencyCheckGitlabJenkinsIntegrationTest.javaIf any of these guidelines are not met, please update the tests accordingly or provide a justification for any deviations.
8-8: LGTM: Class now extends a more specific base class.The change to extend
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestaligns with the PR objectives and likely improves code organization for programming tests.To ensure the new base class is correctly implemented and used, please run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
: The new base class
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestexists and is correctly extended by relevant test classes. The removal of the@Autowiredannotation aligns with centralized dependency management in the base class.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation and usage of AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest # Test 1: Check if the new base class exists echo "Checking for AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest:" fd -e java AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest # Test 2: Check for other classes extending the new base class echo "Checking for other classes extending AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest:" rg -t java "class \w+ extends AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest" # Test 3: Check the content of the new base class echo "Displaying the content of AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest:" fd -e java AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest -x cat {}Length of output: 13384
8-8: Verify initialization ofconsistencyCheckTestService.The removal of the
@Autowiredannotation forconsistencyCheckTestServicealigns with the PR objectives. However, please ensure that this service is still properly initialized and accessible in the test methods.To verify the initialization and usage of
consistencyCheckTestService, please run the following script:If
consistencyCheckTestServiceis not properly initialized or accessible, consider adding a comment explaining how it's now being managed.✅ Verification successful
Initialization of
consistencyCheckTestServiceVerified.The
consistencyCheckTestServiceis properly declared in the base classAbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestand is accessible inConsistencyCheckGitlabJenkinsIntegrationTest.java. The removal of the@Autowiredannotation does not affect its initialization or usage within the test methods.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the initialization and usage of consistencyCheckTestService # Test 1: Check for consistencyCheckTestService in the new base class echo "Checking for consistencyCheckTestService in AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest:" rg -t java "consistencyCheckTestService" $(fd -e java AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest) # Test 2: Check for any new initialization of consistencyCheckTestService echo "Checking for new initialization of consistencyCheckTestService:" rg -t java "consistencyCheckTestService\s*=\s*new" src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ # Test 3: Check usage of consistencyCheckTestService in the current class echo "Checking usage of consistencyCheckTestService in ConsistencyCheckGitlabJenkinsIntegrationTest:" rg -t java "consistencyCheckTestService" src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ConsistencyCheckGitlabJenkinsIntegrationTest.javaLength of output: 732
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the initialization and usage of consistencyCheckTestService # Test 1: Check for consistencyCheckTestService in AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest echo "Checking for consistencyCheckTestService in AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest:" rg -t java "consistencyCheckTestService" $(fd -e java AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest) # Test 2: Check for any new initialization of consistencyCheckTestService echo "Checking for new initialization of consistencyCheckTestService:" rg -t java "consistencyCheckTestService\s*=\s*new" src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ # Test 3: Check usage of consistencyCheckTestService in ConsistencyCheckGitlabJenkinsIntegrationTest echo "Checking usage of consistencyCheckTestService in ConsistencyCheckGitlabJenkinsIntegrationTest:" rg -t java "consistencyCheckTestService" src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ConsistencyCheckGitlabJenkinsIntegrationTest.javaLength of output: 1574
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalVCServiceTest.java (2)
13-13: LGTM: Import statement added for new abstract class.The import statement for
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTesthas been correctly added, which is necessary for the updated class extension.
16-16: LGTM: Class extension updated and dependencies reduced.The class now extends
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest, which aligns with the PR objectives of refactoring programming tests. The removal of@Autowiredfields suggests a reduction in dependencies, potentially leading to more focused and maintainable tests.To ensure that this refactoring hasn't inadvertently affected test coverage, please run the following script:
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/RepositoryProgrammingExerciseParticipationJenkinsIntegrationTest.java (2)
28-28: LGTM! Verify service accessibility in the new base class.The removal of the
@Autowiredfields aligns with the PR objectives of addressing autowired components scattered throughout the test code. This change promotes better encapsulation and reduces duplication across test classes.To ensure the removed services are still accessible through the new base class, run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the accessibility of removed services in the new base class # Test: Check if the removed services are declared in the new base class ast-grep --lang java --pattern 'abstract class AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest extends $_ { $$$ $_(private|protected) ProgrammingExerciseTestRepository $_ $$$ $_(private|protected) ProgrammingExerciseUtilService $_ $$$ $_(private|protected) ParticipationUtilService $_ $$$ }' # Test: Check for any remaining usages of the removed fields in this class rg --type java "programmingExerciseRepository|programmingExerciseUtilService|participationUtilService" src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/RepositoryProgrammingExerciseParticipationJenkinsIntegrationTest.java
28-28: LGTM! Verify the new base class implementation.The change to extend
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestaligns with the PR objectives of creating new abstract test classes for various test setups. This should improve code organization and reduce duplication for programming exercise tests.To ensure the new base class is properly implemented, run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Verified! The
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestbase class is correctly implemented and the test class properly extends it, inheriting necessary dependencies.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest # Test: Check if the new base class exists and its content ast-grep --lang java --pattern 'abstract class AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest extends $_ { $$$ }' # Test: Check for other classes extending the new base class rg --type java "extends AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest"Length of output: 1191
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/PlantUmlIntegrationTest.java (1)
23-23: LGTM! Verify the new base class functionality.The change to extend
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTestaligns with the PR objectives for refactoring programming tests. This should improve the organization and maintainability of the test code.To ensure the new base class provides the necessary functionality, please run the following script:
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/JenkinsInternalUriServiceTest.java (2)
19-19: LGTM: Import statement aligns with class extension change.The new import statement for
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestis correct and consistent with the updated class extension.
Line range hint
1-105: Summary: Refactoring aligns with PR objectives, verify abstract class setupThe changes to
JenkinsInternalUriServiceTestalign well with the PR objectives of refactoring programming tests and addressing autowired components. The main modifications are:
- Extending
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestinstead ofAbstractSpringIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest.- Removal of the
@Autowiredannotation forjenkinsInternalUrlService.These changes contribute to a more organized test structure. However, it's crucial to ensure that the new abstract class provides all necessary setup and that
jenkinsInternalUrlServiceis properly instantiated or injected.The existing test methods remain unchanged, which is good for maintaining test coverage. Overall, this refactoring appears to improve the test architecture while preserving existing functionality.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest.java (1)
1-27: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are well-organized.The package declaration is correct, and the imports are relevant to the class's purpose. They cover necessary Spring annotations, Hazelcast, and various custom services and repositories required for the integration tests.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/JenkinsJobServiceTest.java (3)
30-30: LGTM: Import statement aligns with class extension change.The new import statement for
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestis correctly added to support the change in the class extension.
Line range hint
1-114: Summary of changes and their implications.The main changes in this file are:
- Extending
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestinstead ofAbstractSpringIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest.- Removal of
@Autowiredannotations forJenkinsJobServiceandUserUtilService.- Removal of user setup in the
initTestCasemethod.These changes align with the PR objectives to refactor programming tests and create new abstract test classes. The shift in dependency management (removal of
@Autowiredannotations) suggests that these dependencies are now handled differently, possibly by the new base class.While the changes appear to be in line with the refactoring goals, it's important to ensure:
- The new base class provides all necessary setup and dependencies for these tests to function correctly.
- Test isolation is maintained, especially considering the removal of explicit user setup.
- The unchanged parts of the file (test methods) still function as expected with the new setup.
To ensure the refactoring hasn't introduced any regressions, please run these tests and verify that they all pass with the new setup.
33-33: LGTM: Class extension change aligns with PR objectives.The change from
AbstractSpringIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTesttoAbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestaligns with the PR objectives to create new abstract test classes for various test setups. This change appears to make the test more specific to programming integration tests with Jenkins and GitLab.To ensure this change doesn't have unintended consequences, please run the following script to check for any other classes that might need similar updates:
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/RepositoryAccessServiceTest.java (3)
24-24: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly.The import statement for
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTesthas been added, which aligns with the change in the class extension. This change is consistent with the refactoring of the test class hierarchy.
31-31: Overall, the changes improve test structure and align with refactoring goals.The modifications to
RepositoryAccessServiceTest.javasuccessfully address the PR objectives by:
- Updating the parent class to a more specific
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest.- Removing scattered @Autowired fields, likely centralizing dependencies in the parent class.
- Maintaining the existing test logic while improving the overall structure.
These changes should enhance maintainability and organization of the test code. Please ensure to run the provided verification scripts to confirm that all necessary dependencies and functionalities are still accessible after the refactoring.
31-31: LGTM: Removal of @Autowired fields improves test structure.The removal of @Autowired fields aligns with the PR objectives of addressing scattered autowired components in test code. This change likely improves the overall structure and maintainability of the test class.
To ensure that all necessary dependencies are still available, please run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: @Autowired fields are correctly inherited from the parent class.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all previously autowired dependencies are still accessible in the test methods # Test: Check for usage of previously autowired fields in test methods echo "Usage of previously autowired fields in test methods:" rg -A 1 --type java "\b(userRepository|programmingExerciseRepository|repositoryAccessService|userUtilService|programmingExerciseUtilService|participationUtilService|programmingExerciseGradingService)\b" src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/RepositoryAccessServiceTest.java # Test: Check if these fields are declared in the parent class echo "Declarations of previously autowired fields in parent class:" rg -A 1 --type java "protected.*(userRepository|programmingExerciseRepository|repositoryAccessService|userUtilService|programmingExerciseUtilService|participationUtilService|programmingExerciseGradingService)" src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest.javaLength of output: 2424
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/IdePreferencesIntegrationTest.java (3)
Line range hint
1-114: LGTM! Good adherence to coding guidelines.The overall structure of the test class adheres well to the provided coding guidelines:
- Test names are descriptive and specific.
- JUnit 5 features are used appropriately.
- assertThat is used for assertions with good specificity.
- The tests avoid direct database access, using repositories instead.
- The test cases are small and focused.
Good job on maintaining code quality and following best practices!
22-22: LGTM! Verify repository accessibility.The removal of @Autowired annotations for
userIdeMappingRepositoryandideRepositoryaligns with the PR objectives to address scattered autowired components. This change likely improves the test structure.Please ensure that these repositories are still accessible in the test methods. Run the following script to verify:
22-22: LGTM! Verify new parent class functionality.The change to extend
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTestaligns with the PR objectives to refactor programming tests. This should improve test organization and reduce duplication.Please ensure that all necessary setup from
AbstractSpringIntegrationIndependentTestis still available inAbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest. Run the following script to verify:src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/JenkinsAuthorizationInterceptorTest.java (2)
29-33: Summary: Changes align with PR objectives and coding guidelines.The modifications to this test class, including the base class change and removal of fields, align well with the PR objectives to refactor programming tests and address scattered autowired components. The changes maintain compliance with the coding guidelines:
- Test naming remains descriptive.
- Test size is still small and specific.
- JUnit 5 features and assertThat assertions are preserved.
- The mock strategy (static mocks) is unaffected.
- Context restart minimization is maintained.
These changes should improve the organization and maintainability of the test code without compromising its functionality or adherence to best practices.
31-33: LGTM: Removal of fields aligns with PR objectives.The removal of
jenkinsServerUrl,jenkinsAuthorizationInterceptor, andrestTemplatefields aligns with the PR objectives to address scattered autowired components. This change should improve the organization of the test code.To ensure that the test methods still function correctly after these changes, please verify:
- The
jenkinsServervariable is accessible in theinitTestCasemethod.- The
restTemplateis still available for setting up themockRestServiceServer.- The
jenkinsAuthorizationInterceptoris accessible in the test methods.You can run the following script to check for any remaining usages of these fields:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the removal of fields # Test: Check for any remaining usage of removed fields rg --type java "jenkinsServerUrl|@Autowired.*JenkinsAuthorizationInterceptor|@Autowired.*RestTemplate" src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/JenkinsAuthorizationInterceptorTest.javaIf the script returns no results, it confirms that all references to the removed fields have been properly addressed.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/JenkinsJobPermissionServiceTest.java (1)
19-19: LGTM! Verify service initialization after base class change.The change to extend
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestaligns with the PR objectives for refactoring programming tests. This change, along with the removal of the@Autowiredannotation forjenkinsJobPermissionsService, suggests a shift in how the service is initialized or accessed.Please ensure that
jenkinsJobPermissionsServiceis properly initialized in the new base class or through a factory method. You can verify this by running the following command:Also applies to: 23-23
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/GitlabServiceTest.java (3)
34-34: LGTM: Class signature change aligns with PR objectives.The change from
AbstractSpringIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTesttoAbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestaligns well with the PR objectives of refactoring programming tests and creating new abstract test classes. This more specific base class likely provides common functionality for programming exercise tests, which should improve code organization and maintainability.
34-34: LGTM: Test methods and functionality preserved.The preservation of test methods and overall functionality aligns well with the PR objectives. The refactoring has improved the structure of programming tests without affecting the core testing functionality. This approach ensures that existing tests continue to validate the system's behavior while benefiting from the improved organization.
34-34: Verify accessibility of removed fields in test methods.The removal of
@Autowiredfields (programmingExerciseRepository,programmingExerciseBuildConfigRepository,programmingExerciseUtilService) and the@Valueannotation forgitlabServerUrlaligns with the PR objectives of addressing scattered autowired components. This change likely improves code organization and maintainability.However, please ensure that these removed fields are still accessible where needed in the test methods, possibly through methods in the new base class.
To verify the accessibility of the removed fields, please run the following script:
If the script returns any results, please ensure that these usages are properly handled after the refactoring.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/connectors/gitlab/GitLabPersonalAccessTokenManagementServiceTest.java (4)
Line range hint
1-236: Overall assessment: Refactoring looks good, but requires thorough verificationThe changes in this file, particularly extending
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestand removing autowired dependencies, appear to be part of a larger refactoring effort to improve the test structure. These changes have the potential to enhance maintainability and reduce coupling in the tests.To ensure the refactoring hasn't introduced any regressions:
- Run all tests in this class and verify they pass.
- Check the code coverage to ensure it hasn't decreased.
- Review the
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestclass to understand what setup and utilities it provides.- Ensure that the removed autowired dependencies are properly handled by the new base class.
- Verify that the mock setup in
setUp()andteardown()methods still works as expected.If all verifications pass, this refactoring can be considered successful. If any issues are found, please address them before merging this PR.
32-32: LGTM: Class now extends AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestThe change to extend
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestinstead ofAbstractSpringIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestappears to be a good refactoring step. This likely provides more specific setup for programming-related tests that interact with Jenkins and GitLab.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any regressions, please verify that:
- All necessary setup from the previous base class is still available.
- The new base class provides all required functionality for these tests.
Also applies to: 36-36
Line range hint
36-236: Ensure all test methods function correctly with new class structureWhile the test methods remain unchanged, they still use
gitLabPersonalAccessTokenManagementService,userRepository, anduserUtilService. Given the removal of the autowired dependencies, it's crucial to verify that these services are correctly provided by the new base class and that all test methods continue to function as expected.Please perform the following verifications:
- Run all tests in this class to ensure they pass with the new structure.
- Check that the behavior of
gitLabPersonalAccessTokenManagementService,userRepository, anduserUtilServicein the test methods matches the expected behavior from before the refactoring.- Verify that the mock setup in
setUp()andteardown()methods still works correctly with the new base class.
36-36: Verify availability of removed autowired dependenciesThe removal of the autowired dependencies (GitLabPersonalAccessTokenManagementService, UserTestRepository, and UserUtilService) suggests that these are now provided by the new base class or are no longer needed. This change can lead to more maintainable and less coupled tests.
Please ensure that:
- The functionality provided by these services is still accessible in the test methods.
- If they are now provided by the base class, verify that they are properly initialized and configured.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseResultJenkinsIntegrationTest.java (2)
28-28: Class extension change improves test specificity.The class now extends
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestinstead ofAbstractSpringIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest. This change aligns with the coding guideline to use more specific test setups for programming exercises.
Line range hint
1-219: Overall improvement in test structure, with opportunities for further refinement.The refactoring of
ProgrammingExerciseResultJenkinsIntegrationTestrepresents a positive step towards a more modular and maintainable test suite. The change to extendAbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestand the removal of@Autowiredannotations align well with the project's coding guidelines, particularly the util_service_factory_pattern.While the core functionality of the tests remains intact, there are opportunities to further enhance the test methods to fully comply with all specified coding guidelines. This includes making more use of JUnit 5 features, ensuring consistent use of
assertThat, and potentially adding performance tracking tests.These changes contribute to a more robust and efficient testing framework for programming exercises. To complete this refactoring effort, consider applying similar principles to related test classes and ensuring consistent implementation across the test suite.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/JenkinsServiceTest.java (1)
41-41: Approved: Class extension change aligns with PR objectivesThe change from extending
AbstractSpringIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTesttoAbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestaligns well with the PR's objective of creating new abstract test classes for various test setups. This refactoring likely provides more specific functionality for programming exercises with Jenkins and GitLab integration, improving the organization and maintainability of the test code.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/GitServiceTest.java (3)
42-42: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Verify gitUtilService initialization and add explanatory comment.
The removal of the
@Autowiredannotation forgitUtilServicealigns with the PR objective of addressing scattered autowired components. However, it's important to ensure thatgitUtilServiceis still properly initialized and available for the test methods.Please add a comment explaining how
gitUtilServiceis now managed (e.g., if it's initialized in the parent class). This will improve code readability and maintainability.To verify the proper initialization of
gitUtilService, please run the following script:#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for gitUtilService initialization in AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest # Search for gitUtilService declaration or initialization in the abstract class echo "Checking gitUtilService initialization in AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest:" rg --type java "gitUtilService" src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest.java
Line range hint
1-487: LGTM! Verify test execution with new abstract class.The test methods remain unchanged and continue to adhere to the provided coding guidelines. This includes using descriptive test names, keeping tests small and specific, utilizing JUnit 5 features, and using AssertThat for specific assertions.
To ensure that the tests still run correctly with the new abstract class, please execute the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Run GitServiceTest and check for any failures # Run the GitServiceTest echo "Running GitServiceTest:" ./gradlew test --tests "de.tum.cit.aet.artemis.programming.GitServiceTest" # Check the test results echo "Checking test results:" grep "GitServiceTest > " build/test-results/test/*.xml | grep -v "PASSED"If the script outputs any failed tests, please review and address them accordingly.
42-42: LGTM! Verify consistency across test classes.The change to extend
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTestaligns with the PR objective of creating new abstract test classes for various test setups. This should help in better organizing the test code and reducing scattered autowired components.To ensure consistency across the codebase, please run the following script to check if other test classes have been updated similarly:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: All test classes consistently extend AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for test classes that might need to be updated to extend AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest # Search for test classes still extending AbstractSpringIntegrationIndependentTest echo "Test classes still extending AbstractSpringIntegrationIndependentTest:" rg --type java "class \w+Test extends AbstractSpringIntegrationIndependentTest" src/test/java # Search for test classes already updated to extend AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest echo "Test classes updated to extend AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest:" rg --type java "class \w+Test extends AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest" src/test/javaLength of output: 5044
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalVCIntegrationTest.java (2)
Line range hint
1-524: LGTM: Comprehensive test coverage and adherence to best practicesThe
LocalVCIntegrationTestclass demonstrates excellent test coverage for various scenarios in local version control integration. The test methods are well-named, use appropriate JUnit 5 features, and follow the coding guidelines by usingassertThatfor assertions. The class effectively uses mocking where necessary and covers both happy path and error scenarios.
39-39: Approved: Class inheritance updated to new abstract base classThe change to extend
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBasealigns with the PR objectives of refactoring programming tests. This new base class likely provides a more specific setup for programming integration tests.To ensure this change hasn't inadvertently affected test functionality, please run the following verification script:
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/StructuralTestCaseServiceTest.java (3)
28-28: Improved test structure with new base class.The change to extend
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBasealigns well with the PR objectives. This new base class likely provides a more structured and specific setup for programming exercise integration tests, which should lead to improved organization and reduced duplication across test classes.
16-16: Verify accessibility of removed autowired dependencies.The removal of several autowired fields (CourseUtilService, UserUtilService, HestiaUtilTestService, StructuralTestCaseService, and ProgrammingExerciseTestCaseTestRepository) suggests these are now provided by the new base class
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBase. This change reduces boilerplate code and centralizes dependency management.Please ensure that all these dependencies are still accessible in the test methods. If they are now provided through protected fields or methods in the base class, consider adding a comment or updating the class documentation to clarify how these dependencies are now accessed.
✅ Verification successful
Dependency accessibility in AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBase confirmed
Our investigation has revealed that the base class
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBasedoes indeed provide access to most of the required dependencies:
- The class is defined and extends
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest.- It contains protected fields for:
HestiaUtilTestServiceStructuralTestCaseServiceUserUtilServiceWhile
CourseUtilServiceandProgrammingExerciseTestCaseTestRepository(testCaseRepository) are not directly visible in this class, they are present in related classes, suggesting they might be inherited from a parent class or injected through other means.The absence of a constructor doesn't indicate a problem, as Spring supports field injection, which is likely being used here.
In conclusion, the removal of autowired fields from the test class is justified, as the necessary dependencies are accessible through the base class. This change reduces boilerplate code and centralizes dependency management as intended.
To improve clarity, consider adding a comment in the test class documenting that these dependencies are provided by the base class, or update the base class's documentation to explicitly list all available dependencies for subclasses.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the new base class provides the necessary dependencies # Check if the base class exists and contains the required fields or methods ast-grep --lang java --pattern $'class AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBase { $$$ (protected $_ courseUtilService|protected $_ userUtilService|protected $_ hestiaUtilTestService|protected $_ structuralTestCaseService|protected $_ testCaseRepository) $$$ }' # Check if there are any compilation errors in the test class due to missing dependencies rg -p "cannot find symbol" -A 5 -B 5 src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/StructuralTestCaseServiceTest.javaLength of output: 533
Script:
#!/bin/bash # List all protected fields in the base class ast-grep --lang java --pattern $'class AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBase { $$$ protected $_ $_; $$$ }' # Find files with non-UTF-8 encoding find . -type f -name "*.java" -exec LC_ALL=C grep -IL . {} \; > non_utf8_files.txt # Check for constructor-based dependency injections in the base class ast-grep --lang java --pattern $'class AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBase { $$$ public $_($_ ... ) { $$$ } $$$ }'Length of output: 103680
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Identify and list all Java files with non-UTF-8 encoding find . -type f -name "*.java" -exec bash -c 'file -i "$1" | grep -vq "utf-8"' _ {} \; > non_utf8_files.txt # Exclude files with encoding issues and verify that the base class provides the necessary dependencies ast-grep --lang java --pattern $'class AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBase { $$$ (protected $_ courseUtilService|protected $_ userUtilService|protected $_ hestiaUtilTestService|protected $_ structuralTestCaseService|protected $_ testCaseRepository) $$$ }' | grep -vf non_utf8_files.txt # Check for constructor-based dependency injections in the base class, excluding problematic files ast-grep --lang java --pattern $'class AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBase { $$$ public $_($_ ... ) { $$$ } $$$ }' | grep -vf non_utf8_files.txtLength of output: 82828
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the base class definition grep -R -i -a "class AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBase" . # Look for protected fields matching the names of the required dependencies grep -R -i -a "protected.*\(CourseUtilService\|UserUtilService\|HestiaUtilTestService\|StructuralTestCaseService\|ProgrammingExerciseTestCaseTestRepository\)" . # Check for a constructor in the base class grep -R -i -a "AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBase(.*)" .Length of output: 3416
28-28: Ensure test integrity after refactoring.While the core logic of the test methods remains unchanged, it's crucial to verify that the new structure doesn't introduce any subtle issues. Please ensure that:
- All tests in this class are re-run and pass successfully.
- The test coverage remains the same or improves.
- There are no unintended side effects from the new base class.
Additionally, if it doesn't already exist, consider adding a dedicated test class for
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBaseto ensure its functionality is correctly implemented and maintained.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/BuildLogEntryServiceTest.java (4)
Line range hint
367-372: LGTM: Good edge case testing.This test method effectively checks the behavior of
removeUnnecessaryLogsForProgrammingLanguagewith empty or whitespace-only logs. It's a good practice to include such edge case tests.
Line range hint
1-390: Consider using external files for test data.The test scenarios (GRADLE_SCENARIO and MAVEN_SCENARIO) contain large amounts of log data. To improve readability and maintainability, consider moving these scenarios to external resource files.
You could refactor this by:
- Creating resource files (e.g.,
gradle_scenario.logandmaven_scenario.log) in thesrc/test/resourcesdirectory.- Loading these files in your test class using a utility method.
Example:
private String loadScenario(String fileName) { return new String(getClass().getResourceAsStream("/" + fileName).readAllBytes(), StandardCharsets.UTF_8); } @ValueSource(strings = { "gradle_scenario.log", "maven_scenario.log" }) @ParameterizedTest void testScenario(String scenarioFile) { String scenario = loadScenario(scenarioFile); // ... rest of the test }This approach would make the test class more readable and easier to maintain.
Also, ensure that the new testing approach (extending
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTestand removing@Autowiredannotations) is consistently applied across all relevant test classes in the codebase.#!/bin/bash # Check for consistency in test class extensions and Autowired annotations echo "Classes extending AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest:" grep -R "extends AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest" src/test/java echo "Classes with @Autowired annotations:" grep -R "@Autowired" src/test/java
16-16: Class extension change requires verification.The class now extends
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTestinstead ofAbstractSpringIntegrationIndependentTest. This change might affect the test setup and execution.Please ensure that:
- The new parent class provides all necessary setup for these tests.
- The change is consistent across all similar test classes.
Also applies to: 20-20
✅ Verification successful
Please rerun the verification with the corrected shell script below.
Also applies to: 20-20
Class extension change is consistent, @Autowired removal is isolated.
The change from extending
AbstractSpringIntegrationIndependentTesttoAbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTestappears to be consistent across the codebase. There are no remaining classes that extendAbstractSpringIntegrationIndependentTest.Regarding the removal of the
@Autowiredannotation:
- This change seems to be isolated to the
buildLogEntryServicein theBuildLogEntryServiceTestclass.@Autowiredannotations are still widely used throughout the codebase, including in test classes.This suggests that the removal of
@AutowiredforbuildLogEntryServiceis likely intentional but not part of a global refactoring effort. It may be an initial step towards moving away from field injection to constructor injection for this specific service.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for consistency in test class extensions echo "Classes extending AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest:" grep -R "extends AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest" src/test/java echo "Classes still extending AbstractSpringIntegrationIndependentTest:" grep -R "extends AbstractSpringIntegrationIndependentTest" src/test/javaLength of output: 169335
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for consistency in test class extensions echo "Classes extending AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest:" grep -R "extends AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest" src/test/java echo "Classes still extending AbstractSpringIntegrationIndependentTest:" grep -R "extends AbstractSpringIntegrationIndependentTest" src/test/java # Check for @Autowired annotations echo "Classes with @Autowired annotations:" grep -R "@Autowired" src/test/javaLength of output: 192019
Line range hint
359-365: Consider enhancing test assertions.The current assertion
assertThat(result).hasSizeLessThan(30)is quite broad. Consider adding more specific assertions to ensure the filtered logs contain the expected content.You could improve the test by:
- Asserting on specific log entries that should be present after filtering.
- Checking for log entries that should be removed.
- Verifying the order of important log entries.
Example:
assertThat(result).hasSizeLessThan(30) .extracting(BuildLogEntry::getMessage) .contains("BUILD FAILED") .doesNotContain("Pull image progress: Downloading");Also, verify that
buildLogEntryServiceis properly initialized without the@Autowiredannotation.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/SubmissionPolicyIntegrationTest.java (3)
34-34: Class extension change improves test organization.The change from
AbstractSpringIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTesttoAbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestsuggests a more specific base class for programming exercise tests. This change likely provides more relevant setup and utilities for programming-specific test scenarios.
Line range hint
41-49: Verify init() method functionality with removed dependencies.The init() method seems to function correctly despite the removal of previously @Autowired fields. Please ensure that all necessary setup steps are still being performed correctly, especially those that might have relied on the removed services (e.g., programmingExerciseRepository, gradingService).
To verify the correct setup, you can add logging or assertions after each step in the init() method. For example:
@BeforeEach void init() { userUtilService.addUsers(TEST_PREFIX, 2, 1, 1, 1); // Add assertion or logging here userUtilService.addInstructor("other-instructor-group", TEST_PREFIX + "other-instructor"); // Add assertion or logging here // ... (continue for each step) assertThat(programmingExercise).isNotNull(); assertThat(programmingExerciseId).isNotNull(); }
Line range hint
51-456: Comprehensive test coverage with good use of parameterized testing.The test methods cover a wide range of scenarios for submission policy management, which is commendable. The use of parameterized testing (e.g.,
@ParameterizedTest) is an excellent practice for reducing code duplication and ensuring thorough coverage of different cases.To ensure that the removal of @Autowired fields hasn't affected test functionality, consider adding a simple end-to-end test that exercises the main workflow of submission policy management. This test should create a policy, apply it to an exercise, and verify its effects on submissions. For example:
@Test @WithMockUser(username = TEST_PREFIX + "instructor1", roles = "INSTRUCTOR") void testEndToEndSubmissionPolicyWorkflow() { // Create and add a submission policy addSubmissionPolicyToExercise(SubmissionPolicyBuilder.lockRepo().active(true).limit(2).policy()); // Verify policy was added correctly ProgrammingExercise updatedExercise = updatedExercise(); assertThat(updatedExercise.getSubmissionPolicy()).isNotNull(); assertThat(updatedExercise.getSubmissionPolicy().getSubmissionLimit()).isEqualTo(2); // Simulate submissions and verify policy enforcement ProgrammingExerciseStudentParticipation participation = participationUtilService.addStudentParticipationForProgrammingExercise(programmingExercise, TEST_PREFIX + "student1"); // First submission (should be allowed) Result result1 = simulateSubmission(participation); assertThat(result1.isRated()).isTrue(); // Second submission (should be allowed) Result result2 = simulateSubmission(participation); assertThat(result2.isRated()).isTrue(); // Third submission (should not be rated due to policy) Result result3 = simulateSubmission(participation); assertThat(result3.isRated()).isFalse(); // Helper method to simulate a submission private Result simulateSubmission(ProgrammingExerciseStudentParticipation participation) { String repositoryName = programmingExercise.getProjectKey().toLowerCase() + "-" + participation.getStudent().getLogin(); var resultNotification = ProgrammingExerciseFactory.generateTestResultDTO(/* ... */); var resultRequestBody = convertBuildResultToJsonObject(resultNotification); return gradingService.processNewProgrammingExerciseResult(participation, resultRequestBody); } }This end-to-end test would help verify that the core functionality remains intact after the refactoring.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/atlas/learningpath/LearningPathIntegrationTest.java (3)
376-379: LGTM: Updated Javadoc referenceThe package reference in the Javadoc has been correctly updated to point to the
atlaspackage instead of theservicepackage. This change improves the accuracy of the documentation.
Line range hint
465-484: LGTM: Updated Javadoc referenceThe package reference in the Javadoc has been correctly updated to point to the
atlaspackage instead of theservicepackage. This change enhances the accuracy of the documentation and maintains consistency with the previous update.
Line range hint
1-1010: Summary: Comprehensive and well-structured integration testThis file provides a thorough integration test for the LearningPath functionality. It covers various scenarios, user roles, and edge cases, which is crucial for ensuring the reliability of the system. The recent changes improve the accuracy of the documentation by updating package references.
Key strengths:
- Comprehensive test coverage
- Clear organization using nested test classes
- Consistent use of JUnit 5 features and AssertThat assertions
Areas for potential improvement:
- Some test methods could be refactored for better focus and readability
- Additional specific assertions could enhance test clarity in some areas
Overall, this test file is of high quality and the recent changes contribute positively to its maintenance.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseBuildPlanTest.java (2)
12-12: Update of base class toAbstractProgrammingIntegrationGitlabCIGitlabSamlTestThe class now extends
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationGitlabCIGitlabSamlTestinstead ofAbstractSpringIntegrationGitlabCIGitlabSamlTest. This change aligns with the refactoring efforts to use specialized abstract test classes for different test setups.
Line range hint
17-19: Ensure services are accessible from the new base classThe
init()method usesprogrammingExerciseUtilServiceandexerciseUtilService, but these fields are no longer declared in this class. Since the@Autowiredfields have been removed, verify that these services are provided by the new base classAbstractProgrammingIntegrationGitlabCIGitlabSamlTest. If they are not available, you may need to reintroduce them or adjust the method to access the services appropriately.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/AbstractProgrammingIntegrationGitlabCIGitlabSamlTest.java (1)
27-81:⚠️ Potential issueAvoid direct database access in tests
The test class directly autowires repositories, which may lead to database access during tests. According to the coding guidelines (
avoid_db_access: true), tests should avoid accessing the database to improve performance and reliability. Instead, use fixed data and mock dependencies.Please check the test methods to ensure that they do not perform database operations. Mock the repositories and services as needed.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/TestwiseCoverageReportServiceTest.java (1)
16-16: Verify that necessary dependencies are provided by the new base classThe test class now extends
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBase, and several@Autowiredfields have been removed. Please verify that all required services and repositories are correctly initialized by the new base class to preventNullPointerExceptionor other issues.Run the following script to confirm that the base class provides the necessary dependencies:
Also applies to: 25-25
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalVCLocalCIParticipationIntegrationTest.java (2)
15-15: Updated import aligns with new base classThe import statement has been updated to reflect the new base class
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest, which is appropriate given the change in inheritance.
25-25:⚠️ Potential issueVerify availability of autowired services after base class change
Changing the base class to
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestmay affect the injection of services likeprogrammingExerciseUtilService,vcsAccessLogRepository, andparticipationUtilServiceused in this test class. Please ensure that these services are provided by the new base class or reintroduce them to prevent potentialNullPointerExceptions.Apply this diff if the services are not available through the new base class:
+ @Autowired + private ProgrammingExerciseUtilService programmingExerciseUtilService; + @Autowired + private VcsAccessLogRepository vcsAccessLogRepository; + @Autowired + private ParticipationUtilService participationUtilService;src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/BuildPlanIntegrationTest.java (2)
17-17: Ensure compatibility with the new base classChanging the superclass from
AbstractSpringIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTesttoAbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestmay have implications on the test configuration and dependency injection. Please verify that all necessary beans and configurations are correctly inherited and that the tests execute as expected.
Line range hint
19-36: Confirm dependencies are properly provided by the new base classIn the
init()method, the following repositories and services are used but are no longer declared in this class:
programmingExerciseRepositoryprogrammingExerciseBuildConfigRepositorybuildPlanRepositoryprogrammingExerciseUtilServiceEnsure that these dependencies are provided by
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestand are correctly initialized. Missing or improperly injected dependencies could lead toNullPointerExceptionduring test execution.To verify if these dependencies are declared and autowired in the superclass, you can run the following script:
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/CodeHintIntegrationTest.java (3)
16-16: Import statement correctly updatedThe import statement for
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTestis appropriately added to match the new base class.
22-22: Class extends the updated abstract test classChanging the base class to
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTestensures that the test class utilizes the correct setup for programming integration tests.
129-129: Repository usage updated to the appropriate repositoryThe update to use
programmingExerciseSolutionEntryRepository.save(newEntry)ensures that the correct repository is used for savingProgrammingExerciseSolutionEntryentities, maintaining consistency.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseTestCaseServiceTest.java (2)
Line range hint
73-76: Check availability oftestCaseRepositoryinshouldUpdateTestWeightIn the
shouldUpdateTestWeighttest method,testCaseRepositoryis used to retrieve and update test cases. Confirm thattestCaseRepositoryis accessible to prevent potentialNullPointerException.Ensure that
testCaseRepositoryis provided by the superclass or properly initialized.
31-31: 💡 Codebase verificationInheritance of Required Services Missing
The superclass
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestdoes not provide the required protected services (userUtilService,programmingExerciseUtilService,exerciseUtilService,programmingExerciseRepository,testCaseRepository,participationUtilService,feedbackCreationService,gitService,groupNotificationService,websocketMessagingService) previously available. This may lead to uninitialized dependencies inProgrammingExerciseTestCaseServiceTest.🔗 Analysis chain
Verify inheritance of required services after superclass change
The class now extends
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest. Ensure that all necessary services and repositories previously autowired are correctly inherited from the new superclass.You can run the following script to check if the required services are available in the superclass:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if superclass provides the required protected fields. # List the declarations of the superclass rg --type java -A 5 -B 2 'class AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest' -g '*.java' # Search for the required services in the superclass rg --type java 'protected .* (userUtilService|programmingExerciseUtilService|exerciseUtilService|programmingExerciseRepository|testCaseRepository|participationUtilService|feedbackCreationService|gitService|groupNotificationService|websocketMessagingService);' -g '*.java'Length of output: 10441
⛔ Skipped due to learnings
Learnt from: Hialus PR: ls1intum/Artemis#7451 File: src/test/java/de/tum/in/www1/artemis/exercise/programmingexercise/ProgrammingExerciseTestService.java:9-9 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:35:48.767Z Learning: The use of wildcard imports is acceptable in this project as specified in the `.editorconfig` file.Learnt from: Hialus PR: ls1intum/Artemis#7451 File: src/test/java/de/tum/in/www1/artemis/exercise/programmingexercise/ProgrammingExerciseTestService.java:9-9 Timestamp: 2024-01-19T15:49:43.303Z Learning: The use of wildcard imports is acceptable in this project as specified in the `.editorconfig` file.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseGitIntegrationTest.java (2)
34-34: Confirm All Services Are Properly Initialized After Changing Base ClassBy changing the base class to
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest, ensure that all required services and repositories used in this test class (e.g.,userUtilService,programmingExerciseUtilService,exerciseUtilService,programmingExerciseRepository,participationUtilService,gitUtilService,gitService) are properly initialized and available. This is essential to preventNullPointerExceptionor other runtime errors during test execution.
Line range hint
94-96: Consistent Use of Mock StrategiesThe coding guidelines specify the use of static mocks (
mock_strategy: static_mocks). In theinitTestCase()method, methods likedoReturnanddoNothingare used to mock behaviors. Ensure that these mocks are consistent with the project's mock strategy and consider using static mocks if that aligns better with the guidelines.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/HestiaDatabaseTest.java (16)
13-13: Update import to new abstract test classThe import statement correctly updates to
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest, aligning with the new test framework.
26-26: Extend fromAbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTestChanging the superclass enhances the test structure and adheres to the updated testing architecture.
43-43: Saving the task usingtaskRepositoryThe task is appropriately saved to the repository, ensuring it is persisted for the tests.
62-62: Assert task retrieval after additionThe assertion correctly verifies that the added task is retrieved as expected from the repository.
69-69: Verify task deletion after exercise removalThe test properly checks that tasks are deleted when the programming exercise is removed.
76-76: Retrieve test cases for the programming exerciseFetching test cases associated with the exercise is correctly implemented.
88-88: Confirm deletion of test cases and solution entriesThe assertions ensure that test cases and solution entries are deleted alongside the programming exercise as expected.
96-96: Add test cases to task and verify associationsAssociating test cases with the task is implemented correctly, maintaining the integrity of relationships.
100-101: Save and delete task in repositoryThe task is correctly saved and then deleted, testing the repository's handling of task lifecycle.
102-102: Verify test cases remain after task deletionThe assertion confirms that deleting a task does not erroneously remove associated test cases.
109-109: Initialize test cases for code hint associationFetching and asserting test cases before associating them with a code hint is correctly handled.
113-113: Associate task with test cases and saveThe task is properly associated with test cases and saved, maintaining correct relationships.
132-132: Save task with associated code hintsThe task correctly includes the code hint in its exercise hints before saving, ensuring bidirectional relationships are maintained.
142-142: Verify remaining entities after code hint deletionThe assertions accurately confirm that tasks and solution entries persist after a code hint is deleted.
150-150: Confirm complete cleanup after exercise deletionThe test ensures all related entities are deleted when the programming exercise is removed, maintaining database integrity.
Also applies to: 153-153
159-160: Delete task with code hint and verify cascading deletesDeleting the task and verifying that code hints are also deleted, while test cases and solution entries remain, is correctly implemented.
Also applies to: 162-162
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest.java (1)
173-208: Ensure utility services adhere to the factory pattern.The utility services injected from lines 173 to 208 should align with the
util_service_factory_pattern: trueguideline. Confirm that these services are implemented following the factory pattern, promoting better modularity and reusability.Please verify the implementation of these utility services to ensure they conform to the factory pattern. If they do not, consider refactoring them accordingly.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalCIServiceTest.java (3)
28-28: Ensure the new base class provides necessary dependenciesThe class now extends
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestinstead ofAbstractSpringIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest. Please verify that the new base class initializes all required services and dependencies previously provided by the original base class.
Line range hint
154-203: Ensure consistency inGetCheckoutDirectoriesTestsnested classThe nested test class
GetCheckoutDirectoriesTestscontains multiple test methods for different programming languages. Ensure that all programming languages supported by the application are covered, or document why certain languages are omitted.Check if additional tests are needed for other programming languages like Python or C++.
Line range hint
71-85: Dependencies intestReturnCorrectBuildStatus()may be missingThe test method uses several services (
userUtilService,programmingExerciseUtilService,exerciseUtilService,participationUtilService) that were removed from the autowired fields. Verify that these services are now provided by the new base class or initialize them appropriately.Run the following script to check if these services are available in the new base class:
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseRepositoryServiceTest.java (2)
17-17: Change of base class aligns with refactoring objectivesChanging the base class to
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTestis appropriate and aligns with the refactoring efforts to improve the test architecture by introducing new abstract test classes. This enhances the organization and maintainability of the test code.
Line range hint
29-41: Verify initialization of services after changing the base classWith the removal of
@Autowiredannotations and the change toAbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest, ensure that all services and utilities used in this@BeforeEachmethod (e.g.,userUtilService,programmingExerciseUtilService,exerciseUtilService,participationUtilService,programmingExerciseRepository) are properly initialized by the new base class. Confirm that these dependencies are available to preventNullPointerExceptionor other runtime errors during test execution.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/ProgrammingExerciseTaskIntegrationTest.java (5)
18-18: LGTM: Updated base class toAbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTestThe import and change to the new base class align with the PR's objective to refactor tests using new abstract test classes, enhancing test structure and maintainability.
24-24: Confirmed: Test class extends the appropriate new base classThe test class now extends
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest, which is consistent with the refactoring efforts and ensures the test uses the correct setup.
117-117: Avoid direct database access in testsAccessing the database through
taskRepository.findByExerciseIdWithTestCaseAndSolutionEntriesElseThrowshould be avoided in tests as per the coding guidelines (avoid_db_access: true). Consider mocking the repository or using predefined data instead.
142-142: Avoid direct database access in testsAs previously mentioned, direct database access in tests should be avoided. The usage of
taskRepository.findByExerciseIddirectly queries the database. Please consider using mocks or in-memory data to simulate database interactions.
83-83:⚠️ Potential issueUpdate variable name to maintain consistency
The variable
programmingExerciseSolutionEntryRepositoryshould be renamed tosolutionEntryRepositoryto reflect the changes made in the repository variable names, ensuring consistency throughout the test class.Apply this diff to update the variable name:
- assertThat(programmingExerciseSolutionEntryRepository.findAllById(solutionEntryIdsBeforeDeleting)).isEmpty(); + assertThat(solutionEntryRepository.findAllById(solutionEntryIdsBeforeDeleting)).isEmpty();Likely invalid or redundant comment.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/AuxiliaryRepositoryServiceTest.java (1)
16-16: Ensure all dependencies are provided by the new base classThe autowired fields
auxiliaryRepositoryRepository,auxiliaryRepositoryService,exerciseUtilService,programmingExerciseUtilService, andprogrammingExerciseRepositoryhave been removed from this test class. Please verify that these dependencies are correctly provided byAbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTestor its superclasses to prevent anyNullPointerExceptionduring test execution.You can run the following script to confirm that the base classes declare these fields:
This script searches for the protected field declarations of the required dependencies in the base classes. Ensure that these fields are properly initialized to avoid runtime issues.
✅ Verification successful
Dependencies Correctly Provided by the Superclass
All required dependencies (
auxiliaryRepositoryRepository,auxiliaryRepositoryService,exerciseUtilService,programmingExerciseUtilService, andprogrammingExerciseRepository) are properly declared inAbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest.java. This ensures they are available toAuxiliaryRepositoryServiceTest, preventing anyNullPointerExceptionduring test execution.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the base classes provide the necessary dependencies. # Expected: Fields are declared in the base class hierarchy. # Find all superclass files superclasses=( "AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest.java" "AbstractSpringIntegrationTest.java" "AbstractArtemisIntegrationTest.java" ) for superclass in "${superclasses[@]}"; do class_file=$(fd "$superclass") if [ -n "$class_file" ]; then echo "Checking in class file: $class_file" rg 'protected (AuxiliaryRepositoryRepository|AuxiliaryRepositoryService|ExerciseUtilService|ProgrammingExerciseUtilService|ProgrammingExerciseTestRepository) ' "$class_file" fi doneLength of output: 2262
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/ProgrammingExerciseGitDiffReportIntegrationTest.java (2)
14-14: Adhere to the coding guidelines for test class hierarchy.The change in the base class to
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBaseshould ensure compliance with the coding guidelines, such as minimizing context restarts (context_restart_minimize: true) and using the utility service factory pattern (util_service_factory_pattern: true).
24-24: Confirm the test class provides necessary configurations and utilities.By extending
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBase, verify that this base class includes all required configurations, utilities, and context setups needed for the integration tests to function correctly.You can run the following command to ensure that the base class includes the necessary beans and configurations:
Ensure that the output shows the services are available in the inheritance hierarchy.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/CodeHintServiceTest.java (8)
20-29: Update Base Test Class to Reflect Correct Integration TestThe change from
AbstractSpringIntegrationIndependentTesttoAbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTestaligns the test class with the appropriate abstraction for programming exercises. This ensures that the test setup is correctly configured for programming integration tests.
58-58: Verify Repository Change for Solution EntriesIn the
addSolutionEntryToTestCasemethod, the repository has been updated toprogrammingExerciseSolutionEntryRepository. Ensure that this change is consistent throughout the test class and that the repository is properly initialized and injected.
84-84: Ensure Correct Saving of Solution EntriesThe use of
programmingExerciseSolutionEntryRepository.saveAll(solutionEntries);in theaddCodeHintToTaskmethod replaces the previous repository interaction. Confirm that all solution entries are being saved as expected and that the repository correctly handles the batch operation.
165-165: Confirm Retrieval of Solution Entries with Test CasesThe method
programmingExerciseSolutionEntryRepository.findByExerciseIdWithTestCases(exercise.getId());is used to fetch all solution entries associated with the exercise, including their linked test cases. This appears to be an appropriate use of the repository method.
186-186: Validate Persistence of Updated Solution EntryThe test verifies that updates to a
ProgrammingExerciseSolutionEntryare correctly persisted and retrieved. This ensures that any modifications to solution entries are accurately reflected in the database.
203-203: Check Association of New Solution EntriesAfter adding a new solution entry to a code hint, the test confirms that it is correctly associated with the exercise. This enhances the robustness of the test by ensuring that new entries are properly linked.
219-222: Verify Removal of Solution Entries from Code HintsThe test confirms that when a solution entry is removed from a code hint, it is no longer associated with that hint but remains in the database. This behavior is important for maintaining data integrity without unintended deletions.
243-246: Prevent Saving Invalid Solution EntriesBy throwing a
BadRequestAlertExceptionwhen trying to save a solution entry with a test case unrelated to the hint's task, the test ensures data consistency and prevents invalid associations.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/GitlabCIServiceTest.java (2)
30-30: Import statement for the new abstract test classThe import statement correctly adds
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationGitlabCIGitlabSamlTest, aligning with the refactoring to use the new abstract test classes.
39-39: Ensure compatibility with the new base classBy extending
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationGitlabCIGitlabSamlTest, please verify that all necessary beans, configurations, and autowired components are properly initialized. This change may affect dependency injection, so ensure that the tests run without any issues.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/ProgrammingExerciseSolutionEntryIntegrationTest.java (1)
14-14: Ensure the new base class aligns with testing guidelinesBy changing the superclass to
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest, please verify that this base class adheres to the coding guidelines specified, particularly:
avoid_db_access: true: Tests should avoid direct database access.mock_strategy: static_mocks: Ensure that static mocks are used appropriately.context_restart_minimize: true: Minimize unnecessary application context restarts.Also applies to: 21-21
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseTest.java (3)
39-39: Appropriate change of base class to AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestThe update to extend
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestaligns with the refactoring efforts to use new abstract test classes tailored for various test setups. This enhances the test structure and maintains consistency with the project's testing architecture.
