Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

#13685 Upgrade jquery.mobile.custom.js to be compatible with jQuery 3.x #13688

Conversation

kirmorozov
Copy link
Member

Description

Upgraded jQuery mobile, created same events+ scroll using builder.
http://jquerymobile.com/download-builder/

As of documentation it drops support of IE 10 and Android 4 browser
https://blog.jquerymobile.com/2017/05/11/jquery-mobile-1-5-0-alpha-1-released/

Fixed Issues (if relevant)

  1. Incompatibilies with jQuery 3 #13685: Incompatibilies with jQuery 3

Contribution checklist

  • Pull request has a meaningful description of its purpose
  • All commits are accompanied by meaningful commit messages
  • All new or changed code is covered with unit/integration tests (if applicable)
  • All automated tests passed successfully (all builds on Travis CI are green)

@orlangur
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @kirmorozov, why you think upgrading to alpha release is a good idea?

@kirmorozov
Copy link
Member Author

And alpha release is more then 9 months old, looks like permanent solution, but called "alpha".
I would not expect major changes as there are no changes in repo since release.
jquery-archive/jquery-mobile@1.5.0-alpha.1...master

@kirmorozov
Copy link
Member Author

I would even prefer to remove jQuery Mobile at all.

@orlangur
Copy link
Contributor

Removal sounds much better to me as after your previous comment I've get familiar with https://blog.jquerymobile.com/2017/12/21/the-future-of-jquery-ui-and-jquery-mobile/ and taking into account https://blog.jquerymobile.com/2016/01/28/a-long-overdue-status-update/ this library development seems kinda dead.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants