Added sendJSON method

[bl4ckm0r3]

I have found myself writing a lot of JSON.stringify, so i made an utility method that will do it for you!

[lukeed]

Hey, cool! 😃 Not sure why I didn't think to include this, I do it all the time too.

I'll make the changes, but how do you feel about calling it json instead of sendJSON?

[bl4ckm0r3]

No worries, that's the beauty of opensource!
Tbh i think JSON is kind of all caps (acronym).
I did a sendJson first but then changed for standard.
I think sendjson doesn't read as well as sendJSON or sendJson.
What do you think?
I am open to suggestions :)

[bl4ckm0r3]

I have just realised you meant just json instead of sendJSON.
I think clarity is better and sendJSON describes better what is going on.
But it's your library :)

[lukeed]

No problem 😆 I'm leaning towards json() because of bytes (lol) and it looks more like the Express response helper (res.json({...})), and people may be used to that.

Lemme ask around real quick for opinions and I'll get back shortly~

[SinisterBlade]

FWIW, I think just json() is clear enough. (And it looks prettier too! 😊)

[lukeed]

Me too 😄 That was also the consensus I got today when I asked others. 🙌

[lukeed]

Thank you @bl4ckm0r3~! 🎉

[bl4ckm0r3]

thank you @lukeed very nice library!
ps i have slept on it...like json better :D

[lukeed]

Haha, great!!