139-139: Updated repository usage to testCaseRepositoryReplacing
programmingExerciseTestCaseRepositorywithtestCaseRepositoryis appropriate due to the removal of the autowired field. This ensures that the test continues to function correctly with the new repository structure.
167-169: Consistent use of testCaseRepository and updating test casesThe change to use
testCaseRepositoryfor fetching and saving test cases maintains consistency after the repository refactoring. This update ensures that the test cases are appropriately managed within the new test setup.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/ExerciseHintServiceTest.java (2)
21-21: Update superclass toAbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTestThe change to extend
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTestis appropriate and aligns with the refactoring objectives stated in the PR to use new abstract test classes for programming exercises.Also applies to: 29-29
31-31: Ensure consistency in test prefix namingThe
TEST_PREFIXis correctly defined. Ensure that this prefix is consistently used across all test data to prevent conflicts with other tests.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseTemplateIntegrationTest.java (2)
61-61: Update of class inheritance reflects appropriate refactoringChanging the superclass to
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestaligns with the introduction of new abstract test classes tailored for different setups. This enhances code reuse and maintains consistency across integration tests.
61-61: Verify that removed autowired fields are provided by the superclassThe fields
programmingExerciseTestServiceandprogrammingLanguageFeatureServicehave been removed from this class but are still used within its methods. Ensure that these services are available in the new superclassAbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestor are otherwise properly initialized to avoidNullPointerException.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalCIResourceIntegrationTest.java (2)
Line range hint
223-225: Exception handling in test may hide errorsThe
try...finallyblock in the testtestGetBuildLogsForResultmay suppress exceptions thrown within the test body, leading to false positives.Ensure that exceptions are properly caught and asserted within the test. Consider using
@AfterEachfor cleanup operations like deleting files.
38-38: Class extension change verificationThe test class now extends
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBaseinstead ofAbstractLocalCILocalVCIntegrationTest.Ensure that the new base class provides all the necessary setup and utilities required for the tests to function correctly. This is crucial to prevent any unintended side effects due to the change in inheritance.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/ProgrammingExerciseFeedbackCreationServiceTest.java (1)
31-31: Verify dependency injection after changing the superclassWith the test class now extending
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTestand the removal of several@Autowiredfields, please ensure that all necessary services and repositories are correctly provided by the superclass or through other means. Specifically, verify that:
feedbackCreationServiceprogrammingExerciseRepositoryprogrammingExerciseBuildConfigRepositorytestCaseRepositoryprogrammingExerciseUtilServiceexamUtilServiceare properly initialized to prevent
NullPointerExceptionand ensure the tests run successfully.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/ProgrammingExerciseLocalVCLocalCIIntegrationTest.java (2)
35-35: Appropriate import of the new base test classThe import of
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestis necessary due to the change in the base class. This aligns with the refactoring objectives to use new abstract test classes.
58-58: Update test class to extend the new abstract base classChanging the base class to
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestis consistent with the PR's goal of restructuring the test architecture. This change enhances code organization and maintainability.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/ProgrammingExerciseTaskServiceTest.java (3)
Line range hint
139-149: Ensure proper cleanup of related entities when deleting tasksWhen deleting a
ProgrammingExerciseTask, related entities such asCodeHintshould also be properly deleted to maintain data integrity. The test verifies that the code hints are deleted, which is good practice. Ensure that this cascading delete behavior is consistently implemented across all related entities.
215-218: Validate the correctness of test case retrievalThe test asserts that the task contains the correct test cases:
assertThat(actualTaskWithTestCases.getTaskName()).isEqualTo("Task 1"); var actualTestCaseNames = actualTaskWithTestCases.getTestCases().stream().map(ProgrammingExerciseTestCase::getTestName).toList(); assertThat(actualTestCaseNames).containsExactlyInAnyOrder(testCaseNames);This is a good practice to ensure that tasks are associated with the correct test cases.
227-235: Confirm that test IDs are correctly parsed and associatedThe test checks that test cases are correctly associated with tasks using test IDs. It's important to ensure that parsing and association logic works as expected, especially when using IDs within problem statements.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/hestia/ExerciseHintIntegrationTest.java (1)
23-32: Ensure correct inheritance from the abstract test classThe test class now extends
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest:class ExerciseHintIntegrationTest extends AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest {Verify that this change aligns with the intended test context and that all necessary configurations and initializations provided by the new abstract class are appropriate for this test.
To confirm that all dependencies are correctly injected and configurations are set, you can review the abstract class:
✅ Verification successful
Inheritance Verification Successful
The
ExerciseHintIntegrationTestcorrectly extendsAbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest. All necessary dependencies and configurations are appropriately set up as per the abstract class.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the inheritance hierarchy and check for required initializations. # Test: Find the abstract class definition. rg --type java --files-with-matches 'abstract class AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest' | xargs cat # Expected Result: The abstract class should properly set up the test context required by ExerciseHintIntegrationTest.Length of output: 7429
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/StaticCodeAnalysisIntegrationTest.java (1)
38-38: Update base class aligns with refactoring goalsChanging the base class to
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestaligns with the refactoring objectives mentioned in the PR description. This update enhances the test structure and promotes better organization of test classes tailored for different setups.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingSubmissionAndResultGitlabJenkinsIntegrationTest.java (1)
41-41: LGTM!Extending
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTeststreamlines the test class and reduces dependencies, aligning with the refactoring objectives stated in the PR. This change enhances maintainability and follows the project’s architectural direction.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/TestRepositoryResourceIntegrationTest.java (1)
46-46: Verify compatibility with new base classChanging the base class to
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestmay affect the test setup and utilities provided by the superclass. Ensure that all necessary configurations, mocks, and utilities are still available and that the tests behave as expected with the new base class.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalCIIntegrationTest.java (2)
58-58: Updated import to new base classThe import statement has been updated to
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBase, which aligns with the new abstract test classes introduced for better test organization.
77-77: Class now extendsAbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBaseThe
LocalCIIntegrationTestclass now extendsAbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBase. This change is appropriate and matches the refactoring objectives to use the new abstract test classes, improving the test architecture.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseGitlabJenkinsIntegrationTest.java (1)
47-47: Ensure superclass provides required servicesBy changing the superclass to
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest, the@AutowiredfieldsprogrammingExerciseTestServiceandprogrammingLanguageFeatureServicehave been removed from this class. Verify that these services are now provided by the new superclass to preventNullPointerExceptionor other issues when they are accessed in the test methods.Run the following script to confirm that the superclass declares these fields:
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/CourseGitlabJenkinsIntegrationTest.java (1)
24-24: Verify that required fields are inherited from the new superclassBy extending
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest, ensure that all necessary fields likecourseTestService,programmingExerciseUtilService, andobjectMapperare appropriately inherited. Since the@Autowiredfields have been removed, it's important to confirm that these services are accessible to the test methods.Run the following script to verify that
courseTestServiceis declared inAbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest:✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: Required fields are inherited from
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest.
courseTestServiceis declared inAbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest.programmingExerciseUtilServiceis declared inAbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest.objectMapperis declared inAbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the field `protected CourseTestService courseTestService` is declared in `AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest` # Test: Search for the field declaration in the superclass. Expect: The field declaration exists. ast-grep --lang java --pattern $'class AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest { $$$ protected CourseTestService courseTestService; $$$ }'Length of output: 277
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the field `protected CourseTestService courseTestService` is declared in `AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest` using ripgrep. # Search for the field declaration in Java files, excluding binary files. rg 'protected\s+CourseTestService\s+courseTestService;' --type javaLength of output: 222
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the fields `protected ProgrammingExerciseUtilService programmingExerciseUtilService` and `protected ObjectMapper objectMapper` are declared in `AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest` # Search for the field `programmingExerciseUtilService` rg 'protected\s+ProgrammingExerciseUtilService\s+programmingExerciseUtilService;' --type java # Search for the field `objectMapper` rg 'protected\s+ObjectMapper\s+objectMapper;' --type javaLength of output: 1607
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest.java (1)
25-25: Verify that required services are available in the new superclassThe class now extends
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestinstead ofAbstractSpringIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest. SinceprogrammingExerciseIntegrationTestServiceandprogrammingExerciseServiceare no longer declared in this class, please verify that these services are provided by the new superclass to ensure that all method calls toprogrammingExerciseIntegrationTestServiceandprogrammingExerciseServicefunction correctly.Run the following script to confirm that
programmingExerciseIntegrationTestServiceandprogrammingExerciseServiceare declared inAbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest:src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseParticipationIntegrationTest.java (1)
40-40: Confirm the new superclass provides necessary dependenciesBy changing the superclass from
AbstractSpringIntegrationIndependentTesttoAbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest, ensure that all required services and repositories previously provided via@Autowiredfields are now available through the new superclass. This is crucial for the test methods to function correctly without dependency issues.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingSubmissionIntegrationTest.java (2)
59-59: Change of base class toAbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestis appropriateThe class now extends
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest, which aligns with the new abstract test classes introduced to improve test structure. This change enhances test organization and maintainability as per the PR objectives.
360-360: EnsureparticipationRepositoryproperly handlesProgrammingExerciseStudentParticipationentitiesThe code replaces
programmingExerciseStudentParticipationRepositorywithparticipationRepository. Verify thatparticipationRepositorycorrectly managesProgrammingExerciseStudentParticipationentities and that all method calls (e.g.,findById,save) behave as expected.Also applies to: 412-412, 416-416, 808-808
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingAssessmentIntegrationTest.java (1)
55-55: Extending the appropriate abstract test class.The class now extends
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest, which aligns with the intended test structure for programming integration tests.src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalVCLocalCIIntegrationTest.java (3)
53-53: Approved: Import of the new base classThe import statement correctly includes
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBase, which matches the new base class being extended. This ensures that all necessary methods and configurations from the new abstract class are available.
