-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 301
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Communication
: Reduce FAQ size
#9568
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request includes modifications to the HTML and CSS of the FAQ components within the application. Changes to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/main/webapp/app/overview/course-faq/course-faq.component.html (2)
Line range hint
13-27
: Enhance accessibility and performance of the filter dropdownConsider the following improvements:
- Add proper ARIA attributes to checkbox menu items for better screen reader support
- Optimize the track function in @for loop to use unique identifiers
<ul ngbDropdownMenu class="checkbox-menu text-nowrap pe-2" aria-labelledby="filter-dropdown-button"> - @for (category of existingCategories; track category) { + @for (category of existingCategories; track category.category) { <li> - <label class="d-flex align-items-center"> + <label class="d-flex align-items-center" role="menuitemcheckbox" [attr.aria-checked]="activeFilters.has(category.category!)"> <input id="filter-{{ category.category }}" class="ms-2 form-check-input" (change)="toggleFilters(category.category!)" [checked]="activeFilters.has(category.category!)" type="checkbox" + aria-label="Filter by {{category.category}}" />
Line range hint
35-37
: Optimize FAQ list rendering performanceConsider using a unique identifier for tracking FAQ items instead of the entire object.
- @for (faq of this.filteredFaqs; track faq) { + @for (faq of this.filteredFaqs; track faq.id) { <jhi-course-faq-accordion [faq]="faq"></jhi-course-faq-accordion> }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- src/main/webapp/app/overview/course-faq/course-faq-accordion.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/overview/course-faq/course-faq-accordion.component.scss (0 hunks)
- src/main/webapp/app/overview/course-faq/course-faq.component.html (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/main/webapp/app/overview/course-faq/course-faq-accordion.component.scss
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/main/webapp/app/overview/course-faq/course-faq-accordion.component.html (3)
6-8
: LGTM! Proper usage of new Angular syntax.The code correctly uses the new
@for
syntax with proper tracking, adhering to the latest Angular guidelines.
11-11
: Verify XSS protection in markdown processing.While using
innerHTML
with a markdown pipe is common, ensure thehtmlForMarkdown
pipe implements proper sanitization to prevent XSS attacks.#!/bin/bash # Search for the markdown pipe implementation to verify sanitization ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ implements PipeTransform { $$$ transform($_) { $$$ } }'
3-3
: Verify heading hierarchy in the page context.Changing from
<h2>
to<h5>
might affect the document outline and accessibility. Ensure this heading level is appropriate within the broader page context.✅ Verification successful
The previous script execution seems to have returned results for a different query (showing pipe transformers) instead of heading elements. Let me try again with a more specific search for headings in the overview directory.
Based on the search results, I can now analyze the heading hierarchy in the overview section. The FAQ component's heading level change from h2 to h5 appears to be appropriate because:
- The FAQ question title is part of an accordion item, which is a sub-component of the larger FAQ section
- The parent components use appropriate higher-level headings:
- Course title uses h3 in header-course.component.html
- Main section headings use h2/h3 (e.g., in course-statistics.component.html)
- Other accordion-style or card components also use h5 for similar content (e.g., course-tutorial-group-card.component.html)
The heading level change from h2 to h5 is semantically correct.
The h5 heading is appropriately used for this accordion item content as it maintains proper document outline hierarchy, where parent components use higher-level headings (h2-h4) for main sections, and h5 is used for nested, lower-level content like accordion items.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for heading elements in related components to verify hierarchy rg -A 1 "<h[1-6]" src/main/webapp/app/overview/Length of output: 3129
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for heading elements in the overview directory and its subdirectories rg -l "<h[1-6]" src/main/webapp/app/overview/ # For files that contain headings, show the content with context rg -A 2 -B 2 "<h[1-6]" src/main/webapp/app/overview/Length of output: 58928
src/main/webapp/app/overview/course-faq/course-faq.component.html (2)
29-29
: LGTM: Consistent margin spacing addedThe addition of margin classes provides balanced spacing around the horizontal rule, improving visual consistency.
Line range hint
8-27
: LGTM: Proper usage of new Angular control flow syntaxThe template correctly implements the new Angular control flow syntax (@if, @for) throughout, adhering to the coding guidelines.
Also applies to: 31-40
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you 🙏🏼
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tested on TS4, looks way better with this change. Thank you :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Checklist
Client
Steps for Testing
Motivation and Context
Currently, the UI is quite overwhelming
Description
I reduced the font size of the question and the title
Prerequisites:
Testserver States
Note
These badges show the state of the test servers.
Green = Currently available, Red = Currently locked
Click on the badges to get to the test servers.
Review Progress
Code Review
Manual Tests
Screenshots
Old UI
New UI