Line range hint
67-74: Efficient test execution with minimized context restartsGood use of
@TestInstance(TestInstance.Lifecycle.PER_CLASS)and@Execution(ExecutionMode.SAME_THREAD)annotations. This approach reduces the overhead of repeatedly creating and tearing down the Spring application context, aligning with the guideline to minimize context restarts (context_restart_minimize: true). It also ensures thread-safe execution and improves test performance.
79-79: Verify removal of@AutowireddependenciesThe class now extends
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBase, and several@Autowiredfields have been removed. Ensure that any functionalities provided by the removed dependencies (examUtilService,buildJobRepository,localCITriggerService,sharedQueueProcessingService,hazelcastInstance) are either no longer needed or are adequately provided by the new base class.Run the following script to check for any remaining references to the removed dependencies in the test class:
✅ Verification successful
To properly verify the removal of
@Autowireddependencies and ensure that the functionality is adequately provided, we need to examine the content of theLocalVCLocalCIIntegrationTestclass. Let's search for this specific file and analyze its content.
The refactoring of the
LocalVCLocalCIIntegrationTestclass has been successfully implemented. The@Autowiredannotations for the mentioned dependencies (examUtilService, buildJobRepository, localCITriggerService, sharedQueueProcessingService, hazelcastInstance) have been removed, and the class now extendsAbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBase.The functionality previously provided by these dependencies is now handled by the base class:
examUtilServiceis accessed through method calls, likely provided by the base class.buildJobRepositoryis used via method calls, suggesting it's available through the base class.sharedQueueProcessingServiceandhazelcastInstanceare accessed as fields, indicating they are inherited from the base class.This refactoring improves code organization and reduces duplication. The removal of direct
@Autowiredannotations in favor of inheriting from a base class is a good practice for maintaining clean and modular test code.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for usages of removed dependencies in test classes # Test: Search for references to the removed dependencies rg 'examUtilService|buildJobRepository|localCITriggerService|sharedQueueProcessingService|hazelcastInstance' -g 'src/test/java/**/*.java' -A 5Length of output: 321119
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for LocalVCLocalCIIntegrationTest class and display its content echo "Searching for LocalVCLocalCIIntegrationTest class:" fd LocalVCLocalCIIntegrationTest.java echo "\nContent of LocalVCLocalCIIntegrationTest class:" cat $(fd LocalVCLocalCIIntegrationTest.java)Length of output: 89686
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/RepositoryIntegrationTest.java (2)
82-82: Verify the impact of changing the superclass toAbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest.Switching the superclass from
AbstractSpringIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTesttoAbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTestmay affect the test setup and configurations provided by the parent class. Please ensure that all necessary initializations, dependency injections, and configurations required for the tests are still appropriately handled. Verify that this change does not omit any critical setup steps that were present in the original superclass.
1030-1030: Confirm thatparticipationRepositorycorrectly replacesprogrammingExerciseStudentParticipationRepository.The method
updateLockedByIdis now called onparticipationRepositoryinstead ofprogrammingExerciseStudentParticipationRepository. Ensure thatparticipationRepositoryhas the appropriate implementation for this method and that it correctly updates the lock status of the participation. Verify that this change does not impact the correctness of the tests and that all references to the old repository have been properly updated.Also applies to: 1053-1053
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseGradingServiceTest.java (1)
65-65: Class inheritance updated correctlyThe class now extends
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest, which aligns with the new testing architecture and enhances code modularity and maintainability.
| protected Set<Class<?>> getAbstractModuleIntegrationTestClasses() { | ||
| return Set.of(AbstractLtiIntegrationTest.class); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
LGTM: Method signature and implementation updated for improved flexibility.
The changes to the method signature and implementation are well-thought-out:
- The return type
Set<Class<?>>allows for multiple integration test classes in the future. - The method name change accurately reflects the new return type.
- The implementation correctly uses
Set.of()to create an immutable set.
These updates improve the extensibility of the test architecture.
Consider renaming the method to getAbstractModuleIntegrationTestClassSet for even more clarity, as it emphasizes that a Set is being returned:
- protected Set<Class<?>> getAbstractModuleIntegrationTestClasses() {
+ protected Set<Class<?>> getAbstractModuleIntegrationTestClassSet() {
return Set.of(AbstractLtiIntegrationTest.class);
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| protected Set<Class<?>> getAbstractModuleIntegrationTestClasses() { | |
| return Set.of(AbstractLtiIntegrationTest.class); | |
| protected Set<Class<?>> getAbstractModuleIntegrationTestClassSet() { | |
| return Set.of(AbstractLtiIntegrationTest.class); |
| protected Set<Class<?>> getAbstractModuleIntegrationTestClasses() { | ||
| return Set.of(AbstractAtlasIntegrationTest.class); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
LGTM: Method signature and implementation changes improve extensibility.
The changes to the getAbstractModuleIntegrationTestClasses method (previously getAbstractModuleIntegrationTestClass) are well-implemented and align with the PR objectives. The new signature allows for returning multiple integration test classes, which improves future extensibility.
Consider renaming the method to getAbstractModuleIntegrationTestClassSet to more accurately reflect its return type. This would improve code readability and maintain consistency with Java naming conventions for methods returning collections.
- protected Set<Class<?>> getAbstractModuleIntegrationTestClasses() {
+ protected Set<Class<?>> getAbstractModuleIntegrationTestClassSet() {
return Set.of(AbstractAtlasIntegrationTest.class);
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| protected Set<Class<?>> getAbstractModuleIntegrationTestClasses() { | |
| return Set.of(AbstractAtlasIntegrationTest.class); | |
| protected Set<Class<?>> getAbstractModuleIntegrationTestClassSet() { | |
| return Set.of(AbstractAtlasIntegrationTest.class); |
| protected Set<Class<?>> getAbstractModuleIntegrationTestClasses() { | ||
| return Set.of(AbstractFileUploadIntegrationTest.class); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
LGTM: Method signature and implementation updated correctly.
The change from getAbstractModuleIntegrationTestClass() to getAbstractModuleIntegrationTestClasses() improves flexibility by allowing multiple integration test classes to be returned. The implementation is concise and clear, using a Set as recommended for collections.
Consider renaming the method to getAbstractFileUploadIntegrationTestClasses() to be more specific about the type of integration tests being returned, adhering to the test naming guideline for descriptive names.
| @Override | ||
| protected Set<Class<?>> getAbstractModuleIntegrationTestClasses() { | ||
| // @formatter:off | ||
| return Set.of( | ||
| AbstractProgrammingIntegrationGitlabCIGitlabSamlTest.class, | ||
| AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest.class, | ||
| AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest.class, | ||
| AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest.class, | ||
| AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBase.class | ||
| ); | ||
| // @formatter:on | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
LGTM: getAbstractModuleIntegrationTestClasses() method is well-implemented.
The method correctly returns a set of abstract programming integration test classes, aligning with the PR objectives. The use of a formatted block improves readability.
Minor suggestion for consistency:
Consider adding a blank line before the // @formatter:off comment to match the blank line after // @formatter:on. This would improve consistency in the formatting:
@Override
protected Set<Class<?>> getAbstractModuleIntegrationTestClasses() {
+
// @formatter:off
return Set.of(
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationGitlabCIGitlabSamlTest.class,
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest.class,
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest.class,
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest.class,
AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBase.class
);
// @formatter:on
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| @Override | |
| protected Set<Class<?>> getAbstractModuleIntegrationTestClasses() { | |
| // @formatter:off | |
| return Set.of( | |
| AbstractProgrammingIntegrationGitlabCIGitlabSamlTest.class, | |
| AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest.class, | |
| AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest.class, | |
| AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest.class, | |
| AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBase.class | |
| ); | |
| // @formatter:on | |
| } | |
| @Override | |
| protected Set<Class<?>> getAbstractModuleIntegrationTestClasses() { | |
| // @formatter:off | |
| return Set.of( | |
| AbstractProgrammingIntegrationGitlabCIGitlabSamlTest.class, | |
| AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest.class, | |
| AbstractProgrammingIntegrationJenkinsGitlabTest.class, | |
| AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest.class, | |
| AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBase.class | |
| ); | |
| // @formatter:on | |
| } |
| @Autowired | ||
| @Qualifier("hazelcastInstance") | ||
| private HazelcastInstance hazelcastInstance; | ||
| class SharedQueueManagementServiceTest extends AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Additional Test Classes Require Refactoring
The following test classes are still extending AbstractSpringIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest and should be updated to extend AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest to maintain consistency with the refactoring objectives:
CourseServiceTestUserAccountLocalVcsIntegrationTestManagementResourceIntegrationTestAbstractTutorialGroupIntegrationTestQuizSubmissionIntegrationTestLdapAuthenticationIntegrationTestPlagiarismPostIntegrationTestAuthorizationLocalCILocalVCEndpointTestModelingAssessmentIntegrationTestModelingExerciseIntegrationTestModelingSubmissionIntegrationTestExamRegistrationIntegrationTestAbstractIrisIntegrationTestAeolusTemplateResourceTestAeolusBuildScriptGenerationServiceTestExamStartTestBuildAgentDockerServiceTestBuildResultTestBuildAgentSshAuthenticationIntegrationTestNotificationScheduleServiceTestResultListenerIntegrationTestResultServiceIntegrationTestParticipantScoreIntegrationTest
Please ensure that these classes are updated accordingly.
🔗 Analysis chain
Class now extends AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest.
The class signature has been updated to extend AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest. This change is in line with the PR objectives to refactor programming tests and create new abstract test classes for various test setups.
To ensure this change is consistent across the codebase, let's verify other test classes:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other test classes that might need similar updates
rg --type java -g 'src/test/java/**/*.java' 'class \w+Test extends AbstractSpringIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest'
Length of output: 4427
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Identify test classes extending AbstractSpringIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest but not AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest
rg --type java -g 'src/test/java/**/*.java' 'class \w+Test extends AbstractSpringIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest' | grep -v 'AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest'
Length of output: 4258
| assertThat(taskRepository.findByExerciseId(programmingExercise.getId())).hasSize(2); | ||
| var tasks = taskRepository.findByExerciseIdWithTestCases(programmingExercise.getId()); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Avoid direct database interactions in test methods
The test methods are performing database operations using repositories directly. This practice goes against the coding guidelines specified for test files:
avoid_db_access: truemock_strategy: static_mocks
For example:
assertThat(taskRepository.findByExerciseId(programmingExercise.getId())).hasSize(2);
var tasks = taskRepository.findByExerciseIdWithTestCases(programmingExercise.getId());Consider using static mocks for repositories to simulate database interactions without hitting the actual database.
Also applies to: 56-56, 63-64, 77-77, 83-84, 99-99, 106-107, 112-112, 123-123, 131-131, 133-133, 139-139, 148-149, 159-159, 167-167, 174-174, 197-197, 205-205, 215-215, 218-218, 227-228, 232-232, 235-235, 248-248, 265-265, 267-267, 278-278, 379-379, 382-382
| import de.tum.cit.aet.artemis.programming.AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest; | ||
| import de.tum.cit.aet.artemis.programming.domain.ProgrammingExercise; | ||
| import de.tum.cit.aet.artemis.programming.domain.ProgrammingExerciseTestCase; | ||
| import de.tum.cit.aet.artemis.programming.domain.hestia.CodeHint; | ||
| import de.tum.cit.aet.artemis.programming.domain.hestia.ProgrammingExerciseTask; | ||
| import de.tum.cit.aet.artemis.programming.repository.hestia.CodeHintRepository; | ||
| import de.tum.cit.aet.artemis.programming.repository.hestia.ProgrammingExerciseTaskRepository; | ||
| import de.tum.cit.aet.artemis.programming.service.hestia.ProgrammingExerciseTaskService; | ||
| import de.tum.cit.aet.artemis.programming.test_repository.ProgrammingExerciseTestCaseTestRepository; | ||
| import de.tum.cit.aet.artemis.programming.test_repository.ProgrammingExerciseTestRepository; | ||
| import de.tum.cit.aet.artemis.programming.util.ProgrammingExerciseUtilService; | ||
| import de.tum.cit.aet.artemis.shared.base.AbstractSpringIntegrationIndependentTest; | ||
|
|
||
| class ProgrammingExerciseTaskServiceTest extends AbstractSpringIntegrationIndependentTest { | ||
| class ProgrammingExerciseTaskServiceTest extends AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider refactoring to use static mocks instead of direct database access
The test class ProgrammingExerciseTaskServiceTest now extends AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest and directly accesses the database using repositories such as taskRepository, testCaseRepository, and codeHintRepository. According to the coding guidelines for files matching src/test/java/**/*.java, you should avoid direct database access (avoid_db_access: true) and use static mocks (mock_strategy: static_mocks). Refactoring the tests to use static mocks will improve test performance and isolation.
| programmingExerciseTestCaseRepository | ||
| .saveAll(programmingExerciseTestCaseRepository.findByExerciseId(programmingExercise.getId()).stream().peek(testCase -> testCase.setActive(true)).toList()); | ||
| exerciseLite = exerciseRepository.findByIdElseThrow(programmingExercise.getId()); | ||
| testCaseRepository.saveAll(testCaseRepository.findByExerciseId(programmingExercise.getId()).stream().peek(testCase -> testCase.setActive(true)).toList()); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid direct database access in tests
According to the coding guidelines (avoid_db_access: true), tests should avoid direct database interactions. The line:
testCaseRepository.saveAll(testCaseRepository.findByExerciseId(programmingExercise.getId()).stream().peek(testCase -> testCase.setActive(true)).toList());performs a database operation to fetch and save test cases. Consider mocking the testCaseRepository or using test utilities to set up test data without accessing the database directly.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor stream operation to avoid using peek() for state modification
Using peek() to modify the state of objects in a stream is discouraged, as peek() is intended for debugging purposes. Instead, use map() to modify and return the objects:
Refactored code:
testCaseRepository.saveAll(
testCaseRepository.findByExerciseId(programmingExercise.getId()).stream()
.map(testCase -> {
testCase.setActive(true);
return testCase;
})
.toList()
);Alternatively, for better readability and adherence to the util_service_factory_pattern: true guideline, consider using a simple loop:
List<ProgrammingExerciseTestCase> testCases = testCaseRepository.findByExerciseId(programmingExercise.getId());
for (ProgrammingExerciseTestCase testCase : testCases) {
testCase.setActive(true);
}
testCaseRepository.saveAll(testCases);| .saveAll(programmingExerciseTestCaseRepository.findByExerciseId(programmingExercise.getId()).stream().peek(testCase -> testCase.setActive(true)).toList()); | ||
| exerciseLite = exerciseRepository.findByIdElseThrow(programmingExercise.getId()); | ||
| testCaseRepository.saveAll(testCaseRepository.findByExerciseId(programmingExercise.getId()).stream().peek(testCase -> testCase.setActive(true)).toList()); | ||
| exerciseLite = programmingExerciseRepository.findByIdElseThrow(programmingExercise.getId()); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Eliminate unnecessary database retrieval
The line:
exerciseLite = programmingExerciseRepository.findByIdElseThrow(programmingExercise.getId());retrieves the ProgrammingExercise from the database, even though programmingExercise is already available in the test context. To adhere to the guideline of minimizing database access (avoid_db_access: true), use the existing programmingExercise object instead:
-exerciseLite = programmingExerciseRepository.findByIdElseThrow(programmingExercise.getId());
+exerciseLite = programmingExercise;|
|
||
| class ProgrammingExerciseScheduleServiceTest extends AbstractSpringIntegrationGitlabCIGitlabSamlTest { | ||
| class ProgrammingExerciseScheduleServiceTest extends AbstractProgrammingIntegrationGitlabCIGitlabSamlTest { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Change of superclass requires dependency adjustments
By changing the superclass from AbstractSpringIntegrationGitlabCIGitlabSamlTest to AbstractProgrammingIntegrationGitlabCIGitlabSamlTest, ensure that all required services and dependencies are properly provided. The removal of @Autowired fields necessitates that these services are accessible through the new superclass or are appropriately instantiated.
ole-ve
dismissed stale reviews from sarpsahinalp, SimonEntholzer, cremertim, and JohannesStoehr
via
b9cd26f
github-actions
bot
added
the
tutorialgroup
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/tutorialgroup/architecture/TutorialGroupTestArchitectureTest.java (1)
16-17: Approve changes with a minor suggestion for method name.The updates to the method signature and implementation are well-aligned with the architectural changes. The shift from returning a single class to a set of classes provides more flexibility.
Consider renaming the method to
getAbstractModuleIntegrationTestClassSet()for even more clarity about the return type. Here's a suggested change:- protected Set<Class<?>> getAbstractModuleIntegrationTestClasses() { + protected Set<Class<?>> getAbstractModuleIntegrationTestClassSet() { return Set.of(AbstractTutorialGroupIntegrationTest.class); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseIntegrationTestService.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/tutorialgroup/architecture/TutorialGroupTestArchitectureTest.java (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseIntegrationTestService.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: truesrc/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/tutorialgroup/architecture/TutorialGroupTestArchitectureTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: true
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/tutorialgroup/architecture/TutorialGroupTestArchitectureTest.java (2)
3-3: LGTM: Import statement added for Set.The import of
java.util.Setis correctly added to support the updated method signature.
1-19: Summary: Architectural improvements enhance flexibility and maintainability.The changes in this file successfully contribute to the overall objectives of the PR. By modifying the
TutorialGroupTestArchitectureTestclass to support multiple integration test classes, the code becomes more flexible and easier to maintain. This new structure aligns well with the goal of refactoring programming tests and addressing scattered use of autowired components.The modifications lay a solid foundation for future enhancements and additions to the test suite. Great job on improving the architecture!
...ava/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/tutorialgroup/architecture/TutorialGroupTestArchitectureTest.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...t/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/AbstractProgrammingIntegrationIndependentTest.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseIntegrationTestService.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseParticipationIntegrationTest.java (1)
Line range hint
1160-1171: Use fixed data instead of generating data dynamically in testsThe
setupExamExerciseWithParticipationAndResultmethod generates dynamic dates and data during tests. To comply with the guidelinefixed_data: true, consider using fixed dates and predefined data to enhance test reliability and predictability.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseParticipationIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/ProgrammingExerciseParticipationIntegrationTest.java (1)
Pattern
src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: true
| // TODO remove again after refactoring and cleanup | ||
| @Autowired | ||
| private ProgrammingExerciseIntegrationTestService programmingExerciseIntegrationTestService; | ||
|
|
||
| private ProgrammingExercise programmingExercise; | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid direct database access in tests
Directly accessing the database in tests using programmingExerciseRepository contravenes the guideline avoid_db_access: true. Please consider using the provided UtilService methods to handle test data instead.
Apply this diff to replace direct repository access with UtilService methods:
- programmingExercise = programmingExerciseRepository.findWithEagerStudentParticipationsById(programmingExercise.getId()).orElseThrow();
+ programmingExercise = programmingExerciseUtilService.findProgrammingExerciseWithEagerStudentParticipationsById(programmingExercise.getId());📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| programmingExercise = programmingExerciseUtilService.findProgrammingExerciseWithEagerStudentParticipationsById(programmingExercise.getId()); |
krusche
changed the title
Development: Refactor programming testsDevelopment: Refactor programming server tests
Integrated code lifecycle: Provide Instructors more options to control container configuration
#9487
Checklist
General
Motivation and Context
Autowired components are all-over the place in the test code. Following (for instance) #9415, these changes introduce new abstract test classes for each test setup (LocalCI/Independent/GitlabJenkins/GitlabCI).
Description
Adds the new abstract test classes and adapt the arch test to accept multiple (abstract) test classes that are allowed to autowire classes.
As a side note, this PR fixes a path in JavaDoc for Atlas.
Summary by CodeRabbit
These changes improve the overall efficiency and organization of the testing framework, ensuring better integration and functionality in future updates.